This guy is 100% spot on. She's getting the sexual satisfaction that you can't provide along with the financial and emotional support that being in a relationship with you provides. You're literally the definition of a Beta. Its only a matter of time before she wants to be with an Alpha and you're letting her try out in the process...
>>734488303 Haha.. You guys don't know is she's the one who provides all those. All I provide her, probably, is emotional? I make her a happy princess haha. Plus she also likes to watch when I'm the one getting the fuck.
We are both getting too old for that alpha-beta schtick
>>734488853 Nothing wrong with open relationships or two people with different libido levels acclimating their relationship so it's more successful. If the genders were revered they would be high fiving you, just keep shrugging the projections.
Anything else you know about the anime group? Facebook group, etc? Could you maybe ask? Not that we would want to join specific one you speak of, but a nerd/anime orgy sounds pretty fun to the gf and I but we would have no way of knowing where to start.
>>734489237 Probably because no one is dumb enough to let their girlfriend just randomly fuck dudes.. just sayin' bro. Let me know if you have heard of a relationship like that being longer than a year.
>>734489184 Hmmn, not sure since SHE's the cosplayer, not me. Just listen in during cons, I heard there's always one going on at nearby hotels. Start with NYCC, Anime North, AX... And maybe join Facebook groups that center around lewds and cosplay. That's where they plan shit
>>734489695 Being a swinger couple is a lot fucking different from having a chick literally going through the equivilant of a highschool football team every 2 days. >porn companies owned by partners kek
The reason why sex, the height of intimacy, is such a big deal for humanity.. is because it is the most vulnurable you will ever let yourself be. Which is why a lot of people put a lot of weight into it, which is entirely reasonable, since it's a display showing that they devote themselves to you. Words are literally only that, words. Action is an entirely different thing.
And when you have a chick that literally just fucks every dick in sight, that's pretty fucking sad that you put up with it.
>>734490136 > the equivilant of a highschool football team every 2 days > chick that literally just fucks every dick in sight > it is the most vulnurable you will ever let yourself be
Okay, here's your assumptions. And none are true
I scheduled her to get fucked by two guys in a few weeks. I'm planning the next one to be in a few months. And I control who she does or doesn't fuck. She can make requests, but I approve them.
With the issue of surrender and vulnerability, she's basically handed me her leash and has me take full control of her sexuality. Hell, she's straight but she'll fuck a girl if I tell her to. You can't be more vulnerable than that.
>>734490865 >It's cute that you seem to think that Why thank you, I was going for kawaii
But srsly. She's not fucking anyone I don't want her to. She's dropped friends from her life because they annoyed me. She stopped talking to family that didn't like me. What's a few fuckboys that we talk about as if they were sex toys.
>You mean like she is with everyone else No one else has the level of control I have with her.
>>734490888 I'm busy that day so I'm scheduling it to get recorded. The convo was the usual "I found new toys! You wanna see them?"
>>734482356 If this is true kys, you are a disgrace to the long line of humans that brought you into existence, you have one job a a human and that's to be successful and have a wife and children you can call your own. Honestly the only way to treat this degeneracy is with electroshock therapy.
>>734491629 ... I'm thinking of bringing that up with her but I'm not sure how she'd respond to being a prostitute.
>>734491694 > Again, cute that you'd think that. I cannot see why I won't think that? We live together, she goes to work and class in the morning and straight back to our house after. She only goes out with me or with her one female friend (who is straight up the child of our Lord and doesn't know ther her bestie is a whore). There's literally no time for her to fuck anyone I haven't scheduled.
>Mate, she's the one controlling you and you're too blind to see it. enlighten me then?
>>734491281 Hey op, I'm with you on this. Not a cuck myself, but I'm sure the gimps here will swear I am, but my wife and I are poly. I know her other lovers and she knows mine. We get to date and have flings without losing the stable partner in crime we have in eachother. I don't get off on it like you do, and it is a source of anxiety for me from time to time (being human sucks sometimes), but it's a great life we have and I regret nothing. Actually just got done watching a movie with my wife and her by, now I'm browsing /b/ and chatting with my gf. You guys live your lives without regret, reservation, or a need to explain yourself to these sperglords. Let them be miserable as they argue over who's most alpha. We run our lives as we actually want, not how they want.
