Is our observable universe inside of a black hole? Is there any

File: 1485976047425.jpg (197KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1280x1280px

that's deep man

>>723700911
It could be inside your moms vagina

File: CuteGoldenRetriever.jpg (38KB, 480x310px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 480x310px

>>723701011
It is fucking deep man.. like what the fuck, that means there could be infinite layers of space... if our universe is inside of a black hole, but we have black holes inside of our observable universe, there could be universe inside of the black holes inside of our universe, layers and layers of infinite space.

>>723700911
no

File: ^0860E58DF1E7E55AFD180BD0818F578DC1643730067ED9CB5D^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr.png (915KB, 1080x1286px) Image search: [Google]

915KB, 1080x1286px

>>723700911
There are plenty of reasons for why it couldn't be you dumb fuck, but what's the point of explaining it to such a faggot

File: (m=e-yaaGqaa)original_1016325.jpg (60KB, 575x845px)

60KB, 575x845px

>>723700911
Do you mean this black hole?

>>723701226
shit, maybe thats how parallel universes work

>>723700911
could there be a black hole inside of another black hole?

>>723701385

You might be colorblind, anon.

File: (m=e-yaaGqaa)original_1016354.jpg (40KB, 575x378px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 575x378px

>>723701460
Is this black enough for you?

File: skinny_pete_gets_around.jpg (152KB, 1024x683px)

152KB, 1024x683px

>>723701226
>>723701412
mkay... deep...

File: 10544297_1499696840295426_512609705_a.jpg (43KB, 306x306px)

43KB, 306x306px

We should round up all the blacks and force them in a space ship inside of a black hole for scientific knowledge.

File: (m=e-yaaGqaa)original_139794621.jpg (38KB, 450x600px)

38KB, 450x600px

>>723701460
Or this, is this black enough?

>>723701649
...peed...yakm

>>723701652
do you have any idea how much time or money that would cost? to even send one black person, let alone all 1 billion+ of them? you sir are a buffoon

>>723702217
It pays for itself in the end really..

>>723702408
We wouldnt be able to see what happens unless they're smiling the whole time

File: FwQ0ceyX.jpg (55KB, 640x640px)

55KB, 640x640px

>>723700911
itt: I have no idea what I'm talking about but what do you think

>>723702517
i think yes. we should get it done. in fact the sooner we think about it, or do it? especially? the faster we can get back to normal life soon, or sooner or later at least.

>>723700911
If you could get small forever do you think you would drop into another universe?
What if dreams are alternate universes turning on and off inside you brain?

Where do squirrels go during hurricanes?

File: 1986_testarossa_nightdrive_by_rejectsocietyfx.jpg (2MB, 1052x1488px)

2MB, 1052x1488px

>>723702517
I think it's true, when you think about a black hole, why is the center total darkness? It's total darkness because light can not pass through it because of how strong the gravitational force is. Now think about the edge of our observable universe... why can we not see past it? We can not see past it because light can not penetrate the "walls" of the black hole.

File: 1352324759870.jpg (31KB, 310x310px)

31KB, 310x310px

>>723701051

>>723703131
The observable universe is always expanding, it just takes time for light to reach and object and reflect back or the photons take too long to reach us that it reaches a different frequency which we can't see, there's no wall

>>723703694
But if a black hole distorts space could it not be inside of a black hole but still be expanding?

File: 1401x788-fetty_Wap.jpg (182KB, 1401x788px)

182KB, 1401x788px

>>723703694
And if most spiral galaxies have black holes at their centers, like the massive black hole in the center of the Milky way, could these black holes not suck up all of the matter needed for the creation of a universe?

>>723703951
There are many things about a black hole that we don't understand. Theoritically anything is possible within one.

File: 1452036192961.png (231KB, 590x441px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 590x441px

>>723704345
Even inside of a black hole I doubt I could get laid though.

>>723704524
now now, you can get laid anon. all you got to do is believe in yourself

File: NotAMoose.jpg (55KB, 440x440px)

55KB, 440x440px

>>723704645
But what if I'm about to get laid for the first time and when I stick my dick in I fall into a black hole?

>>723704258
I don't think there is a set amount of matter needed for a universe. A universe could be created with just one particle of matter, really.

File: 1485868230783.png (691KB, 644x646px)

691KB, 644x646px

>>723703131
lol I know black holes kind of get into difficult physics that revolve around really cool questions and difficult answers..and despite that..across all the boards..I think you may have just typed the most retarded string of words I've ever read.

>>723700911
>Is our observable universe inside of a black hole?
Yes.
>Is there any reason it couldn't be?
I don't see why not.
>If a black hole distorts time and space, could a universe not fit inside of a black hole the size of a sun if the space inside is distorted?
Sure, do you see why not?

>>723703131
The "light" hasn't reached us yet, or has effectively attenuated to much to be distinguished from background "noise".

File: Saturn Hexagon.jpg (42KB, 700x304px)

42KB, 700x304px

>>723704906
>HURR DURR BLACK HOLE AND THEORETICAL PHYSICS EXPERT HERE.... LET ME TELL YOU WHERE YOU'RE WRONG.........
kindly fall back.

