[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

So thank to Emperor Trump you no longer will have internet p

The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Thread replies: 227
Thread images: 27

So thank to Emperor Trump you no longer will have internet privacy

http://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-kill-fcc-broadband-privacy-rules-2017-3

Enjoy having your ISP look through all your internet activity
>>
>>726675904
>Enjoy having your ISP look through all your internet activity
implying they don't already

now they can just sell it to other people who want to look at it
>>
>>726676022
>being this uninformed about internet privacy laws

You're literally braindead if you don't realize how this is a huge change
>>
this is the future I voted for.
MAGA
>>
>>726675904
No one cares about your trap threads, op. Relax
>>
>>726677678
Then you are a retard and an Asshole.

Enjoy your turd meal.
>>
>>726675904

This is a good thing. It protects our freedoms from terrorists. There are no many terrorist attacks in russia, this proof works.
>>
File: IMG_0224.jpg (43KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0224.jpg
43KB, 600x600px
>>
https://youtu.be/1J1Ots2AhiY
>>
>>726678611
You sound like you have a lot to hide lol
>>
>>726675904
I'm just gonna take a big shot in the dark here.

that you do not have the number of democrats who voted against it.
>>
File: 1490072730002.jpg (50KB, 540x508px) Image search: [Google]
1490072730002.jpg
50KB, 540x508px
>>726675904
>>
>>726679088

Zero democrats voted for it, all republicans
>>
>>726675904
This picture is so hot
I'm imagining I'm named at a Trump rally, and he's laughing at my penis, pointing out how small I am in front of the jeering crowds, calling me pathetic and it's all i can do to keep from crying and I get painfully hard, shaking from the cold and the embarrassment. My voice is barely above a cracked, pathetic choke as I apologize to Daddy for wasting his time
>>
>>726675904
I honestly don't care. If you use twitter, facebook, or google, you shouldn't care either stupid.
>>
Donald Trump (and Hillary Clinton for that matter) is old enough to remember when Elvis was on the Ed Sullivan show. No joke, do the math.

These old fucks don't even understand the internet much less can they make good decisions about how to regulate it.
>>
>>726679394

Lol so dumb
>>
File: 1482976402690.jpg (67KB, 475x460px) Image search: [Google]
1482976402690.jpg
67KB, 475x460px
>>726675904
>>
>>726675904
#canadian
>>
File: herpderp.jpg (33KB, 488x366px) Image search: [Google]
herpderp.jpg
33KB, 488x366px
>>726675904
If you don't block javascript from facebook, twitter, or google, this shit has already been happening to you.
Every website that has a facebook or twitter like/share button contains javascript from them that track you. It's easy for them to match up ip info with people or residences.
>>
File: 1394212603030.jpg (29KB, 600x540px) Image search: [Google]
1394212603030.jpg
29KB, 600x540px
>>726680576
NOSCRIPT.BMP
>>
holy fuck im so fucked shit I must go to mars or to the moon n live there the rest of my life
>>
What the hell do I care. Nothing illegal on there. If they wanna see what I jerk it to, what music I like, and my /v/ shitposts, so what.

What's good, FBI niggas?
>>
They're outsourcing surveillance and bypassing the 4th amendment via marketing companies.
>>
>>726681222
all well and good until they outlaw porn, then what are you going do?
>>
File: You gonna Get.jpg (14KB, 233x300px) Image search: [Google]
You gonna Get.jpg
14KB, 233x300px
>>726681932
>then what are you going do?
the only thing left to do
>>
>>726678802
look up moscow theatre gas
>>
>>726679443
so are the people who invented the internet... just saying.

also, so am I, and i am here and I suspect have more knowledge about computers, networks and the net (anyone remember Gopher?) than most people under thirty...
>>
>>726677436
No faggot. Have you been reading WikiLeaks the Fed has had a microscope up your asshole for years. Difference is that you liked it.
>>
>>726679179
Such faggotry. Why don't you put world population in there. It would make your liberal tears waterfall graph look better.
>>
>>726682391
he's a retarded millenial who thinks old people cant into tech as tech is a magical thing that only children can comprehend.
>>
>>726682391
Why are you such a passive-aggressive "just saying" faggot. Kill yourself... just saying.
>>
>>726675904
Realistically, if they really wanted to know what im doing on the internet, they will find a way to figure out what im doing
>>
>>726675904
>having your ISP look through all your internet activity
Don't they already do that? Isn't that how/why people keep getting letters from lawyers about downloading music and movies?
>>
>>726682622
Meh, it's like voting between ball cancer and throat cancer.
>>
>>726683453
Throat cancer team won!! yay

>people that literally put party before country
>>
>>726683453
>muh turd or a douche
It's dumbfucks like you who are the reason why the most dangerous candidate in US history is now POTUS.
>duuuh they're all the same
>>
>>726675904

Your ISP has already been doing that for many years. Haven't you ever noticed that when you search for something, ads with the same thing suddenly appear on every site you visit?
>>
>>726675904
They already DO.
>>
>>726679179
Just as in every election ever, the winner was the person to receive the most votes of any single candidate.
"Other" includes all of Hillary's votes, plus all the votes for all the other candidates.
>>
>>726684034
>just as in every election ever, the winner was the person to receive the most votes of any single candidate
Are you retarded? He lost the popular vote by around 3 million votes.
>>
>>726684276
Electoral votes are the more important ones anyways
>>
>>726677436
Yeah but its not just trump you dumb fuck. Obama did similar shit. Same shit different asshole.

