What do you think of the media attack on Milo? We all knew they

Breitbart was definitely waiting for the right moment to back stab him. What did you think would've happened? He's gay, against Christian ideals, and likes black people

what goes around comes around

>>723346366
Did they actually want him to leave? Or did he resign so it wouldn't reflect badly on them?

>>723346771
Milo is too smart and wild for Breitbart to control and they can't risk the PR disaster now that Bannon is in the admin

>>723346246
George takie had similar story, leftwits say its not at all the same thing.

>>723346246
>>723346246
are you fucking retarded? nothing was taken out of context. sure, he could've been joking, people cope in a different way (and I'm no fan of his). but he was even trying to get Rogan to agree that he gets hard looking at hot 15 year olds.

go back to t_d you cunt.

Dude, he literally said a grown man having sex with a 13 year old is ok.

Nothing was taken out of context.

>>723346246
I believe two things: Milo is actually a pedophile and people take pedophilia waaaay too seriously.

It all comes down to what parents want, and parents don't want their children having sex, be it with another kid or be it with an adult, they just don't want it to happen because parents see children as property, not as human beings.

The result of this excessive control is the current hysteria and absurd legislation over something that, really, shouldn't receive a tenth of the attention it gets.

Now, one guy who sees things in a simpler, and less hysterical way, decides to speak his mind, and everybody loses their shit and start demanding his head on a spike for his blasphemy. That, just because he mentioned the holy subject in a dismissive tone. Now he will be "justifiably" persecuted, fired, deflected, dismissed, miss-characterized, and completely neutralized, simply because the label "pedophile" was attached to him by people who already hated his guts, but always feared his influence.

Was that a low blow? Yes.
Is there anything he can do? No.
Will it all just blow off and be forgotten, eventually? Hell no.
Is this his own fault? Absolutely not.
Is this the media's fault? No.
Is this the public's fault? Yes.
Is this really such a big deal? Not in the slightest.

If people weren't so retarded over pedophilia, the media would NEVER have this power to simply destroy someone with this accusation, which is, dare I say, 99% of the time used as a weapon to destroy people, than a defense for children.

>inb4: you're a pedo

>>723347529
You're a pedo

>>723347586
Tackling the points like a pro.

I wouldn't expect less from reddit 2.0

>>723346611
That's not true and you don't want it to be either. History proves it. Plenty of monsters died fat and happy.

> inb4 mah spirituals

Humanity aspires to far better than it can ever earn. This is the hope. Trust me, you don't want karma.

Soooo... Who else just watched Sargon of Akkad's take on this? I'm seeing some familiar talking points.

Watching the interview Milo had where this whole thing came out, yes, he was indeed talking about his own personal experiences of abuse as a 13 year old at the hands of a catholic priest, and said that it worked out because he learned how to give great head.

That sounds to me like making a rather dark joke to cope with what was probably a horrible experience. I don't recall a point where he said "molesting 13 year olds is a great idea and I myself also want to molest 13 year olds."

This was a set up.

The liberels are getting revenge for trump and are taking us out on by one.

First bearing
Then piediepie
Now milo
They're trying to take down shoeonhead with fake nudes
They paid thunderf00t to snipe Lauren Southern but luckily failed.

They wont stop until all skeptics and anti progressive are destroyed.

>>723346246
Trollers getting trolled. Guy's a cunt, deserving of no sympathy. All news is fake these days, just Mr Bulletproof finally got shot this time, and what a shame it wasn't shot for real.

File: Cz1dxyfW8AEfHVw.jpg (7KB, 368x376px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 368x376px

>>723347529
fuck off kike

File: f7FdEdG.jpg (10KB, 260x194px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 260x194px

>>723347529

>>723347529
You're a pedo

>>723347529
Lets look at all the pieces.

He is was sexually abused as a child by a man.
Now he is a self-hating (if you've heard his policies regarding gays) overly flamboyant sub faggot who gets off to making a scene.

He is obviously an individual with profound psychological damage that has made him a generally non-constructive member of society. Most individuals like him aren't so lucky to find a niche as an anti-SJW and just end up becoming drugged up sluts with no futures.

In this case.. the guy doesn't even see the damage it had done. He would be a normal, successful journalist, not the center of hate.. good only in the eyes of the fringe members of society.... making his mark as an opposition of out-of-control ideals targeted at fairness.

Pedophilia.. although totally hot.. is really.. REALLY bad for the victim in the long run.

>>723347666
A liberal setup, and all they had to do was get milo to excuse paedophilia on camera of his own free will several times

Damn that's a clever trap. Obviously not milos fault at all

>rofl

>>723347724
I think the hysteria plays a bigger role on this "damage" than the sex itself, but convincing a hysterical person to calm down and see reason is way harder than it should, when it comes do pedophilia.

>>723347666
Good luck to them taking out the Monolith that is Pewdiepie.

His audience of 50 million know his humor, know that this is all taken out of context, know that this is all bullshit and taking satire too seriously, and are unilaterally deciding that the news is NOT TRUSTWORTHY.

50 million 11-20 year olds have watched the mainstream media try to destroy someone they enjoy for literally no reason. While 30 and 40 somethings that know nothing about Pewdiepie are up in arms about the nazi propagandist corrupting their children, the children themselves will never trust the news for anything ever again.

>>723347529
There is no pedophilia, its an euphemism for wanting to rape children.

Children just cant give a meaningfully consent I don't know what the appropriate age is and it definitely varies but the current law in e.g. the US is appropriate.

>>723346970
What does George have to do with this? Do you want him to resign from Breitbart too? His story was between two teenagers. And George is a nice guy. He doesn't make enemies by abusing the first amendment to troll people by making them feel bad for their beliefs.

>>723347529
See, here's the thing: all gays are pedophiles.

>>723347887
Yeah, that kind of attitude is exactly what creates the mysticism around the subject and gives it way more power to destroy people than it does to help children.

I don't expect to change the mind of someone so ideological though, so you can keep believing whatever the fuck you want to believe.

>>723347935
On the Howard Stern Show, Takei shared details of his first sexual experience with the host and co-host Robin Quivers, who gleefully enjoyed his retelling of how he, as a 13-year-old boy, was molested by an “18- or 19”-year-old counselor at summer camp at Lake Arrowhead in Los Angeles.

Technically teens, but only by the barest margin.

>>723347978
I have no doubts of that. Good luck getting faggots to admit that though. Not even straight guys admit they want to fuck 15 year, even though the most searched term for porn is still "teens".

Go figure?

>>723347841

Everything he said was token out of context

>>723347876

Disney has pulled their businesses from him and now also those 11 year olds parents have a negative view on him. The liberals have damaged piediepie.

>>723348142
I can't remember where I saw this but 100 men were surveyed and they were shown innocent pictures of females and they had to decide which was the most sexually attractive

Most voted 14

No one's going to admit anything but everyone knows the truth lol

>>723348177
So instead of making 20 million this year, he'll only make 16 million from ad revenue on Youtube.

The horror. He still has 99% of his original audience, and the ones that he's lost are at least partially being replaced by non-fans that are flocking to him out of sympathy for his position.

>>723348177
>Everything he said was token out of context
Let's be honest here, his intention was clear, and the only reason he didn't use a more direct language was because he knew it could be bad for him.

The problem isn't with what he believes, it's with the reaction of the public.

Finding 13-14 years old sexually attractive just shouldn't be seen as something this severe.

>>723348080
In aware of that. I remember listening to it that day. No one defended him. No one cared in fact. He wasn't making an argument for AoC laws. (Like Milo did at his press conference, referencing European laws) I also don't recall him ever attacking Milo. So, I'm still wondering, what is the point of bringing up George in all this.

>>723346246
Him trolling himself was inevitable in the business he is in.

>>723346246
he looks gay as fuck honestly

>>723348232
Exactly. We all know the truth. Women are no different either. We just want to condemn those for speaking up about it saying "you're a pedo, die in a fire" and such. Maybe in a decade or so, things will change.
until then, I'm going to Thailand every summer as usual. 

>>723348604
Well...

>>723348548
Because these people are looking for an aquivency to focus on so they can avoid the truth and spin things to their own narratives

File: IMG_2484.jpg (73KB, 410x668px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 410x668px

>>723346246
Give it a rest.

>>723348073
There is no ideology, I never said sth. like "rape is immoral" just stated the fact that sex with underaged is always rape.

File: 7ac.jpg (35KB, 600x448px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x448px

>>723347521
This.

