s/fur / g/fur thread >/b/ mod deletes an allowed /b/ thread,

Because Hiro doesn't really care about this place.

File: Communism Tint.png (606KB, 716x971px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 716x971px

Also found my image.

Because the fur shits fucking gay bro.

What I find humorous is that the mods on /trash/ hate "h/fur" but love gfur, sfur, and all the gross variations and fetishes of each kind.

>>719398482
this

>>719398513
Furrys a gross fetish though?
You want to be dogmen?
You want to fuck dogmen?
You want to be fucked by dogmen?
I just dont understand please enlighten me to your odd thing thats going on here

I recommend you accept the /trash/can OP. Now let's just worry about those traps now hmm?

>>719398590
The vanilla attraction, is not so bad. It's when it devolves into piss, scat, diaper, vore, etc. I literally started from Playboy, to vanilla hentai, to tentacles, then furry. Fapping to the art/crude drawings is fine, fursonas, the furcons, etc, are the real bad parts.

>I don't understand the question, I'm sleep deprived.

File: 9de2fd60794269fce172238907d2516a.png (803KB, 921x1200px) Image search: [Google]

803KB, 921x1200px

>>719398590
it's a stimulating combination of the human sexual form and cute/emotive animal characteristics

like chocolate and peanut butter, cute and sexy are better together

File: 1484571521318.jpg (229KB, 853x1280px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 853x1280px

>>719398590
Not really
No
Women, not men.
See above.

Its a majorly overreacted to fetish and fandom. I'm surprised loli, hard bdsm, and the more hard shit doesnt get the treatment furries do.

File: 1481241604703.jpg (228KB, 1280x1261px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1280x1261px

>>719398735
I think the bright colors, and the fact that furry art also tends to incorporate other outlandish fetishes just tends to grab people's attention more than other weird porn

>>719398682
But why though?
Why not a regular women? Does it not go against everything you knew and learned your entire life?

>>719398838
100% this.

>>719398689
But there doggos though?
My dogs cute but i dont wank over it?

>>719398735
Its all weird though?

File: 1483619515548.gif (2MB, 691x687px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 691x687px

>>719398928
All fetishes are weird. Furries are just a fetish. To aome at least. Nonsexual furries exist.

>>719398838
That's probably it.

>>719398854
I have a "regular" girlfriend. I put in quotes because she's pretty cool to me, but strange in other ways. This one is also lighter than me.

Anyways.

Furries turn me on because unlike standard hentai and loli, the facial expressions can be designed to be more animalistic, more human like (almost to the point of nekomimi and such), to proportions I love seeing on women. I guess to simply say, the drawn art really can bring to the imagination what real life can't always fulfill.

I had a German Shepherd, and would never hurt him like that. It's strictly just a fetish, nothing I'd carry over in real life.

File: 1483382313399.png (698KB, 1245x1956px) Image search: [Google]

698KB, 1245x1956px

>>719398899
I don't want to have sex with actual animals - zoophiles, while more prevalent than in the general population, are still very much a minority in the furry fandom.

Merely applying certain animal features can both enhance the human form and inherently impart certain stimulating associations - a sly fox girl, a horny bunny babe, mischievous raccoon lady, etc

Switching over to phone, she's calling me to bed, I'll be back.

>>719399106
This one gets it.

File: 10c332404476211f94c5342724553368.jpg (71KB, 423x590px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 423x590px

How come DeepArt.io doesn't work on a subscription/purchase model?
What would be great is if I could pay $20 and for a long time or forever be able to do this gimmick with a high processing priority, high resolution, and no watermark.

It asks for 19 euros just to get a single image in high resolution though, and that's absurdly overpriced; I'm not paying that, and you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who would.

>>719399230
Some artists do this for a living, so this might be their only source of income. But if it isn't, then that's just rude.

File: 1478310785656.png (596KB, 1147x1078px) Image search: [Google]

596KB, 1147x1078px

>>719399230
I'm guessing you're just paying for computing time, pretty sure the algorithms are open source

>>719399014
>>719399106
Thanks for your time to clear that up for me /b/ros sorry if i seemed a little judgemental, anyway ill be on my way have a good one

>>719399484
Not a problem, you helped me think!

