Is there a place where I can get unbiased news? I just want to

>>730916052
what you are describing is editorializing, and no. it's essentially impossible now.

i really like this site which is by no means perfect, but a lot less shitty than just about any other news site

reason.com

it's biased towards reality, which is what you want

File: Judaism-Intensifies.gif (212KB, 501x585px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 501x585px

>>73091605
Problem Goy?

>>730916052
Alex Jones and freedomain radio are where I get my news and advice. Breitbart is pretty based too

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_novedades.htm#april2017

>>730916052

You are an idiot. There is no such thing as objectivity when it comes to news. This has nothing to with a bias, but rather that every piece of information that is handed to you in any way by any medium has been worked on by someone else. Even a cameraangles may have influence on "bias".

Just use different (biased) sources and try to make up your own mind, or don't.

>>730916193
>Alex Jones and freedomain radio are where I get my news and advice. Breitbart is pretty based too
hello /pol/

Alex Jones is a meme and not real news. Breitbart is ok but don't make it your main news source.

>>730916052
No. All views are by definition partial in some way.

>>730916052
The BBC is trustworthy and fairly neutral

>>730916444

trips don't lie. Nonetheless, this anon is right.

>>730916456
The BBC is biased to fuck.

>>730916052
As a conservative, the best middle lane closest to unbiased I get is the Philip Defranco Show. A little left leaning, but he acknowledges it and tries to just give facts

>>730916412
Kek and freedomain is basically a cult
>I wasn't being serious

>>730916504
>>I wasn't being serious
Yeah, but plenty of people unironically think Alex Jones is redpill Jesus

Try full spectrum survival on YouTube, posts a 3-4 min video on weekdays explain the news and has heaps of other survival content on his channel.

>>730916052
Create your own opinion. Watch the same international story, first on biased BBC, then on biased RT. Somewhere in the middle is your unbiased answer.

>>730916052
Doesn't exist since bias is part of it and marketing.

>>730916491
Agree with this here

I think his new news network will be fantastic as well and I have high hopes it will be across the political spectrum of people on the show too.

>>730916193
Alex Jones is = to The Daily show

>>730916371
>Guy asking for traditional journalism
>gets called an idiot
way to go anon

What really happened.com

RT

/r/conspiracy

File: truth-fake news.png (319KB, 960x868px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 960x868px

Op here
thanks guys, I am actually learning shit.

File: 1453421124762.gif (382KB, 376x280px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 376x280px

>>730916774

I am calling him an idiot, because he thinks it is even remotely possible for unbiased information to be passed to him.

Been watching news hour on PBS for a couple months. No ads, no emotional fear mongering, no one sided arguments (opposing views are usually given calmly by a trump advisor, and a Democrat). It's a bit on he boring side, but I think that's how news should be. Plus on the PBS website it's free..

>>730916193
>>730916840
All extremely biased sources with no facts.

I usually go with AP or Reuters. News services like that tend to actually be just the bare facts with little to no editorializingto any effective degree. Also nice because a lot of bigger news orgs that do slant tend to get their news from these services anyway, so if you do you're ahead of the game

FoxNews

Its the only news source that can legally say they are Fair and Balanced.

>>730916899
>what you should know
>a bunch of libshit hysterics

jesus christ, the person who made that list was a hardcore proggie and probably a no-fun-allowed permavirgin to boot

>>730916918
Seconded, I go to them a lot for unbiased stuff

>>730917006
Die in a fireplace.

>>730916965
Haha, conspiracy - yes. The others, maybe you should check them out before dismissing them.

>>730916193
>Alex Jones
The guy have been a joke way before you underage fags came along.and boy i was a full conspiracy fanatic back in the day.

I really think it's important to have some sort of accredited news. Many of the things listed here as "news" are not accredited news sources, so they can claim anything in the name of entertainment. For instance in a plight to see his kids again Alex Jones said his personae is an act. Whether or not his news is true, he has to know how damaging and fearmongering it is, or he wouldn't have tried to pretend he's he is someone else off camera.

I used to listen to alex for years cause hes. your buddy and doenst afraid of anything.
Well came to the conclusion hes a showman for bucks and power,note how he shills. when jack blood and other partners left him i took notice.

File: IMG_2287.jpg (287KB, 462x4481px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 462x4481px

>>730916965

>>730916052
Impossible but i feel you bro im also tired of all this left and right bullshit i can't even read a newspaper anymore without pushing me to one side or the other.

>>730916910
That's a fine opinion, and philosophically interesting, but it's not realistic. The reality is it's possible to convey the rough details of events in such a way that isn't political in any direction, and some services do that. To claim otherwise is to claim that language is incapable of conveying truth, which looking at our technological history can't be true. A ton of our most impressive inventions' births have depended on the successful conveyance of truth, and they exist now, so it must have happened.

People like to repeat "they're all political" as an excuse to be lazy and not critically evaluate their news sources, but unfortunately that's not reality. By accepting that idea you're accepting being lied to, and only because you can't be bothered to question it.

File: 8GFBPXR.jpg (53KB, 605x543px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 605x543px

>>730917065

File: 1469093110164.png (230KB, 726x720px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 726x720px

>>730916052
>>>/pol/

Mark Twain pointed out that "If you don't read the news, you're un-informed. If you do read the news, you're mis-informed."

NPR also has some great, non emotional content. I've found out about so many interesting things via Npr. And their tiny desk you tube series is amazing. I hated t pain until I saw his tiny desk performance.

Its good to look at all sides and figutre the truth is somewhere in the middle.
I read alternet and Freerepublic i watch BBC ,german and french news a little fox (as much as i can stand) Democracy Now is a superliberal outlet but they do thier homework and stick up for vets. I find Tom Hartmann to ba a balanced show he has repulblicans all the time on his show and is a author opf many books on Jefferson. Look if someone is putting too much emotion into delivery suspect them.

>>730916052
NRK is pretty decent, but it's only in Norwegian.

>>730916052
news is useless if have no grasp on history

>>730917630
Mark Twain lived in a time where all the newspapers were independently owned by Rich barons who hoped to politically influence the public to further their own fortunes.

Which is the same today, only news services exist who aren't owned by anyone, and you don't have to live close to them to hear them thanks to the Internet

>>730917630
Yeah Samuel clemmens had some great one liners, but using a quip about the news of the late 1800's in relationship to the news of today seems less pragmatic than finding an accurate, non biased news source.

>>730916052
https://porkinspolicyreview.com/category/porkins-policy-radio/
http://profcj.org
https://www.corbettreport.com

>>730916179
>reason.com

Libtard Biased

Everything not in their taste is called "socialism", even Bush and Trump

File: alice in waterworld.jpg (84KB, 660x660px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 660x660px

>>730916179
>reason.com
Thanks, I'll check it out.
I should have mentioned that I get some of my info from what appears to be a similar website, IJR (Independent Journal Review)
But I do use different (biased) sources, mostly just wondering what you guys check out.

>>730917805
News are nothing but tomorrow's history.

>>730916910
following situation:
>dead man, slavic nationality, 25 years old, got shot but nothing was stolen

Unbiased news would be:
>Slavic man aged 25 was shot, nothing was stolen

See? unbiased news

>>730916052
https://www.youtube.com/user/LarkenRose
good place to get some backbone so that you are not fooled by the simplest tricks

>>730918011
>Everything not in their taste is called "socialism", even Bush and Trump
yeah that's not even remotely true. nice try though.

>>730918035
you are welcome anon

>>730916052

CNN is a reliable news source

>>730918118
Unbiased news would be:
>A man aged 25 was shot, nothing was stolen

Why is nationality so important ?

Al Jazeera? It's where I get all my news from.
Probably pretty biased though

>>730917696
This. NPR is my mainstay.

All cable news channels are bunk. News shouldn't require a cable subscription, and none of the major media outlets really make a lot of money from their news divisions compared to their other interests.

>>730916918
This.

The PBS Newshour is the best. Real fucking journalism. Judy Woodruff is a constant professional, Hari Sreenivasan is real cool. all the correspondents are good too.

