Just for the sake of discussion, what's the best way to

ebola

sound cannon

>>722872759
so basically you're limiting it to gasses.
chemical warfare is dangerous.
so many guys got killed just making that kind of bomb.

>>722874068
>so basically you're limiting it to gasses.
I guess if you aren't creative, I am.

>>722875227
fuck off artillery is always an option

>>722872759
Nuclear weapons.

>>722876072
thats explosive

File: woonder.jpg (59KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1280x720px

ez

>>722872759
Truck

>>722876559
plane

Gas, flamethrower, water cannon (+electricity),

>>722877738
The water cannon idea is a classic, but I don't know how one would go about electrifying the stream of water effectively and without shocking them self.

>>722877738
>>722878447
Boiling water cannon.

File: 1486011841002.jpg (68KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 400x400px

>>722878713
I love it

napalm? technically not explosive

gases in an open enviroments wouldnt be very effective

>>722878713
good lord your evilness is delicious

>>722878713
if the water was merely boiling it would cool down as it travels through the air. The range is limited by the amount of water you are putting through the system. You would need a LOT of water to disable a crowd this way.

Try a steam cannon. Same (short) range but superheated steam can do a LOT of damage. And less mass/more direct heating than just water. With a heavy steam cannon you could melt people.

flame thrower is OP in closed spaces

Maybe an 'enraging' agent?
Make the crowd tear itself apart.

>>722880407
You can use boiling oil instead, then.

>>722880547
Yeah... good idea, idiot...
How about a "suicide agent", now we got started...

>>722872759
Easy. I'd just use my superior sowrd skills to cut them all down one at a time.

Try harder next time OP, haha.

Text me 6789373475

shit what the hell does no explosives allowed means? you want like white weapons like swords and shit?cause cannons can be considered guns and almost all gases and biological weapons are spark triggered. does a frag granade counts?

File: angie-varona-photos-age-legal-20-2014-40.jpg (31KB, 382x960px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 382x960px

Text me :D 6789373475

An EMP. Watch how the masses lose their minds without electricity.

>>722880858
women, got that right anon, those cunts can destroy civilizations

>>722880681
yea something, you just need a much higher specific heat than water. And to heat all that water would be a nightmare. It would be a firehose to a hydrant with a few boilers in the line, not a backpack system.

Steam could be a backpack system to take out a room. (need nuclear to heat it that quick, or battery array for 2 mins of use, chemical for 5 - 10 mins use)

just pull down Op's pants, his faggot ass is so cockhungry it would suck everything in miles

>>722872759
Drop spiders from the ceiling, then when everyone is in full panic mode, release the tigers

you can just put on a boombox one of Hillary's speeches and watch all of them commit suicide

Hoses and electricity

OP here
gases are out, >>722880053 is right.

>>722881069
Steam is an interesting idea, I like that.

>>722880843
you dont get it
>>722881283
you get it

>>722881392
horses and electability

have a MRI machine in the middle of the room and turn it on. It would pull the weapons towards it and kill anyone close by.

>>722880053
someone has never been crowd controlled with tear gas.

>>722881611
I have, and thats exactly why I said its not effective, disperses too fast to do serius damage alone, and people can just move, thats why its effective do DISPERSE and not kill, you moron, go get tear gassed in the face before talking shit

How much set-up do you have OP, what kinds of preparation do you have? Do you get to create the area or just what you can take in with you?

Use a radiation trap

>>722872759
bulldozer or a combine

>>722881872
and who are we killing? just women? just blacks? just muslins? all kinds of "people"?

>>722881872
Prep work can be anything.

It could take all day to prep, it could take all night.

>>722881855
You stupid piece of shit.
Maybe if they wanted to kill they would use the kill-gas (look up WWI for some real world OUTDOOR examples) and not the please-go-home-now-gas?

>>722881889
Lol, like dropping an uranium bar in the middle of the crowd? he's trying to be effective, and spending years so they slowly die of radiation poisoning isn't very effective, you know, since speed is a key factor on effectiveness

You're all taking this way too seriously.