Its a huge issue i agree but dont be a leftist "hillary wouldnt ever do this. Obama was a savior"

Now i know you never mentioned any of this but i just felt the need to clerify this.
>>
>>726683685

>most dangerous candidate in US history

Isn't Hillary the one that wanted to start a war with Russia? I'd rather get someone that triggers SJWs and talks shit on Twitter than someone who's going to get me conscripted to die freezing in some fucking tundra or get us nuked
>>
>>726684498
Yeah... no shit

>>726684607
Stop talking out of your ass. Clinton did not want """a war""" with Russia, and I'm pretty sure congress would not have even entertained the idea if she introduced it without a pretty good reason.

I get it, you'd rather have a pathological liar with a distinct authoritarian style who was probably colluding with one of the most corrupt authoritarian regimes on the planet in office... 'cause butthurt libs huhuhuh

Stay dumb.
>>
>>726684859
>I get it, you'd rather have a pathological liar with a distinct authoritarian style who was probably colluding with one of the most corrupt authoritarian regimes on the planet in office... 'cause butthurt libs huhuhuh
>Doesn't mention that the alternative would've been pretty much more of the same, except Hillary would have pandered a lot harder to degenerate trannies, faggots, mexicos, and sandniggers

kek stay mad
>>
>>726684972
>Doesn't mention that the alternative would've been pretty much more of the same
Low energy argument, Trumpette
>>
>>726684515
Yeah, but Trump was gonna "drain the Swamp" and was for the "average Joe" and "told it like it was" and "said what he meant". How's it feel to now know he's not only just like every other politician POS, he's WORSE.
>>
>>726685028
>I get it, you'd rather have a pathological liar with a distinct authoritarian style who was probably colluding with one of the most corrupt authoritarian regimes on the planet in office
>implying that citing largely unsubstantiated claims are an argument

When people like you try to claim that Trump is some authoritarian nazi because he doesn't want illegals or people from a short list of countries coming in, you sound just as bad as the people who said that Obama was trying to abolish the second amendment so he could put us all in FEMA camps when he was trying to institute stricter gun control laws.
>>
File: 1459998413412.png (595KB, 600x597px) Image search: [Google]
1459998413412.png
595KB, 600x597px
>>726683334
>>
>>726685045
Everyone knew he wasn't for internet privacy/neutrality. Hillary wasn't either so it never really came in as a major factor of either of their campaigns.

You're really grasping for straws here
>>
>>726685181
>when people like you try to claim that Trump is some authoritarian nazi

>trying his best to delegitimize all critics, notably the press
>rarely presents tangible arguments to refute "fake news"
>lies about his enemies and regarding things that don't go his way
>predicates his campaign on getting rid of illegal immigrants like it's the main fucking issue we face (it's not). Oh, and don't forget to throw in the promise to ban Muslims -- sound a bit like anyone here?
>can't stand being challenged on anything

Yeah... it's not the same as the conspiritarded Republicans and their paranoia about the Dems "tekkin all their guuunz".

The only reason Trump is not like Hitler is because we have checks and balances.
>>
>>726685523

>predicates his campaign on getting rid of illegal immigrants like it's the main fucking issue we face (it's not).
Didn't Obama spend the better part of one of his terms fighting for "Marriage Equality?" You're aware that gays make up like 3% of the country, and only a fraction of that 3% is interested in actually getting married. Turns out that gays, not too big on that whole monogamy thing. At best, gay marriage is a thing that affects less than two percent of the country, yet it was a huge issue for the Obama administration. Looks like Trump's not the only one who sensationalizes issues that affect an objectively small portion of the population for votes.

>Oh, and don't forget to throw in the promise to ban Muslims -- sound a bit like anyone here?
>Trump comes out with his "Muslim Ban"
>Doesn't ban Indonesia, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, or even most of the countries with the top 10 muslim populations in the world, only bans like, two.
Donald Trump really sucks at banning Muslims, maybe he doesn't have access to Wikipedia? Or maybe, just maybe, he just wants to ban some countries known to have a disproportionately high percentage of radical Muslim terrorists until we can get better vetting in place? Kinda like that Syria place? You might've heard of that place lately. Lots of explosions, people getting their heads cut off for not following a certain religion? Bad place. Bigly.
>>
>>726675904

Fuck freedom, I want big government to make me feel safe.
>>
>>726686047
Wrong, immigration faces the majority of the population. That's why he won, retard.
>>
>>726684498

Well yeah, fuck what the people want.
>>
>>726686186
Well, if we look at the numbers, there's about as many illegal immigrants in America as there are gay people. So I felt that it was a fair comparison.

Regardless, I can't tell if you're on my side or not, I'm arguing for Trump here.
>>
>>726686047
>didn't Obama spend the better part of one of his terms fighting for "Marriage Equality?
... no. Although I suppose you'd have to define "the better part".

