Thread replies: 274
Thread images: 60
Thread images: 60
>tfw you realize after all this time that it's democrats and liberals that are the real fascists
Basic Tenets of Fascism:
>"Nothing against the state". Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong.
Democrats: You don't want to sell a cake to a gay couple because of your religion? We're going to tell you you have to or close your business.
Democrats: You don't want to perform gay marriage in your church because your religious beliefs don't agree with it? Don't care. Do it or we'll close your business/church.
Democrats: Don't want to pay for contraception/abortions for your employees because your deeply-held religious beliefs disagree with the murder of unborn children? Don't care. Do it or we'll close your business/charity.
>"Everything in the state". The Government is supreme.
Democrats: Bigger government, more control of individual lives, more taxation. We can spend your money better than you can.
Democrats: Don't want/need to buy this product? We'll force you to buy it or we'll penalize you a few hundred/thousand dollars every year until you do.
Republicans: Smaller government, states rights, less taxation.
How do you explain this, lefties? Why do you use the label "fascist" to slander republicans when it seems it lines up more with your own ideology?
>>
>>721326530
Wow, that's a very skewed view you have. Also a couple of those things are factually wrong (like no one is forcing churches who don't want to perform gay marriage to do so).
It's okay to fight bigotry and intolerance, doing so doesn't make you intolerant.
>>
>>721327737
So it's ok to be fascist if you claim it's "fighting bigotry and intolerance"? Isn't that what the nazis said? How do you explain forcing your agenda on everyone else and quelling any dissenting opinions with physical violence, riots, punching people in the face, and pepper-spraying them when they voice their opinion (Berkeley for example)?
>>
File: it-s-a-shit-hole-o.gif (524KB, 320x176px) Image search:
[Google]
524KB, 320x176px
>>721326530
>2017
>still unaware of what fascism means
and im out of here faggot
>>
File: trump_shill0.jpg (47KB, 500x375px) Image search:
[Google]
47KB, 500x375px
>>721326530
sure shill
>>
>>721326530
Republicans: Smoke pot. ILLEGAL
Republicans: Anal sex, blow jobs. ILLEGAL
Republicans: Abortions. ILLEGAL
etc
>>
File: 16194882_1432271796792756_6261447256213601120_n.jpg (32KB, 480x379px) Image search:
[Google]
32KB, 480x379px
>>721326530
>>
File: anotherfatrepublican4.jpg (327KB, 600x600px) Image search:
[Google]
327KB, 600x600px
>>721328271
this
>>
>>721328162
>>721328210
I laid out my position quite easily in OP. Are you saying liberals can't be fascist when they contain 9 out of 10 characteristics (and the1 they don't posess is simply "hurr durr has to be right wing"?) Doesn't make sense at all and it's a cop out honestly.
If I've got a shoe with every component except laces, it's still a fucking shoe, idiot. The only shill is you.
>>
>>721327896
You've got enough strawmen there to keep a whole farm bird free.
I'm not forcing my agenda on anyone. And it's a load of bullshit to claim that all our protests are violent. Sorry if a fringe decides to get carried away (or even infiltrated, that happens too), but that is certainly not the method of the majority.
It's okay to punch Nazis, seriously those guys aren't up for having a good faith debate, they just want to shit over everyone. They're going to make shit up against us anyway, might as well give them a black eye to whine about about.
By the way, the pepper spraying was done to liberals, not by them.
>>
File: trump_8959970768548901012_n.jpg (21KB, 600x287px) Image search:
[Google]
21KB, 600x287px
>>721328409
>>
>>721328320
Post a link where he said this.
Shills out hard today.
>>
>>721328409
no, ur just unaware of what fascism means, u uneducated faggot nigger
>>
File: punchin_nazis.webm (913KB, 600x248px) Image search:
[Google]
913KB, 600x248px
>>721327896
>>
>>721328557
It is never not okay to punch Nazis.
>>
>>721328654
Then why vote one to be your president?
>>
>>721328498
>Our protests aren't violent
Muslim HRC supporter lied and said she was attacked by Trump supporters on a subway, assaulted, and spit on. Later arrested for filing false police reports.
http://abc7ny.com/news/nypd-muslim-woman-lied-about-attack-on-subway/1656487/
Black man shot at bar for simply saying he supports Trump
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/paul-jones-trump-supporter-shot-at-cleveland-bar-d/
Anti-Trump liberal KILLS UPS driver after mistaking him for Donald Trump
http://downtrend.com/71superb/crazy-liberal-kills-ups-driver-thinking-it-was-donald-trump
Gang of 4 blacks drag Trump supporter out of his car in daytime traffic and brutally beat him
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/11/20/gang-of-four-who-brutally-beat-trump-supporter-in-chicago-is-about-to-receive-justice/
Gang of anti-Trump black Chicago residents kidnap handicapped teen, imprison and torture him for 48 hours while streaming it all live on facebook
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/01/06/facebook-live-attack-chicago-suspects-in-court/
>Sorry if a fringe gets infiltrated
Post any proof that liberals have been "infiltrated" by someone else
>it's okay to punch nazis, they don't want a good debate
Only I'm looking for facts right now in a good debate. Seems you're just calling anyone who disagrees with you a "nazi" to automatically justify punching them in the face (using violence to quiet a dissenting opinion).
>the pepper spray was done to liberals not by them
Oh the girl assaulted on camera was a liberal? The facts are not on your side but keep making things up, pal.
>>
>>721328320
It's probably poorly stated, but you *do* have a right to disagree with facts if you have evidence that suggests said facts are not correct.
Just because something is considered a 'fact' by most of the population doesn't mean it can't be disproven, but disproving something many people believe requires a lot of solid evidence.
I don't know who this guy is or care about American politics, I just wanted to say that.
>>
File: 16194882_1432271796792756_6261447256213601121_n.jpg (53KB, 802x448px) Image search:
[Google]
53KB, 802x448px
>>721328508
Here ya go
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/01/23/sean-spicer-press-briefing-inauguration-viewership-sot.cnn
inb4 CNN left wing media blah blah blah. It's a video of him saying it. The source doesn't matter
>>
>>
Democrats: You don't want to sell a cake to a gay couple because of your religion? We're going to tell you you have to or close your business.
This is discrimination, a little different, I see where you're coming from here. No religion prohibits you from completely interacting with homosexuals, so deciding to not sell something to someone based on what they do in the privacy of their own home is peetty at best, but is it ethical for a government to restrict this? The answer is not clear.
Democrats: You don't want to perform gay marriage in your church because your religious beliefs don't agree with it? Don't care. Do it or we'll close your business/church.
There are people who have tried to sue for this, but this is nothing that any notable figures are pushing for, you have to be weary of this "loud minority" that media likes to focus on. Like pretending that all Trump voters are uneducated hicks, or that all Hillary voters are fat sjw's. It's just not that simple, and a tactic that media uses to de-legitimatize any political opponents.
Democrats: Don't want to pay for contraception/abortions for your employees because your deeply-held religious beliefs disagree with the murder of unborn children? Don't care. Do it or we'll close your business/charity.
I would say this is a much more complex issue.
Imagine that this is a company who is against vaccines or gmo's and refused to pay for something simple like a flu shot for your children.
This last part is pure speculation, but I feel like a lot of this times when this comes up it's more about not wanting to spend money than having any moral obligations against the specific problems.
>>
File: da_bears.gif (498KB, 499x212px) Image search:
[Google]
498KB, 499x212px
This is now a bear jew thread.
1. Both political parties are corrupt. Don't forget what the DNCdid during the election, but at least they aren't led by a narcissistic fuck who is setting this country up for failure.