I just wanted to know of funny ways to fuck with protesters. And yes I find gassing those crowds funny.

>>722882056
you know why they were used on WWI??? because of fucking trenches you stupid cunt, they gassed trenches, again, it would not be effective on open enviroments, one fucking wrong gush of wind and puuf the mustard gas is on your face

>>722882343
this is 4chan, you do not imply you're gonna kill people and expect not to be taken seriously

>>722872759
go to taco bell. eat three pounds of re fried beans. crowded area. LET IT RIP. of course u would walk out fine. everyone loves their own stench

>>722876222
Technically the FAT MAN bomb was an implosion bomb.

File: 1487142078051.jpg (9KB, 228x219px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 228x219px

>>722876529
lul'd

>>722872759
water hose, hydrochloric acid (available at your pool shop)

>>722882343
Broken glass everywhere, gallons of that stink bomb crap, pop packets on the ground (step activate POP POP POP panic), ammonia and bleach in plastic bags, super soaker with bleach ("my protesting clothes got ruined" lol),
2-inch caltrops ftw
accuse other crowd members of things and get them beaten up, anything that can cause a panic or stampede, act violent/break things, then leave and tell the cops the protest is violent.

most damage? caltrops. Drop them randomly in a thick crowd and someone WILL fuck their foot up.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>722882636
implosion primed nuclear explosion.

File: taco bell.jpg (117KB, 1020x570px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1020x570px

>>722882616

>>722882936
Still counts as either.

>>722882406
so smoke would blow away in the "open air" but not a 4 foot by 6 foot trench in open air? You are literally so dumb i cant even.

Unless there is a strong wind a few gas canisters with arsnic or mustard gas would kill. Especially in an urban setting. No question moron.

>no guns or explosives
Fucking tough
Biological warfare, radiation poisoning, fucking them all to death

>>722883166
no, it does not. the 500 meter diameter ball of nuclear hellfire was not caused by an implosion lol.

by your logic a gun is an explosive weapon and not a projectile because it is caused by an explosion. god u r dum.

>>722883223
if you think there was as much ventilation in a trench as there is in open fields, there's not much I can do for you anymore, i could even try to star explaining that it has a lot to do with area of effect and dispersion and wind but it's not woth it

>>722883223
fucking just take a look at fluid mechanics

>>722883223
and that's what videogames teach

>>722883872
Ok, even if you have that little of an understanding of aerodynamics, even if I am completely wrong (i'm not) and making everything up:

Then why would they use gas attack WHEN THE ENEMY WAS CHARGING across the trenches?
They would gas when the guys were out in the open charging.

Or let me guess, every top general and scientist from WWI is wrong and obviously does not have your in depth understanding of "area of effect" and "wind". By the way did you learn about airflow from the college of vidya games? "area of effect" as if gas canisters were an area effect spell HAHAHAHHAHA. just stop idiot. People are gassed outside all the time. hahah

>>722882537
When did I say kill?
>brutally harm

fucking read

>>722872759
With 20 years of dedicated and efficient martial Arts training relating to fighting multiple armed opponents.
Also, a physically healthy and fit body.

>>722881448
KEK
Also a flamethrower

>>722884382
follow up,
>>722883872
look at these videos of real life gas in outdoor situations. There is even wind in the first and second one and you can see that the video game logic does not apply to your "area of effect" dispersion
http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2014/09/28/vo-watson-hong-kong-crowd-tear-gas.cnn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebolOvmrW90

>>722881435
Gas grenades have worked well in the. Past for nonlethals.

Who's to say you don't have a massive volume of gas underground, released from the floor when the crowd is over it?

