i made these 3 accounts already, and have been tweeting @lau

>>718243597
A wonderful idea

>my name is Duca
>I live on the second floor

File: 1500x500.jpg (99KB, 1500x500px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1500x500px

>>718243597
profile banner

File: Bribri.png (39KB, 573x291px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 573x291px

Contributing

>>718243747
>I live upstairs from you
>yes I think you've seen me before

File: Nice.jpg (23KB, 356x367px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 356x367px

>>718244304

File: Screen Shot 2017-01-08 at 8.08.47 PM.png (2MB, 1176x1262px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1176x1262px

>>718243597
she tweeted this in response.

we have to keep going

>>718244179
brutal

>>718243597
Good to see you unfuckable hate nerds are still into harassing random people over perceived slights against your idols.

File: Phil.jpg (88KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 720x540px

>>718245678
>Good to see you unfuckable hate nerds are still into harassing random people over perceived slights against your idols.

What did he mean by this?

File: mbixpywasb7y.jpg (91KB, 1094x962px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1094x962px

>>718243597
What the fuck are you underage faggots winning about this time?

Wow the guys a bitch faggot, who are you? His faggot gimp army?

>>718245678

What's worse is this time it's in December of a complete fucking worm. /b/ doesn't care who they idolize anymore, as long as they got the criteria of being "oppressed", meaning they did something shitty and are hated for it

>>718243747
>>718244304
please open the door it's me goku!

>>718246276

Defense*

Fuck

>>718245987
Some chick wouldnt go to some event as Martin Shirkeli's +1 so he started harassing her about it, got banned from Twitter, now the fags who model themselves after him are doing the personal army thing.

>>718245987
that loser Shrekeli got banned from twitter for harassing some journalist and now other losers are I guess pissed off about it

now I'm thinking about Shrekeli as Shrek

>>718245678
>idols
kekt

>>718245042
Why? Shkreli is worse than ball cancer. I hope his thin skinned douchey ass hangs himself over getting banned on twitter.

>>718245678
>>718245987
>>718246061
>>718246519
>>718246672
this isn't about shkreli or the dumb bitch it's about twitter

they banned milo, countless others for saying what they want. she wasn't harassed, the picture was up for a day - if you think that's harassment.. lol

who the fuck cares how much of a scum he is, if he wants to do that he HAS RIGHTS to do so ie the first ammendment

protect freedom of speech

>>718246672
Who cares. It's fun to see people react.

>>718247313
agree

>>718247313
Twitter can delete anything it wants at anytime dumbass. You need to brush up on what constitutional rights do and do not cover.

>>718247313
>freedom of speech
On a privately owned website, kek

>>718247730
This.

File: whats_going_on.jpg (119KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 640x480px

>>718243597
What's this all about?

>>718243597
dont give a shit tbh

>>718247313
Twitter is not part of the government. You have zero freedom of speech on that site idiot.

>>718248169
preach, fuck these "protect freedom of speech" manchildren

>>718248169
trololol

>>718248449
People like them make the world think all Americans are that stupid.

>>718248231
>>718248330
>>718248449
trolls kek mah gov't can take away muh guns bc it isn't covered by muh rights

lulz go troll a site that cares

>>718248660
lauren get off /b/

>>718248669
Nobody mentioned guns retard.

Martin Shkreli is a idiot!!

>>718248792
bill of rights, retard

Martin Shkreli fudge packed a cat

>>718248928
so...

>>718248669
>>718249009
Are you on your period cupcake?

>>718249009
Get this douche a midol

Martin Shkreli got fingered by his uncle

>>718249009
I don't think this moron even knows what point they're trying to make.

>>718247313
You literally have no idea what the Freedom of Speech protects do you? You sign a Terms of Service when you sign up for a Twitter account. What do you think that covers, you fucking 8-year old?

>>718249257
>>718249773
srs lauren you prolly have 'better' things to do
>>718249953
no you don't

>>718249953
>point
kek

>>718250040
who is lauren and do you have nudes?

>>718245987
this is a really dumb picture lmao, who made this huffington post or NYT?

>>718250040
Calmer than you are dude.