2. Punching Nazi's is always okay. Doesn't anyone remember this from
Indiana Jones?
>>
File: alt-facts-spicer.webm (1MB, 863x576px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 863x576px
>>721328947
no u
>>
>>721328498
Not forcing by violence(mostly), but excluding and misrepresenting those views which go against the collective majority view of the western world.
>>
>>721329018
pt 2
>"Everything in the state". The Government is supreme.
Democrats: Bigger government, more control of individual lives, more taxation. We can spend your money better than you can.
Democrats: Don't want/need to buy this product? We'll force you to buy it or we'll penalize you a few hundred/thousand dollars every year until you do.
Republicans: Smaller government, states rights, less taxation.
If you were saying conservative vs modern dems or reps, then yes, I'd agree. But right now Democrats accept that fact that they want a bigger government, while republicans say they are in favor of a smaller government, unless it's against their personal views, (abortion, drugs, gay marriage).
At the same time, I do see where you're coming from.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but fascism is when one (small) party is in control and has extreme rule over it's people. The U.S. would be more Populist unless I'm mistaken on definitions.
And I still think it's unfair to compare the U.S. to a fascist government, under the rule of either Trump, or Hillary.
The biggest thing I think people need to realize is that no matter what, you will always be under the rule of someone. And I would rather have one like the U.S. where it's an elected body with the interest of the people, rather than one where the group with the most people and biggest guns and do what they want because they can crush all opposition.
>>
>>721328711
I didn't. I'm from Scotland and couldn't vote, but if I could I'd have voted against Trump.
>>
>>721326530
Let's get a movement going, /b/. Let's infiltrate the ANTIFA terrorists and fuck their shit up from the inside. Their childish, destructive tantrums have gone on too long. They are extremists in every sense of the word, wanting to shut down free speech they don't agree with, and murder anybody that doesn't follow their agenda. We need boots on the ground to start taking part in their clusterfuckery and attack their members from within. Law enforcement won't do anything against these faggots, so it's up to us. LET'S RESTORE ORDER TO AMERICA!
>>
File: trump_putin1482352384898.jpg (84KB, 960x712px) Image search:
[Google]
84KB, 960x712px
>>
>>721329335
Got a catchy name for this grass roots movement? Need something that really gets people's attention.
>>
>>721328712
> Muslim HRC supporter lied and said she was attacked by Trump supporters on a subway, assaulted, and spit on. Later arrested for filing false police reports.
Wow, you want to cherry pick a few cases and apply that to the entire group. I may be liberal, but that's not something I do. Everyone's got their extremists. If all you can see is the extremists, then you'll never understand the main position of the group.
> Post any proof that liberals have been "infiltrated" by someone else
It happens all the time
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/01/27/veri-j27.html
> Oh the girl assaulted on camera was a liberal? The facts are not on your side but keep making things up, pal.
In the UC Davis case (I don't know which case you're referring to), it was the police who pepper sprayed a bunch of Occupy protesters who were peacefully sitting down.
>>
>>721329546
Well, no. I don't want to go and be an autissimo naming it something like The First Order. If star wars hadn't used it for a shitty reboot, then it might have been fine.
>>
>>721329685
>Wow, you want to cherry-pick
I posted 10 instances, how is that cherry-picking exactly?
>B-bu-but we're being infiltrated look at this PROP SOCIALISM WEBSITE
Are you fuckin' for real right now? kek. Because an obvious left-wing fringe socialist website would never lie, right? Get fucking real kid.
>I don't know which case you're talking about
The girl at Berkeley who was assaulted 2 days ago with pepper spray for simply talking to a news reporter. Are you trying to play stupid now or are you really this misinformed? Also you can't equate police using riot tactics to stop actual riots to a civilian man assaulting a civilian woman for having a different opinion.
>>
>>721330021
>I posted 10 instances, how is that cherry-picking exactly?
There are 320 million people in the US. Presumably that means 160 million liberals (although stats indicate more).
Your sample size of ten incidents, with no controls, no standards and a transparently common narrative cannot tell us anything of value about liberals.
>>
File: confused.gif (498KB, 200x183px) Image search:
[Google]
498KB, 200x183px
You know what I love is that I see all of this controlled speech bullshit as a direct result of the US education system. Im in my twenties and I remember when I was in school in the 90's bullying was an extreme issue that people were looking for ways to address. This was the peak of participation trophies, varying degrees of special education, integration programs, and if a school board picture didn't have at least 4 races shown with both men and women it was deemed unfit for children's eyes because it might give the wrong impression. We were all taught that words have power, and what we say affects other people. We were all taught that calling someone names can hurt just as much as getting their ass kicked.
I want to say that in the initial stages that it worked. There was a decrease in Bullying and related suicides (I'm too lazy to look for a citation, fuck you. This isn't a peer reviewed journal). I think were it went wrong was with the parents who got super into into this and wouldn't let anything happen to their precious snow flakes. I remember seeing these parents storming around school when I was young, complaining about violent recess conditions (Swear to fucking god), or no left handed scissors for their unique little child. Teachers had to bend to this, because no teacher will ever be able to get away with saying, "I think your kid needs to be toughened up." or, "I think your kid is too shy/awkward/loud/aggressive/etc." instead we all got newly diagnosed disorders, and regulations for special treatment.
The hyper liberal speech controlling protesters are just a logical conclusion of this teaching. Young kids are impressionable. Our first decade or so strongly informs our outlook. I can't overstate how severely implemented this control of speech was integrated into schools. I honestly feel pretty lucky. I went through the earlier iterations of the speech control, but the culture was solidified for the college age kids we see now.
>>
>>721330558
>your sample size with no standards
They're all clearly anti-Trump assaults on civilians. I don't think you have half a clue what you're talking about. The majority of Americans support the stuff he's doing, so I fear you may have just pulled your "stats" out of your ass like every other liberal usually does.
57% of Americans approve of the temporary immigration ban
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/january_2017/most_support_temporary_ban_on_newcomers_from_terrorist_havens
Quit trying to push some narrative that the liberal mindset is some normal thing. It's not. Liberalism is dead.
>>
>>721330772
>Liberalism is ded
Lol try again faggot. The democratic party is dead. The majority of us who are liberal have at least one major issue with the current democratic party. All we've seen is a bunch of reactionary ass grabbing. And for reference fuck the hyper liberal dumb shits who think every day should be story time.
>>
File: libtards.jpg (783KB, 900x3037px) Image search:
[Google]
783KB, 900x3037px
>>
>>721330772
>They're all clearly anti-Trump assaults on civilians.
That are not representative of the bigger picture. You cannot prove that the protests of 160 to 1.5 million people are violent by pointing out the violent actions of less than 20.
I never defended "liberalism" from your failed understanding of statistics and objective proof because I don't have to, anyone with two brain cells could see you're a shill.
>>
File: Pepe_gets_punched.jpg (56KB, 509x541px) Image search:
[Google]
56KB, 509x541px
>>721331139
pussy
>>
File: sewer_rat_barbie_2325.jpg (101KB, 750x670px) Image search:
[Google]
101KB, 750x670px
>>721330772
>http://www.rasmussenreports.com/
nope
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/americans-sharply-divided-along-partisan-lines-over-travel-ban-trump-cbs-news-poll/
>>
File: immagration.jpg (44KB, 620x348px) Image search:
[Google]
44KB, 620x348px
>>721330772
>>
>>721331541
>waaaa you're a shill for pointing out the truth
You keep saying "statistics" and "objective proof" when I'm the only one who's actually posted either one in this thread. You have no facts to support your position, just hot air.