File: 472b047e2c1b881c97cdf8be86fc2b8a4d147ad6.jpg (356KB, 800x708px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 800x708px

>>719399230
>>719399443
yeah that's what it looks like
if you're tech savvy you could do it on your machine, it just might take a few days depending on what sort of cpu/gpu you've got

>>719399484
nah it's definitely an esoteric fetish, I don't mind giving my justification for it to the curious

File: 22de99855c918c192801ac3610c718f9.png (1MB, 1200x1142px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x1142px

>>719399323
It's not like they'd make less money if they changed to a sane pricing model though.
Ungenerous offers just mean that customers are ripped off and are very rare, no one wins.

>>719399443
They are, but that implementation of them isn't, and it wouldn't be simple to replicate.
It's about as helpful to have the open source code they used as it is to have the ingredients for fudge.

There is absolutely no way you're going to make fudge without knowing how.

>>719399714
A subscription would help for sure. Guess it's just money gouging.

Quints

File: impressive.png (186KB, 457x303px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 457x303px

>>719400000

File: 1482101370917.jpg (132KB, 720x608px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 720x608px

>>719400000
WHAT THE FUCK

File: b0fe0be61c22897a3407f52582efe4fc.png (43KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 700x700px

>>719400000
not bad

File: Well Done.jpg (135KB, 1280x905px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1280x905px

>>719400000
Smooth as asscheeks my man.

File: 807b5587790e81b25cba6d05f7f4538c.jpg (108KB, 770x570px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 770x570px

>>719399598
It would be super fun to not be restricted.

>>719399823
My point is though that it's ineffective money gouging.
People aren't going to make even a single microtransaction on a gimmick they know they only want to play around with, they just want to play around more easily until they forget about it a day to a week later.

People love to get a lot for their money, funnily enough.
I actually came across a game with a perfect implementation of a microtransaction: It was a cops-vs-robbers style game, and for $4 people could permanently be really overpowered when they played a cop.
Lots of people bought it, and it made the game much more interesting, because it meant that there was actually a cop that was a challenge to take down.

File: 1480918361820.jpg (134KB, 894x894px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 894x894px

>>719400000
neat...

>>719400088
Make a rebellion happen, Mr. Dubs. I believe in you.

>>719400000
Whaf

File: 0a736fc58d0b50e7bddfe6b8496e6759.png (37KB, 700x600px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 700x600px

>>719400088
It's still a pretty new use of that technology, I wouldn't be surprised at all if some competing services pop up soon

hell, you could be one of 'em if you can scrape up some capital and technical know-how

g/fur thread only two people in it at the moment.
>>719391650

File: Number One.png (750KB, 1100x1200px) Image search: [Google]

750KB, 1100x1200px

But S-Fur...

File: 1482009878232.png (1MB, 1280x886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x886px

>>719400159
>>719400290
I just sent them an email explaining what their pricing model should look like, not planning on doing anything fancy.
I have other irons in the fire, I might end up having to beg a Maori tribe for business funding as part of a very strange economic and cultural model.

File: Up The Irons.jpg (630KB, 920x1300px) Image search: [Google]

630KB, 920x1300px

>>719401004
Godspeed dude. Hopefully the pricing is lowered.

File: 002214c015fe71d7160b213a06bc2d34.png (2MB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x1280px

Why don't more men keep their wives lactating?
I would :3

File: 1470922194911.jpg (877KB, 1229x1280px) Image search: [Google]

877KB, 1229x1280px

>>719399106
It appears this thread has interesting viewpoints.
It really seems to enhance the human side and bring the emotional aspects more visible.

File: 1484700333339.png (1MB, 1536x1843px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1536x1843px

source on this?

File: 1470651648311.png (526KB, 1280x1543px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 1280x1543px

There's an image I can't find, even on e621.
It's a g/fur image, with a couple cuddling on the bed, one asleep and one softly whining in bondage with a vibrator on his cock.

File: Relax Nigga.gif (997KB, 500x700px) Image search: [Google]

997KB, 500x700px

Sup My Dudes