MARK SHIELDS!!

Also check out Charlie Rose.

File: 1468702545774.jpg (175KB, 508x587px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 508x587px

>>730918311
>Al Jazeera
>Probably pretty biased though
>Probably

>>730918466
Al Jazeera is fine, idiots just can't get over any name that sounds like durka durka.

>>730918617
It's not about the name you moron.

File: who is 4chan.gif (1MB, 250x333px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x333px

>>730918227
I do watch them, and fox to get kind of a 'both sides' thing going.
I'm old enough to remember the days of Peter Jennings, Larry King, Ted Koppel, Walter Cronkite, Tom Brokaw, David Brinkley, Ed Bradley, Diane Sawyer, Andy Rooney and Dan Rather.
Kind of miss that shit.

>>730919107
How bout instead of watching 2 biased news sources, you just watch one unbiased one? Like the PBS Newshour.

>>730916052
Euronews.

The
Best.

>>730916052
Reddit.com

>>730916052
narnia, unfortunately the news only covers events in narnia

>>730918354
>>730919254
I mean it guys. PBS is the best. I just remembered that i'm wearing my PBS shirt right now.

>>730916052
Check out Snopes.com for clear facts. Not exactly a news site but a great tool for gettin the full story on a topic

>>730916052
For every issue and event, I read an article from Vice and then an article from The Daily Wire. Then I see which parts overlap and that is something close to the truth.

It fucking sucks that this is how it has to be in 2017 and even CNN is really fucking biased. If the left outlets report on an issue and the right outlets don't write anything about it, it's probably just a smear campaign or not important.

>>730916456
Except when the government issues a D notice.
Got a cabinet member who enjoys raping kids ? Got GCHQ and the NSA conducting illegal spying on an industrial scale ? Not to worry, we'll just issue a D notice and the BBC won't be reporting on it. There is a reason why the UK just dropped to 40th in the press freedom rankings.

>>730919500
Hahahahaha- snopes is truth

>>730916052
www.rt.com
It's certainly as neutral (or in my opinion moreso) as any of the main 'Western' news outlets. So, if you can't find a truly impartial site maybe just read both sides of the propaganda ?

>>730919107
You can find Larry King now on RT. He's been there for years!

>>730919985
RT does what the Us media does. Points out flaws in opposing countries. If you want to know what's wrong with the US, you need to get outside of the western media realm.

>>730918290
No, that would be selective news, dumbass. His being Slavic is a fact, just like his age or his gender, there is nothing biased about it.
On the other hand reporting that he was probably killed because he was a dirty Slav, now that would not be a fact, that would be biased speculation. Are we understanding yet?

>>730916371
There is a difference between
>A local man was shot today
and
>A local man was shot today, yet another in a stream of increased gun violence

News and bias do not always have to come together.

>>730916052

Just google it and look at many differing sources ya dingus. News, as soon as it extends beyond being writing on a paper that states what events took place without leaving anything out is inherently biased. Hell, even the mere choice on what events a newspaper reports on is an expression of bias. There's no escape from ideology.

>>730919985
RT is state run. End of story.

>>730920637
What in the Us isn't? If it's claimed to be independent - check again.

>>730916052
Xinhua News or CCTV

>>730916193
Breitbart is basically pants on fire

>>730920701
Ok, Dmitry.

File: 67766028.jpg (137KB, 660x440px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 660x440px

>>730920621

obligatory zizek

>>730920770
Not saying RT isn't, just hate when others assume Western media has their hands clean and puts their viewers first over corporate interest.

>>730916052
No, at the time being your best bet is to watch the two sides, like fox news and cnn, and figure out what the facts are yourself. It sucks and damn near impossible to get the two sides, because it may not be covered, but it's about the only way you can get it as it stands.

>>730916052
Basically nowhere. Every human alive, even you who are trying your best to get the facts are bias.

The scientific method and experimentation even has steps and techniques to avoid a researcher's bias.

Every journalist will always have their world view spin on things.

Its up to you to analyze the facts from actual experts, see what the consensus is (consensus is what all studies and data point to.. Not an expert's opinion) and make up your own mind as best you can.

Also if something makes you angry or in any way emotional, then watch out.. Because your view on it is likely going to be warped..

In Canada we have cbc. Theyre pretty good about presenting both left and right views. They get called liberal propoganda and bias all the time but thats because conservatives seem to be on a bender with that lately. Anything that disagrees with them is fake news.

Both my father and I listen read and love and were on totally opposite sides of the spectrum. And even though im liberal, i hear plenty of stories from them about our current liberal provincial government (who is very terrible..) using liberal propoganda and lies to maintain votes in the next election. And i agreed with them. That's not all either. I hear a pretty far right story out of them several times a week and they host real experts and actual economists.. Not alex jones characters. Pretty eye opening at times.

Pretty far right stuff or a total liberal propoganda news source, huh?

>>730920947
State run is state run. If US news was anything like RT, they wouldn't be criticising the administration like a good free press should. Bias due to corporate interest is different, but if that bothers you then RT should be vile to you.

>>730921073
They pick and chose their criticism. Real journalism is dead and everyone parrots what's handed down as the narrative. I feel like if your news source talks at all about celebs, then it's not news worthy. It's all a distraction. All too media outlets are corrupt, but everyone needs to see all sides. I regularly checkout SANA, PressTV, RT.... all the places America has problems with to hear their side.

>>730916469
Unless the individuals involved work really hard to be nutural or if there's a balanced amout of individuals moderating stories before they're published for bias, but I could be overly optimistic and hope that it's still possible.

>>730921301
Anon, Russia Today is purely a propaganda outlet run directly by the Russian government. You don't get worse than that. If you want to come up with all the ways another outlet can theoretically be worse go right ahead, but you're just obscuring the basis premise of this conversation.

>>730916371
Yeah, but it is clearly also bias. All of these media types go to universities full of Marxist and Jew scum. They are taught by them, this is then expressed in their coverage and story selection.

>>730917006
Plz b b8 n not sum moron that believes this

>>730921510
After getting out the Marines years ago 2010, I've been reading nothing but news and over the years I've seen more truth on RT than the US. Your world view is different than mine but my global travel and going to war has taught me to keep an open mind to everything. RT gives more truth in western entities and their hegemony. But when it comes to Russian affairs - I see their propaganda push. Grain of salt everything but listen to all. Then use reason to find your truth because there are lies everywhere.

noagendashow.com

brety fugin grate

>>730921870
That's a great story. I guess changing the subject is fine. Goodbye.

>>730916456
buncha globalist elite fucks

>>730921426
>amout of individuals moderating stories before they're published for bias
>amount of individuals moderating for bias before a story is published
fuck I suck at English

>>730916193

>people not recognising this as bait

Is /pol/'s reputation really THAT bad?

>>730922134
I didnt think I changed it - elaborated more on my point. That's it. I enjoyed the chat. Best to you

>>730919933
if you can find me an obviously factually incorrect Snopes right now, I will believe anything else you say.

Go for it.

>>730916456

The BBC tows the government line. Tories in power? Tory mouthpiece. Labour in power? Labour mouthpiece.

For this flip-flopping reason, the right wing accuse them of being 'far left' and the left wing accuse them of being 'far right'.

BBC has amazingly pulled off the ability to not be 100% trusted by all the political spectrum which I suppose in a weird way makes them... unbaised?

>>730917696
fuck npr to death for how hard they shilled for hillary during the primaries. my local charlotte nc station flat out lied about bernie several times.

>>730922284
I won't do your homework for you, but here: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snopes+caught+lying&t=h_&ia=web

>>730916052
Fox News is known for being fair and balanced, I think they even started using it as their tagline after a while. It even airs on a major network so you don't have to track it down on the internet

File: e6d73a24-5599-4615-bbbf-edd591be8aac.png (1005KB, 1600x1283px) Image search: [Google]

1005KB, 1600x1283px

Here you go.

