How many of you are secretly attracted to teens? I'm ta

http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/rind/cont.html

Just gonna leave this here, so nobody can argue from ignorance.

I mean, they're still gonna, but at least they won't have an excuse.

File: 1473503773665.jpg (900KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

900KB, 2000x1333px

Bump, help out with a bump pls

Here from other thread, have a bump.

>>718276968

I am attracted physically but not mentally...

Then again you aren't fucking their personality.

It's been fun riding two threads to autosage with you faggots, but I have to turn in. Work and all that fun shit.

Visions of 13-year old sugarplums dancing in my head. Stay safe, /b/rothers. Stay aware, stay armed. Physically and mentally.

File: It's time to sleep.png (255KB, 630x773px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 630x773px

>>718277698
Goodnight /b/rother, see you tomorrow

Although children cannot give informed consent to sex, this doesn't mean it is harmful. It only becomes harmful when society tells the child that it's harmful, and they believe it.

>>718276968
Not a secret, just not common knowledge.

>>718277698
good night
have fun trying to rape kids

>>718278120
>It only becomes harmful when society tells the child that it's harmful, and they believe it.

>still trying this pasta

>>718278311
Just wanted to get the ball rolling.

And I wanted to make it clear that the debate wasn't about whether or not children can consent. We agree that they cannot. The debate is about whether or not sex between an adult and a child is inherently mentally scarring, or if the damage is socially constructed.

>>718278496
>debate

or like mindless bickering and insults

good luck with that, faggot

Holy shit threads gonna die fucking post

>>718278831
The first third of that thread had some really good debate

Then after that it steadily dissolved

>>718278852

it's a shit thread anyways

>>718278496
>We agree that they cannot.
We do not. Consent requires nothing but knowledge, and children are sponges for knowledge. They can learn as much as one is willing to teach.

"Legal consent", on the other hand, is a whole 'nother kettle o' fish.

>>718278931

no, it didn't.

it's the same bullshit in every thread.

everyone pretending to have intimate details of of the kids' minds

>i know this to be true. you're just being a retard!

>>718279093
You're right, I just bashed that out quickly because I didn't want the thread to die.

We are both opposed to outright violent rape, but mutually desired sex is not inherently damaging. The only mental damage that arises, I believe, is when society tells the child that something bad has happened to him/her. Contrast this with violence, where something objectively bad and painful has happened, and the difference becomes clear.

Some 13 and 14 yo's look 18 or more

What should the age of consent be? Should there even be an age of consent?

>>718279729
0.0
yes

>>718279481
>getting robbed is only bad because society tells you it is
>getting stabbed is only bad because society tells you it is
>having your anus ripped open is only bad because society tells you it is
>browsing 4chan is only bad because society tells you it is

File: 1453272719589.jpg (13KB, 236x314px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 236x314px

>>718276968
Humans are made to be attracted to potential mates, and girls get periods at around 13-14 so I'd say it's normal, especially since most girls try to look older than they are with slutty clothes and makeup etc.

>>718280129
>Humans are made to be attracted to potential mates,

>which totally explains why i want to fuck 4 year olds

>>718279967
Did you not read what I wrote? Violence is objectively bad because it fucking hurts. Sex with children is not bad because it doesn't hurt unless you tell them it hurts. Let a child and an adult have sex in a world where no one tells them not to. See if that child grows up traumatised.

The Jewish overlords are conditioning children to be traumatised.

>>718280264
>Did you not read what I wrote?
of course not.
i'm on 4chan.

>Violence is objectively bad because it fucking hurts.
>Sex never hurts

>Let a child and an adult have sex in a world where no one tells them not to.
>willing to let a child be raped for the sake of "research"

>The Jewish overlords
>trying this hard

>>718280237
No, cause they can't have babies yet. Did you even fucking read what I said you pedo?

File: 3dfd75a3d7fb64e586d5bc50a9b425a4.jpg (71KB, 564x564px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 564x564px

>>718280264

>>718280585
>No, cause they can't have babies yet.

and yet i'm still attracted to 4 year olds.

so your point is completely invalid.

>>718280264
I concede that penetrative sex with a child might be very painful and so should not be done.

But there's nothing wrong with blowjobs/handjobs.

>>718280691
The original question was if it's normal to be attracted to teens, 13+. I said yes to that. What you have is a mental health issue. Pedophilia is NOT normal, but wanting to band a 14 y/o girl is. It's just not socially accepted.

Pedo's should be forced to take philosophy classes on morality so they can truly understand why they are wrong in thi king on such autistic terms as shown above

>>718277332
I'm going to laugh my fucking ass off if this is the new hill SJWs, progressives, and the LGBTQ+ community chooses to die on.

File: 200_s.gif (30KB, 324x200px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 324x200px

OP here

I should have created a separate thread to continue the discussion, and then made another thread to have this poll in. This thread died because it didn't have a unifying topic.

Fuck me man why do I suck so hard

>>718281149
>implying knowing WHY they are wrong will change their thinking in the first place
>implying ancient philosophers didn't fuck little boys in the bath houses

File: 1482855094185.jpg (136KB, 546x700px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 546x700px

>>718280264

>>718281298
No actually I implied none of that. I understand their urges won't cease to exist, but they wouldn't be allowed to be so confidently retarded like in this thread.

>>718281572

>expecting /b/tards to change their behavior

>>718276968
little girls are the sweetest purest thing alive, their hair is glistening, their skins soft and smooth, thier personality are kind, open, and loving. They are deseptive sluts that only want power over men. Young girls are untainted by the world, they are simply the best thing in this world, and one of the only reasons i live. Whats not to love.

>>718281887
i meant to say they "arnt" deceptive sluts like older girls

>>718281887
>Young girls are untainted by the world

>aside from the shitty music videos
>and the constant barrage of makeup advertisements that brainwash them into thinking they need to cover their face

>>718282235
they may be effected but they arnt the tainted cheating sluts that get turned on by how many men that can use. they are perfect before they start wearing make up, and cheating/lying

>>718282468
>they are perfect before they start wearing make up,

so... 4 years old, then...

right on...

>>718282775
well to me thats 12-14, but if you like 4yr olds .. well each to their own

>>718283200
they're wearing makeup well before 12-14

>>718276968
You can't help what you like, it's acting on it that is eh

File: yep.gif (812KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

812KB, 200x200px

>>718283305
yup, can confirm.
>sister is 6

>>718283305
lol i dont care, i like little girls, you think i care about this argument fuck dude..

>>718283617
Post pics or something

File: 1481486167590.gif (2MB, 300x242px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x242px

>>718283873
naw but believe these dubs