More gifs related to filename of real life ones. Show me

bumb for interest. This is now loli thread.

>>727332463
Did someone offer her pizza?

>>727332463
thinly failed cp request thread. reported

>>727333589
Why?

Someone has the gif of the gymnastic girl with captations?

>>727333685
you know damn well why paedo

>>727333807
British trolls are worst trolls.

>>727333956
>British
that alone makes them a better troll

Kys paedo scum. Your kind will be hanging from trees soon

>>727333758
What

>>727333807
Want some candy?

>>727334035
brits already have troll teeth, they just need to be green.

File: jummy dog.webm (377KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 320x240px

>>727332463

>>727334198
you know, the one where she says not to use her pussy but to use her asshole

File: 1490794580369.gif (73KB, 129x150px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 129x150px

>>727334192
Fully clothed girl in no sexual context -> pedo

>>727334329
FUCK OFF

File: Squirt horse.webm (2MB, 270x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 270x480px

>>727332463
What is a gif? Do you mean gift?

>>727334329
Kek'd at the thought of someone believing this shit

File: 6235686.jpg (29KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x480px

>>727334441

>>727334441
why would someone do this

>>727334362
ITS PAEDO BECAUSE I SAID IT IS.

>>727334441
Was not expecting it to be yellow

>>727334441
got more? ;)

>>727334362
>>727334570
The context makes it illegal in most civilised countries.

lern2law

File: 1490756870465.gif (1MB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x150px

>>727334570

>>727334362
You're fucking retarded if you don't think OP is a paedo. Kys too

>>727335020
fuck your cousin, faggot paedo american

>>727335026
He maybe is but it's not explicit CP. Kids in regular videos doesn't mean cp.

>>727335020
how did that fit inside of such a young girl. i feel sick

>>727334308
Yeah that one

>>727334286
Snakes are such useless creatures.

>>727335352
>>727333589

>>727335838
Calm down cunts and let the candy man have some fun. It's /b ffs

File: disapoint.jpg (42KB, 766x960px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 766x960px

>>727334693
>The context makes it illegal
>lern2law

>>727336009
"Let's all condone this filthy paedo lmao"

Kys

Wows
https://youtu.be/FY9BwIhkbsg

>>727336019
In the UK this is absolutely the case. I think it's similar in North America, too.

You're allowed naked beach pics of your own kids but if you have pics of other people's kids it's a different story.

I bring this up every now and then and people always fly into a rage. The law isn't hard to understand.

>>727336339
Still no pornographic content. Also don't you smell the bait you nasty fucker?

>>727336517
Still no nudity

Fags rage because of "loli" in file name. Don't care grown muslim men can marry 9 year olds in some arabic countrys.

>>727336621
I never said there was.

>>727336898
"Don't care"

We hate them too you fuck

>>727336517
>reaction image of a child making a funny face
>not your kid, therefore you're a pedophile and should be sent to prison

It must suck living in a dystopian shit hole like the UK.

>>727337199
Kek

>>727337247
That's what i meant with no cp or nudity. It's just from a casual video.

File: usa-election_clinton2.jpg (74KB, 664x441px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 664x441px

>>727337199
>breakable

>>727337247
The USA has the PROTECT act which is basically the same thing.

It must suck being a dribbling retard.

>>727337703
Not my fault that your are retarded and must suck a dribbling cock

>>727338057
So you have nothing to say because you've lost the argument. How embarrassing.

>>727337703
Child actors? Every adult who has seen any movie with kids in it is a fucking child rapist send them to the gas chamber fucking creeps protect our childrens faces from being looked at!!! get the burka!!! Fucking rape paedo retards everywhere. GAS ALL THE

>>727338222
>>727338417
>>727338222
Actually i just did

FUCKING NORMIES GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY BOARD YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT CUCKLORD HILLARY LOVERS
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: dealwithit.png (852KB, 850x1586px) Image search: [Google]

852KB, 850x1586px

>>727337703
>>727338222
That wasn't me, but he's right. You look fucking retarded trying to argue this point and honestly I don't have the energy to keep arguing with someone so aggressively stupid.

>I bet this is illegal in the UK too

>>727338542
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>727338222
So what now? Who lost the argument?

>>727332463
So senate really fucked with our internet http://www.ipanon.com

>>727339034
everyone who read it

>>727338417
Are you autistic? Do you struggle understanding context?