MILO is a perfect example of the media twisting something into fake news. The biggest one-sided piece of shit for a journalist there is.
I don't have time to explain myself in great detail, but consider things like his interview at UC Davis which was broadcast on KDVS, wherein he denied saying many things which would have shown him to be lying through his teeth about his political positions, then KDVS relayed those clips where he said those things verbatim. Then later on, he does that annoying thing where he always has to be right, and so he does this "NO serious scientist has EVER said that X is 100% true." In this case, he was talking about people being born gay or not. When the fact is that being gay does have -some- environmental and developmental factors, there really is a genetic predisposition and basis for homosexuality. Yet, Milo wants to say that the "liberal left" was "lobbying" for gay rights by "fabricating an outright lie" that homosexuality is something you are likely born with. And all he says to support this is something to the effect of "NO serious scientist who is worth mentioning has EVER said that being gay is something you're born with. There are environmental factors." And when the interviewer pointed out what I highlighted, that in fact, there are genetic factors, and since they exist, Milo's point that it's an "outright lie" is false, then Milo literally goes "NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE". Then he says he never said it was an outright lie. Then they play the clip.

And later on, Breitbart news posts an article, in which the headline is something to the effect of Milo Destroys UC Davis Debate or some shit like that.

Milo used to be okay, but seriously, lately he has shown what a vain, narcissistic (yet curiously self-loathing) shit excuse for a journalist he is. I can imagine him finding a post like this which criticizes him and highlighting the fact that I'm not relaying it verbatim, and him going "none of this is true"

>>723348731
Whatever you want to believe, dude.

The lying mainstream media doesn't like that he's a gay conservative because it contradicts their narrative that everyone has to be a damn liberal or else you're homophobic. That's why they bring this up now 2 years after he said it.

Not up to speed, I saw news this morning he resigned

>>723348548
George Takei waxed poetic about an experience he had as a 13 year old being molested by an older man. No one gives a shit, even though he's implying a positive effect from a 13 year old being molested.

Milo made a crude joke about being glad that he got molested at 13 by an older man, because "he learned how to give great head," and implies that maybe people worry too much about pedophilia and that it isn't as big a deal as people make it out to be. People are up in arms claiming that he's an advocate for pedophilia, and that he himself is a pedophile.

It's a double standard. They both say they had a positive experience with being molested at 13, but one is completely ignored and the other is crucified.

This will only make him more popular.

>>723347521
If the 13 year old is okay with it, I have a real hard time figuring out what exactly is so objectionable about that.

>>723348873
Gonna have to agree with this anon.
Anyone who does not please have a valid argument rather than muh feels.

>>723348873
It converts them to the gay.

>>723348873
maybe that a 13 year old cannot give consent, you fucking moron

>>723348873
Sex is an unspeakable act that only adults are allowed to do.

>>723348992
Explain why?

>>723348974
If a 13 year old has sex with another 13 year old, did they rape each other because neither of them can give consent?

>>723347841

Why did they wait all this time to mention it then?

>>723349033
Jesus said so obviously.

>>723349036
oh god you are stupid

Fuckin dumbass self styles himself as a "provocateur" and then gets his shit pushed in when News Media finally gets fucking provoked. Big fuckin surprise.

The only problem now is that without him it'll take organized demonstration to manage provoking the left into unjust violence, and that's been the culture wars major tipping point thus far. We can't rely on some retards to shit on pewdiepie or whoever once a fucking week for us. We need big stories that the News Media is forced to pass on or lie about in order for us to keep up the pressure. We need the fucking Snowflakes freaking out at Milo.

I swear to fucking shit if that greek faggot doesn't get his fucking ass back in the game post fucking haste we're gonna lose every inch of ground we've taken. Sargoy can't solo this shit for fucks sake and Alex Jones is a fucking meme.

Who's that fag in the picture? Is that you OP?!

>>723348743
He literally said those things, moron.

>>723349036

The boy would be branded a rapist and the girl would be the victim.

>>723349036

naw, the problem occurs when one is over the age of 18 and is fucking 13 year olds.

File: IMG_2468.jpg (33KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 640x480px

>>723348839
>a joke
>i was merely pretending, guyz

Yeah fuck off

>>723347666
Derp

Milo said what he said. There is no editing around the words and this is not the first time he has broached the subject during a recoding.

>>723349161
Like the 19 year old that molested George Takei, but it was totally cool because Takei was a fan of butt stuff?

>>723349161
it is technically illegal, since they cannot give consent, so they both rape each other.

File: 1480776513344.jpg (41KB, 500x378px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x378px

>>723349036

>>723347861
Sex in general has always been a sensitive topic. Nothing seems to inspire hysteria quite like sex does. Consider how people reacted to promiscuity, masturbation, porn, and homosexuality in the past and how collective self-denial played it's role and how the most vocal people were always the most guilty of what they condemned in others. People often seem to be hysterical over what they desire...

>>723349222
dunno about this story. but if george takei was underage, then the 19yo committed statutory rape.

>>723348974
How exactly that make ANY sense to you, in your mind?

If the 13 year old is GIVING consent, how is he unable to give consent? Please, explain to me how that works.

File: IMG_2444.jpg (30KB, 540x303px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 540x303px

IIT: pedo conservacucks defending their jewish homosexual pederast nigger-fucking hero.

>>723349238

i don't think so as statutory rape constitutes an adult (i.e. 18+) having sex with a minor (i.e. < 18)

unless there is some other rape law i'm not aware of outside of statutory and assault rape.

Somehow we got to a place where the alt-right is defending premarital homosexual sex, while making the argument that age of consent laws are totally arbitrary and possibly too strict?

How is this in any way conducive to conservative ideology?

>>723347887
>I know nothing about the subject
>But the law is definitely correct
You are retarded

>>723346246
watching conservatives and /b/ defend a nigger loving jew faggot is surreal. i don't even care if if the media set him up. watching you guys scramble around his ankles like dogs is awesome as fuck.

>>723349036
thats the most idiotic statement ive heard all day

>>723349301
By that rationale, 5 year olds can give consent.
I like this.
You are a true conservative and a patriot.

>>723349113
Yes, but he denied literally saying those things until they showed him saying those things. Then he tried to switch gears by saying that gay people are born gay when earlier he said that they were not and that no serious scientist has ever said they were. He's got this complex of always having to be right.

>>723349301
to break it down to subhumans like you: law is there to protect people. and with 13 you don't have the full scope of your actions and on top of that you are very easily manipulated. that is why, as a 13y, you are not allowed to buy a car or to have sex. you are too stupid to decide if you want to or not.

>>723349161
How exactly?

At what point does "giving consent" stops being consent and becomes a crime because the consent given is no longer valid?

>>723349301
>If the 13 year old is GIVING consent, how is he unable to give consent? Please, explain to me how that works
It's generally argued that a 13-yo is not mentally mature and experienced enough to work out and understand the implications of their actions and the motives of another person.

That's why they are generally, in civilized countries at least, also not allowed to enlist, vote, apply for credit, watch adult movies, drink alcohol in bars or pubs or drive;

tl;dr - they're children

>>723349384
>nigger loving

Yeah that's why he's shitting on muslims. Cause he loves them.

>>723349387
Technically, it wasn't a statement. It was a question.

Lrn2english shitskin

>>723349384
right?! i hope these guys never stop defending his honor. comedians go their entire lives trying to make shit as funny as this.

File: IMG_2474.gif (2MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x300px

>>723349424

Also let's not jump too quick to conclusions. Im not saying Milo is outright lying, but he follows a pattern.

Gets called out for antisemitic diatribe, claims he's half jewish. Called out for racist rhetoric, he claims his boyfriend (who no one has ever seen) is black. Hates on lesbians and male gays plus outs a transsexual student, claims he himself is gay thus invulnerable to criticism. Talks about "very young boys" being sexed in private parties and him not speaking up, advocates for pederasty, and suddenly he's been sexually abused.

The pattern of self-victimization and manipulation is there.

>>723349501
u mad bro?

File: Untitled1.png (46KB, 774x356px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 774x356px

>>723349488
hahhahaa please, please tell me more. tell me how based and pure he is.

>>723349411
Now, do you equate a 5 year old giving consent to a 13 year old giving consent, then?

Are you REALLY sure a 13 year old wanting to have sex, or enjoying someone fondling their balls is the EXACT same thing as a 5 year old giving consent? Really?

Are you against 13 years old masturbating then? What if an adult is watching the 13 year old masturbating, is that also rape?