When the nazis (favorite buzzword of the left) were doing their thing, you faggots love to blame the germans who stood by and did nothing as being "just as guilty." So tell me, fuck-o. Show me any source where the "peaceful protesters" have stood up and stopped this imaginary "minority" that you keep referencing. Where have the "peaceful liberals" stood up and stopped them from setting shit on fire or destroying property? Show me evidence to support your claim or shut the fuck up.
>>
>>721331139
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/03/21/white-trump-protester-sucker-punched-by-black-trump-supporter-in-brutal-video-of-tucson-rally/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/03/10/politics/donald-trump-protestor-punch-face/index.html
"Those liberals are just violent fascists!"
KYS
>>
>>721331933
fuckin kek you seriously arguing the validity of rasmussen now?
Fuck outta here shill
>>
>>721332179
2 instances to the 10 I posted. Also those happened a year ago, have you looked out your window lately faggot?
KYS
>>
File: trump_shill.png (364KB, 568x363px) Image search:
[Google]
364KB, 568x363px
>>721332224
>shill
>>
>>721332120
Ugh, I'll explain with an example this time.
>Assertion: white people love to shoot students.
>Evidence: Collumbine, Newtown, Anders Brevik, Elliot Rodgers.
>Conclusion: I have found five examples to support my theory proving my assertion about 1.3 billion people correct.
You get it yet?
>>
File: terrorists_3255915684290643224_n.jpg (70KB, 610x447px) Image search:
[Google]
70KB, 610x447px
>>721332842
it's true though. They do
>>
>>721326530
OP is 100% right and anyone that remotely thinks otherwise is a basement dwelling faggot.
>>
>>721328271
Blowjobs illegal? Gtfo out of here, schlomo.
>>
>>721326530
>Democrats and liberals are fascists
Literally stopped reading right there. Your post deserves not to be taken seriously, when the faux Republican tweeting of the United States has taken some of the most authoritarian stances within 3 weeks. Actually, you're all fooled, because he's not the president, Bannon is.
>>
File: trump_plan_15589586n.jpg (35KB, 480x334px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 480x334px
>>
Fascism is not a certain policy direction. Fascism is not right or left. Fascism is a style of communication - a mood. Fascism is visceral and angry. This country has been flirting with fascism for a long time. Rush Limbaugh with his bombastic lie telling, scapegoating, and chest pounding Americanism is very much a fascist. Fox News? Joseph Goebbels would look at Fox News in awe at how completely they have realized his fascistic vision. One thing I am certain of; if you think Trump is not a fascist - you don't don't understand fascism - not at all.
So it's not like the Trump and his fascism have appeared out of thin air. The conservatism of Ronald Reagan is dead as a political force and is replaced with fascism. Quit running from it, quit calling yourselves conservatives. Own your radicalism, unfurl your freak flags and give your fascist salutes to El Duce Trump. And prepare to lose in November because there still is a sane majority out here that perseveres.
And spare me the tripe about fascism being a leftist or socialist ideology, or about state ownership. If you think that you need to turn off Beck pick up a few books by Paxton and Eco.
>>
File: 1447954075593.jpg (871KB, 2000x1300px) Image search:
[Google]
871KB, 2000x1300px
Fascism is by definition militaristic, so liberals and and democrats really aren't fascists.
Their intolerance of criticism and willingness to suppress or shout down dissenting opinion does make arch liberalism a form of totalitarianism though.
/pedantry over
>>
>>721333357
>literally stopped reading right there
>literally can't handle the truth
ok, snowflake. don't claim you're educated and don't live in a fucking bubble when you get triggered by a few words on 4chan. fuckin kek
tell me what's factually wrong about my post.
>your post deserves not to be taken seriously
you can't just silence an opposing viewpoint just because you disagree with it. that's precisely something a fascist would do.
>>
>>721333357
haha faggot
>>
>>721333973
All this poetry and not one actual fact. Sad really.
>OMG Goebbels would looove Fox News
>all this chest-pounding
Notice how liberals never have actual facts, just colorful metaphors and similes not at all based in reality? Yeah, you've noticed too.
>>
>>721326530
It might just be that I'm not quite as left as alot of other leftists are, but aren't you taking this to extremes a bit?
Like obviously you would for the sake of your argument, but in reality it's only the fucking third wave feminazis and their fucking irl Tumblr army that's fucking it up for the majority of the left. They're the stupidest, and the most outspoken, and as a result you've based your opinion of the left on the retarded minority.
>>
File: Violent+protests+Berkeley+University+against+l-LyO_Yih0ll.jpg (65KB, 600x400px) Image search:
[Google]
65KB, 600x400px
The term fascist is used too much. Both Dems and GOP are shit stains and corrupt. Both left/right people just have confirmation bias and call anyone names who disagrees with narrative provided for you.
We're fucked. Journalism is dead and controlled by corporations and share holders.
social media spread fake news for left/right
24 hour news channels dilute journalism with endless speculation.
>>
>>721326530
>>"Nothing against the state". Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong.
>>"Everything in the state". The Government is supreme.
These two statements epitomize the current "Republican" president and his people.
>>
File: 4f6f9e8b40073978a4acea5eb2e86a3b5d4162d202a0a7e49662fa7c2565e4bb.png (233KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
233KB, 1000x1000px
>>721326530
I say we just embrace it and become the fascists liberals make us out to be.
Advantages:
>Place liberals into gas chambers
>Shoot liberals
>bomb campuses
>Round up and deport the jews
>Round up and deport the blacks
>place liberals in rape-camps just like ISIS would have.
Disadvantages:
>No asian waifus :C
>Liberals will whine and piss slightly louder than they do now
>Jews will try and use central banks to destroy the country.
I suppose we could just continue with our current trend of nationalism, but really, when it comes down to it liberals will accuse us of extreme fascism if we disagree with them in anyway for any reason.
Why not pull out all the stops and just go for it? Infiltrate an AntiFa black block and start quietly stabbing them to death.
For Right Wing Death Squads and kick in the doors of known activists and execute them.
I mean, if we're gonna get accused of being extremist fascists, we'd might as well deserve it, right?
It's not like they'll call us anything else, they're like broken records, or retarded children, that are incapable of critical or creative thought.
I tried to talk to one the other day and all of his arguments devolved into "true communism has never been tried" as if that some how justified his violent rhetoric.
I'm not even sure liberals count as human at this point, you have to be able to analyze the world around you to be sapient.
>>
File: trump_1465464380160981.jpg (53KB, 478x320px) Image search:
[Google]
53KB, 478x320px
>>
>>721334697
I fucking love that end line dude. Imma steal that shit.
>>
>>721332925
Question for libtards in this thread
do you choose
a)
>police are violent psychopaths and cannot be trusted.
or
b)
>No one needs a gun, only the police should have guns, and you can always call the police.
Leftist hypocrisy is so absurd you'd think it was performance art.
>>
File: 6ceaeef62d83da975ea4bd95ca2f943053b9601d9a62b2a5197feaad00a1f3e8.jpg (280KB, 831x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
280KB, 831x1080px
>>721334102
>Praise Kek
>this is now a kek thread.
>>
File: 5fcea83c2758c3ffc72573dd82b91338013c6f2e5d70fcad8d8cbdf20c74a447.jpg (468KB, 791x606px) Image search:
[Google]
468KB, 791x606px
>>
File: trump_draws2.jpg (1MB, 2048x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2048x1024px
>>721334939
neither, dipshit.
but guns should be harder to obtain. much like a driver's license. Also just like every other profession, there are good cops and bad cops.