>>730921585
I'm fairly certain that it'd be possible to be taught by a Marxist and not be indoctrinated, but only if you ignore it like the propaganda it is and are grounded in your belief system already, which isn't easy for young people.

>>730918290

Unbaised news would be:
>A person aged 25 was shot, nothing was stolen

Why is gender so important?

>>730916456
your wife certainly trusts the BBC, cuck

>>730922688
Sweet, thanks anon

>>730916052
Reuters

AP

Both just release very brief and straight to the point news that other organizations pick up and add their 'flavor' to.

>>730916052

Infowars. Trust me and don't believe the 'hurr they are dumb' meme.

>>730916179

>biased towards reality

lol

how retarded are you?

>>730922759
We could remove even more bias from it
>A person was killed, nothing was stolen

Why is age or how the person was killed important? It just makes people feel bad about how young the person was and will most likely make them "afraid" of guns.

>>730922759
You mean "sex"

Sex is not like ethnicity, there could be very different motives to kill a man or a woman

File: tmp_6035-Screenshot_20170429-095515297087717.png (53KB, 1080x635px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1080x635px

>>730923319
Gender is an appropriate word in that context, no need to get all ideological on us.

>>730923564
Gender is a stupid postmodern word

There are only men and women; if necessary, in oder to make understand that the crime was homophobic, we have to report that a homosexual man/woman has been killed

>>730923318
>There was a person today

Why is whether or not they were killed important? Broadcasting their untimely death is leading people to assume violent crime is rampant, probably to justify increased policing and taking away rights/privacy. Similarly, if nothing was stolen why bother pointing that out? Are people supposed to assume being robbed is the standard state of being?

>>730916179
>biased toward reality
>this bias matches my perception of reality and I therefore do not think that it is as biased as other bias is.
LMFAO

>>730923997
I'm going to assume that you're an ideologue and ignore you
>it's a postmodern word
When was the word coined?
What was society like when it was coined?

Also, what does all that other shit have to do with the word gender? No one brought up any of that other shit than you.

>>730924382
>There was a person.

Why is the specific day important? People die every day. The person isn't any less dead if you manage to see the corpse the day that they died.

>>730924382
Mah nigga! We've finally figured out how to make the news unbiased and it's by telling people absolutely nothing of unimportance, I love it! Get the printers running, we're taking it to market!

>>730924783
>>730924889
I stand corrected, this is the epitome of unbiased news reporting.

>>730924990
Nigger there are like three more tiers.
Calm down.
You trying to end the fun?

>>730916052
>Is there a place where I can get unbiased news?
not really,
you do have to use your critical thinking skills to cut through the fat.
and even then you are going to have your own bias.

Ideally you need multiple news outlets and recognize thier agenda.

IE BBC hired a woman with the sole purpose of creating anti Jeremy Corbyn propaganda.

>>730924382
>>730923318
>>730922759
>>730918290
>>730918118

Maybe it's not about how biased news are reported, maybe all is about the kind of news (culture, science, crime, local politics, ...)

what's the use to report individual crime ? There are always been and will probably always be, little can be do about it. This can only makes people more scary, hateful and cynic

However, topics like how the society is runned, or what the science is learning us about the universe we live in have a much more positive effects over people's mind, making them more imaginative and reflective

>>730925201
>what's the use to report individual crime ?
sometimes its funny, like that guy that tried to rob a gun store
while there was a police officer inside.

>>730924684
>I'm going to assume that you're an ideologue
No, I'm just tired to see this word everywhere nowadays as I feel that, precisely, this word has beeen forged by SJW ideologues.

>When was the word coined?
>What was society like when it was coined?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender#Etymology_and_usage
> In the last two decades of the 20th century, the use of gender in academia has increased greatly, outnumbering uses of sex in the social sciences. While the spread of the word in science publications can be attributed to the influence of feminism, its use as a synonym for sex is attributed to the failure to grasp the distinction made in feminist theory, and the distinction has sometimes become blurred with the theory itself: "Among the reasons that working scientists have given me for choosing gender rather than sex in biological contexts are desires to signal sympathy with feminist goals, to use a more academic term, or to avoid the connotation of copulation".

Just in case you would think I'm right-wing because of this stance, I inform you that I have actually a radical ecosocialist leaning ...

>>730925201
>what's the use to report individual crime ?
Should we only report on group crime?
Like those that happen to a group [identy], not that the perpetrator was a part of a group, especially if the perpetrator was part of a protected group.
Also, why not just report on crime? And leave (((individual))) out of it.

>>730925562
>sometimes its funny
what is not funny is the effects this kind of news can have on stupid people in the long run...

File: tmp_15852-14931876055941545964264.jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 480x360px

>>730925684
I've thought nothing beyond "why this nigga getting upset over the word gender", I use it to refer to an individuals sex, nothing more. The SJW bs is cracra

>>730925955
I was thinking to organizations like organized crime, which could be removed from the world by some proper police action, but it supposes enough political willingness

Little group crime may count in what I called "individual"

>>730916918
Definitely News Hour. Not sure there is a single go to source but this is a good core for US based.

>>730925955
I think he was referring to things like drug cartels in the like, which are in of themselves pressing issues.

>>730926153
I just said - in three little words - that "Sex" was a much proper term than "Gender" : >You mean "sex"

but someone here >>730923564 continued to argue on this

I'm not especially upset, I just reply to what one tells me

>>730926494
Hey, nigga, that's me! Still, sex may refer to the biology aspect of it but it is a broader word, want to have sex? Gender is more narrow, want to have gender?

>>730922519
Does the goverement have any roll in the switch? Or they are afraid of losing funding?

I feel like its normal for people to attack the news -- They are the ones reporting on something unfavorable about them

>>730918311
AL Jazeera is actually pretty good reporting. They launched a cable channel in the US that didn't get traction but was interesting. It's definitely not ISIS central and is a good offset to the non- batshit crazy side of the middle east

>>730926868
What is the damn problem with employing the word "sex" instead "gender" like it has been for long before postmodernity bullshits ? This didn't cause any problems of understanding to anybody before the term "gender" has been created and spread

>>730922688
mfw WND garbage is "higher quality" then The Blaze

Its a little ridiclous to put RedState, Breitbart as the same amount of Partisian as Salon as well
Overall an interesting graphic though.

>>730927162
So, would you like to remove a word from your vocabulary just because a bunch of snowflakes decided to start using it? Just because the word gender came along and was used to refer to one aspect of the word sex does not mean that we have to allow a bunch of retards to hijack the word and use it for their own purposes. I have no idea why you're so afraid of postmodernists.

>>730923997
Fairly certain its been around for qutie some time

I think the concept of what Gender vs Sex is must only be such a hard concept to English speakers since there arent as many gendered words as in other languages that gender nouns i.e. latino/latina

DW, the public German channel is pretty unbiased

>>730922751
also, many marxists that are educators are actually committed to teaching honestly, too, and so work to keep classrooms open to multiple views...being a marxists doesn't guarantee that you're also a bad teacher...though there are definitely exceptions.

>>730927696
>would you like to remove a word from your vocabulary just because a bunch of snowflakes decided to start using it? Just because the word gender came along and was used to refer to one aspect of the word sex does not mean that we have to allow a bunch of retards to hijack the word and use it for their own purposes.

No. I understand your point. But I think we shouldn't encourage

>I have no idea why you're so afraid of postmodernists.
They are, consciously or not, a bunch of reactionaries hijacking as much social and political movements as they can in order to spread their various particularist ideologies and to push their iniquitous agendas

You won't find unbiased news. Best to read NYT, Fox and BBC and realize there is some truth in each, then use your brain to conclude where reality lies.

>>730927696
lol what a NERD

The defintion of the word has not changed. If you wish to celebrate your poor grasp of vocabulary thats fine. I think it mainly matters because there is a 1000:1 ratio of people telling that 1 person that they are wrong in their use of gender when it is in fact the correct usage of it -- as it has been used for 100s (1000?) of years.