"I've come to realize this is just the delusional fantasy of some basement-dwelling fuck jerking over his cosplay wife"
Thank you for actually defining what a cuck likes I guess? I mean, everyone on /b/ is considered a basement dweller, regardless of if its true, and you just accused him of liking to jerk it over her getting pounded by other guys and that that's delusional.
1. if he's doing it, it's not a delusion. 2. no shit he's jerking it to that. That's what he opened by saying. 3. you and I both know we've gotten off to worse you sick, deviant fuck. Quit judging. You're not better than him. You're on /b/, on a week night.
>>734492944 Clearly you're either OP or retarded. The delusional part is that he isn't in a relationship at all and he's vicariously living out his fantasies by browsing her fucking Facebook most likely.
As previously stated, it's fucking sad. >You're on /b/, on a week night. It's 7:30 AM and I'm going to work in an hour? Way to make assumptions though, kudos.
>>734492344 I feel ya. I actually really dislike the whole cuck aspect because a gf and a close friend once really fucked up my life for many years, but I also love deviant relationships, have explored them, and have many friends in many various kinds.
My wife and I actually began having a bf/gf on the side because of college. She graduated before I did and finishing my degree caused us to have a year where we could only see each other once or twice a year. We knew how good we had it with eachother, but also knew we had needs. Since then, only the first couple years of marriage were without other relations. I still get jealous from time to time, as does she, but we talk about it and the others all know how this works. Honestly, her BFs are rather subservient to me, in a totally nonsexual way. They love her too and know that if I say it's off, it's off. They respect that and support it.
>>734493601 Also, can we agree that fucking isn't the supreme end all, be all act that we were told it was while growing up? I think understanding that is a big thing too. It's not an offense against us because they like to fuck. I like to fuck more than 1 specific girl, why the fuck wouldn't she want more than 1 specific guy? It's like different sodas, if soda was sex. Coke may be great, but i don't want it every meal of every fucking day.
>>734493601 Seeing a girl experiencing pleasure-broadly speaking of course-is what tends to get me off, but I can't say I can get behind idea of say my alleged significant other getting that pleasure from another person. Unless it was another girl maybe but that may or may not be because I'm a yurifag
>>734493909 Well, spiritually speaking, sex is the closest two people can become.
Sure if you can stay with one person long enough and still say you're in love, that should be more important than sex. I think what matters is that both parties agree to have other partners or agree to be monogamous
>>734494524 I'm not turning it into a joke, I'm turning the general premise of how I, and everyone else I've ever met, had sex explained to them growing up, into a joke. It's blown out of wack and people get way too possessive because of it. My explanation about soda was how personal preference regarding what we like on a daily basis, appreciates variety, and that sex is no different.
>>734495400 There's good sex and bad sex. There's intimate sex and fucking. I have had sex far less intimate than some conversations I've had. I've fallen in love with people over conversations I've had with them far more often than I have having sex. I reject your notion that sex is the most intimate bonding experience. A capstone/keystone maybe.
>>734495922 I agree on the being involved part. I still approve all partners as well and I don't schedule, but I'm told weeks in advance and have the right to veto for pretty much any reason, but I'm not a dick about it.
>>734495968 If you were analyzing this for the conclusion of a paper for peer review, yes, but that anecdotal evidence that I'm basing my assumptions on is what we call living your life and learning from experience. Also, I'm far happier with my life like this than I ever was in a monogamous relationship, so I mean *shrug* I'm happy and I can even explain a contributing factor of why. If you disagree, fine. Have you tried it? Are you going to try it? Then why argue. Enjoy your life for what you make it and I'll keep enjoying mine.
>>734496080 Same. I turned down one guy because he looked like a prick. Another because he was pompous and full of himself in conversation. And definitely not anyone who talks shit at her or doesn't respect her, even if she is a cum dump
>>734496419 >what we call living your life and learning from experience >My anecdotal should be considered as actual evidence because of these reasons Except not really man. It's like saying that all females are secretly trans men because that's all you've found thus far.
tl;dr, your opinion doesn't matter in the slightest, sex is by far the most powerful bonding experience two people can have.
