Hi you faggots! Can you help me and tell me what's wrong

Should be "have you ever been" to africa, not "did"

>you were to many places
>did you ever been to Africa

>>729503746
Whoever wrote this has a very poor command of English. Their text has loads of mistakes.

For example - "most partS of Europe".

>>729503746
University, you 'went'

>>729503857
This, titts now

File: Capturee.png (36KB, 1133x443px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1133x443px

Still wrong

>>729503857
Also, what other options are there for the '"were" to many places'

>>729503960
Is there "also went" instead of "was also to some remote places"?

>>729503993
were/have been

>>729503746
A Graduated, you have been
B visited, also went
A stayed
B I was in Warsaw
A Did you visit many sights while you were there
A did
B did you go
B went, saw, was
A Have you ever been
B I haven't had the opportunity, but I have heard ...

>>729504092
The options i give are correct but judging by their English im not sure they will give you the right options or even that they'll accept the correct ones...

Get a new teacher op.

>>729504092
"I went up the palace of science" seems odd

File: Capture.png (36KB, 1117x443px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1117x443px

It's still wrong. This shit doesn't show what answers are good or wrong...

post link i'll do it

>>729504255
>>729504275
I guess it could be "looked up"; what options does the palace of culture one give you?

>>729504346
Went/Have gone

>>729504275
What other options are there for "I went up the palace of science"

>>729504086
it's have been

>>729504322
I can't. It's for our college and it'm not sure that giving password away on 4chan is a good idea.

>>729504389
Neither of those really work

>>729504480
I know, right? But that's all i have. I know this course is shitty but it's not me who made this.

>>729504389
No distinguishing between them by tense. You wouldn't say "I went up" or "I have gone up" unless you're talking about something like a tower.

In context it has to be "went".

What is the native language of the teacher?

>>729504479
ok well easier if you gave the choices that you can put

1. post tits
2. complain to teacher, because that looks good
(at least the part you did, there's still some errors in what you can't change)

>>729504275
Aside from the Palace of Culture one, which would only be idiomatic if it is a tower or something like that (you go "up" a tower) this is fine.

I'm a native speaker plus I have a doctorate in (a field of) linguistics...

>>729503746
lol where in glasgow are you? I rejected an unconditional from that shitehole

>>729504275
Unless there's an option for "stayed" in Warsaw?

was in isn't *wrong* though.

>>729503746
a. graduated, have been
b. visited, have also been
a. stayed
b. was in, enjoyed
a. Did you visit, were
b. did
a. did you ho
b. went, saw, was
a. have you ever been
b. haven't had, heard

"visited" most part of europe..
thats wrong

>>729504717
It's a language exercise you fool.
Fuck me Glasgow had a narrow squeak there old chum.

>>729504808
Most exercises would use their own university or school in the example so is it too bad to assume you're from Glasgow? Shut yer hole ya English beasty cunt.

>>729504804
"most part" is never going to make sense though, unless it's something like "for the most part"
It's the teachers fault

File: Capture.png (44KB, 1142x441px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 1142x441px

>>729504608
1.graduated/have graduated
2.have been/were
3.visited/have visited
4.was also/have also been
5.stayed/have stayed
6.was/have been
7.enjoyed/have enjoyed
8.have you visited/did you visit
9.were/have been
10.did/have
11.did you go/have you gone
12.have gone/went
13.saw/have seen
14.was/have been
15.Have you ever been/Did you ever been
16.haven't had/didn't have
17.heard/have heard

>>729504275
yeah visited is wrong
i visited most part of europe - wrong
i visited most parts of europe - works with an s on parts

>>729504781
Still wrong...

>>729505005
Should definitely be "went up the palace of culture", otherwise it's mixed tense

>>729504275
What is the most attractive place you 'have stayed' in?

>>729505005
8 did you visit

File: Capture2.png (36KB, 1145x435px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1145x435px

>>729504781

>>729505005
12 went

>>729505005
1. graduated
2. have been
3. Have visited
4. Have also been
5. Have stayed
6. was
7. enjoyed
8. Did you visit
9. were
10 did
11 did you go
12 fuck knows. both are very odd.
13 saw
14 was
15 have you ever been
16 haven't had
17have heard

>>729505005
3. is nonsense with either answer
5. have stayed

>>729505236
Very strange

File: english.jpg (31KB, 300x303px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x303px

i have traveled the most part of europe..
...visited
i passed up the palace...
rolling for dubs!