>>730923079
hurr, they are dumb...sometimes meme's are true

>>730924382
I love this
>There was a person today.
Grammatically, it works! There was, and now is not.
>There is not a person today

>>730922751
>grounded in your belief system already
What guarantees you that your grounded belief is not precisely a chunk of propaganda and that you are not indoctrinated ?

>>730928297
>>730924382
If you read UK newspapers its really bad

like they slap so many extra words in there

like

Disgusting sexual predator Tommy Gingers raped this female.

>>730928158
>committed to teaching honestly
IDK, is capitalism theft?
>work to keep classrooms open to multiple
Why? So they can be challenged, win the channange, humiliate the student, and show to others why Marxism is good and a moral philosophy/etc?
I just don't trust anyone that can assume that people are good. Also, I doubt there aren't those who don't try to indoctrinate others into their ideology, however I doubt it is many.

>>730928228
>>730927696
I should correct that -- for I'm not sure how long it has colloquially been used interchangeably with sex.. but that is and never has been correct.. There is no one who really cares about your use of the word except some clickbait tranny trolls all the right wing blogs repost and amplify

except in the context that you are getting all booty blustered over someone else using the word correctly and claiming that feminists have changed it

RT !

>>730928523
No idea, but I'd imagine it has to do with how right you believe your belief is and how much you try to get others to believe it too. JMT

>>730928827
Agreed!

>>730916052
No

>>730916193
Keeping our frogs straight

>>730916052
I think the BBC is probably one of the last vestiges of semi-professional journalism
>lmao big black cock
Cute.
I mean, judge for yourself if there's too much of a political bias, but it's at least not written in a condescending "everything I declare you should know" propaganda style like every American news outlet.

File: 1489376080333.jpg (310KB, 550x471px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 550x471px

>>730916624
>do actual research
>think for yourself
good luck, anon
welcome to the right-but-ignored club
screaming into the void! Wooooo!

>>730916412
ow look at the hired slander

File: 1449866978639.jpg (57KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 512x512px

>>730923125
>>730924483
not an argument bros

but feel free to (try to) debunk reason.com. Free Minds and Free Markets bitches

>>730928849
So you acknowledges that not listening to the arguments of someone just because (s)he's Marxist/something-else-you-disagree-with-by-pure-prejudice is not at all a wise attitude

>>730916052
No but a good daily dose of Ghost, Infowars, and Styx should keep your world view semi realistic. Especially if you supplement it with some Drudge.

>>730917304
There are ppl conspiracy so what is your argument to why he is a joke when they do report on shit other news never even touch

File: 1492448240706.jpg (79KB, 730x617px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 730x617px

>>730917370
neat
thanks anon

>>730916052

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com

>>730928228
>The defintion of the word has not changed.
I never said it did or has.

>I think it mainly matters because there is a 1000:1 ratio of people telling that 1 person that they are wrong in their use of gender when it is in fact the correct usage of it
So, now the majority of people are wrong because someone wants to use it for what now? How exactly are 1000 people wrong when that 1 is "correct is their usage of gender"?
>>730928793
How is it being misused? What is the "correct" usage of it than only 1 out of 1000 people can figure out?
Also, are you a clockbait tranny troll? Just saying because you seem to be the one making the bigges fuss over the word gender where you think sex works better.

>except in the context that you are getting all booty blustered over someone else using the word correctly and claiming that feminists have changed it
kek, nigga, I'm just wondering why YOU care so much about using the "correct" terminology, I think the word works just fine in that context. I mean, how is it being misused?

>>730917370
>capitalism

Even knowing this shit is useless. What the fuck can you do at this point. They've already won

I just listen to NPR on the off chance that I give a shit what's happening to other people.

>>730916052
Nah you have to get your news from pretty much major sources and then make your own conclusion. Try reading the AP, Reuters, Christian Science Monitor, NPR, PBS Newshour, BBC (for American/US based news).

These are all pretty left leaning, but I can't find any decent right leaning sites without it being too much.

>>730917922
The value of the quip still stands...there are very few news sources, if any, that keep themselves free of influence. They all at least have the need to keep themselves seeming relevant, not to mention the sense of personal crusade that motivates many journalists. Clemens is right, you just have to find ways to control for misinformation. Treat any source with skepticism and use your judgment. Nothing has changed, really, other than delivery mechanisms.

>>730929366
Eh, yeah but I've heard a good amount from them and it sounds flawed. I just think most, if not all, philosophy is flawed. Mostly because the one sentence I read out of Beyond Good and Evil.

File: germany.png (823KB, 671x930px) Image search: [Google]

823KB, 671x930px

>>730917366
this is true, but i still just like to watch for entertainment and some one saying the things i have been saying for years is kinda nice.

Way it is way to late though.

>>730916052
Any news organization probably has a bias. The true redpill is being able to recognize it and make your own decision

>>730916052
That shit don't exist son.

>>730918035
Pro-Publica?
Is non-profit...but haven't read a lot of their stuff
Possibly good?
Maybe leftie because non-profit?

>>730922688
I agree. Reuters is reasonably credible and neutral. Often lot of other news makers use Reuters to find find facts too.

File: germans.jpg (397KB, 819x672px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 819x672px

>>730919107
>who is 4chan
SSSSt

>>730918011
Reality has a liberal bias, anon.

File: The statistics.jpg (532KB, 616x5370px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 616x5370px

>>730922231
no its not, it is just shills saying to /pol when ever they get triggered by facts.

>>730928726
so what did you study at university? It sounds like you got a harsh deal if that is how your lecturers were treating you

File: 1490562448828.gif (2MB, 412x229px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 412x229px

>>730923044
>>730922688
>>730930020

dude, that graph is propaganda garbage

>listening to some one else's opinion if something is credible or not

Isn't it BBC's policy/contract to show unbiased and informed news?

>>730927696
Not the original anon you are arguing with, but smart people will actually generally avoid using the word "gender" now in anything other than formal technical discussions (e.g. grammatical gender) due to it's pollution via ideology and lack of any clear meaning. Basically it has been broadened so extremely it basically just means "behaviour" now, making it useless and more obfuscating than clarifying.

File: Hammer time.webm (1MB, 296x496px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 296x496px

>>730922759
clearly the suspect was white or east asian

>>730930239
So the difference between an idiot who wants to hate black people and someone who actually wants to solve problems is realizing that race is not the only variable that causes these discrepancies.

>>730930239
are you kidding? poltards are the loudest whiners and 'fact' purveyors on this whole site...You guys seem to reeee about anything that triggers you and then go post seven different threads about it...the outrage is so palpable its becoming boring instead of hilarious

>>730929791
>Beyond Good and Evil.
What guarantees you that Nietzsche were really not a proto-fascist, and not a neutral apolitical thinker according to the academic interpretation ?

Precisely, the reading of the few marxists like Luckacs marxists.org/archive/lukacs/works/destruction-reason/ch03.htm and also Trostky marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1900/12/nietzsche.htm who denounced this very fact, may have prevented you from believe that
>most, if not all, philosophy is flawed

In my opinion, the Marxian dialectic is a pseudo-science coming from the far-left, but people are not enough warned against unwholesome absurdities colported by far-right thinkers like Nietzsche

>>730916899
>'sciencegasm'
>nothing but hypothetical non-issues
Deforestation is a fucking meme. America today has more trees than it's ever had for the last 2000 years thanks to established 'plant two, cut down one' policies. And who gives a fucking shit want a bunch of smelly muchachos do to their crappy AiDS-infested forests? I could go on but pure cba

>>730928726
well, in my opinion, capitalism has a large component of theft and devaluation of humans
-but also yes, so they can be challenged, because most teachers I have known and work with don't want to stop their students from thinking or humiliate them. Sorry they were so mean to you anon...

>>730930414
So why not just keep using it as a basis of "a word that refers to ones biological sex" and ignore the ideology changing it? Else it seems like you're acknowledging the ideology, giving it validity, and conceding your ability to use words to it. I get the point tho.