>>
File: triggered.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 480x270px
>>721327737
its the methods the left uses, anon. put simply people are to afraid to stand up for themselves in this tough world so they want the government to do it for them. they are terrified and have absolutely no way to defend themselves. they need daddy to tell them everything is ok and they'll be taken care of. when people get together wearing masks to destroy things, the rest of us know they are cowards. they won't show their face because they are scared of what they've become. the very thing they think they are fighting against. its cowardly.
>>
>>721334939
How's about option c?
>There's room for improvement in the fields of law enforcement and gun control.
Right wing simple mindedness is so absurd, but I'm a liberal so I can rationally point to poor education and political tribalism as the culprit rather than writing it off as performance art, like a simpleton might do.
>>
>>721329220
You probably voted against your own independence
>>
>>721328536
This guy sounds educated.
>>
>>721335462
You sound like a pompous buffoon. Typical.
>>
>>721335582
I'm sure your average 7th grade science student sounds like a pompous buffoon to you.
>>
File: 1451285235436.jpg (54KB, 692x960px) Image search:
[Google]
54KB, 692x960px
>>721335449
to piggy back on that a little further, no one wants to pay for people who whine and destroy things when they don't get their way. we teach our children this is wrong because it raises spoiled little cowards. i personally love it when people rioting in the streets get a baton over the face. i LOVE the look on their faces when the cops grab them. they scream and cry like they don't understand why they are being arrested. its the ultimate life lesson and you really see it captured on the look in their eyes and the way their voices crack as they are being dragged away. you call it fascism. the rest of us call it order and there is nothing a limp wristed liberal can do to stop order.
>>
>>721330558
So then racism isn't, and hasn't, been a problem for decades. Also, cops are heroes and BLM are just race baiting cherry pickers.
>>
>>721334939
Maybe one could fix A so that B can be achieved
>>
>>721326530
Democracy is a shit form of government anyways.
Majority rule isn't fair.
People are stupid, and will continue to drink the kool-aid.
>>
>>721331991
"CBS" Didn't their poles say Trump had no chance being elected?
>i'm sure they're rite this time
>>
>>721335353
>guns should be harder to obtain
>REEEEE they asked voters for a PICTURE ID to make sure non-citizens aren't voting! FUCKING RACISTS
kek
liberals are just one big ball of fucking hypocrisy
>>
>>721330719
Solid words, guy. I would just say that what some people call hyper liberal is no longer liberal, and not because people took LIBERAL ideas too far, they took PROGRESSIVE ideas too far and have morphed into a dead end culture known as the regressive left. They are regressives.
>>
>>721335849
Care to elaborate on what you're trying to say here?
>>
File: 1485301578391.jpg (28KB, 600x600px) Image search:
[Google]
28KB, 600x600px
>>721326530
>MFW democrats and republicans are BOTH retarded and you will all cause the USA to go down the shitter faster than it can be saved
Being non-partisan is where it's at.
>>
>>721326530
Isn't a big thing about fascism a strong desire for nationalism and isolationism? Dems and Libs have the opposite of this. I was under the understanding that fascism and communism were opposite extremes that both shared a belief in authoritarian governments.
>>
File: 1483774147603.jpg (2MB, 1173x1910px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1173x1910px
>>721326530
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tytKO3HoRz4
>>
>>721336443
Dems/libs share 9/10 tenets of fascism. If I score a 90 on a test, that's an A at most universities.
>>
File: Screenshot_3.png (24KB, 383x388px) Image search:
[Google]
24KB, 383x388px
>>721336265
my main fuckin man right here
>>
File: IMG_4066.png (261KB, 1136x640px) Image search:
[Google]
261KB, 1136x640px
>>721328498
Apparently no one paid attention to the 20th century and the lessons learned so we will probably have to go through it all again.
>>
>>721336141
Everybody can be guilty of cherry picking.
>>
>>721333205
>Blowjobs illegal? Gtfo out of here, schlomo.
You didn't know anti-sodomy laws make blowjobs illegal?
>>
>>721336670
It's ironic you use that quote, when the liberals assaulting people with different opinions, rioting, destroying public property, destroying private property, and blocking roads, stores, highways are literally calling themselves anti-fascists.
>>
>>721336543
Not that I disagree but let me ask, at its core is fascism more of a set of political ideals or just a set of cheap tricks to bolster your political position? Because it seems like we're mixing the two into the definition.
>>
>>721326530
Yeah they're both pretty fascist in that regard. Fuck I'm glad I'm an anarcho-communist.
>>
>>721327737
If you are fighting bigotry and intolerance you'd be fighting the political left. They are literally the thing they say they are against.
>>
>>721336772
You didn't know those anti-sodomy laws were also voted for by Democrats. Those laws are a sign of the times they were passed in.
>>
>>721326530
I came to this realization after the last election. when i look back now, i feel like an embarassed clown that used to wear jncos or had 30 piercings in my face then wondered why no one wanted to hire me for a job
>>
>>721336134
I like the term regressive left a lot more than hyper liberal. Thanks Bruh.
I have a lot of hope for my generation. We aren't all idiots, but right now the regressives are the most vocal. There aren't enough people who are relatively moderate speaking up. That needs to change or we are doomed to be grouped in with the butthurt rhetoric.
For now let the regressive lemmings jump off a cliff of their own making.
>>
>>721329220
nice cucking queenie
>>
File: 1451503342629.gif (1MB, 276x232px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 276x232px
>>721336134
>well said buddy
>>
>>721338287
>A cliff of their own making
couldn't have worded it better myself
>>
>>721328654
Found a /pol/ gobbler
>>
>>721326530
Fascism
A class of political ideologies (and historical political regimes) that takes its name from the movement led by Benito Mussolini that took power in Italy in 1922. Mussolini's ideas and practices directly and indirectly influenced political movements in Germany (especially the Nazi Party), Spain (Franco's Falange Party), France, Argentina, and many other European and non-European countries right up to the present day.
The different "fascist" movements and regimes have varied considerably in their specific goals and practices, but they are usually said to be characterized by several common features:
Militant nationalism, proclaiming the racial and cultural superiority of the dominant ethnic group and asserting that group's inherent right to a special dominant position over other peoples in both the domestic and the international order
The adulation of a single charismatic national leader said to possess near superhuman abilities and to be the truest representation of the ideals of the national culture, whose will should therefore literally be law
Emphasis on the absolute necessity of complete national unity, which is said to require a very powerful and disciplined state organization (especially an extensive secret police and censorship apparatus), unlimited by constitutional restrictions or legal requirements and under the absolute domination of the leader and his political movement or party
>>
>>721339918
Militant anti-Communism coupled with the belief in an extreme and imminent threat to national security from powerful and determined Communist forces both inside and outside the country
Contempt for democratic socialism, democratic capitalism, liberalism, and all forms of individualism as weak, degenerate, divisive and ineffective ideologies leading only to mediocrity or national suicide
Glorification of physical strength, fanatical personal loyalty to the leader, and general combat-readiness as the ultimate personal virtues
A sophisticated apparatus for systematically propagandizing the population into accepting these values and ideas through skilled manipulation of the mass media, which are totally monopolized by the regime once the movement comes to power
A propensity toward pursuing a militaristic and aggressive foreign policy
Strict regulation and control of the economy by the regime through some form of corporatist economic planning in which the legal forms of private ownership of industry are nominally preserved but in which both workers and capitalists are obliged to submit their plans and objectives to the most detailed state regulation and extensive wage and price controls, which are designed to insure the priority of the political leadership's objectives over the private economic interests of the citizenry. Therefore under fascism most of the more important markets are allowed to operate only in a non-competitive, cartelized, and governmentally "rigged" fashion.
