Buffbutts

File: 1d8a62e58752b279b32de50cc689f6a0.jpg (230KB, 1280x1113px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1280x1113px

>>722495549
I don't know what you mean?
>>722495641
Well it'll only make you stronger.
Sweet dreaming.
>>722495949
kek

>>722496524
Well wasn't that mouse/cheetah porn you found? It kiiinda looks like a cheetah anyway

File: tmp_11365-1482734399838-1337940679.jpg (190KB, 834x1280px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 834x1280px

>>722496524
Yeah
A guy with long hair is a label to be called a nigger here
Anyone who isn't LDS/Mormon is one basically

File: 95732e95c836f20cd748e0afa880f9f2.jpg (88KB, 617x842px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 617x842px

>>722496765
Are they going to kill you? I didn't think mormans did that nigger shit?
>>722496571
No it was not a cheetha i think

>>722496864
Got them cheetah spots at least, the rest is not very cheetah though

File: Michael Keaton 27.jpg (161KB, 1050x808px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1050x808px

I think it's almost finished. I have to wait for the last layer to dry first.

>>722494810
I always do.

>>722496864
Oh nvm those aren't cheetah spots

Bananders' fursona is a mouse.

>>722497203
You're actually right

File: Michael Keaton 56.jpg (111KB, 446x299px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 446x299px

Everyone I work with thinks I'm mad. The manager broke a mop then accused me of sabotaging it. The couple that proof read my statement said it sent shivers down their spines. I felt like I was going to vomit and then pass out while looking at a balloon being blown by a fan. Today was very strange.

>>722497259
That means you're a bottom.

>>722497312
Switch ftw

File: 1439170790.leobo_tonymeme.png (967KB, 1055x1600px) Image search: [Google]

967KB, 1055x1600px

>>722497259
>>722497312
>>722497355
That don't mean shit.

>>722497398
Thanks tigger

>>722497355
Nope, mouse means bottom

>>722496140
Moar like this
http://www.ipanon.com

>>722497456
On the bottom of a plump ass yeah

>>722497543
Kitty's gonna devour you... through rape.

>>722497588
That he will

File: 2a9942fca41e4b8c38ed4273dd9f27f3.png (1MB, 1753x1240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1753x1240px

>>722497452
>>722497543
Bottom of my ass!

>>722497627
Just don't make me snap in half plz :p

File: tmp_11365-14855055183741317310177.jpg (240KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 1280x1280px

>>722496864
They linch gays Tig
Its a Trump and Mike Pense State

File: 9098e550a968193e8b8727214b8b8529.jpg (134KB, 646x950px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 646x950px

>>722497790
Then get a open carry / concealed license.

File: 1329703390.heartwood_sciggles_iaheartwood.png (881KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

881KB, 1280x1280px

>>722498074
So, been gettin ass yesterday?

File: tmp_11365-1483850914207-427177259.jpg (211KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1280x1280px

>>722497878
PTSD and Suicide record Tig
I can't
Even if Utah has the most open laws with firearms. If I had 1 of the two I could get an RPG.
Utah, almost no gun control.
Unless you have PTSD and Depression! The reason for those is the large rate of murders involving those two illnesses.

File: 90526f8daa95091b9ce5d95ee446ddcc.jpg (108KB, 787x560px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 787x560px

>>722498329
Ever since the school shoot-ups right?

File: 1460087331.dwalker_kalepinup.jpg (278KB, 1024x1280px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1024x1280px

>>722498358
Here's a tiger, answer my question.

File: tmp_11365-1485347082351-1576183028.jpg (150KB, 564x800px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 564x800px

>>722498358
Not really
USA fucking over VETs and them loosing it
Mall shooting lately
And a few schools have been invaded but never shot up here
Just children raped in the schools and it being ok

I think he left because he doesn't want to answer your question

File: 86545789.jpg (246KB, 1119x655px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1119x655px

Awful, he only wants to comment when its annoying.

Indeed, anyway, I shall return to lurking

File: wat.png (258KB, 702x375px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 702x375px

There exist absolutely no acceptable synonyms for the word "scene" in the english language (scene in the dramatic sense; a part of a play or film). Episode is the very closest I could locate and it still doesn't capture the precise idea of moving between scenes; scene conveys a more fluid idea where episode comes across as somewhat staccato. This has made writing about film perhaps the most unpleasant thing I've done all week that didn't involve answering the borderline brain-damaged questions of insipid females who speak with terror in their voices at the prospect of actually forming an original fucking thought.

File: Michael Keaton 73.jpg (241KB, 900x470px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 900x470px

What about incident? Or instance? Or moment?

File: Michael Keaton 82.jpg (61KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 800x533px

Or segment? Or even part?

File: ohmy.png (9KB, 73x96px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 73x96px

I didn't accept any of those as being sufficiently harmonious for the purpose. Incident has an underlying negative connotation that I rejected because most of the scenes I was discussing didn't suit it, and instance and moment are too implicitly immediate to describe any of the scenes I was using (if any of them had been brief or violent I definitely would've used incident).

Segment and part apply to broadly. Your finger has segments. A lego set has parts. "Scene" conveys an entirely different concept. There isn't a word that's close enough to substitute for it.

File: whyme.png (27KB, 107x114px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 107x114px

Actually, one of the scenes was negative enough for "incident" but not petty enough; the enormity of the interaction was such that incident would've done it an injustice.

File: Michael Keaton 85.jpg (72KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1000x750px

Literally the definition of scene in terms of film is a sequence of continuous action. Every single word I said is a synonym of that scene in the actual literal sense of the word.

Incident is used quite frequently to describe things that are actually quite grandiose. Filmmakers themselves have made entire films about things they dubbed incidents. Don't be pedantic.

File: thatredmageisaspy.png (4KB, 82x130px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 82x130px

But it's not an issue of literal definition here. I'm not questioning the literal definitions. The issue is the connotations of those words. The additional connotations of those words (in lay vocabulary, not for an audience of cinematic scholars) render them disqualified for my purposes.