>Or maybe, just maybe, he just wants to ban some countries known to have a disproportionately high percentage of radical Muslim terrorists until we can get better vetting in place
No, he's just settling on it as a half-assed attempt at following through on a campaign promise. It's also a superficial way for this administration to project """"""strength""""""

1. Not a single US citizen had been killed in a terrorist attack from a citizen of any of those countries since 1975
2. Our biggest concern is homegrown terrorism, and that's been the case for a long time now.
3. What do Muslims do when they feel their stupid religion is under attack? Note: we have 3 million Muslim citizens.
>>
>>726686245
That guy is an idiot, and so are you for not understanding the difference between capitalizing on people's xenophobic tendencies (Trump) and pressing an issue as innocuous as giving homos the right to get a few tax breaks and have some meaningless titles.
>>
>>726675904
Trump is a corporate whore, just like Hillary. Saw it coming
>>
>>726675904
The rule you're whining about never took effect. So this literally changes nothing.

Stupid assholes need something to complain about so they feel aggrieved.
>>
>>726686532
>missing the point
Nobody said that there wasn't a difference between the issues, and you're a moron for jumping to that conclusion. The point was that both people in question used a relatively minor issue that affects people in the very low single-digits of the population to incite emotional responses and make themselves look like heroes.

Obama did it with the gays, and everyone thought he was the greatest for it. Trump did it with the Mexicos, and about just as many people thought the same.

Taking shitty minor issues and blowing them way out of proportion to help your image is what politicians, do. Trump is no exception, and acting like Trump is the one to invent that is fucking moronic.
>>
>>726686787
>Taking shitty minor issues and blowing them way out of proportion to help your image is what politicians, do
You mocked the liberals who point out similarities between Trump and Hitler, I gave you a list of reasons why it's not all that outlandish, and now you're moving the goalposts. You should stop being so intellectually dishonest.

Its also important to note that not only was Trump making that a focal point of his campaign, but he targeted the groups in a highly unscrupulous fashion.
>>
>>726687093
Ok

>trying his best to delegitimize all critics, notably the press
The point has been made time and again by Trump defenders that the liberal press goes out of its way to treat Trump unfairly and paint him as a villain even when he hasn't done anything particularly villainous. We can take the supposed "Muslim Ban" which I mentioned earlier and point out that:

A. it wasn't a ban on Muslims specifically, regardless of what he said previously. We can already establish that there's a lot of things that Trump said to be sensational in his campaign but has stepped back and taken a more moderate stance on for one reason or another
B. It was only for 100 days or so, so that the US could assess the vetting procedures for refugees coming from those particular places because, you know, ISIS.
C. While not similar on paper to a revetting Obama did in 2011 for six months for iraqi refugees, in practical terms, it did the same shit. People had to be revetted and scrutinized more extensively which slowed their process to get into the country significantly. Trump wanted to make sure that the processes we had in place were good to begin with.

>b-but he's just trying to make it look like he's fulfilling his campaign promises by delivering on a more moderate form of his initial promise, if he could just ban muslims, he could!
And if Obama could've made guns illegal with his crocodile tears, he would've done that, too. Like you mentioned, Checks and balances. Trump is not the only President who would fuck up this country if he had absolute power. In fact, I'm willing to bet that there's been about 44 of those in history before him. Republican, Democrat, or otherwise. Also, doesn't matter. As we've found out for the last two hundred or so fucking years, Presidents say a ton of shit during their campaigns that they can't fully deliver on to get votes. Trump voters understood this from the get-go we just liked him better than Hillary.

cont
>>
>>726687093
cont.

>rarely presents tangible arguments to refute "fake news"
Like what? Like I stated before, the press goes out of its way to present facts in a way that makes Donald Trump look like the villain, even when he hasn't fucking done anything. Sure, Fox news hated Obama, but the shit-flinging toward Trump is on a whole new level, and for what? It started even before he was sworn into office.

Give me some examples, and I'm sure I'll be able to find the bullshit somewhere with a five second google search. And please give me something more substantial than
>waaah trump said something mean on tweeter

>lies about his enemies and regarding things that don't go his way
Hit me with some sources, my man. Also, at the risk of being accused of "moving the goalpost" are you implying that Trump doing this is out of the norm by any means? Didn't we just finish dealing with that stupid Trump getting pissed on by russian hookers thing? What about the "Russia rigged the election" thing where there were so little facts to present that the investigating agencies declined to go before the senate and make a statement? Despite Obongo losing his mind and borderline threatening war on Russia for these unsubstantiated claims?
>>
File: RIP net neutrality.jpg (24KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]
RIP net neutrality.jpg
24KB, 640x640px
thank Trump's handpicked currynigger for this
>>
>>726682557
cite that claim
>>
>>726687093
And finally,
>can't stand being challenged on anything
..Except the promises that he's backed down on from his campaign and proposed instead more moderate solutions?