>>723349545
How is he supposed to speak up about it? Name names? With no proof? With no evidence?

That's called Defamation faggot.

>>723347278
Milo was making the point of if they looked older than they are right?
And If people find loli hot and there was CP on here...

>>723349545

yep you pretty much nailed it.

FUCK KIKES WOOOO

wow thats kinda fucked up?

sall good niga im a kike.

wow did u just say niga?

no problems faggot im suckin a black guys cock tonight

wow did u just say faggot?

ye cos im gay nigga WOoOoOOo

mILOoOoOo

>>723349579
not at all, i just like watching people flip out. gamergate was awesome, trump winning was awesome, i just like seeing a bunch of tag-alongs flip their collective shit whenever their favorite baby gets shit on.

>>723349437
>to break it down to subhumans like you
Stopped reading there.

No reason to listen to you if that's really how you see me, just for having a different opinion.

>>723349545
I think we're saying similar things here. With all this being said, I find it ironic that he's constantly bitching about the media doing what it does.

>>723349706
stay retarded then, subhuman scum

>>723346246
The media is attacking him because he is an ass and a easy target. He's a male gay Ann Coulter. His act is old and meant to offend. How would you expect people to react to him. All of the sudden anons are supporting him now that the pedo stuff came up. He ruined himself on Real Time. He can't butt heads with real smart people. His 15 minutes is over.

>>723349222
Taki isn't in the business of debating social constructs and or creating social commentary.

Milos whole business is built off of debating social topics and influencing through his social commentaries.

It's hypocritical and discredits his position when he attempts to hand wave rape when he is the one who is always telling others what constitutes rape and how they should protect themselves.

He is placing special circumstances and writing his own narrative because in his case he doesn't feel it was wrong for him to have had the experience, but he will be the first to tell someone else (and has many times) they are wrong for allowing themselves to be the victim of rape

>>723348777
So every psychological study about the subject was wrong... but you're right...
Its not about beliefs its about facts. And the facts say that child abuse leads to psychological damage. Even for the people that didn't say they were abused until they were adults, so you can't use the "it's the hysteria that surrounds it" argument.

File: IMG_2465.jpg (47KB, 768x392px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 768x392px

>>723349625
Many 5 year olds masturbate too, bud. Also, youre ok with your 13 year old son being fucked by a 38 year old accountant? Shit, if the kid is lucky he might even get his bloody asshole pozzed by his tender mature lover.

Do you even notice the literal verbal shit youre vomiting?

>>723349701
you mad

>>723349545
he's learned well from his nigger friends to play the victim card whenever he gets in trouble.

>>723348839
What? It's the right that canceled his speaking engagement. It's Breitbart that asked for his resignation. It was a conservative group that brought attention to his comments. And he's getting another publisher for his book. So again, what double standard? The left had nothing to do with him getting into this mess. It's his own people that are punishing him.

>>723349628
Not naming names is being complicit and an accessory, you dumb fuck.

>>723349716
Im agreeing with you, bro.

>>723349484
>13-yo is not mentally mature and experienced enough to work out and understand the implications of their actions and the motives of another person.
Are they old enough to understand masturbation and sex?
How are they not "mentally mature" to understand having another person do it for them, instead of them doing it alone?

How can someone who can have sex with another person, without problems, all of sudden becomes INCAPABLE of having sex with others because of age difference?

How does that work, exactly? You can have sex with a 17 year old, but if the 17 year old happens to be 3 months older, he's committing a horrible crime and he must go to jail for it? How does the logic behind that works?

>>723349819
no, but i understand if you need to say something to reaffirm with yourself that nobody could possibly enjoy what you hate.

>>723346246
Isn't this good for him? Any publicity is good publicity, etc. Also, not to imply I disagree with his views, but isn't he mostly just an attention whore? He's like that wikileaks faggot. He might be doing good work, but he's doing it for himself and he isn't fooling anyone.

File: 10896462.gif (254KB, 2000x5000px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 2000x5000px

>>723347529
People do take it too seriously, I agree.
Not that I endorse molestation - that is bad, and we all know it. But you shouldn't be ashamed of liking younger persons. People freak out, but as long as you don't actually touch them, why worry about people liking it?

>>723349101
>>723349360
Nobody really benefits from allowing to rape children. Like safety belts these laws are annoying, can sometimes be counterproductive (e g. Takeshi, Milo had a blast getting raped) but ultimately its better to have them.

Does "pedo=wannabe child rapist" trigger you?

>>723349698
Self-victimization, right from the sjw playbook.

Conservacucks have become what they hate.

>>723346246
https://youtu.be/ABJo7w-efTA

>>723347529
maybe the public just thinks people who think like you and milo are scumbags and want nothing to do with you. go cry some more about it like feminists.

>>723349903
*On an extremely popular radio show*

"Yeah, I was on this cruise ship owned by John Stamos and there were hordes of little boy orgies."
*Gets phone call*
"What's that? John Stamos is suing me for defamation?"

And in an alternate reality

*Milo walks into a police station*
"Hey, I was on John Stamos' cruise ship party last night and they were having sex with kids."
"Do you have any proof?"
"No, but my accusation is enough to warrant an investigation, isn't it?"
"Aren't you that edgelord that's constantly pissing people off? Get out."
You should google the principles of Pragmatism.

File: IMG_2518.jpg (54KB, 736x190px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 736x190px

>>723350007

File: 1260710343244[1].jpg (33KB, 600x486px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 600x486px

>>723349935

>>723349959
I'm the "pedo=child rapist" guy and agree that there is nothing wrong with wanting to touch children or wanting to rape women. Just acting on it should be prohibited.

>>723349961
pedophilia is legally defined as a sexual attraction to children, if you want to be wrong it does not bother me.

>>723350002
they've been watching the sjw movement very carefully and trying really hard to copy their tactics. only problem is that conservatism is exclusive by nature, so when it does something to lend a sense of inclusiveness to itself, the people outside don't buy it and the people inside see it as a sign of weakness and don't back it.

File: 1897721_10152853295567049_5122768831386972294_n.jpg (8KB, 261x151px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 261x151px

Milo wasn't abused by Father Michael because Father Michael doesn't exist.

Milo is from a powerful and influential family with shit loads of money and grew up in the affluent Kent countryside.

He simply would not have been a target. These assholes go after the vulnerable and poor for obvious reasons.

Like absolutely everything in Milo's life including Milo himself it's a lie. The guy is a colossal fraud.

I loved how he took on the moniker of victim hood as SOON as it was clear he was in trouble and it might hurt his career. The hypocrisy is off the charts.

>>723350078
voice of the republican party

File: IMG_2298.gif (774KB, 384x269px) Image search: [Google]

774KB, 384x269px

>>723350072
>Be on Hbo political show
>i was in pedophile orgy parties but im not tellinnnnn'
>pedo parties continue, kids keep getting fucked and pozzed
>not complicit

You are a literal retard.

>>723347724
He actually was a drugged up slut for most of his twenties. Decided to do something about it after that period.

>>723350143
Sexually attracted to children is just PO for "wannabe child rapist". Just accept it and you can accept yourself.

>>723350190
http://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/defamation-law-the-basics.html

>>723350152
facts dont mean anything, attention and confirmation do. conservatives will back milo for anything as long as he's their lapdog. he's their best resource for reaching the 20-somethings. Someone better must be coming along because they're beginning to let him slip

File: IMG_2299.jpg (80KB, 479x664px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 479x664px

>>723350247

Defend your pedophile jew homosexual harder, faggot.

>>723350221
by something you mean blame everything else but himself for his shitty life choices?

>>723347861
So what? The hysteria isn't going to go away just because YOU think it shouldn't exist. You don't get to decide how society should be. It just is how it is, and if you don't like it, too fucking bad. The problem with modern society is we have too many people who think they can shame society into agreeing with them, when all they really do is whine so much nobody wants to talk or listen to them. Then they take that silence as affirmation. Well guess what faggot, Trump is president. Everyone thought Shillary would win. But the silence was not affirmation.

>>723346246
He outright endorsed pederasty and said young boys need a mentor to guide them in being a butt fucking faggot. The only change of heart is after the media scandal.

>>723350152
Like I've been saying. He's an act. He's an Ann Coulter clone. He's a self proclaimed professional troll. He tried really hard to piss everyone off, and succeeded. The media isn't ganging up on him. What did he expect?

>>723348873
A 13 year old boy, just into puberty, full of hormones, emotions and feelings that he has no idea how to cope with is not in a position to make informed decisions about consent to a fully grown man.