>>730930405
it was.

and then the tories went in and threatened to cut all their funding unless they started to report on how jeremy corbyn is a communist jihadi loonietune running around raping swans, burning pictures of the queen and spitting on crumpets

>>730930405
technically but just read it...

File: niggers are dumb serfs.jpg (597KB, 1100x736px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 1100x736px

>>730930461

Environment accounts for little or none of the USA racial IQ gap:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study


In academic standardized testing (which has a tight correlation to IQ), the wealthiest Black children (>200,000$ annual income) underperform all but the poorest White children (<20,000$ annual income), and just barely outperform even them.

http://www.jbhe.com/latest/index012209_p.html


Even when IQ is controlled for, Blacks display higher measurements of psychopathic personality than Whites:

http://www.amren.com/news/2008/08/race_and_psycho/


Violent crime correlates more tightly with race than with wealth or population density:

http://www.ronunz.org/2013/07/20/race-and-crime-in-america/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_income

http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-most-dangerous-states-in-the-u-s.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_African-American_population


The poorest Whites are less criminal than all but the wealthiest 10% of Blacks:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/23/poor-white-kids-are-less-likely-to-go-to-prison-than-rich-black-kids/


Race is also more tightly correlated to homicide rate than single-parent households are, and population density has no correlation to homicide:

http://www1.udel.edu/soc/faculty/parker/SOCI836_S08_files/Landetal_AJS90.pdf

http://www.memecenter.com/fun/4405881/if-all-blacks-suddenly-left-america

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840

IQ of offspring shifts towards the average for the race.
http://humanvarieties.org/2013/04/18/iq-regression-to-the-mean-the-genetic-prediction-vindicated/

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=BMXVZzvLXz8C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false


Certain genes for large brains, linked to high IQ, are common everywhere except Africa.

http://www.amren.com/news/2006/06/scientists_stud/

>>730930646
>the one sentence
I ain't reading all that shit, I stumbled through it and had to read it like 5 times just to start getting it. That and anything that seems to try to sway me away from the center annoys me.

>>730930414
This is not true if you're in a sexuality studies context (unless you mean you can't be 'smart' there) it has a very specific meaning for people that use it in a technical sense
gender = the performance of masculinity, femininity, etc.

>>730930682
a lot of those trees are probably tinybaby trees, that's very different from old-growth forests, anon, don't be naive
quantity =/= quantity

>>730916052
Go to many different sources thats what i do, you'll soon see whats truth and whats stretched

>>730930795
what do you mean by 'ideology'?

>>730920756
Breitbart is purely factual. Unfortunately tho it almost exclusively covers the pro-Republican side.

>>730930879
regarding the amusing infographic that goes with your stale pasta; Russian serfs have contributed exactly nothing to modern science, medicine or engineering.

>>730922688
Kek why tf is Breitbart on par with Buzzfeed

>>730931335
>russuan serfs
do they even exist anymore?

>>730930967
>anything that seems to try to sway me away from the center annoys me.
Don't you fear of being too confident and naive about the established social order ? How can you be sure that everything you read and that contributed to forge your "centrist" apathic opinion was center-politics leaning or apolitical? (Think about it : which side have an interested at getting people disinterested by social change ?) What tells you that the running of the society you live on is the best possible ?

>>730930239
>>730930520
It's one of the biggest disconects from reality I see

Is the "conservatives" talking about whiny liberal snowflakes

Why the only time I hear from these people is when I get hit like a truck with shitloads of whiny "conservatives" bitching about a few people on tumblr

>>730930682
are you retarded?

If you care about immigration you should care about deforestation.

Right, so deforestation in the developing world has been linked to desertification

http://archive.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/uu17ee/uu17ee06.htm

Desertification drives people away from arable lands that are turning into deserts, and into other nations. The effects of desertification in africa is going to push millions of africans into neighbouring nations, america and europe.

http://www.unccd.int/Lists/SiteDocumentLibrary/Publications/Desertificationandmigration.pdf

Its nice that america has more trees than ever before. But the world is bigger than america

File: 1466695021689.gif (275KB, 495x283px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 495x283px

>>730916052
get it from the Jews in Israel, they only lie to the Goyim.

Well... They do lie to each other, but it's less often.

Find an Israeli news source, OP.
Compare info with other sources, CNN, Foxnews, Reuters, (rt is russian propaganda), CNNMoney.

The money sections of those websites often have less bias because the Jews don't fuck around as much when money is concerned.

>>730931624
yup.

A lot of them have even found work in the disinformation industry.

>>730931764
But...anon...i have trees in my yard and...no one is allowed to come in my house...right? so...we shouldn't have to worry about any of this stuff now that we have wall...right? Nothing that I didn't actively do can be a problem for me, right? Right? Because Ron Paul said so?

>>730916052
NPR
that's basically the only option for unbiased

>>730931624
I think the point is that if you have a population of second class citizens they probably aren't going to contribute much to science and engineering. Although a black person invented vegetable-based stereroids which is probably the second greatest medical discovery of the 20th century.

>>730931608
cos they are both garbage tier when it comes to reliable news

File: 1473727209594.png (6KB, 486x576px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 486x576px

>>730931996
>NPR
>unbiased

Boy have I got some bad news for you. It's fucking heartbreaking every time it happens, but they are a mainstream propaganda pusher just like the rest.

They follow the MSM narrative, goy.

>>730919107
>Peter Jennings, Larry King, Ted Koppel, Walter Cronkite, Tom Brokaw, David Brinkley, Ed Bradley, Diane Sawyer, Andy Rooney and Dan Rather
Okay, aside from the fact that Larry King and Andy Rooney are not newscaster, all of the others were biased as FUCK. There just wasn't an opposing side to compare them with back then.

>>730916179
>reason.com
funded by Koch brothers, pushes aggressive libertarian agenda

>>730931335
>>730931624
>>730931924
>>730932037
serf = russian, do you shils even know how to read. as for the contributions. http://rbth.com/articles/2012/03/16/russias_12_top_inventions_that_changed_the_world_15089.html

>>730932078
Oh boy, a person who things an evil cabal of a race that scares him is controlling everything, surely we should listen to this person

>>730922688
This graphic is garbage. Where'd it come from?

Reason and Cato are libertarian, not conservative.

NYT is left-leaning??? For fuck's sake, it's far left.

>>730930795
Because the ideology changing it is a reality. Too many people get sucked into the whole gender this, and since language is determined by social usage, you can't shift language by personally using words in your own special way. Wittgenstein and private language arguments dude.

Far better to just speak clearly and say "sex" or "biological sex". Not only is this clear, but if others do this as well, it makes it so that the only people that casually use words like "gender" are those that are clearly either muddled thinkers or ideologues. Use language that does not signal yourself as such a person rather than trying to "take back" a word that is largely lost.

>>730931940
that is exactly right

Responsibility is for other people to worry about

File: 1449106944135.png (159KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 400x400px

>>730932339
Believe what you will, but NPR is definitively part of the mainstream media collective. They are out of touch partisan liars.

>>730932446
>For fuck's sake, it's far left.

Anything left of center-right is "far left" to you wingnuts.

I'd say that Vice can be decent at times but you're best just trying to listen to both ends of the spectrum and trying to form your own opinion on how bad or good something is

File: colortest.png (784KB, 899x899px) Image search: [Google]

784KB, 899x899px

>>730932339
o boy a apologist denying the actual existent control on society.
When you listen to this https://youtu.be/fEsPOt8MG7E whilst reading your shilling it makes you sound very surreptitious

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXTmAkJKikI

>>730932671

www.allsides.com

>>730932453
dude...but dude...is it muddled is we just clearly use 'gender' to identify and discuss the social performance of masculinity or femininity? As opposed to biological states, dude? Is that confusing for you? So you call it muddled, dude?

>>730932691

All you guys have is youtube videos of nobodies and infowars. There is no secret jew conspiracy you tard. You're just insecure that jews have a hard work ethic and are by in large more successful than you.