>>
Its always the extreme right like by definition
>>
>>721326530
Fascism is a far-right-wing ideology. Democrats tend to be left-wing liberals. I think your hat's on too tight, tbh.
>>
File: Capitalism Decays to Fascism.jpg (68KB, 480x620px) Image search:
[Google]
68KB, 480x620px
>>721326530
> Sure authoritarianism has grown under the Democrats
> But the Republicans are just as bad.
> A key tenet of fascism is dividing the populace through making minorities scapegoats
> Stopping you from discriminating isn't fascism
> Putting gay people in special camps is.
>>
File: Make Nazis Dead Again.jpg (76KB, 576x864px) Image search:
[Google]
76KB, 576x864px
>>721326530
>>
File: We're all PC.jpg (34KB, 540x540px) Image search:
[Google]
34KB, 540x540px
>>
Okay, literally Cuckservatives are the same when their favorite king is in power.
>>
File: White Tears.jpg (55KB, 960x768px) Image search:
[Google]
55KB, 960x768px
>>721326530
> The white tears are real here lol
>>
File: Doublestink.jpg (42KB, 480x476px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 480x476px
>>
>>721342326
Yahoooo buzzwords.
>>
>>721328712
>Seems you're just calling anyone who disagrees with you a "nazi"
Not that guy, but the trump-aligned poster was actually the first one to throw the term "Nazi" around in reference to liberal voters.
In short, read the fucking thread numbnuts
>>
File: dumb_place.jpg (191KB, 696x754px) Image search:
[Google]
191KB, 696x754px
>>721326530
I didn't read any of that.
>>
>>721326530
You are a great American, anon. This can also be seen in the waycrybully campus leftists run around declaring other people's speech to be "violence" while they and their black bloc commie friends commit actual violence.
>>
>>721339918
>proclaiming the racial and cultural superiority of the dominant ethnic group
Sounds like BLM
>propagandizing the population into accepting these values and ideas through skilled manipulation of the mass media
fuuuuuuuuck
>>
>>721342326
>uses race meme and "white tears" in same post
You're not the brightest apple of the bunch are you?
>>
>>721328498
>the pepper spraying was done to liberals, not by them
The pepper spraying the parent was referring to was at Berkeley, where a girl in MAGA hat was pepper-sprayed by an Antifa rioter while speaking to guy with camera.
OP, while so-called liberals do tend to be more violent with their "protests", I find both major parties to be fascist, just in different ways.
>>
>How do you explain this, lefties? Why do you use the label "fascist" to slander republicans when it seems it lines up more with your own ideology?
Sage
>>
>>721343069
Then you see how the term fascist can be stretched to define almost any centralized political party.
>>
>>721327737
>No one is forcing churches who don't want to preform gay marriage
Since you'll probably only like leftist shit, here you go.
>http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/hitchingpost.asp
>A Couer d’Alene deputy city attorney reportedly said on local television that for-profit wedding chapels could not legally turn away a gay couple without risking a misdemeanor citation
>>
>>721341685
Just saying "hurr durr it's gotta be right-wing it can never be left" really shows whose hat is "on too tight" to be honest.
>>
>>721343249
I ask a legitimate question and you try to silence me because you have no way to explain it?
Sure sounds fascist to me.
>>
File: fascism 2 web.png (454KB, 1042x680px) Image search:
[Google]
454KB, 1042x680px
>>721326530
Because, from the top:
1. "Make America Great Again"
2. Threatining (and following through with) threats to kill "terrorists and their families."
3. Mexico, Islam, etc.
4. Promised to increase military spending, citing it as "more important" than a balanced budget
5. "Grab them by the pussy"
6. Multiple instances of blacklisting media, doubting the media, attempting to discredit the media. See: Inaugeration numbers as a small example
7. The entire immigration ban on 7 different countries that have never partaken in any terror attack on the US, the only ban to ever not follow an actual threat or attack.
8. Allows businesses to fire on religion, elects religious conservatives to SCOTUS, etc.
9. SCOTUS nominee has a long history of favoring corporations, all of his nominations so far have had corporate ties, etc.
10. Not Trump exclusively by himself, but Republicans have passed numerous laws to weaken unions and Trump's appointments are on that exact same path.
11. Has threatened cut off funding for the National Endowment of the Arts as well as the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
12. Has threatened to send in National Guard into Chicago and has said repeatedly that he favors Blue Lives over civilians.
13. ExxonMobile, Russia, $200m to the Republican party with DeVos, opening his re-election campaign for 2020 now to open up the way for "gifts to the campaign," refusal to sever ties with his assets, the mysterious removal of several countries that actually did originate 9/11 hijackers and actually do provide money to terrorists but also have Trump holdings from the refugee ban, etc.
14. He lost by 3m votes, less than 23% of the country actually voted for him (only 50% showed up to vote, and he only got 45.9% of the people who showed up to vote).
>>
One of the most egregious instances of Orwellian NewSpeak had been the identification of Fascist political regimes throughout history with exclusively right-wing movements
>>
>>721328498
>It's okay to punch Nazis
The moment you suspend someone else's inalienable rights, in the means of furthering your own political agenda, you are a facist.
>Pepper spraying was done to liberals
There's literally a video of a black bloc faggot spraying a peaceful person with pepperspray for wearing a maga hat
>>
>>721326530
Oh, that's simple. All these snowflakes are only cosplay intelligence they does not possess, to distinguish themselves somehow from ordinary trumpanzees, with hipster style. Unfortunately, intelligence level of snowflakes is the same 85 or so.
>>
>>721329685
>https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/01/27/veri-j27.html
Literally referring to project veritas. There was no violence, the only thing they did was take video evidence of the left INCITING VIOLENCE AT TRUMP RALLIES.
Way to shoot yourself in the foot for not reading your own link.
>>
>>721329685
>UC Davis
You mean where occupy democrats were illegally gathering and blocking traffic, and refusing to vacate when ordered to. You have the right to free speech, to assemble, but you don't have the right to block traffic/infrastructure.
>>
>>721343769
None of this explains how democrats aren't fascists, anon. You're just listing whiny excuses and trying to derail the topic.
>threatening and following through with threats to kill terrorists and their families
Are you implying this is bad?
>3.Mexico, Islam, etc.
This isn't even an argument, you literally just listed a country and a religion.
>6. blacklisting the media, doubting the media..
You're arguing we should blindly trust the media and not question them? What the actual fuck?
>Elect religious conservatives to SCOTUS
What does religion have to do with his SCOTUS nominee? Democrats supported him on his merits over a long career two years ago. Now they've turned their back on him only because trump picked him.
>has threatened to send the national guard into chicago
No shit. The police aren't doing their job (and if they ARE doing their job, they're completely incompetent at it.) They have casualties and gun shot victims on par with Iraq (a literal war zone) and you're saying it's bad for the president to use every legal tool at his disposal to stop that? What the actual fuck, again?
>14. Factually wrong.
>>
>>721327737
>It's okay to fight bigotry and intolerance, doing so doesn't make you intolerant.
Logic, motherfucker, do you study it?
>>
>>721330558
You've yet to combat his "sample size" with even one instance of your own. Ball's in your court, faggot.
>>
>>721331541
>Less than 20
There were over 100 arrests at the inauguration protests alone, for violent offenses/vandalism/property damage, faggot.
>>
>>721328271
Taking religion seriously in country which has MIT and biotech industry.
>>
File: 1479179872810.jpg (66KB, 600x449px) Image search:
[Google]
66KB, 600x449px
Ever notice how antifags only throw tantrums in safe zones where they're protected by leftist politicians?
