So Loli lovers, how can Shade post artwork or real children?

>>726383678
>applying human rights to images
>of fictional characters

>>726385008
>>726383678
op has a point tho, I've always wondered how he's gotten away with this shit. It feels like even tho it would be technically legal depending on where he is situated that SJW cucks would still try to shut him down, especially with his "subtle" positive references to the alt-right.

>>726385469
>>726383678
because it's just a drawing, son

>>726383678
>it's illegal as fuck
No it is not. I promise you it is not. That is false.

>>726383678
I can draw someone robbing a bank. That's not illegal.
I do not understand your logic

>>726385658
>Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.

>Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.

Go read a book nigger

File: 1483247875751.jpg (14KB, 480x380px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x380px

>>726385008
i think because in some places you cant draw real underage girls as cartoon porn, they assume its like that in the USA. USA MOTHER FUCKERS YEAH

>>726385893
>I draw your daughter sucking some niggers cock
Depicting a minor in a sexual manor

File: Considerthefollowing.png (390KB, 898x610px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 898x610px

>>726385469
SJWs dont really roam the internet, they tend to stay in their "saafespaces". Occasionaly stumble accros some stuff over word of mouth and lose their shit but if they really knew what was going on in the rest of the world they would get self diagnosed PTSD just from thinking about it.

How he gets away with it is simple. Drawing something is projection just like it is projection to put a 23 year old porn actor in a school girl outfit and make some schoolgirl fetish porn. No real children or people are hurt in the production of it, even if the chaaracters someone like shad draws are inspired by real people.

>>726385998
>Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor
i can distinguish cartoons from reality, can you?

>>726386019
Shade is in the Us. How does he get away with it?

>>726386072
a drawing is distinguishable from the real human. it's not illegal.

>>726385893
>That's not illegal.
But it would be soon! Promoting violence and sexual content is bad! ZHINK OF THE CHILDRENZ

>>726385998
>indistinguishable from an actual minor

>>726383678
18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children

>>726386159
You just proved my point, its a matter of interpretation. If a case would be taken to court there wouldn't be a judge in the US that wouldnt nail your pedophiliac ass to a cross.

File: pepe is president.png (184KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1024x1024px

PC culture is gonna be end of the US. I tell ya!

>>726385469
>SJWs aren't pro paedo

On what planet?

>>726386431
>If a case would be taken to court there wouldn't be a judge in the US that wouldnt nail your pedophiliac ass to a cross.
you're saying nobody's been taken to court for this stuff and hasn't been let go?
hate to burst your bubble, bud, but it's happened before
maybe try googling something next time before acting like you know what you're talking about

File: 09-100a.jpg (261KB, 2651x3300px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 2651x3300px

>>726383678
Colors and lines are not illegal.
Thoughts are not illegal.
Sexual arousal is not illegal.

Any combination of these things together is not illegal.

Thought control is (used to be) illegal. GFY OP

Sperging out over cartoons: the thread.

>>726386098
Doesn't it just make you want to flood their safespaces with triggering images?

>>726386431
Yo retard, judges have to make decisions by strict and reasonable interpretation of the laws. The defendant chooses whether to have a judge or jury and in criminal cases judges can't just jerk themselves off on the bench like you see in your tv shows.

The only judge who'd even TRY that shit is one stupid enough to not deserve the bench they'd lose from that decision.

File: 1489522219410.jpg (44KB, 480x323px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 480x323px

>>726386599
SJW's were the ones that outlawed fucking children in the first place.

>>726383678
Your understanding of the law is clearly very juvenile. A fictional character, regardless of its likeness to anyone living or dead, is simply fiction. It honestly doesn't matter what the drawing looks like. It's all perfectly legal because the drawing itself is of a character, not of the person it is similar to.

>>726383678

>All characters drawn by Shädman are 18 or older, even if specified otherwise.
Shädbase is for parody purposes only and doesnt actually reflect Shädman's desires or beliefs, the site shouldn't be taken seriously or viewed by anyone.

File: 2016-10-13-little-witch-mercy.jpg (387KB, 950x1343px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 950x1343px

It's not fucking real you gypsy

>>726387087
Fuck, the whole thing should have greentexted. One more time:

>All characters drawn by Shädman are 18 or older, even if specified otherwise. Shädbase is for parody purposes only and doesnt actually reflect Shädman's desires or beliefs, the site shouldn't be taken seriously or viewed by anyone.

>>726386414
Children are defined as real identifiable human beings, not doodles, however precise or well done or resembling someone else.

all an artist has to do is say they are drawing a character. It can look like anyone or anything, however realistic or stylized. It doesn't matter. The law is very clear, and becomes crystal clear when you see actual case law examples.