>>730930975
If gender is used to mean masculinity XOR femininity, then yes, it has meaning. But if it's the etc., then it is now unclear what the term means. I.e. whereas masculinity is the behaviours, thoughts, expectations, and feelings typical to the male sex, and contrariwise for femininity. But anything outside of these two genders is immediately incoherent, as the word can now refer to literally anything a human being can do or experience.

Basically, gender only makes sense as a concept if it is deeply linked to sex in its definition. If you untether it from sex, it ceases to be coherent. Since the latter is what postmodernism and "gender studies" and etc do, the word is largely meaningless.

>>730932583
I don't even listen to them, anon, I just think people that replace the boogeyman with jews are silly and highly sensitive (read: hilarious)

>>730932840
It isn't just used to refer to those things, and that is why the term is not useful.

>>730932924
It's probably more like they seem more successful because he doesn't know any and they're an easy target because he has not real knowledge about them...

>>730916052
deutschewelle
euronews
wikinews

>>730932329
You lack reading comprehension skills. Go back to school.

>>730932624
>Anything left of center-right is "far left" to you wingnuts.
And how do you know what my state of mind is?

NYT is farther left than NPR, would you not agree?

File: jews.png (189KB, 632x724px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 632x724px

>>730932924
>>730933086
They use nepotism and cheating the system to further them selfs.
The jews have been screwing ppl over for centuries if not longer
>you forgetting the meme`s

>>730932929
But if you acknowledge a spectrum running between poles of masculinity and femininity then it makes perfect sense because there can be any number of shades between the poles there. And this 'typical' is highly constructed. It looks different in different cultures, so it can't be said to be a stable identifier, either. You acknowledge that someone can be 'more' manly, right? So there must be shades. Sex is the initial difference that we observed in society (way back) and then we built the elaborate social fantasies of 'manliness' and 'femininity' on top of those observed difference and some biological effects. So it's all cultural, therefore malleable, therefore changing constantly. So I don't think your point makes sense.

>>730932329
Again, why are there so many retards on this board? Is both /mlp/ and /pol/ down or something?

Right,

So Serf does not mean Russian.

Serfdom is a societal status akin to slavery that most peasants in europe suffered throught the middle ages and, in the case of russia, well into the late 19th century.

It is a form of feudal bondage (mmmm, kinky) where a peasant is bound to the land. To compare serfdom to slavery is a tempting allegory as there are similarities, but to compare russian serfdom to african slaves in south, central and north america is erroneous at best and somewhat appaling at worst. Don't get me wrong, you did not want to be born as a russian serf. But you were not seperated from your kithand kin, tortured daily by overseers or actively worked to death in plantations

Now, maybe some of the inventors mentioned there were descendants of serfs. Again, restrictive as russian society was, there was still (some minute almost non-existant) room for some social manouvering (because again, they were serfs, not african slaves) so the army captain mentioned #1 might have descended from some 14th century serf family. Who knows. But more than likely anyone born into a position where they could pursue a career in the sciences did not come from a long proud serf dynasty.

>>730933205
the meme says russians are serfs, , you missed that.
when i called you on it you started to project

>libtard found

File: gun control jews.jpg (2MB, 2832x3916px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2832x3916px

>>730932953
Jews are no laughing matter.

The Jews in congress have been fucking us over for years. For one thing, why are all the Jews in the American government only in the Democrat party? Nepotism?

You can count the number of Jews in the GOP on one hand. Before you proclaim the GOP "rayciss" remember there are lots of black republicans too.

For another, Michael Bloomberg threatened the Democrat party with one billion dollars to get his way. He saw Bernie Sanders wasn't supporting gun control enough and threatened to run as an independent and quote "spend upwards of $1 billion dollars" to fuck up the election.

Rich Jews are holding the American political process hostage and they have no shame about it.

George Soros is another disgusting fucking Jew. Dianne Feinstein is another.

Chuck Schumer is another. The political landscape is full of disgusting fucking Jews.

>>730933281
We know....

One spot to the left of NYT is the young turks and mother jones

You don't see a difference?

File: chuck schumer jew.gif (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>730932953
pic related, a dirty gun-control supporting Jew

>>730933304

Almost all of those were simply because of jews having a different faith than the areas listed, nothing more.

There might be nepotism at play but that isn't a distinctly jew thing. Become successful and your kids can take advantage of it too!

>>730933073
so...anything that can be used to refer to more than one thing is not useful? So...we can only have binary things? So, color is not a useful concept?

>>730933364
Jesus h christ. the serfs of back then are the russians of today as they were russians serfs

>>730933304
so... like the Trumps then?

>>730933413
>Before you proclaim the GOP "rayciss" remember there are lots of black republicans too.

There are *some* black republicans but all have distinct uncle tom personalities and much of it comes from being heavily religious.

>>730933281
I dunno, they mostly like anyone with money...i'd say that keeps them from going very far left. They're neoliberal...

>>730933437
Couldn't tell you, have never seen The Young Turks. Is Mother Jones just dried-up old hippies and potheads?

>>730933364
So you think that intellect is based on only education and not on genetics. yeah we are going to need a citation on that.

File: fuckoff.webm (1MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x360px

>>730916052
aljazeera is alright

File: 1411661129734.png (176KB, 500x279px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 500x279px

>>730933413
>>730933438
Jews are no laughing matter.

File: j.jpg (30KB, 609x343px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 609x343px

>>730933413
Did you shill for trump?

It's my understanding that much more then half of his advisors/cabinet are jewish (republican no less!)

I dont understand why so many anti-jews shilled so hard for trump

>>730933364
thaaaaaank you
the amount of intellectual short-cutting and dumbness in this post was making me cringe

>>730933576
there are a hell of a lot more blacks in america yet you have more jews in the white house, what up with dat.

>>730933587
Perhaps if you are only familiar with one type of news you are not qualified to discuss the new spectrum?

File: 1444147820247.jpg (36KB, 619x453px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 619x453px

>>730933710
He is a waaay better choice than a literal Jew (Bernie Sanders is a Jew), and a corrupt puppet Clinton.

Yes his daughter married a Jew, his cabinet isn't that Jewish.

>>730933350
There is no spectrum from masculinity to femininity. They are fairly distinct clusters (i.e. fuzzy and with some overlap, but with a great deal of non-overlap). You are probably confusing the fact that people can act and feel lots of things, some of which are masculine, some feminine, some neither, and sometimes at different times. I.e. that people can have masculine and feminine aspects does that mean there is a continuous line that can be drawn from masculinity to femininity.

But then again, gender people can't into basic bimodal distributions, clusters, categories and etc., can't tell the difference between a category and an instance and etc., so I'm not surprised you are having trouble.

File: federal reserve.jpg (101KB, 580x404px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 580x404px

>>730933413
Jews literally own the money

>>730933485
We have a word that clearly refers to something: "biological sex". We have a word that is vague and ideologically-polluted, that sometimes sort-of refers to "biological sex". But sure, let's say using the latter is better.

>>730933413
why does it matter that they are jews, though? have you ever met a jewish person anon? I mean..seriously...you sound really terrified of them...it's not like they all know each other and there are WAAAAYYYY more christian white people in positions of power, and muslims and each one of those jews you mentioned works on their 'agenda' with a ton of non-jews...what's your basis for believing that the jewish person's goals automatically set the tone for everyting? How can you tell the difference between what Soros decides and what all his researchers and underlings inform him? you talk about the jews like they have supernatural power and automatically dominate anything they're involved in...so it sounds like you're talking about a boogeyman and is uncompelling and funny

File: Bolshevism.jpg (89KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 600x450px

>>730933475
>different faith than the areas listed, nothing more.
No it was because jews held monopoly and fucked over the ppl every single time in the same manner.

File: The golden goy.jpg (170KB, 903x1024px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 903x1024px

>>730933554

>>730933676
Harvard lets in more under performing jews then any other school.
>they own education.

File: 1411661267128.jpg (36KB, 281x281px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 281x281px

>>730933943
Auditing the fed is common sense at this point, there's no reason not to unless you want to cover up some crimes.