I mean again, give me something specific that you're talking about.
>>
>>726688054
"Obama wiretapped me"

dude fucking lies and you like it
>>
File: 1477487600342.jpg (13KB, 344x315px) Image search: [Google]
1477487600342.jpg
13KB, 344x315px
>>726675904
'cause Bush and Obama never gave the national surveillance agency absolute power and impunity to peer into everybody's private correspondences and internet activity prior

I don't excuse it being done by anybody, but the sad shit is that both parties' shitwit constituencies couldn't care less about unconstitutional domestic spying overall, and if ever they did, it was only whenever the opponents' side were the ones enacting these policies and carrying out such statist overreach

Goddamn, I fucken loathe partisan loyalists/opportunists, bunch of tribalistic cognitive contortionists, selectively outraged idiots, and above all else, statists, ultimately, all of them
>>
>>726688117

Have you been living under a rock?
https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/
>>
>>726688190
that doesn't prove your claim. It's like saying that since I have a gun, a tool designed to kill, that I am a killer. What are you, some kind of ultra-lib faggot?
>>
>>726675904
And there was any choice on the matter in first place?
>>
>>726688156
I'll take "False Equivalencies" for $500, Alex
>>
>>726688156
russian shill am keking at you're life rite now how mulch our you getting payed to post this stupid dribble?
>>
>>726688439
Everyone was cool with expanding the powers of the executive branch and letting him do whatever the fuck they wanted under Obama

But now that Trump's coming for the mexicos, mudlimes, and trannies, it's a problem :^)
>>
>>726688595
that's not the point of the article in question faggot and you know it.
>>
Conservatives hate the popular vote, anyway, because their last Republican president, George W. Bush, also lost the popular vote, but still won the election, thanks to a flawed, rigged electoral college. The same applies with their new leader, tRump, he lost the popular vote, but won through the electoral votes needed. The popular vote tells you just how many people choose NOT to vote for Republicans, the party that gets NOTHING done.
>>
>>726688663

>how many people
Yeah, lucky for us it's the states the vote, not the individual people.
>>
>>726687715
>goes out of its way to treat Trump unfairly and paint him as a villain even when he hasn't done anything particularly villainous
>hasn't done anything particularly villainous
That's debatable. However, my point still stands that when Trump and his Trumpettes cry about "fake news", they're rarely able to cite examples that support their claims (at least examples that aren't chock-full of logical fallacies and half-truths).

>it wasn't a ban on Muslims specifically
I realize that. Nevertheless, you're moving the goalposts again. And you can bet your ass that if he could get away with a Muslim ban, it would be a Muslim ban, but those pesky checks and balances tend to get in the way.

>it was only for 100 days
Oh right, they definitely need those a hundred days for... wait... why do they need 100 days??
>Trump wanted to make sure that the processes we had in place were good to begin with
Ooooo yeah, I call bullshit. It's only adding fuel to the fire, and people are really dumb for not understanding why.

>And if Obama could've made guns illegal with his crocodile tears
You're kind of a cunt, huh? In all fairness, yeah, he probably would have b& assault weapons.

>Trump voters understood this from the get-go we just liked him better than Hillary
Trump voters don't understand much at all, pal. Don't flatter yourself

>Give me some examples, and I'm sure I'll be able to find the bullshit
He has called CNN "fake news" for simply criticizing him. I think I'll need a source from you on that one. Can you tell me why CNN is fake news? Make sure you provide ample sources, anon.

>lies about enemies and things not going his way
1. Obama ordering wiretaps
2. 3-5 million illegal voters
No evidence. There never will be. Never was. Lies.
>>
>>726675904
FYI....we never actually had these rules in effect.
So...essentially...things will just remain the same.
>>
>>726688749
russian shill faggot, the change is that they will explicitly be allowed to sell our browsing history
>>
File: bernie mccain.jpg (102KB, 992x744px) Image search: [Google]
bernie mccain.jpg
102KB, 992x744px
It's so horrible that now ISPs will no longer have to buy your browser history from Google or Facebook, who already have and do indeed sell it.

You pathetic losers.
>>
>>726688875
and you want it codified in law that the ISPs can do it?
>>
>>726688875
Bernie Mac
>>
File: iDE55Cs.gif (1MB, 352x264px) Image search: [Google]
iDE55Cs.gif
1MB, 352x264px
>>726688946

I want to educate people to the fact that you work for Google.
>>
>>726687715
>>726688054
Btw, if you're going to respond to >>726688744, I'd appreciate it if you'd be a bit less verbose. I really don't feel like reading another essay.
>>
>>726675904

O come now, OP...Do you really still suppose the Internet can still be salvaged at this late hour?

tsk tsk tsk

I don't know why I expected better.
>>
>>726689096
no I work for Abbott, so don't trust me on prescription drugs.

And you do want it codified in law then? You didn't dispute my point, being the faggot that you are.
>>
>>726684607
War with Russia! BWAHAHAHA!!!! See this pic.
>>
>>726680257
I watched CNN once too.
>>
>>726689252

>Abbottt

What, like the Pharma giant?
>>
>>726689306
did I fucking stutter?
>>
>>726689295

Where is your pic?
>>
>>726681222
Make 4chan illegal.
Make America great again.
>>
>>726689339

I bet you're the janitor.
>>
>>726689106

Kek, if you're going to respond to my posts, I'd appreciate it if you responded to all of my points, not just the ones you feel like attacking. I do you the courtesy of attacking your points in succession, doing my best to ignore as few of yours as possible. If you're going to cherry pick lines from my post, why are you even arguing?