>>718250173
this is lauren, she's waving bye as she leaves
>>718245042

>>718247313
Look, twitter and facebook are both run by mega liberal neo-hippie cuck trash and trying to use their own logic against these people in the department of censorship isn't going to work because the go-to response of the libfag is "I'm not listening, I'm not listening, la la la la la la la."

its not even worth having social media because it just lines their pockets with more jew-gold.

F U C K
Y O U
4 C H A N
N I G G E R S

>>718250286
Your lack of education betrays you. Anyone with a college degree can tell instantly what publication released this comic.

>>718250040
Muh guns, my social media free speech, oh no!

>>718250349
what about the nudes?

>>718249953
Yeah thats because they dont have one. Its called shitposting.

File: Unappologetic Feminist.jpg (50KB, 1000x747px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1000x747px

>>718245042
People who don't know how to filter their speech so that it doesn't hurt other people's feelings don't deserve freedom of speech. Speech can be harmful and only men who are considerate of the feelings of those around him should have a voice on twitter.

>>718243597
Yeah, totally a better way to spend your time than developing social skills, interesting hobbies, or anything else that will actually get you a girlfriend at some point in your pathetic life.

>>718250367
>when people stop letting you be an anonymous racist on the Internet.

>>718250551
No, that's not how Freedom of Speech works either. Do people really just not learn anything in school these days?

This is not a liberals vs conservatives dichotomy thing; it's literally just about how the goddamned Bill of Rights works.

He was a cunt, im on this females side so i'll send her the link to this thread and tell her not to stress so much since its only one faggot pretending to be many

>>718250499
I think they may actually think they had a point.

>>718243597
The fuck does this have to do with freedom of speech?

>>718250367
ok then what to do? i don't have social media.

but you can trash social media

A high-profile clovergender supporter taken down. Sickening.

Fight back against the oppression!

https://www.change.org/p/all-people-we-want-to-be-acknowledged-as-seperate-fixed-age-genders

>>718250799
OP is an autist.

>>718250551
low quality bait

>>718250648
You can't be racist against jews, they have to be people before they can be a race.

>>718250572
yes bc my life revolves around doing everything to get a gf wtf. i have had a few gfs, and would rather live with a purpose and do shit before i settle down yo

im on mission, support the cause, Sign a petition, summon my wisdom nigga

Conservatives are fucking morons.

>>718250905
this whole board is autist, you're autist that's not an insult you fuck

>>718251009
Everyone likes to fuck. You must be one ugly SOB

>>718251000
That makes an awesome loophole for all racists to never consider themselves racist. Doesn't matter the idiotic nonsense your autistic brain believes, man. There's a reality out there beyond your computer screen.

>>718250828
Not waste time picking a battle with an company that ultimately doesnt give two shits? The most you are gunna do is make this chick feel relevant. Thats what these creatures feed off of, attention. Positive, negative, doesn't matter as long as their name is in your mouth.

>>718251116
Yes it is insulting.

>>718251009
>live with a purpose
Shitpost on b and troll random women on the Internet.

Good luck with that higher calling there, man.

>>718251185
Oh I'm sorry here let me pretend to care about your opinion and morals. Is that better? you want a cookie lil guy?

>>718251000
Trips speak true. Jews are scum.

>>718251009
Your purpose is shit and you should feel like shit.

>>718251331
KEK I think you're dealing with a high school kid with a very limited understanding of constitutional rights.

File: 317.png (90KB, 500x501px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 500x501px

>>718251185

>>718251219
haha that's a really great argument

considering a lot of autists may lack social skills but highly gifted in some areas

you're concerning yourself with a social area so you're probably autistic

srs wtf

I'm a Jew and my dick is bigger than all of yours.

>>718251519
lol

>>718251631
Its a better argument than yours.

>>718251707
>public company
>bill of rights applies to us citizens
>twitter is owned by the govt

you are one dumb ass nigger

>>718251519
that time of the month again sugartits?

>>718251748
but you didn't offer one

>>718251657
Get away from my shekels

look at all these fags supporting someone as faggy as them (except with more bux)

>>718251847
Yet it's still superior than yours. That's gotta tell you something.