File: secondenigma.jpg (378KB, 771x800px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 771x800px

In fact part of the problem is that those words are too technical. The thing I needed with the word "scene" was something that bore the connotation both of a temporal segment of drama and of a general place and feeling. The other words only carry the aspect of time.

File: Michael Keaton 88.png (770KB, 1610x1059px) Image search: [Google]

770KB, 1610x1059px

For example, Incident at Blood Pass, a film by the Academy Award winning director Hiroshi Inagaki, which is about a plot to steal a shipment of gold being delivered to the Shogunate by some petty thieves that involves secret police, rogue Ronin, spurned lovers, revenge, and so on.

The connotation of the word scene in the sense of film is the definition of the word scene in the sense of film. If you are writing for lay people then using words like part, moment, instance, etc. would make absolutely perfect sense.

Part is not at all a technical word, it's the most basic word you could use.

File: Michael Keaton 106.gif (1MB, 500x260px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x260px

Instance is also not technical, nor are incident, moment, or segment. These are all basic words that any person with a vocabulary beyond grade 2 would understand.

File: shiny.png (23KB, 127x140px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 127x140px

You're failing to understand why I have a problem with the synonyms for scene. "Part" and the other words are not technical in the sense that they're arcane or obtuse - they're technical in the sense of being precise, correct, and completely devoid of emotional content. It's worth mentioning, incidentally, that I'm using "scene" here to describe a segment of film, but also (and primarily) of narrative, as presented via the film. The narrative content as revealed through motion picture is more important than the medium of film.

File: Michael Keaton 63.jpg (308KB, 1109x856px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1109x856px

I'm failing to understand because it doesn't make any sense, stupid. You are saying, "I don't want to use words that are like scene because none of them are actually the word scene and only the educated would understand what I mean if I used the word 'part.'"

Scene has no inherent emotional content, when you say the word scene a specific feeling isn't evoked, it is the description of the scene that carries that weight. You could replace the word scene with the word part and still have it carry just as much emotional content.

It is important to note that I assumed you meant the definition of scene from the start. Why are you so bad at thinking? Seriously, that isn't a rhetorical question.

File: Michael Keaton 12.jpg (50KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 640x360px

Here are two examples that are literally the same thing.

The scene in the film when Liam Neeson threatens the kidnappers with murder because they stole his kid.

The part in the film when Liam Neeson threatens the kidnappers with murder because they stole his kid.

BOTH OF THOSE SENTENCES MEAN THE SAME THING IT IS JUST REPLACING THE WORD SCENE WITH THE WORD PART.

File: pitchblack.png (19KB, 136x145px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 136x145px

I never said people wouldn't understand the word part. My problem is the connotations of the word scene (mostly defined by its other definitions) are not shared by any other word. I switched from "connotation" to "emotional content" to try and give you a second way of understanding what I'm trying to explain here but clearly that failed. In plainer English, scene, like many words, means a bunch of things simultaneously. The precise meaning I'm currently using it for benefits from drawing on those alternate meanings. None of the synonyms of scene do that. I'm actually amazed that the issue of connotation wasn't obvious here when I described the difference between scene and episode in my first post, actually.

Again, this is not about literal meaning, it's about coordinated meaning via connotation. At the core, it's an issue of writing beautifully rather than precisely.

File: Michael Keaton 66.jpg (90KB, 1748x983px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1748x983px

If you are incapable of understanding how the word scene can be replaced with any of its synonyms and still have the exact same message come across then you can write neither beautifully nor precisely. Emotional content isn't attached to the word, the connotation in the sense of film is its definition.

Saying, words mean different things doesn't mean anything because they still have synonyms, which mean slightly different things, but not enough to change the message at all.

Episode is completely different from the word scene. Episodes contain scenes but encapsulate much more broadly. I have met actually mentally retarded people who are better at thinking than you. This isn't even a joke, you are terrible at this.

File: AGH.png (9KB, 98x105px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 98x105px

>>722502083
>the connotation in the sense of film is its definition.
I am actually uncertain you know what the word connotation means.

File: Michael Keaton 24.jpg (31KB, 577x459px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 577x459px

When saying scene in the context of a film you are connoting a specific segment of events from a film. Connote, to invoke, imply, suggest, indicate, or signify.

Pretentiousness of the thread increased exponentially.

File: impale.png (12KB, 113x88px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 113x88px

In the context of both the film and the narrative that is conveyed via the film. It is not exclusively the film. A scene is something that occurs in any medium. It is truly ironic that I have to provide a precise definition of connotation here, but it is literally, by definition, an ABSTRACTION and a FEELING. It is not technical, which is why I cannot replace scene with part when connotation is the priority.

File: Capture.png (27KB, 796x344px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 796x344px

I mean for fuck's sake dude.

Holy shit, 2-3 years since I've bothered looking at a gfur thread and subjective still has the same dogshit pretentious personality despite being an idiot, lmao

File: paynoattention.png (49KB, 181x215px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 181x215px

>>722502761
put your name back on nibi

>>722502824
Nope, I haven't namefagged in about 4 years, and you wouldn't even remember me by name. Accept the fact that everyone thinks you're an idiot, tbh. I was in two or three seperate skype groups with you that pretty much everyone left because of how much of a dipshit you were, back in the day. Classic shit.

File: Michael Keaton 111.gif (1MB, 268x275px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 268x275px

>the film and the narrative of the film
So the film is different from the thing that the film is about? I was unaware that the narrative of the film, the entire reason for the film existing, was a different thing from the film itself.
I mean for fuck's sake, dude.
>con-note
>/kəˈnōt/
>verb
>(of a word) imply or suggest

SCENE HAS NO INHERENT FEELING TO IT, THE FEELING IS WHAT IS DESCRIBED WITHIN THE SCENE, THE WORD CAN BE REPLACED WITH ANY OF ITS SYNONYMS AND STILL BE THE SAME THING NOT JUST IN A LITERAL AND PRECISE SENSE BUT ALSO IN THE INVOCATION OF THE FEELING OF THE SCENE.

You are actually stupid. You don't understand how words work.

>>722502824
Not me idiot

It's like a conversation in between two walls.