The only responses you had to contradict anything I said are:
>That's debatable
>you're moving the goalposts (because you pointed at Trump's "Muslim ban" for reasons why he's Hitler, and I told you why it's not a Muslim ban, also various regimes throughout history, including the third reich had strict gun control laws, does this also make Obama Hitler because we can draw one thin, obscure line between their policies?)
>I call bullshit (???)
>assorted ad hominem attacks

You criticize Trump supporters for not being able to cite examples to support their claims, but you do the same shit.

kys
>>
>>726681222
so you basically forfeit your right to privacy then and expect the rest of us to do the same.

Fuck off Vladimir.
>>
File: 1490197871322.jpg (38KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]
1490197871322.jpg
38KB, 500x375px
boot-licking, statist cux to the left, boot-licking statist cux to the right
I see no solace from this shit in sight
>>
>>726689405
close, research scientist, so I clean up the fucking messes marketing makes.

And why are you so interested in my career Vladimir?
>>
>>726689352

No need. Soon the government will have the power to simply seize its domain name and servers, without warrant, all in the name of copyright infringement.
>>
>>726689494
exactly like Republican voters want
>>
File: cute-adorable-kittens-0022.jpg (97KB, 697x645px) Image search: [Google]
cute-adorable-kittens-0022.jpg
97KB, 697x645px
>>726675904
>he thinks internet privacy is real thing that exists in Gregorian calendar year 2017

Should we tell him?
>>
>>726689521
Lol

What's it like to be so consumed with hatred and butthurt? Does it keep you warm?
>>
>>726689453

There is nowhere left to run. You will Hail Corporate with the rest of us.
>>
>>726689453
another false equivalency peddler from russia, fuck off.

The right wing is trying to make it explicitly legal for companies to sniff through our private data without restriction while the left was trying to prevent exactly that.
>>
File: 1490095215378.jpg (49KB, 640x385px) Image search: [Google]
1490095215378.jpg
49KB, 640x385px
>>726689577
>can't refute me
>>
File: Propaganda23.jpg (22KB, 440x270px) Image search: [Google]
Propaganda23.jpg
22KB, 440x270px
>>726678802
>>726678901
>>726679243
>>726679394
>>726680362
>>726681222


Russian shills ITT.
>>
>>726689419

Nonono....What he "expects" matters as much as what you "expect". It doesn't. Not at all. You will give up your right to privacy, or you will not use the internet. Good luck being a part of society in the future without internet access.
>>
File: truth.jpg (50KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]
truth.jpg
50KB, 540x540px
>>726675904
>>
>>726689469

>research scientist

Nah. Not on 4chan you're not. Stop lying. No successful person in his right mind would come to /b/ .
>>
File: tryharderbitch.jpg (91KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]
tryharderbitch.jpg
91KB, 600x450px
>>726689676
>>
>>726689611
>our private data

Nigger, do you even know how the Internet works?

>no, I'm just a cum guzzling faggot who wants to pretend this is the worst thing ever so I can shit on Republicans and feel good about myself

Whatever you're whining about being found and kept already belongs to the NSA. Thanks to Obama. And this is.no longer secret.

Where's your butthurt about that?
>>
>>726689521

No, pretty much everyone but the Progressives let this happen. You're all shit, dearie.
>>
>>726689413
>because you pointed at Trump's "Muslim ban" for reasons why he's Hitler, and I told you why it's not a Muslim ban, also various regimes throughout history
Not the temporary ban on the 7 countries, but rather his rhetoric about a ban on Muslims during the campaign. Try to keep up.

>I call bullshit (??????.???)
Yeah, I think it was a false premise, and I believe it would have done more harm than good. You do realize we can only speculate about most of this shit, right?

>assorted ad hominem attacks
See: 4chan. For future reference, you only make yourself seem like a whiny piss-pants when you point out ad hominem fallacies.

I did cite examples, and you failed to address a single one of them. Btw, im pretty sure I've touched on every one of your weak points.
>>
>>726689785
>no true scotsman
logical fallacies, this early in the morning?
>>
>>726689611
>Russia

Fucking lol

Pathetic.
>>
>>726675904
>emperor trump

1) Senate
2) the rule was never in effect. Nothing has been changed at all.

KYS.
>>
>>726689842
fuck off vlad, we know you're shilling. Obama's NSA activities aren't the same issue (prove me wrong) and his FCC was specifically setting up to prevent this kind of thing from happening (which you would know if you'd actually READ the article)
>>
>>726689611

Once again, only a very narrow segment of the political spectrum fulfilled the requirements of both knowing what the hell was going on and seeing it as a really bad idea. The rest of you let it happen and bitched about it on Facebook.
>>
File: 1487441333212.gif (73KB, 129x150px) Image search: [Google]
1487441333212.gif
73KB, 129x150px
>>726689873
>still can't refute it
>>
>>726689652

And people are evidently stupid enough to fall for it. You can lead a horse to water, Anon. But you sure as fuck cannot make it drink. There's no helping them.
>>
The world will be a better place after that pussy Putin and his shithole nation are wiped off the map.