>>729505322
THE PALACE OF CULTURE AND SCIENCE IS A HIGH RISE BUILDING

i knew it had to be!

given that that confused a native speaker though...

>>729503900
These.

"Have been"

And

"Have you ever been"

File: 1.png (38KB, 1131x442px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1131x442px

>>729505322
FINALLY!

>>729505436
Also, op, if you're polish you could have fucking told me that.

File: Tits.jpg (10KB, 300x226px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x226px

Here, have some tits.

>>729505530
Yeah, there you go. Tell your teacher theyre a prick who can't speak the fucking queens to save his life.

>>729505530
the did you visit did it

>>729505132
And we wouldn't want a situation where he's going to mix tenses, or it'd have gone wrong...

>>729505530
The problem is just that this has a few typos in it, so it's fucked. "Most part of europe" should just be "Most partS of Europe". "I went up the palace of culture and science" should be "I went up TO the palace of culture and science". It's not that it's a fucking high rise building like that other guy said, it's just that they left off the "to". You still wouldn't say " I went UP the palace even if it was a tall building, the only time you'd say something like that is if you are saying "I went up the stairs". You don't "Go up" a building but you can go up the stairs inside a building or go up the elevator shaft or go up to the fifth floor.

>>729503746
>>>729504275
>What is the most attractive place you 'have stayed' in?
Ah I knew it!!
Tits now!!

>>729505837
>"I went up TO the palace of culture and science"
But you might totally say "I went up the empire state building"

>>729505837
Also they're missing spaces at the beginning

>>729506024
Yeah if you're fucking ignorant.

Tits posted and /b/ still argues about grammer

>>729506338
*grammar

>>729506253
>>729505837

You're a moron. Google "go up the Eiffel tower" for example.

>>729505530
Ok, now fulfill your duties and send timestamped tits.

File: FuckingFuck.png (27KB, 1177x441px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1177x441px

If you fuckers still want to argue then help me do this piece

>>729506338
There were no timestamp you fagtron

>>729506563

3 She HAS HAD
is the only error

>>729506563
3. has had (error of number)
6. "for" is possible but clunk

>>729506563
"She has had" not "have had"

File: 2.png (25KB, 1175x434px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 1175x434px

>>729506711
Still wrong

>>729506253

or there is enough context. i think it sounds ok

>>729506734
>>729506563
Also "he just got" is idiomatic in US English but not in British English (which would say He has or more naturally He's)... in case you care.

>>729506828
1. Haven't spoken then?

>>729506916
>>729506828
1. is correct but relies on since in a causal sense ("because" she went to London). In a temporal sense it would have to be "haven't spoken"

>>729506828
7. "Have seen"

>>729506828
2. There's a word missing before "for"

File: 2.png (26KB, 1171x445px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 1171x445px

>>729506916
Still wrong

>>729507109
Here
>>729507022

>>729506828
>>729507022
Yeah try Have seen for 7 but note that saw is correct (but idiomatic) english

>>729507109
You keep changing them. Stop changing them! since a few months is wrong. FOR

>>729507109
also "since" should be "for", but there's a word missing, it's weird

>>729507229
"France"
HAVE YOU NOT EYES TO SEE

File: 2.png (17KB, 970x364px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 970x364px

I think we are close!

>>729507427
5. Have been

File: 2.png (17KB, 963x371px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 963x371px

>>729507581
Still wrong

Did op even post tits/timestamp?

>>729507691
Whats the options for 6, second one?

>>729507691
6. He has just got

Is super wrong

>>729507823
Will post timestamp if i get the answer for the 2nd one.

>>729507877
No it isnt.

>>729507889
I couldnt give a fuck about the timestamp just solve this fucking shit excercise.

>>729507961
what's the alternative for "he has just got"

>>729508234
has just got/just got/just gotten

>>729508323
it's "just got"

File: 2.png (17KB, 987x372px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 987x372px

>>729508411

>>729508549
Oh god try gotten but fuck me, it is not correct english.