Come try that in the south, PLEASE. I can't wait to laugh at videos of your sobbing teargassed toothless face getting thrown in a police bus
>>
>>721332179
>Trump rally attendees
>Already proven that certain DNC staffers had violent democrats to infiltrate rallies, more than enough cause to cast reasonable doubt
Even if that -wasn't- the case, these articles are fucking ancient. And speaking of sample size, let's assume that these -weren't- paid shills, and that they were actually trump supporters. Trump regularly sold out stadiums around the fucking country, two people, out of 62 million. That's a pretty low chance, my dude.
>>
>>721333750
>Unions are the 1%
>>
File: I6HrCW177546-02.jpg (54KB, 650x487px) Image search:
[Google]
54KB, 650x487px
Who here can say they haven't had a black cock in their mouth?
>>
>>721334049
>Literally assaulting people with metal poles and knocking them unconcious
>Not militaristic
>>
>>721334343
This. I think we'd be far better off as a nation if journalists weren't such cancerous panderers.
>>
>>721344911
Do niggers really feel like their cock looking a log of shit is a positive thing?
Maybe HIV+, but why is it always MUH DIKK with you vermin?
>>
>>721335353
>But guns should be harder to obtain
>But you shouldn't have to have a proof of residency to vote
>>
>>721335353
Driver's license isn't a constitutional right
fuck off
>>
>>721336845
That's kinda what that anon was saying, anon. How is that ironic.
>>
>>721333205
Blowjobs are a form of degenerate sodomy. If you have a problem with that then you are a degenerate deplorable sodomite.
>>
>>721344210
>Are you implying this is bad?
It's a war crime
>This isn't even an argument, you literally just listed a country and a religion.
As in, see the executive orders and talk he does about these two. Stop playing dumb.
>You're arguing we should blindly trust the media and not question them? What the actual fuck?
No, I'm arguing that the president shouldn't go around spouting "alternative facts" about inauguration numbers and the like and saying HE'S right and the media's wrong. He's trying to lower your faith in ALL media, you shouldn't blindly trust anything but you should also not trust the guy who's in his interests to keep a good image when the truth is revealed.
>What does religion have to do with his SCOTUS nominee? Democrats supported him on his merits over a long career two years ago. Now they've turned their back on him only because trump picked him.
"Seperation of church and state"
Also, see the entire Republican govt and their idea that legal discrimination can happen under the pretense of faith. Which is, by the constitution, illegal.
>No shit. The police aren't doing their job (and if they ARE doing their job, they're completely incompetent at it.) They have casualties and gun shot victims on par with Iraq (a literal war zone) and you're saying it's bad for the president to use every legal tool at his disposal to stop that? What the actual fuck, again?
Sending in the National Guard is the equivalent of putting that shit under martial law.
>>721344210
>14. Factually wrong.
Look it up.
Even if you were right, which you're not, that's still 10/14
>>
>>721345760
We should trust you. You want to be Trump
>>
>>721345760
>It's a war crime
Killing active terrorists who are plotting to kill us now is a war crime? Since when exactly? Cite sources.
>As in executive orders and "talk he does"
I'm not playing dumb, I'm asking you to explain yourself because you haven't yet made a logical argument to support your position. I'm starting to wonder if you even HAVE a logical position, honestly.
>yada yada inauguration numbers
There are plenty of media outlets (including CNN) that have been caught outright lying and fabricating unsubstantiated stories even before his inauguration and you're arguing that we should still trust them? Come on, man.
>SepAration of church and state
Show me an instance where his specific SCOTUS nominee has forced his religion on anyone through his decisions. It doesn't exist.
>National Guard is the equivalent of putting that shit under martial law
Which is exactly what you do when the majority of a city is out of control and shooting each other. What are you trying to argue here exactly? That they should be left alone and allowed to kill each other?
>Look it up
I already have genius, your numbers are factually wrong.
>>
>>721346009
This doesn't even make sense.
>>
>>721327737
the opposite is true
>>
>>721328162
you're dumb
>>
File: 1419057833924.jpg (79KB, 640x480px) Image search:
[Google]
79KB, 640x480px
>>721326530
an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
synonyms:authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy
read up you troglodyte.
>>
>>721346228
He (or You) never said who to trust or who he trusts. It's safe to assume that he thinks himself trustworthy. This will then be followed by a call to trust your own intelligence and due diligence, followed by "but I guess you're out of luck in those departments" insult.
>>
>>721346393
It's true for both. Not just opposite, both. So the opposite is true, but it would go on forever until one side uses force or fatigues the other side.
>>
>>721346557
>the left can be an authoritarian, nationalistic, dictatorship based on despotism and autocracy
>AS LONG AS THEY DON'T CALL THEMSELVES RIGHT WING THEY CANT BE FASCIST
wew lad, that liberal logic hard at work
kek
>>
>>721329027
I would would rather live in Nazi Germany then a communist hell hole. communists are both mentally and morally deficient. Having a left President would mean being governed by the dumbest and weakest people of society
>>
>>721346214
>threats to kill terrorists and their families
>families
>ie innocent people
THat is a war crime
>>
File: 1415651938426.jpg (57KB, 566x480px) Image search:
[Google]
57KB, 566x480px
>>721346766
literally by definition fascism is right wing
Left-wing fascism and left fascism are sociological and philosophical terms used to categorise real or perceived tendencies in extreme left-wing politics otherwise commonly attributed to the ideology of Fascism. Fascism has historically been considered a far right ideology, but crossovers may be expected according to the theory of extremes meet (French: Les extrêmes se touchent), where the touching point between the far left and the far right may be the use of power and/or political terrorism. Syntagmas such as left-wing fascism provide shorthand labels, but they lack any universally understood or agreed meaning and in common parlance may be used as a pejorative for any left-wing political position, or where unusual (or contradictory) hybrid political positions are perceived.
>>
>>721346600
what
>>
>>721326530
What Republicans don't understand is the concept that "freedom" belongs to the person choose to commit and act or not commit an act, not to the person choosing to prohibit someone else from committing the act or not committing the act.
Religious freedom is the freedom from doing things against your religion. If gay marriage is against your religion then action in question is gay marriage. Your right to religious freedom guarantees you will not have to marry a man. If a gay person wants to buy a cake in your shop, you don't have a right to refuse just because you want to prevent them from having a gay wedding. What they do with the cake is none of your business. Just like an atheist bus driver can't refuse to let you ride on the bus because you're riding to chuch and church is against his beliefs.
The thing liberals don't understand is that while it is wrong to refuse to sell a cake to a gay person, it is not wrong to refuse to CUSTOMIZE a cake in a way that offends you. Nobody can make you write a gay slogan, a Nazi slogan, an atheist slogan, or any other thing on a cake. If you refuse to draw cats on cakes that is your right, as long as you refuse to do it for everyone.
>>
>>721347150
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's more than likely a fucking duck, nigger.
>>
>>721347279
So how is refusing to make a cake for anyone who sticks their dick in another dude's ass discriminatory? You're refusing business to everyone who does it.
>>
>>721347300
>If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's more than likely a fucking duck, nigger.
I see you have no argument probably due to the fact the material given uses vocab that you cant grasp. nigger.
>>
>>721347270
You're pretending not to understand.
>>
>>721347398
You're refusing based on who they are, not based on what you are willing to do.
If I don't make cakes that say "Go Bronocos" because the Denver Broncos are faggots, that's my choice, as long as I refuse to sell them to everyone. If I only refuse to sell them to short people then I'm discriminating and I'm a bigoted piece of shit. You're free to make or not make whatever you want. That's different from choosing who you will make it for.
>>
>>721347580
There's nothing I don't understand about it. You're literally trying to argue because the left doesn't possess 1 out of 10 characteristics of fascism (but it does contain 9 out of 10) that it's somehow not fascist. Your argument doesn't hold water, nigger.