It's that simple.

File: IMG_2519.png (222KB, 1200x628px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1200x628px

>>723346246

>>723349961
Who the fuck are you even talking too retard? I didn't say a fucking thing about pedophilia. I don't give a shit what that flamboyant fucking turd likes or dislikes. What I do care about is the golden oppurtunity his shit stirring presented.

>>723350279
i like how conservatives keep trying to look clever by pointing to liberals that he's everything they should love, but they hate him anyway.

i could live in the country, have a farm, a dog, a barefoot pregnant wife and a gun collection but if i'm a total sack of shit to everyone in my community you bet none of them would want me there.

>>723346246
It seems like you are defending pedos more than you are defending Milo, both are pointless pursuits.

Milo...
What a smug piece of shit scumbag.
Look at how vain this faggot is. This faggot is so full of himself that he probably doesn't even get along with the people in his fagg group. Jesus fucking Christ you idiots really do pick the worst example of a human being to idolize.

>>723346246
I think that when you're as unpopular with the traditional media as he is, you've got to really watch your shit, because they'll take any opportunity they can find to rake you over the coals. It's not right, but he should have known better than to say dumb shit like that.

>>723346246
I hope he gets assassinated.

File: IMG_2483.jpg (568KB, 1374x3035px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 1374x3035px

Yeah, let's raise our sons to thirteen then donate them to lonely old homosexuals to fuck. Oh what a proud moment for us if their bloody gaping kid assholes are pozzed by their caring, tender mature gay lovers. Let's make this dream a reality, guys!

>>723350239
As I said, continue being wrong, I don't care. All attractions are inherent, they are not choices, pedophilia included. "That which is inherent is by definition incapable of being wrong", it is a small truth of the world.
>accept yourself
I feel like this is supposed to be an insult, but it makes no sense whatsoever just like everything else you say.
Conversation over.

>>723350190
> Tell
> No proof
> Get sued
> accomplish nothing
> still have retards on the internet saying you're complicit

You don't have a leg to stand on fag.

File: IMG_2520.jpg (58KB, 621x386px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 621x386px

>>723350551

>>723346246
Seeing a /pol/ orientated thread operate on the absolute underage train wreck that is /b/ was helpful, thanks guys. Interesting.

>>723350370
well entertainers like him, anne, keemstar, jerry springer, geraldo, oreilly, make careers out of being shocking, they're the conservatives version of shock rockers. they've found out that they can make multi-million dollar careers out of doing and saying outrageous stuff that's hard to ignore. The catch is that they have to keep raising the bar every time. Its inevitable that they either quit and fade away, or do something so nuts that it causes their employers to cut them loose.

its all entertainment. at least with heavy metal they look cool.

File: IMG_2521.jpg (57KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 640x480px

>>723350595
Milo is right. Youre doing God's work defending him.

>>723350307
There's a BIG difference between arbitrary laws based on NOTHING but political manipulation and hysteria being used as a weapon by the media to damage people's reputation and publicly humiliate them, whether they are guilty or not, and some middle class college students pushing for legislation just because they feel the world must change according to their will.

Do not lump those things together just because you are unable to differentiate the implications they have.

Nobody is trying to change "society", the problem is with absurd laws that condemn people the same way for different "crimes" they committed. That's the bigger picture you're refusing to see, because it goes against your beliefs.

File: IMG_2287.gif (1MB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x150px

>>723350655

Pewdiepie doesn't need Disney's business is you believe he has lost any fans, or even if he's lost more than he's gained in the last two months, I would say you're mentally deficient. The guy makes more money off youtube than anyone else, and plenty of people sustain themselves with youtubes ad revenue alone without outside endorsements.

>>723350727
True, but he was/is a walking contradiction. He offends anyone connected to any of his labels. Maybe it was an artistic social experiment.

>>723350445
He can't consent to a fully grown 18 year old man, but he CAN consent to a fully grown 17 year old man, right?

He either can consent or he can't, man. Make up your mind.

>>723350846
Shut the fuck up, e-celeb cocksuckin loser

File: IMG_2522.gif (41KB, 277x277px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 277x277px

>>723350898

>>723349411
>>723349437
>>723349484
Muh informed consent argument.

Come back when millions of adults EVERY SECOND make ill-informed detrimental decisions.

Informed Consent / Age of Consent was a meme spread by religious nutjobs because they couldn't ban sex before marriage.

Pre-emptive not a pedo, hebe or anything, chemically incapable of enjoying sex. (lol hormones)

>>723350898
Silence...

Go figure. huh?

so did milo dindu nuffin wrong?

>>723346970
Shit that leftist shit show at the Grammy's with Meryl Streep was embarrassing enough.

Hollywood adores a child rapist .

Roman Polanski.

>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski_sexual_abuse_case

>>723351156
pretty much.

>>723350893
i think he's just trying to be Bill O'Riley 4kids. Some media marketing cabal decided that should be a thing, they found a guy who could strike sparks, bought him and his hair and vaulted him onto the stage, willingly covering his ass every time he put his foot in his mouth until he went full-kid-diddler.

>>723346246
I used to like Milo but I can't see him in the same way after he came out as a pedo...

File: Milo shows Brianna lies more than Todd.png (166KB, 572x476px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 572x476px

>Jokes that as a result of his being abused by a priest, he gives better head and thus doesn't regret it
>Says that homosexual boys benefit from relationships with older men (in this case, "boys" means young men 16-20, similar to the way straight people call women "girls", gays often call men "boys", especially if they're bottoms)
>Says he agrees with the age of consent, calling it "about right"
>Says he thinks SOME people are emotionally mature enough to handle consent at younger ages, but still agrees with the age of consent
>These are all statements the media refers to as being "leaked" except they've been on podcasts viewed by hundreds of thousands of people for a fucking year

Oh look it's fucking nothing. It's almost like the mainstream """journalists""" hate him for political reasons and are willing to take his words out of context in order to smear him... but that would be crazy, right? It's not like any other predominantly internet-based famous people have been targeted by smear campaigns lately. Definitely not the largest YouTube personality or anything like that would be a victim of such a thing.

>>723349804
>Many 5 year olds masturbate too, bud.
Ok, even if that was true, does that REALLY equate to what a 13 year old does when he masturbates? Are those two REALLY the same?

>youre ok with your 13 year old son being fucked by a 38 year old accountant?
I doubt my son would ever feel the need to have sex with a 38 year old to get the emotional connection, support, and affection he needs, but you can believe whatever you want here, mate.

>if the kid is lucky he might even get his bloody asshole pozzed by his tender mature lover.
Ok, at least we're agreeing that they, INDEED, are able to give consent, right? Now, when you say "bloody asshole" I can't help but think you must be equating consent with rape, and forced penetration. Let me ask you this, now: Are rape, and consensual sex the same thing in your opinion?

>Do you even notice the literal verbal shit youre vomiting?
I'm trying to be as logical, and objective as possible, and I'm following every single criteria you are presenting to make this the most agreeable and comprehensible discussion possible, so I really don't know what exactly is originating this accusation, if not from an ideological corruption.

File: -pol- was right again - Milo edition.jpg (154KB, 1024x640px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1024x640px

Say it with me, anons:

/pol/ WAS RIGHT AGAIN

>>723351438
or maybe everyone just thinks hes an asshole and this was as good an opportunity as any to chuck him in the trash where he belongs.

>>723350898
>He can't consent to a fully grown 18 year old man, but he CAN consent to a fully grown 17 year old man, right?

What if he consents to a 17 year old and while in the act the 17 year old gets to 18 years because on that day it's his birthday.

Consent CHECK
But I guess the birthday of the 17 year old made him a rapist then.

>>723349959
finally someone who isn't hysterical.

This is FAR from being me advocating for adults to abduct and rape 7 year olds. I just think a 13 year old boy can perfectly allow someone else to suck his dick, without having the feds knocking on his door making it public and completely destroying his life for it.

I think there's a more balanced position that should be discussed less hysterically when it comes to this subject.

>>723351544
exactly

this

/thread

File: IMG_2487.jpg (115KB, 599x400px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 599x400px

>>723351038

>>723351605
What if the child was born a month earlier, but his ID says he's a month older?

>>723351453
Kid masturbating=kid fucked by adult homosexuals

Fuck off, pedogay

File: IMG_2523.jpg (16KB, 426x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 426x360px

>>723351453

>>723351038
13 year olds do not have enough life or experience to make the same informed choices that adults do. They are (more/very) susceptible to influence and have a lower rational because of this.