>>729508682
Still wrong

>>729508682
oh no sorry ignore that. Has just got and just got are both possible english. try both...

>>729503746
Since you graduated from Glasgow University you've been to many places, haven't you?
Alternate: you went to many places,

Oh, yes, I visited most part of Europe (this text itself is wrong btw, it should be "most of" or "most parts of", though that's not as good), but I also went to some remote places, such as Easter Island.
What is the most attractive place you stayed in? (stayed at would be better, but again, in the text)
It's hard to decide. I have been in Warsaw (for) a few months and I truly enjoy it. (Present tense because you are saying you're still there..."have been in" implies still in currently)

Will keep going, out of curiosity OP where are you from and what's your first language?

>>729509269
"You went to many places, haven't you" is not grammatical.

>>729509269
That is already done btw.
I'm from shithole also known as Poland and Polish is my first language. I'm proficient user of english but not that proficient and this fucking excersise is fucked up.

>>729509269
We're done with that one, check the new puzzle

>>729509269
Did you visit many sights while you were there?
("Have you visited" is wrong, though not badly wrong, because "have" is used as a present tense indication of possession...I don't know how a grammar teacher would say it, but having visited something in the past is fine...that's not the problem. What you "have" is the experience of...well...having...visited the area before. However, in the sentence, the "while you were there", while redundant, is a sort of English limiter that means you can't say "have you". It's complicated.)

>>729509459
Are you sure you did it right? Native speakers sometimes fuck up details of written language.

Anyways, I'll check out new thing.

>>729509438
At least you don't kill your unborn children fam, just gotta get rid of the corruption, poverty, gommunist tendencies and overreliance on external economies, and you'll be pretty okay.

>>729508549
Try "saw" instead of "have seen" on the last one, if available.

File: StilllWrong.png (17KB, 972x380px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 972x380px

>>729509861
Still wrong

also The Game

>>729503746
This mad libs fucking sucks.

>>729510026
Bump. I need the answer

>>729510437
kek

>>729510026
How many options are there for each one? Does it vary or do they all have the same amount?

>>729510026
Is there an "ago" or "now since" for the first part of #7? It's Engrish but it might be the sort of Engrish a Polish Engrish professor would Engrish.

>>729510851
It's 3 for every blank.

File: 123.png (21KB, 960x294px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 960x294px

1.1 Haven't spoken/Didn't speak/Didn't spoke
1.2 Since/Ago/For
1.3 Has gone/Went/Has went

2.1 Left/Has Left/Have Left
2.2 Since/Ago/For
2.3 Has Worked/Was Worked/Worked
2.4 Since/Ago/For

cont.

>>729510943
the fuck
what bastard put multiple sentences on one submit form
Is there a source material for these somewhere or are you stuck trying to guess what the professor doesn't know or just fatfingered the wrong option on?

Can you write out the three options for all of the boxes?

>>729511208
Okay, best get out Notepad and copy these down.
Valid English for #1:
I haven't spoken to her since she went to London
I didn't speak to her since she has gone to London
I didn't speak to her for she has gone to London

In order of likeliness. The third one is a lot less likely than the first two, at least by proper English standards. I'll post each question in its own post for ease.

>>729511208
3.1 Has Had/Had/Have Had
3.2 Since/Ago/For
3.3 Has Got/Got/Has Gotten

4.1 Have you known/Did you know/Did you knew

5.1 Were/Was/Have been
5.2 Since/Ago/For
5.3 Were you/Have you been/Did you be

6.1 Has just got/Just Got/Just gotten
6.2 Since/Ago/For

7.1 Since/Ago/For
7.2 Saw/Have Seen/Have Saw

>>729511422
oh yeah and TECHNICALLY you could say "I haven't spoken to her for she has gone to London", so there's a fourth possibility on that one

>>729511208
He left school three years ago then he worked in France for a few months before coming back to England.

He has left school three years ago then he has worked....fuck it, let me eliminate possible answers to make it faster instead.