Can't happen soon enough, all those faggots dead.
>>
>>726689950
and you think that means it's now OK for the Republicans to explicitly gut any expectation or right to privacy? Fucking Russians, you guys make me sick.
>>
>>726675904
This has been happening for a while, the only difference is the tards who support this happening because it falls under their candidates presidential term.
>>
>>726675904
OP seems to have misunderstood the article in fact more like making people feel a little panic when they see it.... if you like getting baited that is.
>>
>>726689823

>incorrectly using the term strawman

Yeah, I'm kinda glad you're gonna burn with the rest of us. Cheerful, even.
>>
>>726690103
>perfect use of strawman
oh look, the child is learning nihilism
>>
>>726689863

Name one fucking thing a successful research scientist at Abbott fucking Pharmaceuticals would visit /b/ for. Go ahead. I'll wait.
>>
>>726689652
>you're not having a bitchfit online because you're ugly and feel powerless like me??
>russian propaganda
Kill yourself you fucking beta faggot
>>
>>726677436
you don't know the definition of literally.
You are literally a degenerate.
>>
>>726690190
>lol names a division that doesn't exist
preaching truth to faggots like you
>>
>>726689932

His being a Russian mercenary shill is about equal with you being a DNC shill at this point, I'd say.
>>
>>726685045
Please elaborate on exactly how he's worse.
>>
>>726675904
What's ICANN? Who's Obama?

Damn these fucking CIA indoctrination threads, cancerous faggots. For thosewho don't know yet, go visit wikileaks already you ignorant scum.
>>
>>726690237
nobody's paying me, unlike you and him
>>
>>726675904
Welp, I hope my provider likes stay porn, shit posts on 4chan, mindless drivel on Facebook, even more pathetic shit posting on Twitter, lesbian porn, lollies, and I'll, cause they're going to get a good dose of it.
>>
Putin is a faggot.
>>
>>726690049

Next you'll be telling me I work on the Red Oktober.
>>
>>726690290
So Trump is the bottom then?
>>
>>726690048

Who's gonna do it? I'm sure as fuck not spilling my guts out on the Russian tundra. Fuck that shit.
>>
The sooner people realize that every conservative is a TRAITOR to their nation -- every nation -- the sooner we can get to the Final Solution of them. We can start with pedo-Trump.
>>
>>726681932
According to Habeus Corpus, my stash would be grandfathered in
>>
>>726690288
*Scat porn
>>
>>726690144

How was that in any way a good use of strawman?
>>
>>726690235

OK, so you were lying. Got it.
>>
>>726688864
did you...did you not read the law? like at all?

All it basically says it that the FCC rules instilled are dead. And then prevents the FCC from making similar.
>>
>>726690324
Trump is a shitfelching fuckboy
>>
>>726690283

Sure they're not, shill.

(Can I play too?)
>>
>>726690343
Germ warfare, those faggots don't practice sanitation like we civilized people do.
>>
wii redscare 3.0 now
>>
>>726675904
Assuming you had privacy before...

Get a load of this fuckin guy.
>>
>>726690238

I'm not him, but to me he's worse because he's legit dumb. Like, not "playing dumb" or "deceptively stupid" or what-have-you, like his supporters have him pegged...

The man actually is dumber than a sack of fucking doorknobs. To me, that's worse. But, hey, to you it might not be. I guess it depends on what qualities you value once you come to terms with having to chose between yet another two shitbags.
>>
>>726690607
Pretty much.
Get ready for the committees, the lists, the defamation stories...(I feel like some of these are already in existence.)
>>
more predictable political propaganda toobeeonnest
>>
>>726690288

They're certainly going to like broadcasting your preferences and activities indiscriminately to the four fucking corners of the earth, if that's what you mean.

They're gonna find that absolutely delectable.
>>
>>726681932
Re-allocate brain power from doing more productive things and utilize my imagination again like the good old days, or the dark times depending on how you look at it. Still works tho.
>>
>>726690649
Have to disagree with this. His stupidity also is supported by a lack of patience. The ACA reform bill may die today, because he just doesn't want to deal with it anymore. He's going to try and force a vote, without knowing the outcome... if it fails, he'll blame Congress and move on to something else.
>>
>>726690345

Unfortunately, they think you're the same. So, uh....Any ETA when we're gonna settle that little discrepancy? Ellen's on in a half hour.

I never miss an episode. :x
>>
>>726690470
It's all about the deregulation with these fags. They don't realize that even businesses need checks and balances. I work for a Fortune 50 company and believe me, we NEED regulations in place. Some of the most unscrupulous people I've ever met, and that's saying a lot for someone shitposting on a vietnamese crocheting forum.
>>
>>726690839
I love it when she scurrs ppl :-3
>>
>>726690368

They'll just find a way to drag Lincoln suspending habeus corpus in through semantic word torture and arrest you anyway.
>>
>"Bu-buht this WON'T CHANGE ANYTHING"

Yes it will and this is a fucking disaster for internet use and only makes it easier for the rich 1% to get more money over our backs once again.