Nobody gives a shit about fiction, even if it resembles someone real.

File: I'm cia.jpg (61KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1024x576px

>>726386996
>>726386757
>>726386877
>You can't produce, distribute, or possess the images

File: 1437230904563.jpg (76KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 800x800px

>>726387309
Unless muslim and its a picture of mohamed ali

File: 1443090651187.jpg (116KB, 769x798px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 769x798px

>>726387433
Dunno what they got a problem with boxing or something

File: 1471044269352.jpg (62KB, 606x540px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 606x540px

>It's fake dude!
>I just like jerking it to clearly underage, and underdeveloped bodies!

>>726386431
You are clearly uninformed and talking out of your ass. There are entire and well funded organizations devoted to researching this and other erosion of civil liberty extensively for years and I'm happy to tell you that you're wrong.

>>726386925
There was an actual case of a southern judge who used a penis pump during all his court sessions. Even after he was caught they had a real hard time getting rid of him because there is no dis Bar for judges. He kept on using his penis pump in court after he was caught. The court room is a judges private fiefdom

File: 1405599742766.gif (13KB, 300x143px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 300x143px

>>726387562

>>726386599
They flip the fuck out at the mere idea of age gap relationships. You have just submersed yourself in right wing rhetoric painting the other side as total idiots.

>>726387433
No, that's not illegal either. That doesn't' mean some idiot won't take offense, but what we're talking about is the law. It's not illegal, you can depict Muhammad doing whatever and it won't get you in jail.

>>726385469
Cant shut down something thats doing nothing wrong. It can resemble anyone it wants its still legal

File: butthurtflow.jpg (43KB, 494x358px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 494x358px

>>726387682

>>726387635
kek

>>726387649
What a generic and weak response.

>>726385998
*indistinguishable fron an actual minor*
Are you saying you cant tell the difference?

File: 4900417.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>>726388064

>>726387864
You're clearly not paying attention.

I thought the LtCorbis and Keemstars daughter sketches were a bit far, despite it just being sexually subjective. Pornographic content about underage fictional characters is fine by me.

>>726387309
You should actually good a case in Alabama or west Virginia, where they convicted a guy for Simpsons porn drawings.

Shit got real bro.

File: Kek.jpg (24KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 540x540px

So to paraphrase this shit thread...
Its ok to fuck my 13 yo daughters ass
as long as i dont draw a picture of it ?

>>726383678
How can X-23, Lazy Town girl, young Youtube girl, not be full on pedo shit?
Because they's drawings.

>>726386431
Not if you have a lawyer lol. Lets not be retarded OP theres a reason /b/ doesnt ban this shit

>>726388404
Of real children.

>Cop looks at PC
>See loli
What do?

File: mo.png (364KB, 985x1440px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 985x1440px

What if it's Mohammed x Aysha cartoon porn?

>>726388304
Usually in those cases there is actual cp.

They don't convict someone of cp for drawings. That's an obscenity offense, not a cp offense, and it's a world of difference.

>>726388304
I read about the one in West Virginia, and the guy fucked himself over. He took a bad deal in a plea bargain and experts agreed he would not have been convicted in full blown court.

What happened in Alabama, any links?

>>726388683
The only reason cp is illegal is because of concern that it could potentially lead to more children being abused in the future. It may or may not actually be true.

At the end of the day it's all just pixels, like gore or violent video games.

File: 65097fc148b98e8d7e6ecd78c213cfb4.jpg (255KB, 850x840px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 850x840px

>>726383678
loli is legal in plenty of states and counties, silly anon

stfu and post some loli 23

>>726386599
SJW's opinions depend on when it's convenient for them.
Remember how they went apeshit on Pizzagate? There's a fucking reason.

>>726387173
Shadman needs to rename himself to Freckleman or something, seriously.

>>726388683
No, that is incorrect. They are drawings of original fictional characters created by shadman. He may have had some inspiration from a number of sources, specific or otherwise, but that is irrelevant. The fact remains that they are drawings of his characters, regardless of any resemblance to anyone living or dead. That is the nature of fiction.

And that will never change unless the law is ready to dismantle the economic framework of the entire entertainment industry in the US starting with Hollywood all the way to every video game company and book publisher.

>>726386278
>ZHINK OF THE CHILDRENZ
Isn't that what pedos do?

>>726383678
1. He doesn't, those are drawings of his characters
2. Why would it be? They are drawings of his original characters
3. No it isn't, actually. As a matter of actual fact.

File: 334345.png (750KB, 1101x1453px) Image search: [Google]

750KB, 1101x1453px

>>726385008
Second. How much retarded can be people? kek

>>726383678
The law is supposed to be there to weed out the stupid and the dangerous. Shadman is neither, and understands the law, which is why he put fictional character disclaimers.