>>718251657
Yah, it's an awesome perk about being a Jew. Also, Asian women love Jew dick. We'll steadily repopulate this planet with halfbreed Jew/Asian master race children.

>>718251933
that you're trolling nice

>>718251798
Ummmm. This has to be a joke. Just completely backwards gobbledy-gook. Get an education, please. If for no one's sake but your own. You can't go through life being this dumb.

>>718252055
No, that your argument was incredibly stupid.

Conservatives are inbred.

This is why I love b. For the first 68 seconds of this thread there was unity. Then it quickly steamrolled into an orgy of bullshit. Y'all keep on keepin on.

>>718252451
Lesson learned? Shkreli is a faggot

File: Hate Speech.gif (63KB, 339x499px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 339x499px

I am so sick and tired of Universities producing adults who actually believe offensive speech should not be protected.

>>718253679
you don't understand what free speech means

>>718252855
One of us. One of us

File: Rachel Maddow.jpg (27KB, 485x430px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 485x430px

>>718253679
Offensive speech should be protected? lol, on what planet?

No one should have the right to offend others.

>>718253679
I'm sick and tired of adults thinking that they understand constitutional law when obviously they haven't the goddamn faintest idea what is protected and what isn't.

Read your fucking Twitter Terms of Service, you fucking morons. Do you think Twitter is a government institution or something?

File: hswlWExpKw02W3QlRqz-2EcV2wmpteU7N-uziKsE15Y.jpg (78KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 500x750px

You're doing God's work.

>>718253889
Goddammit, you're an idiot too. How does no one know what the fuck Freedom of Speech actually means?

>>718253782
He clearly does. The whole point of the first amendment is to protect unpopular speech. The majority should not be able to silence the minority for simply being in the minority.

>>718254096
OMG! I feel like I am losing my mind. That has nothing to do with fucking Freedom of Speech! Jesus christ. It has to do with the government restricting your right free expression and assembly. It has nothing to do with whatever a private company decides to put in their Terms of Service. Goddamn motherfucking idiots all over this forum. I'm fucking blown away by the idiocy on display here.

>>718253955
The constitution is not a static article. It's dynamic. What is and what isn't constitutional varies depending on whether or not the majority of the justices sitting on the bench are conservative or liberal.

Restaurants are private business and yet they are not allowed to bar Afro-Americans from service. Just because Twitter isn't a government institution doesn't mean my first amendment rights end when I use their service.

>>718243597
Yeah cause a millionaire with a network of lawyers and trolls needs defending.

>>718254472
>the freedom of speech only exists inside government buildings.

kys.

>>718254603
Oh my fucking god. You simply can't be this stupid. Right? It's some kind of troll. It has to be. There are fucking anti-discrimination laws in place that prevent private companies from discriminating on the basis of race, creed, or sexual orientation. These laws have absolutely nothing to do with the Constitution. Please, read a goddamned actual textbook once in a while. Take a class. Pay attention. Try to learn something. You know nothing and are filling your head with completely misguided ideas that have no connection to the actual law.

>all the sjw shills in this thread

>>718253679
>>718254096
Twitter is a company the owners have the right to do whatever the fuck they want. Shut your entitled brat ass up. Jesus fuck you're wrapped in so many layers of fuck and irony that you coudn't argue your way out of a paper bag.

>>718254990
Go home martin, no ones gives a damn about you.

>>718253679
Twitter can do whatever the fuck they want, they are free to do whatever they want with their website. Just like shop owners are free to kick people out of their stores if they start harassing other customers. How fucking retarded are you?

>>718254793
Holy fucking fuck. Good goddamn lord. Is that what you took away from what I wrote? Go to fucking school man. Being this stupid and uninformed will never benefit you.

>>718254603
They can bar the african american if he's harassing another patron.

File: t3_5mj6b2.jpg (1MB, 2592x3888px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x3888px

Not enough tits in this thread. Keep trolling her OP

File: Plank.jpg (37KB, 526x777px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 526x777px

>>718255734
>Bitches about no tits and then posts this shit. Pic for comparison

>>718255641
Not if harassment means sitting down and refusing to leave until you are served.