>>722884382
and that's why I said there was nothing I could do for you, and yes they were stupid, their chemical weapons were proven highly innefective, dependind on climate conditions to work and killing usually on both sides, thus actually not having any importancy other than beeing cruel and beeing banned, pick any history book and they will tell you this

>>722884877
actually your videos demonstrate my point, ir desperses really quickly, policemen have to constantly keep throwing granades to have little effect

>>722884877
>>722885693
but i will cut you a break here because the density of tear gas is lower than like mustard and other really harmfull gasses

>>722885401
not having any importance? Now i know 100% that you are just making shit up, typing autistic works of fiction and falsehoods on the internet.

They banned chemical weapons BECAUSE they killed so many people in such inhumane ways. Entire hospital wards were filled with people dying from mustard gas inhalation. You could make an entire army die slowly over decades which was what made it illegal.

also look and the FUCKING video evidence i posted you fucking basement dwelling autistist. It works very well even in light wind and people use it every day.

>climate conditions

Go get gassed again idiot, maybe it will help unretard you. Maybe then you can learn to argue instead of trying to highroad someone much smarter than you. Unless you can learn to do that, it's you who there is no helping. Go take a shower cheeto breath, and wash the dumb out of your mouth lol.

>>722885922
They cleared a hundred foot area you inbred fuck.

also please tell me what the density of mustard gas is as an absolute and ratio to tear gas. By the way mr. scientist are you sure that was tear gas? maybe using your knowledge of "area of effect" spells and wind dispersion you can determine it and let us know, genius.

>>722872759
Hello Antifa

>>722886124
good lord you're good at swearing, im too lazy to look up a better souce for you, but that will do https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_weapons_in_World_War_I#Casualties

read it and see if they were so important, and the true reason why they were banned (would like to point that banning a weapon because it kills too much its stupid, weapons are banned because they are excessively cruel or cause too much post war damage)

>>722872759

fbi tested its own audio stun gun devices

>>722886335
it's writen in the fucking name of the video you idiot

>>722886335
sincerely did not understand the question about the density of mustard gas

>>722886770
Cause no on ever lies, exaggerates or is misinformed on the internet right?

>>>722886770
>this poster gobbles cocks
there you go! proof you are a gigantic cock gobbler.

>>722886335
it cleared the area because everyone who saw it runs like hell, not because they all were affected, again go get tear gassed in the face and you'll see

>>722887032
yes, when arguments fail, insults till no one can stand being around you,than its almost like you were right and won and mommy loves you again

>>722886953
he (you?) was trying to leave the argument by claiming the problem was a simple misunderstanding about the difference between gas densities so I turned that ploy around and made it seem like the core argument of this discussion was centered SOLELY on the question of gas densities as a form of attacking the point by absurdity or by disproportionality.

>>722887453
oh oks, thanks for clearing it

>>722886662
thanks, also cause nukes aren't banned right? It was banned because the people exposed to the gas would not die right then, but be maimed for life. Which is unsportsmanlike and unnecessarily cruel.

But this line of thinking does infer that people were being exposed to gas in trench warfare conditions (however great 1940 gas warfare effectiveness was).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85y-N5GJa9g

this

>>722887172
>gas isnt effective at crowd dispersal because it works, it's effective because people just leave the area when the cops use it
k

File: 5631d3efaac68_3(538).jpg (29KB, 640x359px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x359px

A Black Hole

>>722888018
OP here
Ending the thread
God damn
Got high and watched a Berkley riot video and wanted to think of funny ways to punish protesters.
Black hole wins
Fucking ruin someone else's thread you angry fucks

>>722888326
your thread way dead anyway faggot.

also, drop caltrops (think really angry tacks on the floor)

>thermonuclear holocaust
>moon's destruction

>>722888540
yep it was a really shitty thread, better part of it was arguing with someone about efficiency of chemical warfare on WWI

>>722888540
this
also rip thread

>>722888912
yea that was a lot of fun, thanks anon!

>>722872759
Drop a boulder like how Wile E. Coyote did. :D

>>722889742
Previous guy talking... just realized threads done :(

>>722889998
I'm lonely:((

>>722878713
boiling oil cannon

>>722880053
Tell that to ww1