>>727338588
I'm not arguing a point, I'm referring to objective fact.

See below:

The first conviction of a person found to have violated the sections of the act relating to virtual child pornography was Dwight Whorley of Virginia, who used computers at the Virginia Employment Commission to download "Japanese anime style cartoons of children engaged in explicit sexual conduct with adults"[14] alleged to depict “children engaged in explicit sexual conduct with adults.” He was charged with 19 counts of “knowingly receiving” child pornography for printing out two cartoons and viewing others.[15] His conviction was upheld in a 2-1 panel decision of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in December 2008.[14] This decision was consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition in which the Supreme Court held that virtual child pornography was protected free speech, provided that the virtual depictions are not obscene. Obscenity, including obscene depictions of children, either virtual or real, is unprotected speech.

Land of the free alright :^)

>>727339034
The person trying to deny it's clothed pics can't be classed as CP even though he probably lives in a country with laws to the contrary.

File: 1490793038525.jpg (219KB, 1024x1536px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1024x1536px

>>727339143
Right in the feels

>>727334441
moar pls

>>727339162
Well you see, she's actually a 3000 year old alien from a distant galaxy so she's not a child.

>>727332463
>>>727338417
>Are you autistic? Do you struggle understanding context?

OP has loli in the file name. Joke and edgy bait. It's content from YouTube. Only because somebody can wank to it in his basement it isn't porn. Is an animal documentary porn because someone faps to it? is possesing the documentary illegal cuz somebody fapped to it? It's free fucking content with a spiced up file name. I don't give a fuck what he may or may not have tried to ask for because no lines have been crossed. It's free fucking YouTube content. What op thinks about it doesn't make it porn, obscene or child abuse.

File: 1469373730879.jpg (571KB, 1333x2000px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 1333x2000px

>>727339162
Is it still illegal if it's a tattoo?

>>727335417

>>727335251

what the fuck did i miss

>>727340090
Lol that's awesome

>>727333758
Pls

>>727340171
Nothing, you pedo fuck. You can stop monitoring for cheese pizza now.

>>727340281
I wonder what that will look like when she is 60

>>727339876
>Prohibits computer-generated child pornography when "(B) such visual depiction is a computer image or computer-generated image that is, or appears virtually indistinguishable from that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct"; (as amended by 1466A for Section 2256(8)(B) of title 18, United States Code).

Wouldn't matter.

>>727339971
A good lawyer could railroad your ass if you were asked to explain what loli meant.

It's not illegal to fap over animals so that's a shit analogy. If it was a documentary on a kindergarten or something and you had it saved as "Sexy kindergarten kids" that could be considered illegal. Depends how strict 'they' want to be.

I'm not saying the law is morally right, just that it exists.

MODS MODS MODS

>>727340376
Fuck. So I have to change the filename of an episode of powerpuff girls from 'sex kittens want milk #5'?

>>727340376
>computer-generated
it's not

>appears virtually indistinguishable from that of a minor

maybe if you're autistic you could confuse a cartoon with a real person but I'm gunna say not again.

>>727334286
reticulated python, world's longest species of snake

>>727340376
> If it was a documentary on a kindergarten or something and you had it saved as "Sexy kindergarten kids" that could be considered illegal

Yeah... got a lawyerfag friend who's trying to muddle his way through this shit.
A lot of it is pretty much based on context. If they can prove you have a history of child abuse or are specificallly using pics and vids of kids as fap material, you're fucked.

One or two oddly-named non-sexual files in a folder that doesn't have porn in it is usually ok, but if they're in your fap folder you're fucked. Then they'll try to establish a pattern and pretty much any vid, pic, or mainstream movie with a kid in it could be a problem

>>727339971

If it was a documentary on a kindergarten or something and you had it saved as "Sexy kindergarten kids" that could be considered illegal.

I think i can't agree with you here. Ones perception of normal behavior doesn't make a difference in the court. people are not allowed to show their sexual organs ( don't know the correct english expression here but i hope you get what i mean) to kids ( in most countrys but let's just take it as a hypothetical basis) . So if a minor would have a massive foot fetish and he would see a persons feet in a not obscene way like on the beach you would not have broken the law. Only because the teen get's maybe aroused by that cuz he has a strange fetish doesn't mean that being barefoot is suddenly inacceptable behavior. So if content doesn't break the law and guidelines by it self, then how i fucking name the file or percieve the content doesn't suddenly change the rules.