Imperial is objectively superior to metric. If your country

>>722790869
hello.
chicago man here.

>>722790869
Hello. I like to make this statement from time to time but we didn't do shit with it. We allowed the Saturn V to be decommissioned, we stopped after Apollo 17, and we are no where near capable of getting back there in a pinch. Also, the US currently forks over money to buy seats on Russian rockets to get into space. This argument only makes it clear as to how far the US has fallen.

Honestly, why not use both? Both are useful for different reasons.

File: b (92).jpg (114KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1000x750px

>>722790869
>you aren't aloud to post here

First man made object on another planet was by the russians. On venus. A planet we've never had anything sent to.

>>722790869
>still believing in the Moon hoax
Just check out the radiation levels first, then for solar activity that year and for the spaceship's wall thickness. This advanced technology must have been lost, today we are struggling against that very problem.

>>722792532
We've sent some probes by it and there were a number of mun impacts prior to that...vega I think. Don't quote me, I'm no Ruski.

Archifag here, I've worked in both. Metric is far superior in every way.

>>722790869
Did they use fucking inches and yards to get to the moon?

>>722790869
https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2007/08jan_metricmoon

>>722790869
>Imperial is objectively superior to metric.
No.

>>722794623

kek

>>722794445
Yes, they did actually

>>722795666
No, they did not use imperial