Isp sells your private data

Isp = ALL YOUR INTERNET USAGE not just google or facebook
>>
>>726690907
Good luck with that

>9proxies.exe
>>
>>726690527

That'd just kill everybody. I didn't like The Stand that much, sorry.
>>
>>726690847
I can't agree enough with this.
>>
>>726690955
Develop a bioweapon that only targets those degenerate faggots.
>>
>>726690684

Terrorist is the new communist.
>>
>>726690847
Sure... but its also not the 'explicitly allow' like this idiot claims. He's acting like they are passing a bill that says 'Companies can sell all your info now, no consequences!!!!'.

When instead all it does is take a set of rules... passed October 2016 (5-6 months ago) that said they can't sell your information, and follow it with "Nope, the FCC can't make that rule."

VERY big difference, and literally nothing will be different from what i was since before October 2016.. Hell, nothing will be different from the way it is now. Because, the rules never took effect.
>>
>>726684859

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjUOlELv7ck
>>
>>726690781

I agree, he's impatient too. So....What part of my post did you take issue with?
>>
>billions of people will now see my shitposting

PRAISE KEK
>>
>>726679232
Then there wouldn't be enough votes to pass it, dumbshit.
>>
>>726690847

Unfortunately, we are past the point of no return. Corporations have been deregulated so much they are very close to challenging the government itself for supremacy to rule. This will not end without bloodshed.
>>
>>726691096
That his stupidity will be a detriment to those that dislike his views, rather than a boon.
>>
>>726691051
I'll agree with your take on the FCC issue. I was expanding the scope to the general tendency of this administration to deregulate and destroy government watchdog agencies. I stand by my statement as it relates to that.
>>
>>726690907

The internet you're on now is a lost cause. I can't believe you can't see how coopted it already is.
>>
>>726689842
>>726689842

Hey cunt, can YOU explain the article?
because im pretty fucking sure I read ISP's changing the definition for sensitive data to advertisers.

(different source, I checked google news to check if this was a troll.)


"With that data, Internet providers would like to sell targeted advertising or even share that information with third-party marketers. But the FCC's regulations place certain limits on the type of data Internet providers can share and under what circumstances. Under the rules, consumers may forbid their providers from sharing what the FCC deems “sensitive” information, such as app usage history and mobile location data"
>>
>>726690907
LOL I remember the same scare about the radio and TV

Nothing came of it, though, now kys
>>
>>726691035

We don't have the genetic capabilities to be that selective, sorry. You're literally asking for shit that hasn't been invented yet.
>>
>>726691193

Oh, OK. Well, while I disagree with you, I can't say that there isn't a certain logic to your argument. Time will tell, I suppose.
>>
>>726675904

We never had internet privacy you fucking degenerate.
>>
File: trump_lies1490116241668.jpg (165KB, 696x960px) Image search: [Google]
trump_lies1490116241668.jpg
165KB, 696x960px
Fuck little donnie
>>
>>726691341
You shill fuck? I dont remember that. You mean when there werent ADS, AND THEN wew now they're the norm? YEAH. THAT FAMILIAR.
now, u wont even need GOOGLE ads to let you know you're getting stalked at what you look at. The Internet will do that for you :^)
>>
>>726691550
>>726691550
You're a fucking idiot, read the article.
>>
>>726691571

See, you could've done so much more to dismantle his argument than what you did in your post.

But you didn't, because you're actually just as dumb as he is.
>>
>>726684515
>Now i know you never mentioned any of this but i just felt the need to clerify this
>implying
Why is this board filled with such dumbfucks anymore? Every conversation has to veer off into a snowflake's political identity
>>
>>726691916

Because all the smart and/or proactive people got tired of being banned. 4chan moderation is fucking cancer.
>>
File: hurr_durr.jpg (31KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
hurr_durr.jpg
31KB, 500x500px
>>726691133
Republicans have a majority in both the House and Senate, and they can pass any bill where all of them vote yes.

Go back to school, nigger.
>>
>>726692171

An accurate assessment. That's why this election was such a big deal.
>>
>>726691787
Right, because he had an arguement.

ReMEMBER WHEN IT WAS LIKE THIS? NO? see.

Can you weigh in Socrates or troll from the side anon? you're as dumb as both rocks
>>
>>726675904
>Enjoy having your ISP look through all your internet activity

The only thing they're going to see is porn and /b/, so I think I'm good. Besides, did you really think your isp doesn't spy on you already?
>>
>>726692276
Any non idiot nigger has known that since election day the second the republicans threw the word mandate around.
>>
>>726692473
Another dumb fuck. it's selling information jesus.
IMAGINE, YOU DONT GO ON GOOGLE, BUT YOU GET GOOGLE ADS SPONDERED BY [INSERT ISP ADS] AND THEY DONT NEED YOUR SEARCHES.