Adults who have entered in to the world as independents and are now making choices based on the reasoning and skills they have learnt and examined as youths. Adults are in no way on the same level (sexually or emotionally) as a child who has just entered in to their teen years and begun to experience sexuality for the first time in their lives.

They don't even have an identity at this point, they are still in the process of learning and and becoming naturalized to what will become who they are as they grow to be independent and grow in to functional adults and peoples.

These laws are in place because they are meant to help protect children from choices they cannot comprehend the consequences of and to deture adults who cannot comprehend how their own intentions and influence may affect a young developing mind who has yet to make any informed choices about their own sexuality.

File: IMG_2524.png (812KB, 917x564px) Image search: [Google]

812KB, 917x564px

>>723351453
Drop dead, pedophile.

>>723351727
What if the child give consent to the adult to masturbate him, is it still a crime?

I'm trying my best to follow your logic and see where you draw the line.

File: IMG_2525.jpg (40KB, 620x345px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 620x345px

>>723351913

(You)

>>723350898
Sorry, where did I say a 13 year old can consent to a 17 year old?

Sorry we broke one of your pet freaks. It's sad, i know, but you still got Alex Jones and he's tough as a brick.

>>723347724
>Although totally hot :')

File: IMG_2486.jpg (12KB, 156x156px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 156x156px

>>723352008
Alex is in full Milo defense right now.

>>723352074
That's kind of sad. Like, honestly sad. It's like when the heavy's medic gets killed.

Literally pedophiles only live to molest children. Perverted people only live to be perverted. You are extremely lucky the practical people haven't taken your land and belongings by force. Oh wait that's already happening with taxes and everything... Nevermind...

>>723349387
>>723349096
>>723349257

Surely you guys could elaborate on why it is this stupid? If people under 18 cannot give consent then surely it is rape when two people below 18 have sex then? Or is it also not rape when a 14 year old fucks a 6 year old? Please explain your thought process instead if just saying it's stupid.

>>723352074
Alex is full sweat mode still over his 5th dimensional physic vampires manipulating the earthy plain of exsistence.

>>723346366
He's fucking catholic you moron

File: IMG_2284.png (96KB, 301x308px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 301x308px

>>723352141
Alex is an opportunist, a fear profiteer with his nose deep in breitbart's collective asshole.

Bill Cooper warned us against him.

>>723352178
Children are a protected class they do not fall under the same laws as an adult.

File: IMG_2038.jpg (13KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 259x194px

>>723352179
You better not be a Renfield, anon.

>>723352237
I thought he was the shamebaby of Rosanne Barr and Yosemite Sam

>>723350546
Jesus fucking christ :/

>>723352074
How though? Alex got praised by a state controlled Russian news channel for being so pro-tradional values, and standing up for Christian ideals cause in Russia homosexuality is practically illegal and shunned. Yet he defends Milo, who isn't even an American citizen?

>>723346246
former editor of Breitbart calling others out for Fake News. Weeeeeeew lad

>>723352352
...have fun scrubbing that mental image out of your head.

Could not have happened to a more deserving cunt; plus he did it to himself trying to be an edgy cunt.

>>723351885
>13 year olds do not have enough life or experience to make the same informed choices that adults do.
Can 13 year olds fuck other 13 year olds, then?

>They are (more/very) susceptible to influence
Everyone is susceptible to influence. Doesn't mean they can be tricked into sex that easily, but if you CAN be tricked into sex, that means you KNOW what sex is.

>and have a lower rational because of this
What does that even mean, what rational is it necessary to know whether you want to have sex or not? What exactly is so complex that they can't possibly comprehend?

>Adults are in no way on the same level (sexually or emotionally) as a child who has just entered in to their teen years and begun to experience sexuality for the first time in their lives
Can a 13 year old have consensual sex with another 13 year old?

>These laws are in place because they are meant to help protect children from choices they cannot comprehend the consequences of
What consequences? Pregnancy? STDs? Mommy's anger?

>to deture adults who cannot comprehend how their own intentions and influence may affect a young developing mind
Do you mind explaining to me how EXACTLY their intentions and influence may affect a young developing mind, please?

>who has yet to make any informed choices about their own sexuality.
Isn't having sex a great way for them to make this informed choice about their own sexuality? Who are you to say they can't do it?

>>723352356
he wants girls back in the kitchen tho. so its cool bro. its totally cool.

File: IMG_2491.jpg (157KB, 750x537px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 750x537px

>>723352356

>>723352244
So it's fine for a 15 year old to fuck a 6 year old?

>>723346246
Who's He?

File: fag ylyl.jpg (58KB, 376x442px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 376x442px

>>723352480
milo is a filthy turd burglar who gets off on trumps fecal fumes

Now we all know how he contracted the gay.

>>723352505
Possible answers to this kind of pertinent question:

1 - YOU'RE A PEDO, SICK, MONSTER, DIE, IMMORAL, WITCH, KILL HIM, HE DESERVES TO BE SKINNED ALIVE, MONSTER, RAPIST ROOOAAARRR.
2 - Children cannot consent because blah blah blah blah muh feelings blah blah blah impact on they psyche blah blah blah blah damaged for life blah blah blah blah laws to stop adults from blah blah blah blah blah blah therefore wrong blah blah blah blah blah my opinions blah blah blah blah children can't understand sex blah blah blah blah blah blah they're not ready blah blah blah blah blah they can't possibly understand blah blah blah blah blah blah therefore you're wrong.
3 - HUURR MILO FAGGOT HAHAHAH U MAD TRUMP IS GOING DOOOOWN HAHAHHA SWEET TEARS CONSERVACUCK HAHAHAH

File: IMG_2526.jpg (52KB, 1078x516px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1078x516px

>>723352505

Pedo pls

>>723352748
Look at that, I got the first one right.

>>723352505
I think that's the exact fucking opposite to what he means

File: IMG_2527.jpg (54KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x500px

>>723352712
>Angry cuckservative pedo and his wall of text

>>723346246
He is a news chasing media whore. He endorses base ideologies that hate his very existence.. he is gay and a jew.. and a a fucktard.

>>723351885
imagine needing to spell this shit out to quasi philosophical pedos

ty for typing it out anon

File: IMG_2528.jpg (22KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 300x168px

>>723352799
Tell us more...

>>723351885
>Adults who have entered in to the world as independents and are now making choices
kek, there's your problem there.
You seem to think adults automatically make good decisions. How fucking naive.

When I was 10 I made better life choices than 90% of adolescents, which is why my life isn't shit and there's is. and instead of taking the blame, they push it on to others, be it parents, education, older generations or government.

You still never answered where all this sudden experience comes from when people turn [arbitrary age of consent] age.
Protip: literally impossible, it's chicken and egg.

Again, millions of adults make ill-informed decisions every second.
Decisions about sex, babies, bills, shopping, activities, drugs, junk food, buying cars, homes and non-essentials when poor, getting in to even more debt.
Age of Consent is an argument for idiots that are incapable of rational, informed thought! THE IRONY.

>>723348777
Fuck off pedophile

>>723352497
Isn't it kind of the other way round too though?

Progressives:
> It's wrong for an adult to have sex with a consenting 15-year-old

Also progressives:
>It's fine to be have sex with children as long as your an esteemed actor, film maker or democratic politician

File: dead fags.jpg (171KB, 728x472px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 728x472px

>>723352621
tru dat

>>723352392
Again, 13 year olds are not adults.
They do not fall under the same law because of their position in life.

This is why problem children go to correctional treatment (juvenile court systems) when they are found doing unlawful activities and problem adults go to "real" courts for committing crimes

13 year olds are equals to one another, adults hold authority over them. Adult have that authority because children are not capable of fully understanding Or grasping the full depth of the majority of lifes issues.

The lack experience and they lack outlook that comes with being a self sufficient indivual

This is really not hard to comprehend when your not trying to defend your own agenda anon

>>723352909
> And you rape them in a dungeon*

File: IMG_2529.jpg (31KB, 576x576px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 576x576px

>>723352898

If you were a freshman or sophomore in high school and were unable to understand the ramifications of sucking a 45 year old mans penis you probably needed help tying your shoes in the morning.

File: IMG_2530.jpg (26KB, 300x299px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 300x299px

>>723352909
No need to deflect blame, soon youll be accepted.

Follow Milo's efforts.