Harassment is subjective.

Ok, since apparently no one has even read the Bill or Rights here even once before formulating their opinion on what it means, I'll post it here. Maybe try to read it a few times and see how Twitter banning users has nothing to do with it.

>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Now, I get that there are multi-syllabic words there that you might not understand the first time you see them, but keep reading and try to learn something you absolute mongoloid idiots.

File: ofy.jpg (57KB, 288x289px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 288x289px

>>718255580

>>718255580
I have a doctorate.

>>718255580
>anyone who disagrees with me must be uneducated because I'm right about everything.

You're an arrogant little fuck.

>>718243597
what did she do?

>>718256404
>if I reply to my own post in agreement, it will make it seem more valid.

>>718255580
>Holy fucking fuck. Good goddamn lord.

Are you really this unaccustomed to people disagreeing with you? You must live in your own private little bubble.

File: 2.jpg (46KB, 427x640px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 427x640px

>>718256166
What bout her?

>>718256368
You do not get to dictate how the constitution is interpreted.

>Now, I get that there are multi-syllabic words there that you might not understand the first time you see them, but keep reading and try to learn something you absolute mongoloid idiots.

This patronizing ad hominem doesn't make you seem smart. It makes you seem very stupid.

>>718256988
There's just nothing to disagree with. There's what Freedom of Speech actually means, and then there's whatever the hell you all think that it means. I don't know if you think you learned this at some point or if you just tried to extrapolate from the term "freedom of speech" to apply it to situations with which it absolutely does not apply.

File: 1344978079320.jpg (2KB, 126x117px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 126x117px

>>718244179
>James Rustle

>>718243597
Keep sending emails
https://mobile.twitter.com/laurenduca/status/818219782721904641

>>718257220
Oh well. I tried to help educate you. You are obstinately refusing to accept what Freedom of Speech actually means and what is protected and what isn't. Talk to a lawyer about this sometime. Maybe talking to someone in person you might be willing to learn something.

>>718256343
Yeah, I deserved that response for taking your obvious bait.

>>718257548
My understanding of Freedom of speech is correct. It isn't mistaken.

You need to learn how to argue without using Ad hominems if you want to be taken seriously as an academic.

>>718254065
You shouldn't be allowed to call people an idiot. It's offensive and it might hurt someone's feelings.

It's also incredibly ironic because only idiots reply to obvious bait.

>>718257711
Wasn't bait. I sincerely believe that you don't understand the Freedom of Speech.

>>718259343
It is bait. Nobody is as retarded as you're pretending to be. The gig is up, back under your bridge now

>>718259175
>It's offensive and it might hurt someone's feelings.
Grow some thicc skin loser.

>>718259459
Just stop feeding the trolls.

There's a difference between freedom of speech and straight up harassment. You goons actually defend this prick?

>>718259526
Nah its just been one dude samefagging for like ever now. He doesnt even have bait anymore he's just throwing hooks into the water.

>>718253889
I hope you are trolling.

Feelings don't matter.

File: evidence you can actually cum too much.jpg (35KB, 505x538px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 505x538px

>>718243597
freedom of speech =/= freedom to twitter

get it right, idiot.

>>718259436
Here's your reply.

When you're ready to have an adult discussion, I'll be here ready to argue.

Unless of course, you consider your position to weak to withstand debate and would prefer to continue hurling insults.

either way I win.

>>718255734
>Not enough tits
>posts no tits

File: Problematic.png (779KB, 744x742px) Image search: [Google]

779KB, 744x742px

>>718259687
only to men. women are in the public sphere now, so you have to adapt. you have to refrain from saying things that offend us.

It's the law.

>>718247313

>Be a creepy Beta.

>Tweet typical creepy things.

>Mfw Twitter (a privately owned company, whom you've blindly clicked "I agree" on their terms of service, same as the rest of us) was petitioned to ban said Beta.

>nothingtodohere.jpg

>>718259805
Nobody is insulting you, just your poor quality in bait. I already told you nobody is as retarded as you're pretending to be, so I'm obviously not insulting you. Just your methods.

But in the end, who's the real retard? The actual retard, or the one pretending to be a retard?