>>
>>721335672
The average liberal arts major certainly does.`
>>
>>721345760
They sent the national guard when 9 black kids couldn't go to a white school in Arkansas. Was that martial law?
>>
File: 41c8d99ba3ecadcde374378ea373c38ef32f6614702f0cabab0892594e9b47b4png.png (1MB, 1280x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1280x1024px
>>721331760
Your comeback wounds me sir, wounds me I say.
>tfw the left doesn't even have kek on their side.
>>
>>721347637
No I seriously don't understand, you're saying it was bait or something?
>>
>>721343769
If the left keep on pushing tolerants and acceptance of human depravity then you will get your wish you will get true Fascism. You should fear the silent majority.
>>
>>721347580
>I'm going to sprinkle dictionary words into my post, and then use them as backup for the first reply, so eveybody know how smarts I am
Faggggg
>>
>>721348176
>Dictionary words
Yeah they're all in there
>>
>>721348155
checkd and well put, anon
>>
>>721326530
Here's a question for Republicans who think Hobby Lobby should be able to force it's healthcare provider to not give out birth control in order to control the choices of i's employees:
If I own a business and war is against my religion, don't I have the right to refuse to let national guards members take off weekends for guard duty?
If I'm a Muslim and eating pork is against my religion, can't I forbid my employees eating pork because if they come to work with Pork in their body they are desecrating my building?
Does religious freedom protect their right to control their actions or my right to control their actions?
If TAKING contraception is the action that is against someones religion, isn't the person choosing to take or not take that action the one whom the freedom of choice belongs to?
The bible never says it is a sin to give someone else a choice. In fact, it straight up tells you to mind your own business and let God judge other people's choices. It's not your duty to prevent them from sinning.
>>
>>721349009
But then Republicans never gave a shit about what the bible actually says.
>>
>>721349009
Hobby Lobby never argued to for their healthcare provider to not provide birth control. Their entire position was they didn't want to pay extra for birth control and leave it up to the individual to pay for.
You literally just tried to skew facts to support your position with lies.
If you're a muslim, I see nothing wrong with not serving pork or allowing pork on your property if that's what you want to do based on religious beliefs.
You've tried to use false equivalencies and they don't hold water.
>>
>>721345416
your tin foil hat fell off and you haven't noticed
>>
>>721349009
I can answer the third one. There is president set for jews at least, if you are "unclean", meaning have sinned by say eating shellfish or pork or are menstruating, you were not allowed at temple until you cleansed yourself. Therefore, jews would have the right to refuse to let people enter if they have eaten pork... but they could not stop people from eating pork in the first place.
>>
wtf except hobby lobby won and no church is forced to allow gay marriage. You most be retarded.
>>
>>721349009
Here's how it works:
If you're a patriot for the white ethnostate you may act to support it.
If you're not, you may not discriminate against those who are.
>>
>>721349550
the only ones "supporting" the side with physical violence, rioting, and setting things on fire is the left who are not part of whatever "white ethnostate" you just made up in your head
>>
>>
>>721349775
shut up faggot
>>
>>
>>
>>721349730
Are you fucking retarded?
200 years of fucking ACTUAL, REAL OPPRESSION of minorities, killing, enslaving, and imprisoning them with the strictest of intentions to undermine their livelihood and existence in your "AMERICA FIRST" nation.
Fuck you. Fuck you, you fucking moron.
You are absolutely, 100% on the wrong fucking side of history, and you're too fucking sheltered and white to understand.
>>
>>
>>721350000
Checked.
>>
>>721350000
I'm not white, but sure kid. Keep showing just how racist you are.
>>
>>721350000
nice quads 2 bad they were wasted outside of
>>>/pol/
>>
>>721336493
purrfect lmao
>>
>>721350098
You're a shitty liar. Not that I would expect much from a trump supporter.
Congrats! You are the epitome of what is wrong with America.
>>
>>721350218
I'm not lying? You are overtly racist and a hypocrite like most left-leaning assholes. I'm a Native and you should get the fuck out of my country already with your dipshit ideology.
>>
>>
>>
I didn't know CTR visited /b/
Sage
>>
>>721350323
You're not native. You're an asshole on the internet who can't have an actual discussion without lying his ass off.
>>
>>721350332
Like a refreshing rain
>>
>>
>>721350323
>as a black man
get the fuck out you fucking faggot.
>>
>>721350400
>someone disagrees with me
>must be ciswhitemalescum
Who can't have an actual discussion? I'm not lying but keep being overtly racist, you're just showing what enormous hypocrites the left are. Again, I'm a native and most of us hate democrats.
Probably has something to do with this:
>The Trail of Tears
President Andrew Jackson (democrat) herded indians into camps, tormented them, burned and pillaged homes then forced them to relocate. Thousands died along the way.
Take your dumb ass back to europe, again, and quit fucking up my country.
>>
>>
>>721335353
How about we try actually enforcing the gun laws we already have I know you have zero clue what they are
>>
>>721330558
>Your number is more like 80 mil.
This is a big problem of you libs' thinking. You think it's totally D vs R, and that's it. Truth is, Dems are 24-26% of voting pop, Republicans are like 22%. The rest of the country is some kind of indie or libertarian or whatever else, but the majority of /everyone/ claims to be conservative.
You guys, either D or R, are the minority in the country. Even combined, you're still likely the minority. Not as many people think like you do as you may think.
>>
>>721350688
>blames democrats from pre-political reformation for modern democrats.
Motherfucker you know the parties were ACTUALLY ideologically switched, right?
You're not native.
I know you're not native, YOU know you're not native, but ok. Let's say for the sake of the argument, you actually ARE native.
MOTHERFUCKER THE PEOPLE YOU SUPPORT FUCKING HATE YOU. THEY WOULD LITERALLY RATHER SEE YOU DEAD THAN GIVE YOU REPARATIONS.
>>
File: 1478451130379.jpg (351KB, 900x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
351KB, 900x1200px
I agree lefties and their love of government intrusion need to be stopped, but I'm 100% pro-abortion. Not just pro-choice: pro. fucking. abortion. The vast majority of people spitting out kids have no fucking business reproducing, and I fucking HATE children. Kill the little fuckers the moment they're conceived. Hell, kill 'em on the way out.
>>
Neo-liberals and neo-conservatives both have fascist tendancies, and choosing between the two is cancer.
>>
>>721351073
I wish you'd been aborted.
>>
>>721351073
>>721351051
this doesn't work. you should stop.
>>
>>721351091
Actually neo- anything uses /pol/ unless they're retarded
>>
>>721351139
>>721351124
(you)
(should go to /pol/)
>>>/pol/
>>>>/pol/
>>
The left is absolutely intellectually dishonest as fuck, but the emerging right has its own share of bullshit.
It's incredible how dense the left are when it comes to this election, though. They have a fucking point when it comes to Trump being illegitimate, but they keep looking everywhere they can for what's under their own nose. The fact that they know it doesn't make it any better, how do you stand up and tell the population "actually we should be in power, because since Clinton stole the nomination from Sanders in the first place and we enabled her campaign the election was bogus from the beginning!" without being totally de-legitimized?
Along with the mindless collectivism in aid of "inclusiveness" (as if that ever fucking worked), the screeching SJWs and the rioting and violence, the left is falling to fucking bits, and it's doing everything it can to give oxygen to their opponents. I thought that Trump would be a fucking disaster and that the DNC would come together and re-emerge to clean up the pieces, but it looks like it's going to be the other way around, if not a COMPLETE shitshow from both sides.