>>730934039
I know there are harmless Jews that aren't in positions that they are able to fuck us over.

But the problem is that they are essentially a group of foreigners in whatever country they inhabit.

>>730933822
if he supports israel unconditionally and gets most of his strategy from jews, then he is functionally, politically indistinct from jews...so the only think you hate really here is the idea that these people are jewish...you're just simply against their race...since they aren't doing anything different from every other greedy, power-hungry person in the world...right? i mean, just acknowledge that it's an irrational antipathy...

what do people think of the associated press?Non profit. Ownership is shared by a bunch of different newspapers, radio and tv stations.

I dont know.. seems a little legit.

>>730934039
>there are WAAAAYYYY more christian white people in positions of power,
The positions of control tend to be held by jews >>730933943

>>730934210
what is you definition of 'foreigner'? Almost all of those jews in US politics were born here...got all their education and money here...with mostly non-jews

>>730933791
>Perhaps if you are only familiar with one type of news you are not qualified to discuss the new spectrum?
Again, you're making assumptions about what I am familiar with. Young Turks and Mother Jones are outliers. NYT and WSJ are mainstream. I don't have a TV, so I watch neither Young Turks or Red Eye. They're news commentary, not news.

File: jews quote.jpg (115KB, 643x960px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 643x960px

>>730934221
>you're just simply against their race..
We have never seen them you claim, yet we hate them.

How can we hate that we dont see.
We know who is a jew and we know they are destroying the west.

>ppl still deny this

File: 1419179624216.gif (148KB, 1002x740px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1002x740px

>>730916193
>Alex Jones
>Breitbart
>straightforward news with no bias

It wasn't for the baiters and trolls this site would be as bland and boring as network t.v.

and now back to you Wolf McJew, with the latest breaking news....

Democracy Now is pretty good

>>730934330
but most of those people were appointed by christian presidents and serve at their pleasure
>positions of power

File: immigration act and nationality.png (382KB, 1817x1015px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 1817x1015px

>>730934391
>what is you definition of 'foreigner'?
non european

>>730934481
0/10

>>730934468
Still not hearing a more based suggestion of you

>>730934451
those quotes have neither sources nor dates

>>730933490

well of course

But many of the inventions mentioned in the chap's list is by non-serfs

"Andrei Vlasenko ran an estate in Tver province. In 1868, he invented the world’s first grain harvester"

"Alexander Popov, a professor of physics, announced the invention of a system for wireless communications at a lecture at St Petersburg University in April 1885"

The first commercially viable artificial rubber was polybutadiene resin, synthesised by the method developed by Russian chemist Sergei Lebedev.

Russian engineer Vladimir Shukhov, who also created the first industrial cracking unit in 1891.

Vladimir Zworykin was another Russian engineer whose inventions debuted in the United States

Transformers were invented, built and put into operation by Russian electrical engineer Pavel Yablochkov and physicist Ivan Usagin.

It is owing to discoveries by Russian physicist Alexander Stoletov that we enjoy television today.

None of these people were serfs or descendants from serfs.

Now I would argue that russians descendent from serfs are about as smart as africans descended from slaves, but it's not really true. After feudalism was abolished in russia, the former serfs were not treated to the widespread endemic institutional racism that the blacks were in the late 19th, early 20th and, well, late 20th and... erm early 21st century.

Hell, there are entire threads dedicated to how retarded blacks are but if I suggested that any retard descended froma russian serf is not bright enough to be a scientist then people would literally shit themselves in agner. I bet osme russian is sitting reading this just fuming as we speak.

Perhaps the blacks are not as bright as european whites. But they are definietly on par with the slavic whites growing up as serfs under the tsars.

No amount of "russian" inventions discovered by the urbanized upper and middle classes will make up for that.

russian serfs and their descendants are the niggers of eastern europe.

>>730934182
harvard is just a business school and an old boys club anyway, who cares? it lets in all kinds of underperforming rich kids...so does Yale (Bush/Kerry) ...is there any way to distinguish between what you say as jews and what everyone else calls 'rich people'? Other than an incident of genetics?

>>730916052
Sky news is pretty good

File: ShowImage.jpg (57KB, 898x628px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 898x628px

>>730933822
It stopped showing up on google but actually i beleive his cabinet is like very very jewish. I haven't gone by one by one to verify but it seems accurate. Help me understand why people would shill mega hard for whats probally the jeweyest US presidential cabal ever... It makes no sense that you become a mega propagandist for the lesser evil/jew cabal when you are highly anti-jew

>>730934509
okay...how do you define European, because most people define someone's nationality or...continentality...by where they were born, you know that, right? That's where culture comes from...the people you grew up around...it's not like it's a magic gas that gets sprayed on new white-looking babies if their parents are blonde

File: 1411660909919.jpg (88KB, 674x428px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 674x428px

>>730934391
Their loyalty is divided because they have friends and family in Israel and sometimes dual citizenship.

If at any point those people put the interests of Israel, a foreign nation, above the interests of the American people then they are in fact, foreign agents.

>>730933943
Whats up with this listing yellen then yellin?

File: invasion.webm (1MB, 426x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 426x240px

>>730934608
just look at the policies.
Its real you just cant believe it because its so bad.

>>730934608
and I think the West is pretty good. still have 90% of all the money and guns and control the IMF and world bank mostly...sooo... destroying? Also, yes specious sources...and he wasn't able to disentangle his reasons from the idea that he just doesn't like them because they're 'different'

>>730934104
did a jew make this? I never understand the font choice for the names. it makes difficult to read them. they chose to make them..slightly more jewish looking text over readability?

File: master gold.jpg (129KB, 693x536px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 693x536px

>>730934767
He's the best candidate we've had in a while.

He purports to put America first and has even taken steps to remove foreign money from our elections. That puts him above all the rest for now.

That's another thing I want to bitch about, Israeli money funding congressional elections and the presidential election.

(((AIPAC)))

File: map-of-palestine-before-israel-1948.gif (571KB, 2310x3880px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 2310x3880px

>>730934210
>a group of foreigners in whatever country they inhabit

which includes "israel"

>>730934931
The same can be said for most evangelical protestant politicians...and for that matter, literally anyone who has a relative in or affinity to a foreign country...by your logic, Reagan was a foreign agent for Ireland...

>>730934943
DOUBLEJEW!!!!!!

>>730935212
Only if he acted in the interests of Ireland, possibly because he has friends and family living there, above the interests of America.

>>730933711
well i am happy you took your time in crafting a reply rather than try to debate any point. Well done on being special

>>730933628
no i don't. where did I write that? Intellect is clearly a product of genetics and through education you gain the tools to express that intellect.

You can place the smartest kid in the world in a jungle and when you come back in 40 years chances are [that he has died from malaria] that he does not possess anything more impressive than rudimentary survival skills. I would not expoect him to be able to draw up plans for a more efficient large hadron collider, for example.

You need genetics and a good education as the former would be wasted without the latter and vice versa.

But do I believe that certain races are inherently smarter than others? No, no I do not because I am not a 1920's academic fellow strolling round the tropics measuring craniums and bosom sizes amongst the unwashed primitives of Banbury on Sea.

>>730934620
serfdom got abolished in 1850
>None of these people were serfs or descendants from serfs
How would you know they were not descended of serfs?
Even so that is just the top 10 contributions by Russian are you saying the russians have not made more contributions that that?

