[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

What's the best political/news website /pol/? Vote: ht

This is a red board which means that it's strictly for adults (Not Safe For Work content only). If you see any illegal content, please report it.
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 2

File: IMG_5802.png (472KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_5802.png
472KB, 640x1136px
What's the best political/news website /pol/?

Vote:
http://www.strawpoll.me/12321875

>Discuss
>>
Political Outsource >>>
>>
>>722703039
Thread.
>>
Breitbart
>>
>>722703166
Kek
E
K
>>
>>722703166

What? If you include the leftist trash that is CNN and BBC (both proven already to be propaganda machines), why not a genuine news site that actually reports the real unfiltered truth?
>>
>>722703337
>>722703192

Sorry, that was meant for you.
>>
File: IMG_5803.jpg (33KB, 569x428px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_5803.jpg
33KB, 569x428px
>>722703337
IMHO:

Best:

Political Outsource: unbiased, underground, real

The Guardian: fast reporting, mostly fair

Rueters: clean, simple news not much narrative involved

Bad:
InfoWars: fear mongering alex jones. Good for a laugh or a ruse, but not much else.

Breitbart: terrible source, a guaranteed mockery if you use them as a fact backup

DrudgeReport; I just hate their layout. They do their share of biased news, too.

Zerohedge: the sky is always falling here, not a fan of that.

Absolute WORST:
CNN: I think you know why. Every story has a pushed narrative.

BBC: tries to bait people into slipping up in interviews

DailyMail: Flashy headlines, shitty reporting

WashingtonPost: annoying ass liberal cucks who use EVERY article as a platform for their left wing ideas

Not bad, not good:

FOX: meh, good reporting but sometimes a bias obviously to the right.

Mirror.co.uk: bit of a tabloid

Wallstreet Journal: makes you pay $$ to read, not that interesting stuff but sometimes they're good

NY Times: acts like a tabloid sometimes
>>
>>722703885
This
>>
>>722703885
It's Reuters you dumb motherfucker
>>
>>722705142
Rueters
>>
>>722705142
Who cares? The company is going to shit anyway
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 2


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Posts and uploaded images are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that website. If you need information about a Poster - contact 4chan. This project is not affiliated in any way with 4chan.