Twitter is a private company. As such, they can boot anyone they want.

They, like FB, are run by liberals who are oblivious to their bias. They think anyone who is right of center is Hitler in training.

Expect this type of censorship. They cannot debate ideas on facts, so they rely on censoring opposing views.

>>718260285
>Twitter is a private company. As such, they can boot anyone they want.

When the Christian owned bakery denied a cake for lesbian couples, the government sued them and drove them to bankruptcy. But as long as you are a libtard owned company like (((Twitter))) you can ban any white male you like for any reason.

We are second class citizens in our own country.

>>718260106
>Nobody is insulting you
>>718253955
>you fucking morons

>>718259436
>Nobody is as retarded as you'

Just so we're clear, I posted this >>718253679
because I believe offensive speech should be protected by the first amendment. My belief isn't a fringe position. The notion that the purpose of the first amendment is to protect offensive speech is very common. It's even been in a movie
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zemrWBIc_hE

then you said that I don't understand what freedom of speech means. If you're disagreeing with me, then you clearly think that offensive speech should not be protected by the first amendment.

>>718260285
My restaurant is a private company. If that means I don't want to serve niggers, I can boot anyone I want.

Twitter can ban who they want, just like you can ban people from your website if you have one, just like u can ban all niggers from your minecraft server or all underaged people in a group you have

>>718262964
bans are unconstitutional. they are a violation of the freedom of speech.

>>718261737
You're talking to three different people as if they are all one but ill yank your hook a little.

Offensive speech is protected by your constitution. Twitter, is owned by a group of people who are free to do whatever they want with their site. If they don't agree with something or someone, they are not bound to honor your free speech because it is a private thing. Martin wasn't banned for being black. Martin wasn't banned for saying something offencive. Martin was banned for his harassment of another user. Which, if you were smart enough to read the terms and conditions of twitter, is well within the contract listed when you blindly click "agree."

Twitter doesn't have to honor shit. Go to a support group and cry about it.

File: Abraham_Lincoln_O-77_matte_collodion_print.jpg (266KB, 560x700px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 560x700px

>>718243597
>https://twitter.com/fight4martin

>lol bc you're a women we're doing this, no bc you're a piece of shit brainless bitch

>Claims to not be doing this over gender

>Uses gendered insult

Logic 101

>>718264069
>who are free to do whatever they want with their site

that's just not true. Just like restaurants can't bar Afro-americans from service for merely being a private business, twitter cannot ban someone for saying something offensive.

What if a biologists posts something on twitter in support of the theory of evolution and a Christian fundamentalist is offended by it? Should twitter be able to ban the biologist?

Where twitter is drawing the line regarding what is and what isn't offensive is subjective to the moral position of their corporate officers, who happen to be overwhelmingly feminist sjw.

Just because they're able temporarily able to get away with it doesn't make it constitutional.

>>718265140
You're comparing apples and oranges. I already told you he wasn't banned for being black or being controversial.

>"Well what if this situation..."

Thats not what happened. Stop splitting hairs, and trying to justify one thing based of of a completely different hypothetical "what if" situation that doesn't exist.

>>718265140
>that's just not true

Just because you dont like something doesn't make it any less true. Grow up.

>>718265140
harassment =/= offensive content

File: 1 (16).jpg (7KB, 259x195px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 259x195px

>>718243597
I'm actually pretty vocal IRL about my support for Shrekli. I'm pretty sure I've lost some friends but I don't even give a fuck, this dude is a fuckin G.

>>718266030
I disagree with you. It's NOT apples and oranges.

>>718266319
It absolutely is. You can disagree all you want but you're still wrong.

>>718266319
This confirms the troll though. I already gave you examples of why your logic is flawed and you're just choosing to ignore it. You might as well register as a democrat for the next election so they'll let you into their safe space where you can choke and sob about ur freedums

>>718255734
Where's the tits?!

>>718266269
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/twitter-harassment-trial-verdict-1.3415112

That doesn't stop feminists from using claims of harassment to sensor content they find offensive though, does it?