>>723352816
>>723352748

What exactly is the lowest age a 14-year-old can fuck before it becomes a problem, consent-wise?

Can a 14-year-old fuck:
another 14-year-old?
a 13-year-old?
a 12-year-old?
...
...

At what age does it become a problem, please elaborate.

>>723349772
>the facts say that child abuse leads to psychological damage.
Where are those facts?

A bunch of females being unable to "even" after some jock touched them between her legs, now she's traumatized forever?

That's what you use to stop a 13 year old from allowing someone else to suck his dick? That's your excuse?

Women don't like sex, therefore 13 year old boys can't let people suck their dicks, is that correct?

Fuck off.

>>723352945
I don't support that at all though.

I'm strictly for chronophilia laws.
These split humans up in to groups based on physical maturation.
Only the groups directly next to each other can interact sexually.

It eliminates every grey area on sexual relations, which is why it will never pass. Sex crimes are an easy number booster for funding.

>>723348717
Clearly you didn't watch the interview.

File: IMG_2531.jpg (32KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 480x480px

>>723353025
You are totally right. 14 year old boys should be cumholes for 45 year old homosexuals.

MAGA!

>>723352932


>This is really not hard to comprehend when your not trying to defend your own agenda anon

Savage

>>723353025
There's no logic behind it, it's purely feelings based legislation.

No wonder it was pushed by feminists.

>>723352932
So what is the age range a 13-year-old is allowed to have sex with?

>>723346246
Yeah, how dare they attack Milo, how is wanting to fuck 13 year old boys /not/ OK?

File: IMG_2532.png (19KB, 652x520px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 652x520px

>>723353137
Dont worry, Milo will be hired by Salon soon.

>>723353092
I've only been talking about sex between two people where both persons cannot give consent, I do not see the connection with 45 year olds.

Could you please just answer my question instead of just avoiding it?

>>723353092
So they can consent? That's the real question. Are they able to understand the implications of being a "cumhole" for a 45 year old homosexual?

You can't have both, they either understand what it is, or they don't.

File: IMG_2533.jpg (28KB, 300x237px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 300x237px

>>723353191
Oh of course 13 year olds can consent to have their assholes fucked to a bloody pulp by middle aged gay men, friend. Isnt it wonderful?

>>723352898
It has has nothing to do with adults being "bad" at making personal choices, it has all to do with adults are aware and "should be able to" grasp a basic concept of right from wrong.

The standards an adult is held towards are different than a child because a child is just starting to come to terms with the things they will carry on with them in to adulthood.

A child does not have the same breath of depth as an adult has, they do not share the the same responsibilities or carry the same standards of life...they are not equal to an adult.

Adults are deterred from interfering with a child in their own selfishness and needs to help allow the child the ability to grow and mature on their own with their own peer groups and equals Giving them the best chance they have to enter adulthood as balanced and capable indivuals

>>723352932
>Again, 13 year olds are not adults. They do not fall under the same law because of their position in life.
Sure, but CAN they give consent to one another, or not?

>13 year olds are equals to one another
So... they CAN give consent to one another?

>adults hold authority over them
All adults?

>Adult have that authority because children are not capable of fully understanding Or grasping the full depth of the majority of lifes issues
What issues? Consent?

My question is very simple: Can they give consent or not?

>The lack experience
Are they experienced enough to understand what sex is, or if they want it or not?

>and they lack outlook
Are you talking about STDs? Pregnancy? What exactly is it that they can't foresee that adults can, in regards to sex?

>This is really not hard to comprehend when your not trying to defend your own agenda anon
What agenda? WHO is really pushing an agenda here, mate? I'm trying to understand your reasoning, but so far all I got was bullshit.

>>723353121
Lawfully no one.

An adult will always be accountable for allowing it if known.

Realistically, their peers
Aka: their equals.

>>723353400
>A child does not have the same breath of depth as an adult has, they do not share the the same responsibilities or carry the same standards of life...they are not equal to an adult.
So... they CAN'T give consent? Even if it's to another 13 year old?

ARE 13 year olds allowed to give consent to each other, or not? Just answer this question, it's really not that hard.

>>723353498
>Realistically, their peers
What if one of their peers is 18 years old?

>>723353498
Right, "peers" is kinda vague there buddy. You need to be more specific.

If you cannot specify an age range then the only valid conclusion is that people below the age of consent are both getting raped when they have sex with each other.

>>723353276
So they DO know what consent is and they ARE able to give it, regardless of their partner's age, correct?

File: IMG_2536.jpg (85KB, 620x400px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 620x400px

>>723353430
Dude just stop. Go fuck a small pillow or something.

>>723353516
Neither is understanding why it's frowned on, but you're still here stumped.

I'm beginkng to think your a child yourself, it would explain the inability to understand an adult world

>>723349358
It's not, it's a Jew attack to sway the conservatives. There is no Conservative party there's the Jews and the Jews...

>>723353621
Just answer to the question, please.

CAN a 13 year old give consent to another 13 year old or not?

>>723353400
THEY AREN'T AWARE, that's the fucking problem.
They literally are not aware of the difference between right or wrong.
THIS IS WHY THEY MAKE BAD DECISIONS EVERY DAY.

I used to be friends with a girl. (she turned in to a cunt and her boyfriend became a shit stoner retard)
Turns out 2 years later, the apartment she moved in to, she is in massive fucking debt.
Why? You want to know why?
She bought a fucking parrot, an expensive cage for her now 2 parrots, and buys Pokemon cards and shit junk food in large amounts.
Then she went and bitched on Facebook about how poor she is and is now being PAID BY THE GOVERNMENT to see a councillor to help her fix her life out.

GEE, SURE IS REASONED THOUGHT AROUND HERE.
Oh, wait.

Children are literally more intelligent than adults.
This is a biological fact. They have more neural synapses, well over double.
They are more than capable of understanding the differences IF TAUGHT such differences.
But teaching that is immoral and anti Christian.
Can't teach people about SEX, how AWFUL.

File: IMG_2537.png (505KB, 835x539px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 835x539px

>>723353594
Oh yeah, a 13 year old wants and craves old man cock. They know very well when theyre about to be given the gay gift by bug chasers. 13 year old kids want it, need it, and deserve it.

>>723353631
So... you prefer not to answer my question because it blows your bullshit ideological garbage out of the window, but, somehow, I am the one pushing an agenda?

Fuck off, mate. Just fuck off.

>>723353700
The question I'm asking is whether or not they can give consent to the "old man cock" or not.

Are they able to consent? Are 13 year olds ABLE to give consent?

>>723353654
Nope.
But they are more than capable of deciding their future by deciding to study well in school and pick the courses they are interested in.

You know, major life-changing decisions that every young teen decides on.
Totally not important at all.
Absolutely no ramifications for making the wrong decisions there.

File: IMG_2539.jpg (104KB, 1260x560px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1260x560px

>>723353707
You totally showed him, bud. Mmmhmmmm!

File: IMG_2482.jpg (51KB, 350x516px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 350x516px

>>723353745
Of course they can consent, buddy. Yum!

>>723346246
the medias the only reason hes as big as he is in the first place. they have every right to "attack" him lol, its what they do. u idiots are all just the ones playing into the whole cycle. keep clicking those links and watching those news pieces about it though, that ad revenue is a gold mine.

File: IMG_0410.gif (2MB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x270px

>>723353707
It's been answered. You just choose to not accept it.
that's not my problem or my burden to bare, that's your own.

>>723353749
Right, so the two 13-year-olds raped each other then?

>>723353749
So a 13 year old CANNOT give consent to another 13 year old, therefore if they happen to engage in sex, they BOTH must be charged with rape, and sent to a juvenile prison for having sex, correct?

They also must BOTH be charged as sex offenders for life, because they can't possibly understand the ramifications that having sex with one another will have when OTHER PEOPLE decide it's NOT okay, correct?

Did I miss something here?

File: lol.png (494KB, 535x535px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 535x535px

he's a faggot kike pro-pedo progressive. he will burn in the pits of hell for eternity

File: 570151062.jpg (65KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 720x960px

Laws are there to protect immature children from dirty old men. end of story. anyone who condones fucking 13 year olds is a pedo.

And don't start with the "how about two 14 year olds ? how do they consent ? Its bullshit. 2 kids fooling around with each other is not comparable to an adult sexually abusing them. Milo fucked up bigly, bollocks to him

>>723353849
Please refer to the answer, I can't seem to find it.

>>723353849
I asked: Can 13 year olds give consent to another 13 year olds?