File: forfuturereference.png (9KB, 75x99px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 75x99px

Yes, the film is different from the thing the film is about, obviously. The narrative is an aspect of the film, connected to but not encompassing various other mechanical features. Is that not obvious?

>Scene has no inherent feeling to it.
Maybe you don't share the connotations I do, although my connotations are predicated on other definitions of the word scene, but that's really the nature of 'feeling' - it's not necessarily universal. This is why semantics is a dubiously scientific field at the best of times and I wasn't speaking scientifically to begin with.

>>722502935
Wow, it only took you two posts to expose yourself. I've never been in a skype group associated with these threads. Nice try, though.

>>722503008
I didn't really think so either. I just saw the word pretentious again and ran with it.

>>722503150
hint: I never said it was associated with these threads, you dumb cunt. They were shota groups.

Read: pretentious yet idiotic

File: mindpower.png (9KB, 81x97px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 81x97px

>>722503291
You're doubling down on the lie since I gave you a fake out on purpose. I've never been in any skype group; the most collectivized my skype has ever been has been in a handful of calls of about 5 people at most, all of whom were from the threads and none of which recurred at any point - because I barely use skype. I'm legitimately curious who would be annoyed enough with me to lie this badly though.

File: Michael Keaton 98.jpg (305KB, 670x377px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 670x377px

Scene is literally just a container word used to signify a very specific segment from a film. You could not use the word scene and have it mean the entire film just as you can't use the word scene to describe an episode. Scene is a signifier for a small segment within the larger whole. There is no inherent feeling attached to the word scene itself.

Sure, in a super literal use of the word film to mean the actual medium itself, sure, but in a narrow sense, when talking about a specific film, you cannot separate the film from its narrative. You can separate the narrative from the film, but not the other way around. Film, like scene, is a container word. While scene means the segment which contains this specific thing, film is the container for all the parts of the film.

File: Michael Keaton 10.jpg (407KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1200x800px

I'm almost positive that you were in several skype groups, Subjectivefag. I remember David going on about how much he hate being in certain skype groups because you were in them. David, of course, is too autistic to leave a group once he is a part of the group.

I like how this thread went from gay muscle furry porn to talking about scenes and films

>>722503398
>doubling down on a lie when you made an incorrect assumption out of idiocy
>trying to save face because you can't accept how much of a pretentious twat you are, even though none of it is justified

And yes, you have, you're full of shit if you're going to sit here and claim you weren't in the Skype groups that I have literally been with you in.

Tldr: give up, stop lieing, it's not helping you come off as any less retarded. Fyi, these groups were about ~2 years ago, maybe. Clearly you haven't grown up at all since then, though.
>>722503516
Yeah, he's full of shit. No clue who david is, tbh.

File: uncle.png (13KB, 96x157px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 96x157px

Like I said, "inherent feeling" isn't going to be universal at the best of times. There's no word that, once spoken, evokes the same emotion in every listener. You didn't share my connotation for the word scene - that's fine, because I wasn't trying to make a generalizable point to begin with, which is what you have failed to grasp this entire time.

>>722503516
I seriously never wasn't. I use skype for like 3 people. David may have been thinking of IRC - which I used for a few months between 2012 and 2013, on Scales' channel, but I was never in a single skype group.

>>722503559
I challenge you to prove this. Like this is just a strictly factual detail about my life history at this point that you've gotten 100% wrong. I've never used skype groups for anything at all.

>never wasn't
never was*
I should not argue without sleeping, christ.

subby always gets fucking rekt when he argues with fool.

People who suck dick dont deserve to have opinions, shut up with your pretentious shit sf.

>>722503671
james never understood what I was talking about here.

File: My name is Michael Keaton.jpg (221KB, 700x843px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 700x843px

I am going to go ahead and believe David on this one. He hasn't lied to me about you as of yet.

I don't share the inherent feeling because there isn't an inherent feeling for the word scene, which is why you are an insultingly dimwitted individual.

>file too large
Not the first time I've been told something of mine was too big.

No, I understood what you were attempting to say, you're just too horrible to form a coherent argument.

>>722503704
sure, darling

File: flight.png (13KB, 123x80px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 123x80px

jesus, I'm not even sure how skype groups work. James I really don't care if you believe me here, this is a tier of bullshit that approaches I did not have sexual relations with that woman. Or david just doesn't remember what IRC is, either one.

There isn't an inherent feeling for any word. There are feelings that are more or less common, but none of them are inherent, which, again, is why I wasn't attempting to make a generalizable argument about the word scene. That is not the point.

>>722503611
>I've never used skype groups for anything at all.
Kek, like that other guy already confirmed, this is pure bullshit. If you're going to try to come up with retorts at least make them grounded in some kind of fact, instead of trying to pussyfoot around all of the shitty assumptions you're making. I was actually pretty surprised after visiting this thread that you're still the same piece of shit that you were years and years ago, but I guess people don't really change when they see the world through alternative facts and just think anyone having a go at them are just crazy.

Best part of arguing with dumbcunts is how frivolous it is, you'll never walk away from one without believing that you won it, those are the joys of being pretentious yet ignorant, basically.

Also, way to save face after lieing like a retard by saying that you only said it to "fake me out on purpose". Nice logic, m8y
>>722503780
what name did David go by on here? out of curiosity

File: Michael Keaton 60.jpg (32KB, 600x200px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x200px

No, not every word has an inherent feeling to it. Bag does not have an inherent feeling to it. Paper does not have an inherent feeling to it. Shoe does not have an inherent feeling to it.

>>722503962
He called himself David.

>>722503911
>There isn't an inherent feeling for any word. There are feelings that are more or less common, but none of them are inherent, which, again, is why I wasn't attempting to make a generalizable argument about the word scene. That is not the point.

2deep4u, well done, keep spouting pretentious dribble to explain something that even 15 year olds are aware of. There is nothing objective about language, everybody knows it's fluid, you spud.

>>722504037
Eh, fair enough, has been years since I paid attention to circlejerk really, guess idk him at all.

File: fire.png (13KB, 88x96px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 88x96px

Read my post again, james, I said "isn't" an inherent feeling for "any" word.