Are you saying that africans have not been heavily underrepresented in these field simply because they lack the genetic intellect to compete

File: Who's Silvergoldnicklepennycopperstien's favorite little goy.jpg (171KB, 1162x1048px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1162x1048px

>>730934767

File: 1469718763081.jpg (44KB, 640x549px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 640x549px

>>730931608
>why tf is Breitbart on par with Buzzfeed
I was thinking the same thing. Buzzfeed is WAY more biased and full of shit than Breitbart

File: ourworldindata_average-iq.png (235KB, 2877x1745px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 2877x1745px

>>730934620
>But they are definietly on par with the slavic whites growing up as serfs under the tsars.
Statistics say otherwise, you are full of shit nigger

>>730935137
anon...he tried to appoint a liegit Russian lobbyist...'foreign money' out of elections
AIPAC funds tons of politician on both fucking sides...and Trump has already started shooting missles for the Israelis

Drudgereport.com of course

>>730935137
So you just forget about the jewish cabal surrounding him even though you consider them the evil thats controlling the world?? AND Shill for them? I could see grudgingly voting for but not the ridicilous quanity of shilling i see from anti-jew..anti globalist people

also:

>>Mr. Trump dismissed talk about a split inside his White House between aides with a nationalist or globalist orientation. “Hey, I’m a nationalist and a globalist,” he said. “I'm both. And I’m the only one who makes the decision, believe me.”

>>730934104
i can't believe that Bannon somehow found himself on the wrong foot of this crowd.

maybe it was something he said?

>>730916052
Best way is to read various news sources, plus read some books on politics and stuff so you can see through any editorializing

Also make note of the news as you hear it so you can notice any subtle changes in wording (Words like "alleged" have a habit of disappearing without evidence being provided after a few days)

Two Amazing Books I'd recommend:
>Prisoners of Geography by Tim Marshall
Good primer on geopolitics, helps explain things like the Ukraine Crisis and the NK Crisis

The Dictator's Handbook
>Just amazing. Changes the way you see the world, and how leaders vie for power. 11/10

Of course read more books about history and on more detailed issues that interest you too

>>730935289
>But do I believe that certain races are inherently smarter than others? No, no I
Oke so you are a nigger who thinks he is smart because of his education yet scores low on his iq test.
im sorry i couldnt care asthe sound of this guy walking in to the woods and leap frogging 170k years of skitskin evolution was to loud. https://youtu.be/nCKkHqlx9dE

>>730935288
How do you distinguish between the interests allies? You can't expect anyone to think you're making an unbiased evaluation while you're screaming about JEWS...you see that right?

File: Jared the ferret.jpg (119KB, 750x714px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 750x714px

>>730935646
He called jared a globalist cuck

>>730935369
>WAY more biased and full of shit than Breitbart

I don't think that's possible anon

unless we consider "truthfeed" type sites as news

>>730935137
Dude have you not paid attention on the elections in this world.

it is all about voting for the lesser evil these days

File: kushner.jpg (96KB, 710x473px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 710x473px

>>730935788
I think thats an old list lol. There are more

He's also doing something with increasing entrepreneurship or something?

Trump has no ideological spine so hes basically head jew in charge

>>730935212
holding dual citizenship and originating form a place you have no contact with are 2 different things.

File: 1430790675194.jpg (40KB, 397x394px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 397x394px

Just have to know their goals and understand why they're presenting it as they are. You can kickstart this by going through an article and highlighting what is a fact and what is an opinion, think of yourself as a completely detached research scientist as you do this, act as if you are studying animals.

Right now the political right has less reason to dissemble because their guy is in power but I admit to being center-right in my own politics. I think the core of conservatism is neither xenophobia nor fear, just a wise distrust in the true extent of man's capabilities and progress whereas progressivism reflects implicit trust in human capability. Nobody is entirely either of these ideas, it's their interpretation of history both old and new that determines what they think. One's understanding of history can be both simple and accurate, it can also be very complex but inaccurate or any combination thereof. I think liberals screaming about bias and all that shit are an extremely loud, aggressive minority using their access to money, academia and high technology in an attempt to control the direction of society in accordance with an entirely incorrect yet emotionally compelling school of philosophy which is far more metaphysical than economic, a reflection of it's almost exclusively millennial generation hosts. I am only right-of-center right now because I disagree with their obvious aggression. They are what happens when those who see the glass as half full cannot solve a problem and it's probably our place as people who see the glass as half empty to fix situations like this one.

File: Trump searches for new wife.jpg (113KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 800x600px

>>730918118
>Slavic man aged 25 was shot, nothing was stolen

Yeah, that's not "unbiased"
It's biased to the left if it includes any followup story or implication about foreigners, specifically Slavs being targeted by hate gangs, or racist groups etc

Its biased to the right if the followup or in story implication has anything to do with "rising tides of foreigners" or the "journalist" implies the man was in the act of committing a crime, without there being actual proof as such.

Leading in with the fact that the man was of Slavic extraction is dubious from any angle, unless of course you are Slavic and reporting that an American billionaire and widely known political figure is in your country attempting to troll the streets for a new wife.

>>730935289
>But do I believe that certain races are inherently smarter than others? No, no I do not because I am not a 1920's academic fellow strolling round the tropics measuring craniums
Lol that is actually a thing, regions of the brain are dedicated to specific functions, if the brain is more developed and larger that function is stronger.

>you have been brainwashed by unscientific bullshit.
>you chose to ignore current research on intelligence

>>730935417
Shooting missiles at the Syrian airbase that used chemical weapons on the Syrian people isn't quite the same as committing a trillion dollars to a war for Israel.

>>730935613
The Jews around Trump aren't nearly as influential, it seems.

>>730936181
>used chemical weapons o
Allegedly
> the Syrian people
They are not syrians they are invaders that came in true a demographic invasion.

>>730936330
>Allegedly

President Trump: We listened to their generals making the decision.

Obviously the intelligence wasn't made public.

>>730936292
What do you mean? I would say the people that surround him have more control / effect over trump then any president I'm familiar with in America

He has no firm ideology, no real knowledge of how to do anything politically, no real knowledge of how to do any economically, he just knows hes gonna MAGA

Someone has to tell him how to do that -- and he has nothing to push back with

File: Chemical attack.png (253KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1200x800px

>>730936443
We know it is bullshit as the location of the attack had a gas canister crushed by a external charge. and not a missle impact releasing the chemicals.

The chemical used was chlorine, SA shipped in chlorine
Germany muffled up several chlorine gas attacks on its citizens before this happened.

>>730936181
I think it goes to more than just that though

During his campaign he heavily shilled for the putin plan to solve the syria problem

All the alt rights shilled for russia saying the bombing would start ww3

Basically hes going back on his whole plan to exit us from syria

>>730935299

>How would you know they were not descended of serfs?

because a lot of those inventors listed were from 1870 - 1920. Russian society may have moved away from serfdom but if you were born on a farm chances are you would die on that farm, as would your children, as would their children.

There are exceptions of course. Maybe one or two of those engineers were the grandchildren children of runaway serfs or peasants forced into the city by famine or war. By the time I researched every scientist's there's lineage this thread would 404.

Russia has contributed a lot to the world. Can't think of many things on top of my head and it wasn't the peasants who contributed. Except for the revolution, then they supported the intellectual middle class sjw's because they were promised free bread and peace. Smart move, shame it backfired somewhat when Lenin started murdering the peasantry.

>Are you saying that africans have not been heavily underrepresented in these field simply because they lack the genetic intellect to compete

I would argue that, yes. Given the correct education you could make a smart black guy a scientist.

No matter how much education you a retard however will ensure that he will become a scientist. Even if he did happen to be white.

>>730935372
That graph thinks the popualr and thus intellectual distribution is evenly spread across russia. Show me a graph that shows the iq spread across the nation and I imagine the western half of russia, that has been subjected to far greater western culture and influence, will be smarter than the eastern half.

I could be wrong of course. It's just a prediction.

>>730936646
>belies the Russian state propaganda over the president he probably shilled tirelessly for

>>730936779
That's because every time Assad uses chemical weapons he makes the USA and Russia look like fucking fools for negotiating a chemical weapons treaty with him.

After like 8 years of war it's likely he isn't even in control of his own military anymore.

That means, generals on the ground using chemical weapons and needing their shit pushed in so the US and Russia can save face.

Assad's usefulness for enforcing the chemical weapons treaty is about at an end.

>>730936809
>1870 - 1920. Russian society may have moved away from serfdom but if you were born on a farm chances
And how do you think they got rid of serfdom?, what event led to that? the thing that broke the cycle and dethroned the land lords