That's the problem with this whole thing. 3rd wave feminists are asserting that offensive content IS harassment and they are using this line of thought to silence any dissent to their political position. In other words, they find disagreeing with them offensive and offending them IS harassment. Twitter corporate headquarters is feminist central right now. They only hire gay men.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vagVf5cf-V0
@24:00

>>718257020
Hahaahhahahhahahhahaahhahahh

>>718266727
>This confirms the troll though. I already gave you examples of why your logic
No it doesn't and you have not.

>>718266487
no, you. you're wrong. here's why >>718267319

>>718243597

i've been making fake profiles for that faggot on gay barebacking sites

File: IMG_7381.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>718267495
NO YOU!

File: Best Captain.jpg (27KB, 429x484px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 429x484px

>>718267587
You!!!!

>>718267670
No! YOU!

File: IMG_7474.gif (521KB, 237x255px) Image search: [Google]

521KB, 237x255px

Let's have a "No, you're wrong!" Thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i wuld pay 100 bucks to lick her feet

>>718267319
Once again, that is simply not what happened. I encourage you to find an article about the incident or something and educate yourself, before you try passing out tinfoil hats.

File: Screen Shot 2017-01-08 at 9.27.18 PM.png (19KB, 258x190px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 258x190px

>>718243597
Whatever, man. I'm fucking done with Twitter.

>>718267405
I did.

>and you're just choosing to ignore it.

I told you he wasn't banned for being black or being offensive and you keep riding those "WELL SHOPS CANT KICK OUT BLACKS AND WHUT IF SCIENCE VS CHRISTIAN" garbage bottom feeder logic. Its the same brainwave as the feminism you hate so much. Fighting flawed logic with flawed logic just makes you both retarded.

>>718268459
He wasn't banned for being offensive?

>>718243597
Is this the guy who over charges super hard for those AIDs drugs or whatever? I just looked him up and he was born on April 1st, which makes me think we're in a simulation.

>>718268459
You didn't even look at my post and simultaneously accuse me of ignoring what you posted. The irony is astounding.

I haven't ignored anything you posted. I just think you're wrong.

>>718243597
Fuck Martin. << period

Useless smug fucking cocksucker who values no one else in the world but his giant ass self and his ego.

He needs more than a fucking twitter suspension

It's like twitter anticipated there being a thread about this here and assigned a few interns to shill for them with damage control.

>>718268783
He was banned because he kept harassing her. He's offensive on a fucking daily basis on his twitter and they dont give two dicks about it. But he sent her a message saying he had tickets to the inaug as a joke since she hates trump so much, and she put him on blast on twitter. Then he blew up her messages, as well as getting other people (I.E. people like OP) to harass her as well.

You can be offensive all you want. When you start directly fucking with someone else, thats when twitter throws up the brakes. Especially someone with such a large following.

>>718250440
Yeah he's actually right

>>718269045
You can think I'm wrong all you want it doesn't change the fact that thats just how it is, and bitching and moaning about your entitlement of free speech to a private network is just going to fall on deaf ears. You're basically the polar opposite of TrigglyPuff in this situation.

>>718248169
If you're an SJW leftist, you can say anything you want, but if not Jack will ban you.

File: C1sWoe9XEAA552A.jpg (110KB, 750x1126px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 750x1126px

>>718243597

>>718269495
Pretty much. But its his site so he can do that. He doesn't have to provide everyone with a free and safe social network.

File: 1450411766336.gif (1MB, 311x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 311x240px

>>718267587
>>718267670

File: PUTIN TRUMP MRBLOBBY.jpg (160KB, 1113x656px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1113x656px

were here....you need help?

>>718243597
Just making sure I understand you here:
1) Pharmafag harasses someone on twitter
2) Twitter bans Pharmafag for violating their TOS
3) Your reaction is to harass this person more

Wouldn't it make more sense to attack Twitter for banning Pharmafag? Honestly not sure how your train of thought got to where it is.

File: dissent-is-hate.gif (68KB, 372x548px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 372x548px

>>718269319
I love how you don't even consider that the feminists at twitter headquarters weren't salivating at the prospect of taking the means of communicating with the entire world away from a trump supporter with a large following for any reason.

This has everything to do with feminism.