>>722503962
Prove I was on a skype group at any point. It has literally never happened. I don't use them. Your win condition here is all sorts of straightforward, but it's impossible because I can list the group conversations I've had on the fingers of one goddamn hand.

1. me, mak, katia when playing battlefront 2
2. me, spawn, freklz, zac, and...someone else, playing csgo

Every other mass conversation I've participated in online has been via mumble or...I guess ventrilo and teamspeak back in ancient history.

>>722504073
Right, except that james is under the impression that I was making an objective judgment about language which is why I needed to point out this obvious thing to him.

File: wark.png (17KB, 101x148px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 101x148px

And IRC, of course, apropos text chat rooms rather than group chats. I was in a couple of steam group chats for about 10 minutes at a time; boo's I think, carpet's once. None of those lasted very long.

File: Michael Keaton 97.jpg (161KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1600x900px

Discipline has an inherent feeling. Mother has an inherent feeling. Inherent, meaning that there is a feeling inherent to the word, not a specific feeling, but a feeling. I misspoke, I meant to say bag, paper, and shoe have no feeling at all. They are wholly neutral, like scene.

>watching an actually insane person talk about how being completely fucking nuts really pays off

It's because you were trying to be objective about language. You have claimed several times in the past that it's objective.

>>722504120
He's pretty cool.

File: que..png (4KB, 582x103px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 582x103px

>>722504144
>but it's impossible because I can list the group conversations I've had on the fingers of one goddamn hand.
Then it's not impossible, is it, genius? The only thing that makes it impossible is the fact of pic related

So, are you really going to try to honestly claim that you have never been apart of a group on skype relating to shota? To clarify, since I know that you're retarded, the word group in this context entails any conversation with more than two parties.

And no, they weren't on vent or ts or mumble, these were not calls, these were IM conversations.

File: Michael Keaton 5.jpg (81KB, 1306x705px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1306x705px

God I love that man. I will weep when he passes away, which may be very soon given his age.

> "no words have inherent feeling"
> plosion
> words like "mother" stemming from infant gestures

this nigga is supposed to be a linguist too, kek

>>722504523
>this nigga is supposed to be a linguist too, kek
Eh, I mean, that's exactly what all pretentious twirps think and say though, isn't it? They try to beat around their idiocy through the use of language that they barely even understand, as though it will make them seem like anything other than 15 year old TriHard(s)

File: justdoesn'tcare.png (55KB, 224x117px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 224x117px

Bag, paper, and shoe can have feelings, that's an overgeneralization, although I'll agree they probably don't have a common feeling (except for maybe evoking tactile memories or something).

I don't recall claiming language is objective but I might've done. Certain fields of linguistics are objective in how they measure language, and semantics can be precise to a certain degree, but ultimately it can never achieve absolute objectivity.

>>722504379
>So, are you really going to try to honestly claim that you have never been apart of a group on skype relating to shota?
Yes. There's a keep history forever option, isn't there? I suppose it doesn't matter now. But yes, I've never been in a shota related skype group.

Look, I have no clue who you are but you're cleaving very closely to a very specific story and I suspect there's some reason for it other than just plain dishonesty. Would you like to explain further? At this point I'm just curious because believe me I'm well acquainted with my own porn consumption habits and besides the fact that shota isn't my preferred genre, I don't usually discuss porn with other people if I can help it. So I'm very curious where you got this whole thing from.

>>722504523
I should've said inherent universal feeling. There are words that have feelings that are extremely common to the point of being borderline universal, though.

>>722504646
No, I'm actually going to college for it.

>>722504523
>>722504646
This guy thinks he's a lot of things. Fucking armchair expert who read a few novels about philosophy.

At least I can take pride in the fact that somehow I still have the ability to make an entire thread angry at me without trying.

File: Michael Keaton 51.jpg (181KB, 1920x1005px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1920x1005px

It can never obtain any level of objectivity, it is an entirely arbitrary system that has evolved and still evolves through use.

I think of nothing at all when I hear the word bag, paper, or shoe. Or rather, I get no specific image in my mind when I hear it or read it.

>>722504773
I'm aware, man. In the 4 or 5 years that I've lurked and posted, I don't think I've ever spoken to somebody who could actually stand him, despite how persistent he's been about being apart of the furfag community. I just feel sorry for him, tbh.
>>722504798
The last ditch "lul I trol u xD" if they're mad I win! comment, nice save, m9

>>722504667
>So I'm very curious where you got this whole thing from.
It's called reality, friendo. And hell, maybe you just treated is as a trap/twink group, fucked if I know or care how you justified it.

File: falling.png (11KB, 95x106px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 95x106px

Well, no, in phonetics we can measure the precise acoustics of various sounds that are produced and document the language as it currently exists by finding what is more or less the mean phone for any given situation. That's very objective. Semantics can't really do that.

Since we've already agreed that language is subjective that's immaterial.

>>722504896
You know, I didn't INTEND to do that. I still don't know who you are and I wasn't antagonizing you and you're mad anyway. These things just happen.

>>722504959
Which also isn't my genre. I like furry porn. I don't have moral objections to shota and can talk more about that at length, but the genre is still not the point, because I've never used skype groups for porn, or any groups for porn, because outside of these threads which I access for entirely different purposes I go find porn on my own time.

>>722504896
Pitiful aint it? Its exactly why he comes here, no one can fuckin stand him so he has to talk to social rejects.

>>722505070
nibi, you complain about not having friends, like, constantly.

>>722505070
Eh, iunno man, it was actually fucking sad when he was in the group lmao. Even between a small cozy and casual group of 5-6 people he somehow managed to make everyone in it hate him within 24 hours. Some people just have no understanding of their own bias, or the shit that they spew, tbh. Sadlyf

It's barely worth mentioning at this point but, again, never happened and I don't know who you are. Jesus.

File: 1470786625964.png (1MB, 783x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 783x1024px

>>722505092
Ive had friends, they werent actually friends. Thats when I realized kindness and friendliness is an invitation to exploit.

File: seethe.png (10KB, 81x91px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 81x91px

>>722505289
I guess it's less complaining than proclaiming followed by sermonizing, to be fair.

