What if we convince trans people to go by something that starts with B instead of transsexual. Then the acronym would be LGBBQ.
batshit?
>>723635753
Kek. I like this
>>723635880
No, something serious enough that they adopt it. We tell them that "transsexual" isn't accurate since they aren't changing sexes, they're just corrected a mistake that was made when they were born the wrong gender.
>>723635753
Absolute madman!
Biologically detatched
>>723636332
This might work
How would we go about doing this?
>>723637217
Make some convincing Tumblr posts
>>723637439
We could actually pull this off. Should we start doing this now, or try to come up with a better word?
>>723637625
see if you can come up with a better one, but just go ahead right mow
>>723638041
Alright. Lets do this.
Holy shit anon, you're a genius
We have to make this happen
We can just make it an LGBBQ by burning them
>>723641274
Mike Pence would approve
backward
>>723642353
What you mean?
>>723635753
This is one of the best ideas I've seen in awhile
>>723641274
>>723641997
bigender
bigay
byebye
bitransexual
definition: you identify as a transexual but aren't a full trans yet and lean both ways
>>723644341
we can shorten it to bitrans
>>723644341
No, it needs to replace transsexual so it gets replaced in the acronym
>>723644509
oh yeah
brachi means arm
so brachitranssexual?
which would translate to a branch 'arm' of transsexualism
>>723644589
Did somebody say OH YEAH
>>723644825
Nooo, it has to be a REPLACEMENT for the word transsexual. We need to make up some shit about the word transsexual being triggering and why the new word is a good replacement
>>723645081
that is the replace dumbass then we just say the definition is that you are a part of many branches of transexualism and we tell them its convenient because it can shorten the gender list since this will include many types of trans shit
>>723645302
Its more likely to catch on if we pretend that "transsexual" is offensive.
>>723645636
so just say that it's offensive to be called a trans when I only identify as a branch of transsexualism? #brachitransexual
would that work?
I feel like the word binary would be in it
>>723645999
No, we tell them that "transsexual" isn't accurate since they aren't changing sexes, they're just corrected a mistake that was made when they were born the wrong gender.
bilateral
having two sides
>>723646671
That's not relevant to transsexual though
bumping for wins!
>>723646671
bimodal
binary
http://www.mieliestronk.com/corncob_lowercase.txt
bifocal?
>>723647172
if they fall for this it'd be worth a million keks
define it as you focus on 2+ genders at the same time or are identify as opposite gender?
Bump
This is good shit
>>723647172
>>723646911
i think bimodal would be better as bifocal has been over used as is.
>>723648152
ok, agreed
all in favor to implement bimodal?
>>723648278
+1 for bimodal
broken