Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800.jpg (38KB, 800x494px) Image search:
[Google]
38KB, 800x494px
Why do Americans name their children what they are called themselves and add "junior" after?
Over here, it's common to add the parent's name as a middle name, like Mikael <Father's name> <Last name>", but naming children the same is seen as taboo here.
Imo, it's really selfish and arrogant. I don't think they do that in England, so I don't think it's traditionally British but American.
Explain! I feel bad for the children who are forever gonna be compared to their parent they are named after.
>>
I agree. Being a junior is pretty lame.
>>
>>723892315
I think its a lack of imagination coupled with a lack of history.
>>
What's even worse are people naming themselves "Adam the first", and then they name their children "Adam the second". Seriously, wtf?
>>
File: 1409795551830.jpg (91KB, 915x960px) Image search:
[Google]
91KB, 915x960px
>>723892315
well you're fuckin stupid
> never heard of Henry the 8th
>>
>>723893541
top kek
>>
>>723893541
7 Henry's before him
> a former king of......? you guessed it england
>>
>>723893541
That's royaly. Royalties always did that shit because well...they're royalty.
>>
>>723894070
My point is that it sounds fucking stupid and arrogant when people who aren't royalty do it.
>>
>>723894070
well there you have it, by that logic Americans bearing that title must be royalty. how do you feel now you plebian cuck
>>
Junior?"
Junior?"
>>
>>723894366
Bueller?
Bueller?
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2