File: Peter Lorre 151.gif (388KB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 250x188px

>we can measure sound
Sure, but that's not really language is it? It's a part of language, sure, but sound is not language. Cars make sounds, the wind makes sound, etc. You can measure those as well.

Just had a close call with Eric, he was stuck on his tank lid and couldn't get down. I unhooked his leg and he's alright now. There has to be a better tank for these guys.

>>722505289
Eh, I mean, there's no such thing as friends in these threads, tbh. There have been a lot of people here and there that think that there are, but really it's always more or less just been a haven for people who are just lonely and lacking that shit irl basically. Unfortunately, though, that still doesn't really equate to there being much of a meaningful connection between people, nor should there be really since these are for the most part glorified porndumps and boredom solvers
>>722505337
>it's less complaining than proclaiming followed by sermonizing, to be fair.
I mean, there's no way anyone is far enough removed not to realise they're coming off as pretentious retards talking like this, tbh. Nobody is that oblivious, surely. This shit doesn't make you sound intelligent online, it makes you sound like an idiot.

File: 1485568901930.jpg (54KB, 479x498px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 479x498px

>>722505337
It helps me stay on the path, reminds me not to stray.

File: allbetter.png (36KB, 145x134px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 145x134px

Syntax isn't language either, it's a component of it though. And the acoustics of the human voice are fairly unique to us. That said you're right, the more you make it about actual human application, the less scientific it gets, which is why semantics is by far the least objective wing of linguistics.

>>722505440
>I mean, there's no way anyone is far enough removed not to realise they're coming off as pretentious retards talking like this, tbh. Nobody is that oblivious, surely. This shit doesn't make you sound intelligent online, it makes you sound like an idiot.
No, I'm aware. People have been telling me it sounds pretentious since I was 14 and I first started posting on the internet. The bizarre truth is that I actually just talk like that in my normal life. It's not an affectation. But yes, I've been getting grief for that register for almost a decade.

>>722505456
You know, if you feel it working for you, carry on.

>>722505440
Friendship is meaningless, give it enough time they'l eat you while you're down. It is better to keep an acquaintance/s.

>>722505561
It is, its great.

>>722505561
So, what you're saying is you haven't matured or taken on anyone's advice or just generally grown at all since you were 14? No shit, sherlock.
>he bizarre truth is that I actually just talk like that in my normal life
That just makes it worse, as bad as it is online, it would be 100x more autistic irl, wew. Must be hard af to make friends if you actually present yourself irl like that as well, holy shi

>>722505617
Eh, only if you let them, ultimately it depends what you want to get out of the relationships themselves. They key to any and all interactions with people is managing expectations, really.

File: sweat.png (19KB, 81x73px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 81x73px

>>722505660
Well, no, I've matured pretty considerably, but I haven't abandoned one of my default registers because it annoys people on the internet. Keep in mind I don't talk like this in every social interaction. If I'm in a classroom, I default to it, but if I'm hanging out with friends I tend to speak more casually on an almost gradient scale relative to how friendly I am with them (to the point where if me and my best friend are together I sound like an actual hoodrat).

This isn't actually unusual, by the way. More likely than not, you code-switch too to a noticeable extent. You might not be aware that you're doing it, and your codes might not resemble mine, but you almost certainly do it.

File: Peter Lorre 144.gif (430KB, 500x361px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 500x361px

At age 72, after eating a yogurt,
My grandfather put aside his spoon,
And lost his mind
In the garden he sang
Songs for The Beatles
And called himself
Rudolph the Bear.

The specific sound of the human voice isn't unique to us, it's just sound, you could make a machine that sounds exactly like us, and they have.

Precise analogues to the human voice didn't arise without further human intervention, though, it's not like you can find human vocal anatomy and the relevant acoustic products of that anatomy without finding either an actual human or something a human created to simulate a human.

>>722505780
>If I'm in a classroom, I default to it
Ah fuck,so you're one of those really annoying kids who talks as though they should be the ones taking the class. God I'm glad I graduated and don't have to deal with all of the pretentious kids who talk as though they're top shit just for being at uni, lel.
>>722505780
>you code-switch too to a noticeable extent
Yes, the difference is, I'm aware of my surroundings and how I present myself, and I don't act like a twat because I have the self control to understand the context of my words before I use them. TLDR: if you're finding everybody disliking you, or being annoyed at you, it's probably just because you're an annoying peice of shit rather than you being perfect and the world around you being crazy

File: Crispy.png (26KB, 93x142px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 93x142px

>>722505983
Again, it's not an affectation. I realize I can't prove that to you any more than you can prove to me that I was in a shota skype group at some point in the last 4 years, but that's irrelevant.

> if you're finding everybody disliking you, or being annoyed at you, it's probably just because you're an annoying peice of shit rather than you being perfect and the world around you being crazy
I don't find that. Right now, the people annoyed at me are the following:
1. you, anon, who has constructed a life's story for me that does not exist and may have ulterior motives
2. james, who has hated me for awhile
3. nibi, who hates everyone and everything depending on his mood.
Difficult though this may be for you to believe, I get along with almost everyone I meet.

>>722505889
>or something a human created to simulate a human.
No shot, water is wet, what an entirely redundant and vapid statement.

>>722506127
Have you been following the context of the exchange between james and I? The point is that human acoustic products are unique to humans.

File: Peter Lorre 4.jpg (114KB, 488x598px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 488x598px

The vocal folds in a dog are similar enough to that of a human that they are currently being tested for human vocal fold surgery.

File: fwoomp.png (47KB, 243x182px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 243x182px

Indeed, which I find fascinating, but canine vocal folds (and articulators, and resonating cavities) as they occur prior to human intervention are not sufficient to produce the range of phones available to human beings. Similar != same..

File: Peter Lorre 391.png (206KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 500x375px

Both pigs and monkey's also have similar structures to the human vocal folds. Certain species of birds are also able to mimic, almost precisely, the sound of a human voice. Furthermore, there are goats that sound exactly like humans when they bleat.

