Ryzen is on the rise. Meanwhile I'm still sitting here with

File: 1382709271275.jpg (54KB, 521x400px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 521x400px

>>723711900
Ryzen is overpriced shit, dont fall for the maymay

>>723712096
It's literally cheaper than Intel at similar or even better performance.

>>723711900

i7-6820HQ reporting.

fuck amd plebs

Don't AMD proccessors are hot as a damn oven?

It shouldn't be a problem for most rigs, but people always complaint about this with AMD laptops.

>>723711900
AM4 in the shelves soon.

It look like AMD solved their power consumption problem and now have by far have the highest raw number in frequency and memory but they only start to implement all the wizardry Intel do.

>>723712604
>Not having 8 cores at 5Ghz and a barbecue
Please.

Every AMD product I have ever owned was a disappointment. I would always buy something after reading some good reviews, then think "maybe I should give them a chance and hey it is cheaper too!". Next thing I know I am staring at 100km long triangle spikes shooting out of an imperial guard's helmet armor in every direction. Then 3 years later I would give them another chance. Then I get more problems. No thanks. nVidia and Intel for me forever onward.

File: Capture.png (60KB, 941x788px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 941x788px

>>723712948
>not have 32 threads

>>723713217
I bet you paid more than $200

>>723713342
both CPUs were $45/ea referbs

Intel will still be better than AMD. Like if Coke and Pepsi changed flavors. It would still be Coke and Pepsi.

File: 1430468324860.jpg (7KB, 251x251px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 251x251px

>>723713147
>Buy cheaper
>It's less good

>>723713490
I know. I was tricked by the reviews and their raw numbers used when reporting specs. Thought I was getting better value, but all I got was sadness. Ah well I have learned my lesson.

Intel fanboys seem to be shitting themselves. Do yourself a favor and never be a fanboy for anything or anyone.

>>723712246
cheaper where? every place I've seen Ryzen is more expensive

>>723713416
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Xeon+E5-2670+v3+%40+2.30GHz&id=2337
Hu?

What work faster? Two threads at 2,6Ghz or one at 5?

>>723713594
This is the thing I never understood.

AMD is cheaper and have the most Ghz and have the most cache, but Intel spend its money in dark magic or something so their proc with shitty numbers would give more FPS.

>>723711900

It's cheaper than a new Intel but it's a side-grade. All Ryzen means is there is a choice if you need a new machine. Keep your money in your pocket, think about it when it's actually time to upgrade your machine.

Anybody got any idea why my pc won't turn on? I got a white screen like 5 hours ago and now my pc won't turn on other than powering my screen to say no signal. Any ideas are helpful.

>>723713668
1800x outperforms Intel chips twice its price. Check Amazon.

File: vfvgv.jpg (10KB, 144x123px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 144x123px

>>723714549
gpu blew up