First of all im not a expert on physics so please bear that in

>>723166341
Well technically, if the universe is large enough, there would be a 100% chance of an exact doppleganger of yourself, with atoms in the same position. But as for your theory, the universe would be dead by the time all atoms that made you up dissipated and the came together again.

>>723166341
>This has been stuck in my head for quite a while now because for me it actually shows that you get reincarnated with a possibility of 100%

well yeah. you just wont be reincarnated as a conscious being (consciousness itself is a fraud)

>>723166341
I'll start by saying that the universe does not have unlimited time. It will eventually end. It is guaranteed, but in a universe after our own may end up creating an exact copy of you in the exact same period. Possibly recreating the same memories.

>>723166634
but even after the universe stops existing, why would it be impossible to get recreated again with the same parts its made out of before? It could take trillions of times, and years but it will happen

>>723166748
Essentially you are worthless.

>>723166341
I had exactly this idea for a long time. We should start a new religion.

so i think after u die, you will wake up as the same being trillions of years later but without any memory and on another planet

>>723166807
This is possible just VERY unlikely.

File: printer.jpg (37KB, 640x627px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 640x627px

>>723166341
>So with the universe having like unlimted time to exist
There is no evidence to suggest the universe has infinite time but plenty of evidence showing time is finite and didn't exist before the universe came into existence

>would it not be sure for those atoms to find together one day and forming you again?
Given enough time the probability of anything reaches close to certainty, so yes. Similarly, given infinite energy and thus infinite time, you'll be re-created inside out and upside down and everything else for all eternity.

>Maybe thats why you cant remember your past life...
Or maybe it's because we don't have past lives

>This has been stuck in my head for quite a while now because for me it actually shows that you get reincarnated with a possibility of 100%
Given your bullshit assumptions, sure.

In reality the universe is as we expect it- finite.

>>723166903
yes, lets call ourselves the ancestors of infinity

>>723166957
but the universe got created at some point right? So why would it not happen again someday?

>>723166341
Our current understanding of physics does not rule it out, but gives it a negligible chance. Cosmic expansion will drive apart every real particle into its own hubble sphere long before it would have any significant likelihood.

Actually, here's a question: Can a particle heisenberg itself out of its own hubble sphere?

>>723167109
>but the universe got created at some point right? So why would it not happen again someday?
Depends how you define created. The big bang theory is pretty shaky just now but it's still the best explanation we have. There's no reason to suggest it would happen again, or that it wouldn't, so it's all presumption unless you start venturing into quantum mechanics, and even then you're just presuming.

>>723167485
well but i can say it happend so why would it not be able to do that again (no matter if its big bang or something else) ? Everything that happens can happen again