>>722506125
>but that's irrelevant.
If it was irrelevant, you wouldn't have just brought it up again for the third time in the past 10 minutes whilst claiming it as "irrelevant". Your saltiness is evident in your insistence, and you're not fooling anyone by trying to shrug it off saying its "irrelevant" whilst continuing to be the one bringing it up. Nice try, though.
>who has constructed a life's story for me that does not exist and may have ulterior motives
ah, one of those, "this doesn't fit muh world view so It must be wrong rathe than me being wrong" types, naturally.
>Difficult though this may be for you to believe, I get along with almost everyone I meet.
Not that I care, but yeah, I don't beleive it. Like I said, I've been around these threads for a good 5 years. Everybody that I know who has come across you, that I've spoken to either in threads or elsewhere if you happened to have ever came up, has expressed their dislike for you. I'm sure you probably confuse those who tolerate your childish nonsense with people who like you, tbh.

Actually, do you have a link for specifically the use of canine vocal folds for human surgery? I'm actually very curious.

Again, birds and goats can mimic a handful of our phonemes, just as trained humans can mimic bird calls; the architecture is still only similar.

>>722506425
It's not saltiness, although you're free to read it that way. I'm insanely curious, which is kind of similar. And this isn't about world view, this is about my own personal history - the objective facts of my life. I would like to know why you believe facts about my life that I do not.

Your impressions of me are noted.

>>722506179
>The point is that human acoustic products are unique to humans.
Very dangerous wording, considering there are a large variety of animals etc that are capable of mimicking or producing the sounds to begin with. Is there an animal that sounds exactly like humans, and uses the same forms of speech and speech patterns that we do? Of course not, that would be fucking stupid, the entire point of talking to begin with is to communicate in an inter-species sense. That being said, saying "the point is that human acoustic products are unique to humans" is a non-statement as always, since it practically borders on circular logic.

File: Peter Lorre 81.gif (731KB, 250x167px) Image search: [Google]

731KB, 250x167px

Have you tried Googling this shit yourself? Also, you go to college, you should have access to an archive of peer reviewed journals on pretty much all subjects. If you were so curious, you'd do it yourself.

Certain birds can pretty much mimic any sound we make, including mechanical sounds, perfectly. To say that our sounds are unique to us is false.

File: Peter Lorre 480.png (525KB, 526x525px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 526x525px

>In this valley I saw something where I thought I was insane or something was not right anymore

Why not both, you absolute madman?

Typically if someone makes an affirmative statement that is based on existent research they can access the materials as they do so, that's what citations are for. I am curious, but not curious enough to dig through my university's terribly indexed database system; talking to you isn't the only thing I'm doing this morning.

I know of no birds that can mimic every consonant phone of even english, nor the vowel qualities of normal human speakers. They can mimic the meaningful units well enough to be comprehensible, even easily comprehensible, and falsely identifiable as human within their limited range of options.

>>722506605
"The sum of human acoustic products are unique to humans". Is that sufficiently precise for you?

>>722506480
>I would like to know why you believe facts about my life that I do not.
The world doesn't revolve around you, snowflake, I know for a fact that my statements are true as it was obviously a group that I was privy to, and was as such an "objective fact of my life" as you pretentiously put it. Mind you, you still have more to gain by proclaiming that these events never transpired given the context of this conversation and how it started, as well as the fact that to admit that these events did transpire would lead to you having little recourse against the initial statement that you have, and continue to have, a shitty "pretentious personaility, despite being an idiot"

And yes, when you force something fallaciously whilst trying to save face by pretending that you don't care or that it's "irrelevent", then it's saltiness, not just curiosity.

File: Peter Lorre 146.gif (975KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

975KB, 500x375px

Then you aren't interested in the subject.

Starlings are so good at mimicking human speech patterns that people often get confused and look to see who is talking to them.

>>722506778
>Is that sufficiently precise for you?
Read: water is wet, a circle has no corners.
Like I said, this is a borderline definition truth, it's an empty statement and saying it achieves very little outside of the standard pretension.

The sum of canine acoustic products are unique to canines
The sum of avian acoustic products are unique to avians
The sum of feline acoustic products are unique to felines
One plus one is two
ya get the point? you're saying nothing at all here, these are definition truths. There is no species that communicates vocally that has a set of acoustic products that contains the entirety of another species down to the most intimate nuance. That is an obvious and logical conclusion.

File: Peter Lorre 94.gif (999KB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

999KB, 250x188px

The thing he saw, by the way, wind mills.

Starlings are precise enough for the brain to elide the actual acoustic differences in order to comprehend something that makes sense in human language. That's the difference between phonetics, which is the acoustic discipline, and phonology, which is the psychological discipline.


>>722506794
The world doesn't revolve around me, but the conversation absolutely does. Also, if you're really convinced that the word "objective" is pretentious I think you might just be afraid of syllables.

You're right, it is to my benefit to say these things never happened, just like it's to your benefit to deny being a serial killer - and I have precisely as much proof that you're a serial killer that you do of my posting in these groups. I assume you're not a serial killer, although I could be wrong, but the fact that your (presumptive) denial is to your benefit does not move the burden of proof from me to you. That's absurd.

Incidentally, I never claimed not to be pretentious, I just think the reasons you're bringing up for my supposed pretentiousness are the wrong ones. I don't care what you think about my personality since you clearly don't like me. I do care about the history.

>>722506954
I'm only stating these obvious things because James, the other person I am talking to, is disagreeing with them. Seriously, I'm not sure what you expect from me here.

>>722506930
>>722506778

I'm sure you cancerous fucknuts are happy with yourself about fagging up another thread with your verbal diarrhoea. Just know that I sincerely hope you two will kill yourselves very soon.

I mean, the human brain is capable of convincing itself it hears a /b/ when a /d/ sound is being played over a video of a man producing /b/. Using human perception as a barometer for acoustics completely misses the point.

I actually do have to go to work now though, parts of this conversation have been lovely. Anon, still waiting on that proof. When you provide it, I will gladly mea culpa.

File: Peter Lorre 106.gif (983KB, 499x266px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 499x266px

They are incredibly precise in their mimicry, to the point where even in a recording they could be mistaken.

>>722507080
You spelled diarrhea wrong.