Seriously. I mean I know it "opens" the AD market to other companies but your ISP can sell ALL traffic thats relevant to an ad company? this isn't " oh anon they see u browser Chan", it's them being able to sell ads to you because they KNOW you visit 4chan form the second you connect to a router.
>>
>theyre selling your data
>you get nothing for it
>"haha i dont care"

good job 4chan. good job.
>>
>>726692616
>not having adblock
>>
>>726683714
thats... its called cookies. and its google adsense doing that, not ur fucking ISP. holy shit for elite internet hackers on steroids you guys sure dont understand anything internet related.
>>
>>726688054
/thread
>>
>>726692642
Well youre running Windows. Thats far worse
>>
>>726678802
Also prevents Tiger attacks. Have not been attacked by tigers.
>>
>>726692642
Seriously this.

Been here since 07. Really really don't understand why this website insists on being edgy and le meme face all the time.

Donald Trump has sucked cock from the very beginning. I have no idea why 4chanot supported him other than thinking it's fun to troll.

Old /b/ and anon would have supported Bernie sanders.

Bracing for (you)'s and retarded "yeah but SHILLARY!"

Fuck you. Everyone hated hill dog because of her :muh emails: scandal which was her using a private email with NOT YET classified information.

DONALD TRUMP USES A PRIVATE BLACKBERRY. what the fuck is up with you fat neckbeards. Seriously.

Mcdonalds was correct. Tiny hands. Obama was better.
>>
>>
>>726693212

12 years of /b/.

berniebro. can confirm.
>>
>>726692717
Because all hax0rs left years ago with influx of stormfront newfags
>>
>>726693212
its just the vocal minority who post here. most of us grew up and went to reddit because this >>726693365 cant be associated with this website anymore thanks to /pol/ idiots making it their racist echo chamber
>>
>>726693212
>Old /b/ and anon would have supported Bernie sanders.

This. The trouble started when this shithole went international mainstream, and the slavs got in.
>>
>>726693433
>>726693273


Throughout the campaign I became convinced a significant portion of Trump posters were paid Russians.


I honestly might not have been that car off.
>>
File: trump_shill1487513109912.jpg (113KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
trump_shill1487513109912.jpg
113KB, 800x600px
>>726693554
>>
>>726693212
Been here almost that long, and can also confirm
>>
File: mcdonalds.png (274KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]
mcdonalds.png
274KB, 800x450px
>>726693212
>Mcdonalds was correct. Tiny hands. Obama was better.
lol
>>
>>726693554
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/nov/06/troll-armies-social-media-trump-russian

>inb4 "muh fake news hurr". That's exactly what these groups make you say
>>
>>726693894
Lmao. My sides
>>
>>726692420

You could've pointed out that, as an interactive (rather than passive) medium, the internet really isn't directly comparable to TV or the radio. But nooooo....
>>
>>726692474

No, actually. You'd be surprised how many still have no clue how this is different than any other election cycle.

You underestimate the stupidity of your average American vis a vis their own goddamned government.
>>
>>726693212
>>726693273
>>726693365
>>726693433
>>726693537

Once again, 4chan killed 4chan. The higher ups here are absolute fucking cancer in a bottle for having any type of meaningful interaction.

You can't even blame Hiro exclusively: m00t laid a lot of the foundations for this.
>>
>>726693554

Surely you never thought otherwise?
>>
>>726694908
>>726694908
Why would you blame either of them? It's just another idealistic experiment that turns out the same result, like the hippy communes. This is the logical conclusion of rampant free speech and anonymity.
>>
>>726695924

m00t never set out to perform any experiment. He just wanted a clone of 2chan to discuss weeb shit on. He was horrified when he finally figured out he'd created something more.

I believe it weighed on him so much he finally set out to cripple his own creation, with the hope it would never rise again.
>>
>>726690190

It's pretty good for porn when we get PAWG threads.
>>
>>726688259
"Give me a source trumpette nerd (haha I got him there)". Oh shit, he gave me the truth! Fuck you nerd, hillary was better, Trump is an orange fuckhead.

You sure showed us mate.
>>
File: vu0PP6UH.gif (175KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]
vu0PP6UH.gif
175KB, 800x450px
>>
>>726685356
Could we stop comparing Trump and Hillary? That's over and done. This is about our right to privacy. You shouldn't be okay with it regardless of who is taking it, and it doesn't help the situation to shill for Trump.

And yes, I know I'm replying to a post from 3 hours ago. The point is the same, several in this thread are arguing this.
>>
i remember when the internet didn't give a fuck who the president was.

the lot of you sound like you're practicing for your high school mock government.
>>
Shoulda done this 40 years ago
>>
File: IMG_7217.jpg (63KB, 740x437px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_7217.jpg
63KB, 740x437px
>>726697618
Agreed. Holy shit everyone knows she lost, and dems abandoned her even faster than the repubs wanted to let go. Stop getting the issue twisted. Trump is a smokescreen for some truly troubling things going on.
>>
>>726688259
You're an idiot the only difference now is they're public about it. You seriously are fucking retarded to think governments and ISPs havent been digging into our stuff for the past 10 years minimum. People get warnings for piracy. Obviously they know where we're going to download stuff. If you do anything weird on the Internet then they see it. Fuck off
Thread posts: 227
Thread images: 27


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.