File: 1485872671639.png (166KB, 494x453px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 494x453px

>>723705047
it's amazing how mad retards get, but read my fellow anon to quench your salt and expand your narrow view of our universe

File: schnoz.jpg (84KB, 391x350px)

84KB, 391x350px

>>723704990
He's talking about gravitationally sequestered light, not sheer lightyear distance. WIth such massive gravity and density of the black hole, light indeed gets pulled into it, since light if both a wave and a particle, it theoretically has mass.

Perhaps on the other side of a black hole is a SUN/STAR connected to another dimension, and that's where all the light is coming from, being absorbed from other side and released in our dimension

>>723705231
>thinks he actually knows anything
lol what an expert. you should notify the scientific community ASAP! By cocks, I think you've single-handedly proven all teh theories!!!!!!!!!1111111111111!!`1

>>723703951
Actually, it could be contacting with a faster rate of contraction in the middle, which would give the appearance of an accelerated expansion outward, red shift and all (since that just shows relative motion away from an object, not whether the observer or observed are moving). It would be impossible for us to tell.

>>723705239
light has no mass

>>723705337
boy howdy the cringe in this one is strong

File: IfYouDontReplyToThisPostYourMotherWillDieInHerSleep.jpg (45KB, 316x293px)

45KB, 316x293px

>>723700911
http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~tim/introframe/BlackHoles.pdf

File: 652306036.jpg (35KB, 389x500px)

35KB, 389x500px

>>723700911
Nigga, are you dumb?
Your theory is complete bullshit!

God would not allow it. He's like at the very top and what your saying does not make any sense.

>>723705239
What are you talking about.

File: 1488086570539.gif (119KB, 320x600px)

119KB, 320x600px

>>723706032
Your bait is bad, but it has still slightly angered me.

this thread:

>"guys guys, what if cats... are actually dogs!"
"cats aren't dogs, they're separate species.. we can prove this with DNA and..."
>"YOU'RE SO CLOSE MINDED, WE DON'T KNOW EVERYTHING, DUDE!"
>"WHAT ARE YOU, A FRIGGIN' BIOLOGIST.. LOOK AT ME, I KNOWS THE SCIENCE!! LALALA"

>>723700911
That's actually a valid theory. It ties in with, if I remember the name, universal natural selection.
Universes create universes in black holes, and the universes with conditions that produce black holes have more "offspring."

File: upset.jpg (12KB, 200x213px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 200x213px

>>723706244
This thread actually:

>"Guys, what if cats... are actually dogs?"
"Lol you're so stupid, go back to fuckville town of stupidity. I could prove you wrong using science, but naaaaaaaaaah"
>"Oh yeah? Well cats are animals. Dogs are animals. Therefor, same thing"
>"Hey that sounds pretty logical"
"Lulz, god wouldn't allow that"

Nobody is taking OP seriously, nobody is taking themselves seriously, and any serious claims that have been made are not being taken seriously.

Therefor, acting like one side is being rational is simply... irrational. K, autistic rant done, now go fuck yourself.

File: images (1).jpg (5KB, 282x179px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 282x179px

Guys, what if black holes wheren't some mystical fairy tail shit but isntead just a super condensed sphere that was created when a star went super nova then collapsed into it's self? Black holes are just super thiq bruh, it's like asking if our universe existed inside a rock, only a infinitly more dense.

>>723705239
Yeah, and I'm saying he's wrong to assume that's what's happening at the edge of the observable universe for those reasons alone. There are plenty of reasons why we have a limit to what is observable, including the age of the universe, attenuation, and equipment sensitivity. Two of these are known variables that take time to correct for, and one of these just takes time.

>>723706119
He's talking out his ass.

File: 1485557197328.jpg (125KB, 434x575px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 434x575px

>>723700911
The scwarzchild radius could be a reason a black hole could not be the size of our universe. There are solar system sized black holes at the centers of each galaxy..so powerful their gravity wells are difficult to even imagine, but imagine how small a solar system is compared to a galaxy..and how many galaxies there are..all which follow the same rules. It would be like saying there are different levels of energy/mass..and we're in some low plain of existence, because one so large would still have to follow the same rules. Like an infinitely dense phenomena couldn't be inside an infinitely dense phenomena unless the latter played by a different rule book.

I don't know, there's my crack at it though. I'm no whale biologist.

Also we can't see our outer universe because vector time dilation and the speed of light (we can't see spectrums of energy at certain distances because of the time it takes to reach us, and when we do it's of the distance past..but the velocities of each object relative to each other affect it too)

>>723706480
I'm pretty sure natural selection doesn't apply to the universe itself. And I think this whole thread is forgetting the fact that black holes could die. Let's say this theory is correct, what would happen if the black hole we are in dies?

>>723702481
HOLY SHIT HAHAHAHAH

>>723706623
If we are talking about supernovas creating black holes, why not the big bang? If everything was super condensed in the beginning, why does it have to be a giant expansion rather than a massive collapse? We already have evidence of this happening with bodies past a certain mass. Shouldn't that be the case with an entire universe's amount of matter?