It would be so funny if someone took a shit on his car.. htt

>>723039734
As a non-american I genuinely have no idea why everyone hates this guy. He is entertaining, I like his jokes. Sure the topics he is discussing are often controversial, but thats the reason people are watching im.

Your thread is irrelevant compared to these doubles

>>723 not american, fuck off...

>>723040359
I'm russian and I second that.

>>723039734
Then why don't you man up & do it yourself?

>>723040505

NEWFAG DETECTED

>>723039734

It's impossible.

I don't know when the last time you were at a TV studio was, but they are gated and guarded and the vehicles for stars and production are kept DEEP in the compound.

He isn't unfunny, but comes off as a tryhard most of the time. Also:

>current year
>still fejidjjwdwdojwpow

Fuck, I hate that shit.

>>723040359
He is entertaining & he is funny but he is not shy about pointing out problems in America & Americans cannot allow somebody with a non-American accent to criticize their way of life. Even if it is in their best interest.

>>723041144

But <current year> is a completely valid argument when the opposing assertion is archaic and patently false bullshit.

File: h5hh1hq[1].png (127KB, 356x366px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 356x366px

>>723039734

Aww, did someone get twiggered?

>>723041300

No, it isn't.

An idea does not simply become more valid with time. It was always valid. It's a childish form of argument.

As humour, it was funny for a while but become cloying, and finally rage-inducing.

>>723040584
I'm American and I third that.

>>723041563
>2017
>being raged on the internet

>>723040359
its a europoor trying to dictate american politics. its why he has such shit ratings.

>>723041563

>2017
>believing the Earth is flat

>2017
>thinking Trickle Down works


Things that have been proven false by time or that are demonstrably false through the application of modern science/technology (i.e. the Information Age and the Internet) should be laughable when posted as an argument.

So, again, <current year>, which is shorthand for a much longer and far more condescending scientific thrashing of idiotic opinions, is a completely valid counterargument.

File: John-Oliver-picture.jpg (41KB, 618x412px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 618x412px

>>723040359
>why everyone hates this guy
The fucking look on his face - you just want to smash it in with a couple of knuckle dusters

>>723042416
nobody thinks trickle down works homeboy.

>>723042500

No one except 99.5% of all modern Republicans...

>>723042427

>I'm so British I shit the Queen

That said, I love John Oliver and think he's hilarious.

>>723039734
You leave Oliver alone! He is perfect!

File: Oliver.png (331KB, 450x591px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 450x591px

>>723043473

He's a prick