Your answer was:
You don't understand why pedophilia is wrong, therefore you must be a child because you don't understand why pedophilia is wrong.

You are the only one trying to avoid anything here, mate. I'm asking the questions, you are the one refusing to give a direct answer.

>>723353890
So in your mind a 14 year old fucking another 14 year old boy's asshole leaving him ruptured and bloody is fine and not rape, because it's just kids being kids, what you gonna do?

File: 1485642373687.jpg (21KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 300x225px

If it was fake why did he resign his job at Brietbart?

https://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=%77%68%65%72%65%20%63%61%6e%20%49%20%64%6f%77%6e%6c%6f%61%64%20%63%68%69%6c%64%20%70%6f%72%6e%20%61%6e%64%20%68%6f%77%20%63%61%6e%20%49%20%6b%69%6c%6c%20%74%68%65%20%70%72%65%73%69%64%65%6e%74

File: IMG_2322.jpg (39KB, 306x384px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 306x384px

>>723353849
That gif is so fucking hot mmmmagaaaaaa

>>723353890
>LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH OF A PEDO I'M NOT
>oh also old men are gross and shouldn't fuck anything ever and I don't even want to think about it

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

>>723346246
He likes little boys almost as much as a Muslim.

>>723353868
In the real word Timmy's mum and Tina's mum take them aside and explain to them what they are doing so they can better understand why or why not they shouldn't be doing what they are doing

They have not committed rape. They are equals to one another and nothing was forced. What they committed was playing docter with one another in the name of a mutual curiosity.

Their parents hold the authority over them.
That's what PARENTING is.

>>723353858
Yep.
Totally raped each other.
They were incapable of making any informed decisions, even though they just decided to become an engineer in their future, or a dentist, a doctor, a physicist.

>>723353868
Yes, you missed the part where young teens make hugely important decisions regularly to stick with their education in the subjects they like to further their future career.
But naw, fuck that, incapable.
Kids? pfft, fucking retards, they can't think at all.


The funny thing is you people seem to think this is me arguing for pedophilia, which I am not. (literally not, pedo is pre-pubescent, dumb fucks)
I'm against that. I'm specifically for age groups that limit sexual interactions between people of their biological peers. (which are well-defined biologically)
I'm arguing against Age of Consent, which is a retarded concept that no 2 countries agree on for their age and reasons for assigning said age.
It has NO logical foundations to rest on.

>>723353951
homophobia! stop gay-shaming the children you white-cis-devil.

>>723353890
>2 kids fooling around with each other is not comparable to an adult sexually abusing them.
Great.

At what point does "2 kids fooling around" becomes "an adult sexually abusing them"? When the kid is 17 and the adult is 18? When the kid is 16 and the adult is 18? Where exactly do you draw the line?

>>723353890
Is it also not gangrape if four 14-year olds fuck a girl against her will? Surely they can't be held accountable? They don't even know what consent is at that age after all.

>>723354038
Parenting children on sexual matters?
You fucking sick fuck. How dare you educate!

ITT: pedophiles justifying their degeneracy

File: 1486522520770.png (18KB, 626x551px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 626x551px

lol conservatives pretending that they would defend a dick sucking faggot

>>723353891
Trust me, I am fully aware you can't find the answers.

>>723346246
Fuck Milo, fuck the alt right, fuck Drumpf and his entire cabinet, and fuck anyone that supports him.

Sage goes in all fields.

>>723347721
You got here late bruh

>>723354045
Right, so no define peers. What is the specific age range within which consent is apparently allowed?

>>723354164
but the alt right and conservatism is so punk rock bro

>>723346246
>What do you think of the media attack on Milo?


The faggot got fired by his alt-right white supremacist internet portal.
There is no media attack, you fucktard

>>723354038
>why not they shouldn't be doing what they are doing
Ok, if both kids understand the implications of what they are doing, are they allowed to keep fucking each other, or is it still wrong?

>They have not committed rape.
So they DID give each other consent, correct? Not rape = consent, right?

>They are equals to one another and nothing was forced.
What if it WAS forced though? Are you saying forced sex happens? Are you saying a 13 year olds may choose NOT to give consent if they DON'T want to engage into sex with somebody else???

>>723353951
You're talking about rape. i said fooling around, implying consent, when did rape come into it you fucking tard. In your mind 2 teens exploring sex = rape. i has sexually active at 14 was I the rapist or the victim ?

>>723354127
Yes, so help me out and refer me to the comments you are talking about.
I'm asking for your help man, why won't you do it?

>>723354196
>The faggot got fired by his alt-right white supremacist internet portal.
There is no media attack, you fucktard

Everything wrong with the left, exhibit A

>>723354271
lol greentext fail

>>723354178
Does the kid want to have sex? Do they have someone else who wants to have sex with them? Bam! There is your consent age.

>>723354271
>Breitbart
>left

holy shit, you must be a special kind of retard

>>723354126
I don't. I hate Milo, he is a fucking attention-whore idiot.

But Age of Consent is still retarded.
Chronophilia laws make more sense and have a biological standing.

>>723354178
Biological peers being based on how they are growing.
I am on YOUR side of this argument, btw.
I'm not that other fag against the sex.

Age ranges.
0-5~ : toddler
5 - puberty : child
puberty - maturation : adolescent
Maturation to death point : adult
Death point onwards : OAP.
There are specifically no actual ages in some of these because it would be pointless to define them.

In the case a person from, say, adult group had relations with a child and it wasn't immediately known if they were an adolescent or not, it would be tested.
But even if it WERE to come back pre-pubescent, they couldn't tell from sight alone, which means they were innocent in having sex with that person because they were attracted to someone that LOOKED like they were pubescent.
Edge cases solved.


Or, we just get fucking rid of both this and Age of Consent and go back to Parental consent days.

>>723354196
>There is no media attack, you fucktard
Thank god, right? Imagine if all those media articles and paid mobs demanding him to be fired were ACTUALLY leftists, right? That would be craaaazy...

Thank god it's all conservatives attacking him. Even though conservatives are all pedophiles, they are attacking milo because he's a pedophile. This has absolutely nothing to do with the left. The left dindu nuffin.

>>723346246
>Breitbart fires the faggot who went too far
>It's the left!

massive idiocy as usual from trumpazees

>>723354232
Alright try to stay with me here.

"Is it ok for an adult to fuck a consenting 15 year old?"
No because the 15 year old do not understand consent
> Conclusion 15 year olds and younger do not understand consent and so they cannot give it and sex with them is wrong

"Is it ok for two 14 year old to have sex even though they apparently cannot consent?"
Yes that is perfectly fine
>Conclusion: Children not understanding consent does not matter as long as they are the same age

From the last conclusion it follows that it's fine for children to rape each other because they cannot be expected to understand consent. As long as they are the same age it's all good.

If you disagree, please give a counter-argument.

File: 1479778367537.gif (396KB, 280x280px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 280x280px

>>723354372
lol maga pervert alert

>>723354209
If it was forced and the information was passed along it's the adults responsibility to seek out counsel on the matter.

In children reform is favored over strict punishments if such things end up going in to a legal space and are not handled privately between all pertinent indivuals and kept away from a third parties involvement.

File: milopaedo.jpg (179KB, 700x933px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 700x933px

>>723354439

>>723346246
Here's some Psych 101 for you, OP.
The abused has a tendency to become the abuser, especially if said abuse took place in childhood or teen period.
Does this allow the media to shape a different context? No, it does not. But this man definitely needs a psych evaluation.

>>723354424
>the entire staff of Breitbart threatened to quit if the faggot stay
>Breitbart has already big issues with advertisement and this was a massive blown
>retards still saying it's the left

you deserve your autistic for life medal

>>723354321
Right so a 45 year old man can fuck a 6 year old as long as both consent?

Or perhaps a 14-year-old fucking a 6-year-old?

>>723354439
I don't care about sex at all. I'm a 30 year old virgin that will die virgin.
I don't have any sexual attractions.

Still doesn't make Age of Consent logical.
I'm only arguing for the sake of others sexual relations.

I just don't want stupid shit like >>723354581
happening, hence chronophilia laws being most sensible since it has foundations in our growth.

File: 1438879601922.gif (485KB, 193x135px) Image search: [Google]

485KB, 193x135px

Milo has this idea so he can cope with his own experiences because he started sucking cocks at 13.

Since he got too big too fast a lot of people waited for a moment where they could launch an attack against him.