Okay, assuming your teacher isn't full retard on English, these are WRONG answers regardless of the rest of the sentences and can be DELETED:
1.1 Didn't spoke
1.2 Ago
1.3 Has went

2.1 Have left
2.2 For
2.3 Was worked
2.4 Since, Ago

This at least narrows it down some.

P.S. I know there are no tits coming, I just want to get past the autistic web form

>>729511472
Again, WRONG answers to be DELETED (again unless your teacher is shit):
3.1 Have had
3.2 Ago, For
3.3 Has Got

4.1 Did you knew

5.1 Were
5.2 Since, Ago (iffy on removing "since", I've seen middle European posters type things like "I've been here since an hour ago" as if they were saying "I've known since third grade"...it's picky, but no native English speaker would be likely to use since in this context)
5.3 Did you be (unless yo teacher be a real OG hood nigga frum da sout side because den he might be dere)

6.1 Just gotten (between the remaining two, "Has just got" and "just got", "just got" is more correct/likely btw)
6.2 Ago, Since

7.1 Ago, For (Iffy on removing "ago", I have heard lazy native speakers say things like "It's two weeks ago I saw him", and middle english used sentence structures like that as well)
7.2 Have saw

File: Help.png (25KB, 960x294px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 960x294px

Possible answers:

1.1 Haven't spoken/Didn't speak/Didn't spoke
1.2 Since/Ago/For
1.3 Has gone/Went/Has went

2.1 Left/Has Left/Have Left
2.2 Since/Ago/For
2.3 Has Worked/Was Worked/Worked
2.4 Since/Ago/For

3.1 Has Had/Had/Have Had
3.2 Since/Ago/For
3.3 Has Got/Got/Has Gotten

4.1 Have you known/Did you know/Did you knew

5.1 Were/Was/Have been
5.2 Since/Ago/For
5.3 Were you/Have you been/Did you be

6.1 Has just got/Just Got/Just gotten
6.2 Since/Ago/For

7.1 Since/Ago/For
7.2 Saw/Have Seen/Have Saw

>>729512398
Okay OP, just keep this from 404ing and give me a little time for some process of elimination and I'll give you some of the most likely combinations.

>>729512776
Ok, will do

>>729512776
bump

1:
Haven't spoken, since, went
Haven't spoken, since, has gone
Haven't spoken, for, has gone
Haven't spoken, for, went
Didn't speak, since, went
Didn't speak, since, has gone
Didn't speak, for, went
Didn't speak, for, has gone

2:
left, ago, worked, for
left, ago, has worked, for

3:
has had, since, got
had, since, got
has had, since, has gotten
had, since, has gotten

4:
have you known
did you know

5:
have been, for, have you been
have been, for, were you
was, for, have you been
was, for, were you
(if none of these four work, and you've exhausted all combinations on all of the other questions, swap in "since" for four and try those four even though it's bad english)

6:
just got, for
has just got, for

7:
since, have seen
since, saw
(these last two are unlikely and should be tried after other combinations other than the special note in #5)
ago, have seen
ago, saw

>>729514013
That is still fucking shitton of combinations...

>>729514013
Since there are so many "okay" combinations for #1 and I wasn't able to narrow it down more, here's how I'd approach this:
>start at #7, pick the top option (top option in each list is always the one I consider most likely)
>pick the top option for each going up the list backwards
>if it gives you the error, pick second one for #1 and so on, leaving others the same
>once you cycle through all of the #1s, pick the second for #2 and leave rest the same
>so on and so on through them all except don't bother with the special note on #5 until you've repeated the process for both of the #6s and all of the #7s

>>729514339
Yeah no kidding.
You're still looking at a lot of possibilities but it's not as terrible anymore. 4096 possibilities if you forget about the #5 note, and only 2048 if you don't got into the last two in #7. Still despair-worthy, but I did put the best options at the top of each # so you should finish long before that if the professor didn't have a stroke.
Completely brute-force-worthy, better than 3^18 (like 387 million).

Like I say you will be entering the hopefully most likely combinations first, and I don't think we can save any more work 'guessing' since I put the best guesses at the front. Maybe you could get a better answer earlier being sneaky about which order of question you iterated your bruteforce attempt in though.