>>722507022
>Also, if you're really convinced that the word "objective" is pretentious I think you might just be afraid of syllables.
Again, if you can't recognize statements like this as blatantly falacious and pretentious, then you're just pants on head retarded. Nowhere did I say it was your explicit use of the one word that was pretentious, keep pulling straw-man bullshit out of your ass instead of accepting the fact that you come off as a cunt, and not an intelligent one either..

Also, your need to argue against it is the claim of you not being pretentious, regardless of whether or not you explicitely say it. The first sentance and the way that you felt the need to defend against me calling you such is proof enough that you have no willingness to accept the fact.

All I can say in regards to the history since the contact logs are well gone, despite you being blocked on my skype which is proof enough that these events transpired to me since I never had one on one conversations with you, is that there may have been an overlap with people like Genk, skew, and Azure were there at some stage too. Whether or not that timeline lines up with you being there I forget, and frankly don't really care.

In any case, I may as well take my leaf from the image limit, lest I be sitting here wasting anymore words on you. Cya in another 3 years, I'm sure you won't have grown up in that time either.

>>722507459
I know azure, he and i talk regularly and he can confirm i was never in shota groups. I was wondering if he was involved since i know his tastes

never heard of the other two but that's just process of elimination at this point

eliminate me

File: Shush.gif (2MB, 325x183px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 325x183px

>>722507989

>>722509357
thank you

File: Untitled #18.jpg (1MB, 1856x2156px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1856x2156px

I should probably photograph all my drawings and paintings.

File: Untitled #17.jpg (1008KB, 2073x2419px) Image search: [Google]

1008KB, 2073x2419px

I haven't photographed drawings #1-5, nor paintings #4, #7, #9, #12, #14, or #15. Also #17 changed a fair bit after this photo was taken so that should be photographed again.

File: Untitled #16.jpg (784KB, 1497x1864px) Image search: [Google]

784KB, 1497x1864px

This is the one being reproduced in print.

File: Untitled #11.jpg (888KB, 2547x1647px) Image search: [Google]

888KB, 2547x1647px

I should find a place that does fine art printing and work in printing for a bit.

File: Untitled #10.jpg (937KB, 1977x2403px) Image search: [Google]

937KB, 1977x2403px

Aquatint and etching are what I'd like to have a go at.

>>722496140
literally the most autistic thing I've seen today.

>>722496140
that fantastic voice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0K9dgJwrM7g

File: 1486669264.kyma_afterglow.jpg (128KB, 1280x887px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1280x887px

Finally, less the ego stroke.

File: Burt4.jpg (11KB, 370x432px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 370x432px

Holy shit who let the liberal arts in?

File: 148973459254.jpg (62KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 600x600px

Are you feeling it now, Nibi?

File: 1468526241.galixartistry_photo_2016-07-14_14-52-38.jpg (94KB, 1280x1263px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1280x1263px

What

File: 149784358356.jpg (28KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 600x600px

Well, besides an obvious reference to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYI1TCPKlmU
Why do you post porn on a dead thread, though?

File: 1456360864539.png (156KB, 794x799px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 794x799px

Why not? Its certainly better without the riffraff.

File: 1498734698395.jpg (188KB, 500x627px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 500x627px

You could just browse your folders locally on your computer rather than posting, if that was truly desired.
I agree that there are many annoying people, though. Perhaps myself included.

File: 1471234489268.jpg (148KB, 1247x1280px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1247x1280px

You are annoying

File: 13397346985436.gif (499KB, 500x198px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 500x198px

I'd have to agree; I'm often here just complaining about my life and general woes, which can't be entertaining to look at.
I don't intend much offense by it, but you're no breath of fresh air either, with your optional (but often present) hostility and talk of virginity.

File: 1465441147.the-impeccable-dan_the-impeccable-dan.jpg (483KB, 1472x1775px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 1472x1775px

Maybe you shouldnt come to a porn thread then.

File: aletter.png (17KB, 164x93px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 164x93px

Woo, I'm not suffering from extremely early onset dementia.

File: 14365879834.jpg (298KB, 926x618px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 926x618px

To be honest, they're more for talking than porn, at least in my opinion.
[insert go to furaffinity, e621, etc. etc. post here]

>>722514783
>>722514783
>>722514783
>>722514783

File: 149835978205.jpg (133KB, 767x1042px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 767x1042px

>>722514745
Because it's really just right on time?

>>722514783
>>722514796
They're really not, but that's what you socially inept cunts use them for anyway.

File: subjectivelurkerapproaches.png (7KB, 200x100px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 200x100px

>>722514823
haha yes julian is very old yuk yuk yuk

no, el nutjob up above who thought I used to hang in skype groups for shota topics is dead wrong. I talked to azure about it just to make sure I wasn't fucking crazy.

File: 1444919201593.png (213KB, 768x1000px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 768x1000px

>>722514745
Poetic Justice.

>>722514783
Well I do enjoy venting my frustrations with hostility since I cant do it with my dick.

File: transformation.png (44KB, 175x213px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 175x213px

>>722514973
POETIC JUSTICE
PUT IT IN A SONG

File: 1497856893.png (383KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 1024x1024px

>>722514882
I just mean that it's never too early.
>shota topics
What
What topics even are there?
>>722514973
I just focus my frustrations and hostility towards myself.
Try it sometime; it's great.

File: 1411179105.dragonator_spearfrost_sketchstream.png (380KB, 1100x1042px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 1100x1042px

>>722514882
Coffee is a cunt. Tell him that.

File: smokey yunick.jpg (81KB, 932x524px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 932x524px

>>722514882
Matthew says otherwise.

File: 1420940603.ghostpilot_imgo2.jpg (178KB, 683x800px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 683x800px

>>722515049
I do that already. I am ten steps ahead of you.

File: infinity.png (679KB, 639x466px) Image search: [Google]

679KB, 639x466px

>>722515049
Well, not topics per se. My new understanding is that circa 2011-2012 the shota thread posters hung out in skype and other chat clients to...I don't know, do shota things? I've never been to them and I use skype once in a blue moon, and about the time I'm accused of attending these things I actually didn't have skype installed (it literally wasn't on my laptop until 2013).