>>726389910
Ha, yeah dood

>>726383678
Shut up and post more Shad

>>726385998
Why do you know this? Covering your bases!?

File: 147770932239.png (152KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1600x1200px

Now this is a loli abuse thread!

>>726383678
where can I go to see shade's art?

>>726390974
So what, you say that to ever other non shade image?:

File: maxresdefault (2).jpg (92KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1280x720px

OH MY GOD, I used to wonder why everyone hated you guys and wanted to kill you guys. I even defended you all more than a couple of times and put my own neck on the line for you. I'd always say, "Hey they aren't that bad.", "They aren't really hurting anyone., "It's just a harmless phase, they'll grow out of it.", and "It's only images.", but now after viewing this thread you guys have gone too far. I seriously can't believe you guys. It's not just images anymore, everything has a meaning you can't just post these and get away with it. It's not 'just a phase' you guys are sick and broken. You guys ARE hurting people and you really are THAT bad. I can't believe I'm saying this after all this time. In all honesty it really is nothing personal. It's just a mature and logical conclusion that had to be made. All of your actions have consequences and suffice to say, the only punishment that surmounts to your actions is, well, death.

I really wish there was some other way, if it was up to me I honestly don't mind you all, but something has to be done and this isn't my choice. This is the only way, we have to put an end to you

Permanently.

File: 1365090634176871059.png (294KB, 470x470px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 470x470px

>>726392282

File: 1427494803926.jpg (47KB, 500x674px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 500x674px

It is ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE for kids to understand sex. No matter how you say it, they will not and cannot understand it. Its scientifically proven. There is absolutely no way a child can comprehend sex, no way, absolutely none. If you took a child, and make sex easy enough for a fucking retard to understand, that child could not possibly understand it. This is why we teach kids about sex way into highschool, like we should, science backs it up. People who want to have sex with kids are all 1) Serial killer 2) Rapists 3) Psychopaths 4) Gay. All this is proven by science, by rigorous testing and bulletproof studies. Its impossible to be a pedo without being these four things, absolutely impossible. If kids have sex, they will become whores and kill themselves. Not a single person who has been molested has lived past the age of 21. If a person has sex before the age of 18, half of their brain cells die, because of the intense mental strain sex puts on the mind. This, I assure you, is all backed up 100% by scientific studies and science. These are all the reasons pedophilia is NOT OKAY.
I'm 55 and I did all these studies. I assure you they are all very scientific. I knew what I was doing, because I was born into science. Every day of my life I have been living a life of science. Formulas and chemical equations zoom past my eyes when I close them. At night I dream of being an atom, zooming through the universe faster than the speed of light. After years of being in science. I know for a fact, that it has paid off. In raw data, I base my world, a world that is purely of science. For fifty years, I have trekked on the pathway of scientific discoveries, I am science not. And I do my experiments in a way that produces RESULTS. These are the results I got when I experimented with science. I spoke to science and it spoke back. And these are the results. I assure you.

It's not real.

>>726392282
Le copy pasta

>>726392853
Children need sex. They require release like you do but are denied it with a partner who can teach them and guide them through it lovingly. Many young children masturbate for relief-and what does mom and dad do when they find out? Why, they slap the kids hands and tell them to stop or they will go blind! Once again, this only leads to oppressive, damaging GUILT. By age 11, I was a compulsive masturbator & collected hard-core pornographic magazines like HUSTLER! I was VERY sexual and I was asking for it on a regular basis (and never seemed to get it!) and yet society would have believed I was as innocent as can be. This harmed me. If I had only known a pedophile then, I would have been much happier in my childhood! But then again, if I had decided to have sex with a phile adult, they would have been imprisoned and I would have been in therapy for brainwashing to accept my "abuse". But my childhood had a happy ending-fate soon blessed me at 11 and a half with a woman pedophile who sexually educated me! Other kids are more like I was than you maybe would like to admit. Perhaps you were something like this in your own youth and due to guilt you wish not to admit this side of yourself existed. Think back and be honest with yourself-it is ok to be sexual and you are not alone or wrong! Stop feeling guilty about a natural bodily function and do not infect our kids!

>>726392853
I had sex when i was 8 with a girl who was 10,i knew what sex is,she knew what sex is.

I knew exactly what i was doing.


You're a christian and blatantly out of touch with reality

File: pepe-the-frog-meme-4.jpg (67KB, 612x717px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 612x717px

>>726386994
>ywn

>>726392853
kek

>>726385008
Fictional characters played by real people?

>>726394079
Yeah. They are drawn to look like the real people. These pedos are dumb

>>726383678
ur face is illegal