All that being said was a well known fact for Milo, there is nothing out of ordinary. He kept saying these views in at least 4-5 interviews. All of the evidence are years old. The only difference now is that he got a coordinated attack against him this time.

Everyone acts like a fucking saint and thinks kids don't fuck in their early teens. That's just how it is. Talking about this doesn't make you a pedo ring endorser.

Also leftie retards like op think Milo was this fucking glorious knight who suddenly got corrupted with this info so the alt-right kids would implode. Do you realize that the people who like him do so because he is outrageous and a rude asshole? This won't hurt his reputation among his fanbase.

Tldr: people are prudish and hypocrites, and they try to put logic and morals into a standard character assassination process. Calm down kids. Politics/media works that way.

>>723353953
Because he doesnt want his scandle to hurt them.

>>723354440
>If it was forced
Was it rape, then, if it was forced? What exactly qualifies as "forced"? When is it forced? When is it NOT forced?

If a 13 year old DO NOT give consent to another 13 year old, does that qualify as forced? What if they DO give consent, then? Is it no longer forced?

>In children reform is favored over strict punishments if such things end up going in to a legal space
So, that means there IS a difference between FORCED sex, and CONSENSUAL sex between two 13 year olds?

File: 1483527631615.jpg (24KB, 387x461px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 387x461px

>>723354644
>doesn't have attractions
>vigorously defending child rape
suuuuure

>>723349545
Hammond is that you?

>>723354429
Consent doesn't apply to underage because neither can give it (according to the law) this doesn't automatically make it rape

>>723354659
he quit of his own volition, deal with it. By the way, at what age did you start sucking cocks?

>>723354748

what are you trying to say maggot?

/b/ discussing legal issues is always cringe as fuck.

>>723354581
Is a 6 year old held responsible, in court, the same way a 14 year old is?

If yes, then sure.
If not, then we're talking about two completely different situations.

>>723354748
that he's a has-been already, and really a never-should-have-been.

I wonder what he'll do now, other than suck cocks.

>>723354745
>Consent doesn't apply to underage because neither can give it (according to the law) this doesn't automatically make it rape
That's what rape laws are based upon. No consent = rape, that's the law, it's not a matter of opinion.

File: 1486561727407.gif (169KB, 267x199px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 267x199px

>>723346246
Who the fuck cares or is surprised?
The guy made money by fanning the flames of everyone from the left and right.

Suddenly, some idiots are acting shocked and upset that the little shit-thrower has been taken down by his own comments?

The fuck is wrong?

>>723354429

How are you going to charge an under-aged person with statutory rape?

How do you decide whether or not to charge both of them? You'd have to charge both of them or neither.

If one kid actually forcefully rapes the other, then yeah - charge them with sexual assault.

Either way, kids really SHOULDN'T be having sex with other kids. Like you say, they're not old enough to understand consent according to the law.

If neither person really understands consent, what do you call it then? I'd call it two kids fucking, who shouldn't be fucking - most kids know they shouldn't be fucking, and most parents don't let their <16 teens fuck other teens, or anyone, if they can help it.

>>723354846
>>723354846

he had a base level of reputation and got a promotion basically, and he lost that promotion. What is he going to do? Dunno, maybe what he did before? In half a year nobody will remember this shit. The whole setup was for hurting breitbart's prestige.

calm the shit down, this won't change a thing. He even gained 5000 more subscribers or something.

You are in denial.

learn from this gentlemen.

YOU NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER SHOW YOUR TRUE POWERLEVELS.

EVER.

>>723354721
>child
Adolescents are not children.
You abuse of English is your own fault.

I'm only arguing for it because I am bored and it's funny seeing people try to defend Age of Consent when there are millions of instances daily that adults aren't even capable of making informed decisions.

Better solution, let's take the Jew route on this.
Legally prevent people from adult society unless the prove, by exam, to be capable of rational, reasoned decision skills.
Enact it retroactively by year born.
If they fail the test:
Lose home, car, license, ability to do any adult vices, job, everything.
Nope, no welfare given either, move in with someone legally capable.
Society fixed in a fucking decade.

>>723354912
>the little shit-thrower has been taken down by his own comments
He was taken down by an organized effort by the entire mainstream media, and thousands of leftists demanding him to be fired, and his for his editor to pull his book contract.

If this was about his contract, he would've went down two years ago, when he ACTUALLY made those statements, but back then he wasn't such a big threat to the left as he is now.

>>723355081

wrong.

>>723346246
http://underlore.com/the-final-underclass/

why is this distinction relevant to you?
do you feel treated unfairly?

>>723355044

>*plan to eradicate idiots*

I don't think we should take it that far - but they need to tighten up the standards on mental handicaps.

Some people really are just too stupid to be out there unsupervised.

>>723355044
Sorry,got to step in here--
Adolescents are still within the age group of childhood.

Just so we are clear: 13 year olds have zero ability to do anything that an adult is legally able to do and many are or haven't even started puberty at that moment.

Can a 13 year old legally sign and completely understand a legal document? No.

Go seek out NAMBLA if you want other pesos to agree with you. But society as a whole doesn't.

>>723346246
http://falkvinge.net/2012/09/07/three-reasons-child-porn-must-be-re-legalized-in-the-coming-decade/

>>723355321
>13 year olds have zero ability to do anything that an adult is legally able to do and many are or haven't even started puberty at that moment
Are 13 year olds able to give consent to other 13 year olds?

>>723348496
Indeed.

We react like it's worse than peeling them ISIS/Mexican Cartel style.

That's objectively absurd given our other social position.

http://falkvinge.net/2012/09/07/three-reasons-child-porn-must-be-re-legalized-in-the-coming-decade/

There is nothing you can say about child sex video that's worse than child murder video.

And yet look how they are respectively handled socially.

>>723355081
Wrong.

Did he or did he not say those things?
Was he or was he not recorded?

Then you have zero room to wiggle out here to defend him.

The more spotlight you have for your soap box, the more criticism you'll face.
So don't act shocked when you get the slosh-- it is either the sign of a liar or a moron.

>>723348974
Is that why we try them as adults all the time?

Wake the fuck up and smell the double and triple standards.

>>723355423
13 year olds aren't smart enough to wash their asses or hands properly without catching a funk that needs a doctors visit, never mind consenting to sex.

>>723354881
So both are rapists and victims. i never knew i was a rapist and a victim. good to know

>>723349118
Truth. Just look at how society reacts to a female teacher "molesting" a male student. Now flip the genders.

One gets a book deal the other gets prison rape.

>>723355321
You do realize adolescence extends to mid-20s on average, right?
So suddenly your argument breaks down when that person reaches AoC. (15-18~)

Puberty starts 11-12 for most people in west.
Hell, mines started 10. I was a hairy beast by 13.
This is due to more and regular fat in our diets, which facilitate puberties growth.

Also, 13 year olds are mostly not in the pedo category. In fact, it's quite rare to not have started puberty by 13. Usually only those of poor health and lack of food, which is entirely capable of delaying puberty for life.
Literally adult children by any biological definition.

>>723355474
Exactly. People react more hysterically to a guy admitting he finds 13 year olds attractive, than they care about terrorists literally blowing up people in their homeland.

It's just out of this world to watch this type of reaction, and the way people treat this subject as if it was something sacred, that must NEVER be questioned.

>>723355423
Depends on what country and local laws you ate talking about.

Generally, the answer is no.

>>723351453
Notice how no one has any solid logical refutations to any of these points.

Sad fact: Facts and logic don't matter to people.

>>723355520
>i'm incapable of proper hygiene, therefore everyone else is a stank-ass fool like me
Nice to know.

>>723351544
Pyrrhic victory much?

Maybe the question should be why we tolerate assholes in the first place. Why wasn't that enough alone?

>>723355669
No.

That isn't what adolescent means nor is defined as such.

And no, there is no set time frame for puberty.
Japanese teens, for example, start by 14.
Some Americans have been documented at 11 starting.


It doesn't matter either way.

You are arguing against science and the law.

Are you a doctor or lawyer?
I am guessing not.


You also presume that it actually matters.
NAMBLA tried and failed at what you're trying to argue for. Why not join them?

>>723351885
I love it when I see people half my IQ talking like this.

Every one of those arguments apply to you from people above.

It's just a bunch of excuses for maintaining a ageist caste system.

Children should be treated like adults recovering from a brain injury, end of story.

http://underlore.com/the-final-underclass/

>>723352244
"Protected" XD

You'd die fighting to get out of that "protected" class if it was forced on you.