Cigars, even mini cigars, are morally, aesthetically, and gustatorily

Oh are they more healthy or something?

>>723859075
I don't think you'll find anyone who disagrees... then again this is /b/

>>723859075
Tumors are aesthetically better then cancer.

File: 1464914193390.jpg (2MB, 1500x1171px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1500x1171px

>>723859174
You're not inhaling them so yes, actually. Plus, there's not as many wacky additives. I'm not saying they're healthy, but they're healthier.

>>723859378
I want that hole in my throat so I can take your dad's cock down it.

>>723859561
I feel I can only disagree.

Especially after you split them open and fill them with sweeeeeeet buds.

File: 1487929468790.webm (228KB, 240x160px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 240x160px

>>723859881
Well if I do nothing in this thread, I shall add the word "gustatory" to your vocabulary, good sir.

I think I agree op...but conditionally.

>>723859561

I wouldn't say they're actually any healthier, besides the lack of additives. They're just bad for you in a different way, mostly because smoking a cigar is basically a cross between both chewing and smoking a cigarette.

Instead of lung cancer, you get mouth and throat cancer.

File: 1462880588509.webm (351KB, 540x360px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 540x360px

>>723860381
Which you still get with a cigarette. So cigars severely limit your chances of lung cancer, therefore healthier.