CP on google?
if you google the term "nude mothers" and look on the first images that comes up. there is clearly nude children. what does /b think of this
>pic kinda related
>>731592005
*nude mother
Fuckin weird! I report itnow to google
>>731592410
y ikr
>>731592005
Thanks for the information sir, please remain at home for the duration of the day.
Hec it true
>>731592005
It's only CP if it's intended to be sexual.
>>731592005
looks photoshopped
>>731593748
still contains nudity of children
>>731592005
Nudism will do the same thing. It's not sexual, it's not illegal. Still not going to fuck with it
>>731593933
well if you download it on your pc I'd be sure it'd be illegal
>>731593920
Nudity isn't Childporn. :)
>>731594034
Yes it is.
>>731594034
omfg child nudity
>>731594034
Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive.
>>731594094
Don't breed.
>>731594011
Yeah, but what if you are a photograpfher who is hired to make photo's on such nude vacations? Or family's who wants a nude shoot? If the poses of the child isnt Sexually Suggestive then it's not defined as CP... Dunno where you live maybe turkey, korea or something but here is child nudity not forbidden if it's in an art form or something.
>>731594200
Faggo >>731594199
>>731594199
Maybe in backwards america that's the case
There was another one like this where you'd Google two unrelated words or some bizarre string of text but I can't remember it.
>>731594199
Which depends highly on the context, intent, and focus of the picture.
A clothed child with a focal emphasis on the crotch or the child in an overtly sexual pose could be considered sexually explicit.
>>731594199
Not true at all. In what cripple state/ dictatorship do you live?
>>731594322
dont you think if a police agency busted you with this picture on your pc you'd be charged?
>>731594322
This.
>>731594359
Amerifat
people have been charged with child porn offences for taking innocent pictures of their own children in the bath and sharing it on social media. This is classed as CP
>>731594494
>this
>>731594409
>>731594199
So a father or mother who has photo's of showering naked with thier kid are pedo's too? Or the pictures on thier pc's are childporn too? So let's make all naked child things CP then. Because if a photo of a nude child is CP how come that Newborn Photo's are very populair amongst millenials?
>>731594494
Would charge them for thier stupidness...
>>731594542
teenagers have been charged with cp for taking nude selfies
not joking at all
>>731594542
if someone that is not the childs FATHER or MOTHER or anyone related to the child had this picture on their pc wouldn't it be a different story
meh, tame images
google nude sisters, no cp but not bad
>>731594409
Unless they had evidence of me searching for or soliciting explicit images, no. If I had a questionable pic of a kid that wasn't mine saved to my pc (not just in temp files), then they'd probably put me on a watchlist.
You don't just 'get busted' without a fuckton of physical evidence
>>731594440
Trumpcity. Feel bad for ya. Atleast he knows how to grab them by the pony.
>>731592005
Why were you looking up pornographic pictures of your mother?
>>731594617
I got charged when I shared a girls nudes and she reported it to the police
>>731594542
>"Sufficiently sexually suggestive" >>731594199
Your deduction skills are shit, Faggot.
>>731594094
no its not you brainwashed mindless fucktard
>>731594617
Yeah bc it's "Intended" as. Don't think an accidental nipslip or black shirt with big see through would have.
>>731592005
They are all very fuckable
>>731594617
usually because those selfies are posed in a suggestive manner and the intent behind them is sexual.
Theoretically, a 12yo sucking a lollipop is fine. A 12yo licking a lollipop suggestively and winking is pretty fucking close to the line
the u.s. federal government and many weak minded moralfag scum are completely niggers
kids need orgasms too
>>731594936
>pedo detected
>>731594727
That can be an offence whether she's 14 or 44, depending on the exact laws where you live.
>>731595071
how someone fuck kids a pedo??????????????
>>731595071
Can the mods delete this thread just for being pure cancer?
>>731594667
Believe me before they'll ever charge you, there has to be very strong evidence of you downloading and hording picture from nude childeren. Just some browsing doesn't get you in jail. You have to be a very big CP hoarder or TOR freak to be put on a watchlist. Because everybody can accidentally run in to nude pictures or video's of childeren. Investigating is expensive so there must me very good reasons for it, if they really suspect you and you behave like a stereotype pedo or potential timebomb on the web, they will do everything in thier power to get you. They want the big boys :) and the so called 'makers' are placed above the rest, that's more important than a lousy fella bumping in to some nudity.
>>731595259
can you gtfo and cry like a bitch with severe PMS elsewhere?
anything that causes new/moralfag scum butthurt is chemo
>>731595326
yes anon. you have got a point here
>>731595326
>>731595439
Just pure, unadulterated cancer. Cleanse this thread with a purifying flame.
>>731592005
>im a white american and i sexualize almost everything because thats how my society brainwashed me xD
the post
>>731595509
yeah no
cry harder bitch
you are cancer and not welcome here
>>731594985
And a toddler with a banana in her mouth? I think it goes about the dirty mind of the Western Civilisation. It's so fucked up nowadays. Just like the guy who got called out on social media for being pedo bc showering with his toddler daughter...
>>731595606
The fact your offended by these facts I'm laying down is the single greatest thing to come from this thread. Pitiful.
>>731595661
so much this
normies are such weak minded moralfag niggers
also, if fucking a 9 yr old wife is good enough for the prophet muhammad its good enough for me
>>731595731
you keep replying so it is in fact you that is butthurt
enjoy it
"However, a clever defense attorney successfully argued that the human body, in of itself, is not obscene being the creation of God."
>>731595862
>replies
>>731595862
>the fact you keep replying...
The fact you don't realize I'm trolling you is really filling my kek quota for the day.
>>731596021
likewise
>>731594542
*their
Cat Goddess
>>731595661
If the toddler recognises it as a potentially sexual act and works it like a pro, then it is cp and the parents should be shot.
>>731596065
gtfo grammerfag
>>731596135
grammar*
>>731596134
>If the toddler recognises it as a potentially sexual act and works it like a pro, then it is cp and the parents should be paid.
fixd
>>731595862
actually it is you that is butthurt
oh wait i'm getting ahead of myself
(hue he hur hue hue)
>>731596065
People who are grammar nazi's are very unpleasant to live with.
>>731596186
>>731596256
*nazis
>>731596256
The real Nazi were so much easier, amirite?
>>731592005
Reported, what other sites are there to report?
>>731596229
you cant stop replying so please, enjoy your butthurt kid
>>731596228
You also fantasize about being rich and going to a very poor family and offer limitless money for limitless muffing thier 9 year old?
>>731596332
Reported for reporting
Enjoy your ban
>>731596370
that was my first reply actually
and by the way I'm not even participating in the argument, i'm just throwing in an anal sex joke
i'm quite disappointed you didn't pick up on it
>>731596404
*their
>>731596326
In "me langwich" it's actually the "nazi's" that stole our bikes.
>>731596496
Kek