>>722515072
I'll let him know.

>>722515075
Chaplain? Seriously? I'm really confused about where this perception is coming from since that's 2 people now, one of whom doesn't hate me. I really never did. Azure thinks I was being mistaken for Nobody Important, who I vaguely remember from ancient threads.

File: 690246d5193fdaf8375515d2e0ace220.jpg (86KB, 688x1280px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 688x1280px

>>722515179
Good, I hate him like I hate barry.

File: 1475698253.jpg (100KB, 1059x750px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1059x750px

>>722515125
Get one step behind me, bb.
>>722515179
>do shota things
Ew. A good portion of shota is just awful and disgusting. There's a few cute things, though.
I used to be on a Skype group, but not that one.

File: 1414446266422.png (875KB, 814x1100px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 814x1100px

>>722515254
I am not allowed ass to spite myself for being a virgin.

File: whydoitry.png (8KB, 91x99px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 91x99px

>>722515242
So I assume this means he was nice to you at some point in life?

>>722515254
My lack of experience in skype terms is such that I didn't actually know how group skype chats worked until today because I've never done one. Apparently any group call that's created makes a chat simultaneously, meaning the only two I've ever used were a CSGO chat with zac, avery, spawn and [forgotten fourth party] and the battlefront 2 games I did with katia and mak.

Learning is cool I suppose.

File: horsedogs.jpg (250KB, 900x660px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 900x660px

>>722515254
Shota is 90% of the time totally disgusting, pretty rapey, and I'm confident it's mostly loved by virgins in their late 20's who wish they were in the picture.

File: SMOKEY-INDY.jpg (47KB, 660x440px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 660x440px

>>722515179
No, bad dog. And nobody else posted the 8bit theater or whatever before. Could be that one guy who posted those stick figures under the name "Autist," but bad dog remembers him well and he's basically number 3 for longevity after Chaplain.

>>722498074
Thank you for this. Morning fap commencing.

File: 1452752600.faint_greatorgasmuniversity4thyearsdrake.png (208KB, 757x1000px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 757x1000px

>>722515351
Back in 12 he said ill accept myself sometime and get a nice bf in a few years. (parallels to assholeface)
That didnt happen and not analyzing it since it didnt, I realize it was a mortal insult. Fuck him, faggot asshole.

File: 148975369836.jpg (81KB, 500x343px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 500x343px

>>722515348
How about mouth tho.
>>722515351
I can never go back to Skype, tho.
Oh well.
>>722515455
Shota comics remind me why this world is disgusting.

File: 34eef7fb69a12470939e27a7fba2f078.png (1MB, 803x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 803x1000px

>>722515455
>I'm confident it's mostly loved by virgins in their late 20's who wish they were in the picture.
Taking this into the mental dictionary so I never get into shota.

File: 1460410108.avilore_3-20-2016-avilore.jpg (108KB, 1075x1280px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1075x1280px

>>722515587
No, im not allowed to touch people.

File: smokey.jpg (61KB, 660x495px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 660x495px

>>722515455
This guy isn't helping your case, Julian.

File: release.png (35KB, 379x157px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 379x157px

>>722515455
azure is kind of a slut so he doesn't fit

>>722515547
Oh, right, fuck. I haven't slept recently. For the record, my asriel thing (only applicable topic here) is recent - since the character didn't exist prior to 2015 - and baddog didn't know me before the last 2 years so he's not talking about this.

Demi posted 8 bit theater. Not black mage, though, red mage.

>>722515573
Duly noted.

>>722515587
Yeah I vaguely remember you mentioning something like that. Thank god for every other platform that doesn't rape cpu.

>>722515686
I'm 22 and a manwhore but the rest is granted. That's immaterial though, the porn isn't the issue. It's the participation in an ancient skype community that I'd never heard of before today.

>>722515670
I'll just be touching you, then.
>>722515752
I just use voice chat in any game, and 1 on 1 messaging, steam n shit.

>>722515857
I'm increasingly fond of discord, it runs elegantly.

>>722515752
You better tell him I hope he dies.

>>722515857
Kill yourself

>>722515927
If you want him to order you chinese or something I can get that down too, while you're listing shit.

>>722515997
Shove chinese up your ass.

>>722515906
I have an account, but for some reason or another, never liked discord. It seems good though.
>>722515994
We should go to the gym sometime so we can get swole.
We could probably fight off the alpha males if we worked together.

>>722516073
There's just too many options to be honest. All these goddamn chat thingies.

>>722516073
I have a half-assed home gym, no.

why the fuck did I think chap was named matthew

do I even know his name?

>>722515752
Didn't know you before the last two years? Guy has been around ever since you poked your nasty, ethnically diverse nose into these shitheaps and breathed trisyllabic word that would come to define an alarming amount of your adolescent existence- Matthew knew you before you made him know about the things you would do with Nicholas Piberius Wilde, Fox McCloud and Robin Hood.

>Demi posted 8 bit theater. Not black mage, though, red mage.

I don't care what the hell that digimon is called.

>>722516143
Half-assed isn't getting us swole.
>>722516125
Plus I'd need to download some desktop thing to be able to use my necessary push-to-talk. My clicking mouse and loud fan would annoy people if I did open mic.

>>722516152
>>722516178
Sure you're not losing your fucking marbles, man?

>>722516237
Didn't know me CLOSELY before the last two years, I should've clarified. Again, dallas, I have not slept in 30 hours, please cut me the tiniest, most insignificant bit of slack. Also I'm like 1200% sure I never conveyed a desire for robin hood. I didn't like that movie.

>>722516323
See above. On the prior issue I know I'm not since I checked with the most reputable third party. As for other stuff...yeah we might be fucked.

>>722516303
ur mouse a cute

>>722516303
I dont care about being swole.

>>722516373
My mouse used to have trouble double-clicking / clicking in general, and now it accidentally double clicks. I need a new mouse.
>>722516407
I do.
Then I can be the alpha male.

>>722516373
>I have not slept in 30 hours

Neither have I, you don't have an excuse.

>>722516511
You do that then.

>>722516627
new thread