>>734496868 Eh, I know plenty of people who sportballed their way through college and think like that. It's not that odd. If you ever need think that the world isn't full of idiots, remember how many people live in the US and that, regardless of what side you were on, the country was that split last election. It was apples and oranges regarding ideals.
>>734496831 Except that's also based on anecdotal evidence whereas my claim is supported by thousands of years of societal advancement. Even the most crude and basic of human societies have monogamous relationships.
>>734496868 Bro, you're trying to convince an anonymous imageboard that you have a "super popularrrrrrrr cosplay gurllllll" as a girlfriend that you treat like shit. Are you even trying?
>>734497131 Dude, I'm gonna just pat you on the head at this point because you're actually speaking to a person holding a master's degree with internationally published research in sociology.
I can tell you that so do polygamous relationships. For fuck's sake, even France has been widely accepting of their PM having a publicly recognized mistress until the past two decades. His wife wasn't made he was with her; she was pissed that public tide and shifted to defame her for it. Don't try to step up to me on world sociology.
>>734497619 Fine, harems. Thousands of years of them too. Now if you want research, go find the fucking census yourself. Poly is just as historic as mono since that's the only point you seem able to harp on.
>>734497765 Ah yes, because one individual group of humans outweigh all the others. The evidence supporting monogamistic relationships throughout societal development far outweighs the cases of polyamorous relationships.
But I mean keep trying to back up being a cuck as "the one true calling", Mr. Masters-degree-in-sociology-with-over-300-confirmed-published-papers.
>>734498096 Seriously dude, speaking as someone who, well, at least doesn't sound like you, you gotta drop that "ah yes, *implied finger tent and mwua-ha-ha* as I prepare to condescend to your research and experience" schtick. I know this is /b/, but that's knuckle scrapingly bad. Also, I know most people on here get all bent out of shape over it, but guess what? Those of use who actually do, are used to that shit IRL. Published research of any caliber doesn't do shit for a resumé. Having you try to talk down like that to start an argument is just fucking silly looking to me.
Also, I'm not trying to pull some shit on you. I'm actually just being honest. It's something you don't see on this site much.
>dat image >t-thanks for sending me the pictures of the guys who will soon be stretching your birth canal and painting your cervix with their squirmies >t-that sure makes me feel more comfortable >(rage and self-loathing intensify)
>>734498356 Looks like your "Masters-degree-in-sociology-with-over-300-confirmed-published-papers" shit didn't fly as well as you thought, on an anonymous imageboard, with no evidence to back up your claims while also trying to defend cuck ideology.
Surely your 14 year old mind must be hard at work right now. Point still stands, societal development have pushed monogamous relationships a lot harder than anything else in history.
>Also, I'm not trying to pull some shit on you. I'm actually just being honest. It's something you don't see on this site much. Mate you're so deep into your own bullshit, you're trying to pull the good guy schtick to attempt to dig your way out of it.
>>734498720 Yeah, after I propositioned them fucking my girlfriend, I handed them over to her and she's the one who needs to get their pics, see if she likes their personalities and if she wants to take their dicks.
>>734493601 Her toys can't accidentally impregnate her, and force you with the care of a child that is not your own. Her toys won't make her question if she might be able to receive greater emotional support from someone other than you. Say to yourself you are in control, but remember she will always be an independent person that you truly have no control over. If this is what you want have fun :)
>>734500062 She cannot have another child after our first one, sadly. So that's not even an issue. She's fucked hundreds of guys by now, and she just sent me a message saying how she'll never be happier that she is when we're together. Thanks for your concern tho!
I've got nothing against you or your lifestyle, if that's what you choose, but 5 years is nothing. Five years of marriage/LTR is when you *start* really finding out about the other person, and that's only if you're perceptive.
>>734503327 I just think that after a while she's going to get tired of being a cum dumpster and leave. Whether its her fantasy or not is irrelevant, sex creates a strong chemical reaction in the brain that given too many partners can have serious negative effects on the person or persons such as Anabel Chong and Jasmine St. Claire who both suffered severe emotional issues after their multi-man gangbang. This can be seen as an example of the effects accelerated as played out in the documentary SEX: The Annabel Chong Story
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.