>>
>>721351235
I wish I could have personally scraped you out with a coat hanger.
>>
>>721351032
Who ever said I was asking for reparations? I just don't want to be put in internment camps like the Democrats did with the Japanese.
Democrat Franklin Roosevelt issued the executive order that led to more than 100,000 japanese americans being put into camps
Do you just not know history or what pleb?
>>
>>721351331
The left is absolutely intellectually /pol/
>>
File: 1479044819203.png (906KB, 2342x1400px) Image search:
[Google]
906KB, 2342x1400px
>>721326530
The ONLY course of action is Civil War at this point.
We tried talking to them for 8 fucking years while that racist nigger fucking destroyed our country, all the while the liberals were sucking his BBC.
Only thing both sides can agree on, we hate each other more than we love our own lives and want to see the other dead, destroyed, and forgotten.
>>
>>721351195
Good thing I'm not then : ^ )
Political talk has as much right to be on /b/ as anything else, and no amount of autistic screeching will change that.
>>
>>721351358
>>721351393
Yeah but when you put it like that /pol/ seems like really the only option
you know?
>>
>>721351412
>The ONLY course of action is Civil War at this point.
Bullshit, the only course of action is going to /pol/ where you belong
>>
>>721351331
Motherfucker the republican party is very literally the party of science-denial.
It's ironic, because your initial statement about the left being intellectually dishonest is SUPER intellectually dishonest.
>>
>>721351421
>Good thing I'm not then : ^ )
seems like you technically admitted that you are
>>
>>721351490
Motherfucker the republican party uses /pol/
>>
>>721351235
Fuck off this is a thread
>>
>>721326530
>Republicans: Smaller government, states rights, less taxation.
THIS DUMBASS FELL FOR THIS OLD MEME HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA
>>
>>721351455
Fine then fucker, keep chasing your tail while the fucking country burns.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>
>>
/pol/!
>>
>>721351576
Waaa political discussion hurts my brain waaaaa
>>
>>721326530
I'm not sure you understand fascism. You just sound like a butthurt christian.
>>
>>721351490
Facts conclusively disagree with you anon. You. Are. Wrong.
>How a liberal bias is killing Science
http://theweek.com/articles/629054/how-liberal-bias-killing-science
>>
>>721335462
Oh look a massive faggot why thinks having circle jerks cum guzzling anal cream pie and ass prolapsed completions as part of his education thinks he is a liberal. No your a progresscuck princess fag snowflake nothing more. Gun control laws aren't enforced all the people who commit crimes you bitch about either go on the black market or won't be affected by current or proposed laws. You live in a fucking bubble of deluded massive cuckfaggotry. The real world how it operates and works is a complete mystery to you kid.
>>
>>>/pol/
>>/pol/
>>721351657
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pol
>>>/pol/
>>
>>721351393
>>make point
>>point wrong
>>get corrected
>>make wrong point again.
You just. don't. get it.
God have mercy on you.
>>
>>721351712
holy shit, you're actually crying right now aren't you?
>>
>>
>>721351701
Shit, you should look up the number of yearly toilet-related deaths. I'm surprised the progs let us even look at one.
>>
>>721351659
these are just observations, I'm not butthurt at all. I've yet to see a liberal ITT explain how I'm wrong, just a bunch of name-calling, buzzwords, and strawmen or attempts to derail the topic altogether.
You can't silence someone just for pointing out the truth, no matter how hard you'd like to.
>>
>>
>>721351696
>>conservative rag opinion article
>>conclusive facts
pick one.
>>
>>
>>721334236
>All this poetry and not one actual fact
You'd just pull out an alternative fact to counter the fact.
This shit is more retarded than a Yu-Gi-Oh! game.
>>
>>721351872
>2 minutes between posting source and your rebuttal
>totally had enough time to open source, read it, absorb the information then respond
kek, don't pretend you're at all objective about discussion. you're all the same when it comes to being hit in the fact with facts that burst your echo-chamber bubble.
>oh no, we've been found out
>attack the source, character assassination!
>riot, whine, bitchfit until we get our way!
fucking pathetic honestly.
>>
File: 1469130972859.jpg (399KB, 616x2030px) Image search:
[Google]
399KB, 616x2030px
>>721351879
>>
>>721349775
>>721349837
>>721349845
>>721350056
>>721350130
>>721350332
>>721350344
>>721350622
>>721350742
>>721351051
>>721351235
>>721351561
>>721351712
>>721351799
>>721351846
>>721351857
>>721351879
What is this? Empty over there and you want us to spice it up? Or are you chimping out on a thread you don't like when, nigga, you could just leave.
>>
>>721352162
62,593
320,082
5x
197,000,000
38,000,000
25x
200x
>>>/pol/
>>
File: 1469518570421.png (451KB, 1907x2074px) Image search:
[Google]
451KB, 1907x2074px
>>721352162
>>
>>721336123
attempt to misdirect failed
>>
>>721342164
Difference is one is slightly worse than the other one
>>
File: 1469517345282.gif (139KB, 1169x993px) Image search:
[Google]
139KB, 1169x993px
>>721352218
>>721352230
>>
>>721352348
>>721352349
FORUM SLIDING
CONSENSUS CRACKING
TOPIC DILUTION
INFORMATION COLLECTION
ANDGER TROLLING
GAINING FULL CONTROL
CONCLUSION
>>>/pol/
>>>>/pol/
>>>/pol/
>>>>/pol/
>>
>>721342239
Sure you will princess
>>
File: asdf5481.jpg (1MB, 1752x2974px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1752x2974px
>>721352349
>>
>>721352126
Motherfucker don't virtue signal me. What standard operating procedure for the right;
SCREAMS AND RANTS about the mass media, but can't provide a single source that isn't from a bullshit partisan rag.
There's only one of two things going on here;
1. you're a shitty troll.
2. you're so fucking stupid that you can't see the forest for the trees.
You're on the wrong side of history, son, and that makes me feel bad for you.
>>
File: 1472005953570.jpg (571KB, 2587x810px) Image search:
[Google]
571KB, 2587x810px
>>721352436
>>
>>721326530
So do you realize you're dumb or is it just not something your brain can process?
I've always wondered that. When someone is just flat out fucking stupid but smart enough to delude themselves or deflect.
>>
>>721352511
Keep your head in the sand, kid. Clearly the only one flipping out and having a bitchfit over facts is you. Look at you chimping out with more name-calling and buzzwords.
Sad. Just. Sad.
>>
>>721352592
Wow great answer to the question at hand.
>you're just....just...a-a-a dumb-dumb head
typical liberal when faced with facts.
fuckin kek
>>
>>721352634
Fucking this. Standard MO.
>>
>>721352491
>>721352493
>>721352511
>>721352571
>>721352592
????? ?????????? ??????? ??? ??????? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ??????? ???????????? ??????????? ?????? ?????????? & ????????????? ??????????? ??????? ???????? ?? ??? ???? ????????? ?? ??????? & ???????
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (660KB, 2040x2205px) Image search:
[Google]
660KB, 2040x2205px
>>721352571
>>
File: 1469519407941.png (1MB, 720x9600px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 720x9600px
>>721352744
>>
>>721352634
Ok, it's option 1.
Whatever you say, sweetheart.
>>name-calling and buzzwords.
>>"chimping out"
I bet you fucking complain about not being able to say white pride, too.
Maybe keep the bullshit to your next stormfront meeting, dumbass.
>>
>>721352730
>>721352634
don't samefag, we can all see it
>>
>>721342379
Sorry we just rather not have massive faggotry and nignogery win over actual useful human civilization.
Thread posts: 274
Thread images: 60
Thread images: 60