>>718270030

nono here's what you understand
1) Pharmabro offers slut to go to an event with him
2) slut uses the opportunity to embarass and humiliate him for no reason other than she's a cunt
3) Pharmabro takes it in his stride and makes kekworthy posts
4) Weaboo faggot twitter kicks him from twitter for being the patriachy
5) SJW circlejerk engulfs slut, saying its a cool thing how she humiliated this dude for no reason
6) slut must face consequence or she will continue to believe that humiliating people who open with completely inoffensive and innocent questions is okay.

>>718266030

besides, why can't fruit be compared dipshit?

>>718270738
get buttmad about something that will actually get you laid instead, faggot. you look in a mirror lately?

>>718271179
You argue like a woman. Do you work for twitter?

>>718271179
another emotional argument supporting a position in favor of feminists, who are universally despised in this community.

How much is twitter paying you to do this?

File: Tin_foil_hat_2.jpg (56KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 320x240px

>>718270132
It sure does buddy.

>>718271256
I work for self improvement you do-nothing NEET.

>>718270738
You conveniently skipped over the fact that the event he was inviting her to was the inauguration of Trump, because he wanted to fuck with her knowing how much she hated him.

Jesus, its kinda hard to see how you dont agree MORE with the feminists since you use their tactics and pathway logic.

>>718271483
another ad hominem.

The sad thing is you actually believe you're winning this argument.

File: C1tAkBBWgAAjFXi.jpg (104KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1024x576px

What the fuck is wrong with this bitch

holy fucking kek

i look forward to seeing her video on blacked.com

>>718271717

You're right. I have posted a follow up:
>>718271784

Skrillex was right to rip into this racist piece of shit

>>718271784
Is that really her account or is a troll account?

>>718271473
use logic, there's no victory to be had and you lose time trying with nothing gained. like telling some random bitch she's fat a thousand times. she's still gonna be fat and all you did was waste your time.

>>718271772
Theres not even an argument, you just keep throwing the hook out there and they just keep biting it, because they cant see that youre being ironic by trashing feminism with feminist style logic.

>>718254746


SO much this

>>718272056
I'm not trolling. I sincerely believe that your position is incorrect.

For example, there is no such thing as feminist style logic. It simply doesn't exist.

>inb4 you call me a fat virgin who can't get laid.

>>718272484
lol. rekt

>>718271968

that's really her.

Screenshots because her twitter will get baleeted soon to hide them

Links to some of these style of tweets:
twitr laurenduca status /

805489867648106501
805203753548836864
796809529606438912

her twitter is FULL of this shit

seriously just start scrolling

>>718268297
Gab is a really great network. I hope Shkreli hops on it.

>>718272679
where does she work?

>>718272484
>For example, there is no such thing as feminist style logic. It simply doesn't exist.

hahahahaa

>>718272056
He's just going to keep going, I tried to tell him the gig was up like an hour ago and he's still shitposting because people keep responding to him. Just ignore him. He'll go away.

File: d5c.jpg (36KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 625x626px

>>718272484

>>718272849
>>718272056

samefag

>>718272774

i shit you not, vogue

http://www.teenvogue.com/contributor/laurenduca

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_Duca

Kek

i love how this stupid slut is all "hur dur wimmen power" but most of the world had never heard of her name until she decided to piggyback off pharmabro's fame

>>718243597
holy shit martin is cringy as fuck
cant take no for an answer

Wait, so you're mad because Twitter suspended his account, and somehow that got you all onto the topic of the constitution and free speech? Is this Tumblr?

File: C1s3kr3XcAEqGvk.jpg (65KB, 590x724px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 590x724px

>>718273514
I'm here for the lulz

File: Brenden Adams.jpg (22KB, 475x317px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 475x317px

>>718243597

>freedom of speech

you salty alt-righters should take a remedial course in civics

>>718269638
So he want's to limit his audience, therefore making less money for the company. Good business model.

til stupid faggots still think freedom of speech means freedom from consequence

File: magnificent c**t.jpg (65KB, 1280x854px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1280x854px

>>718247313
I think that Twitter banning Milo is the single, best thing it could've done for him. He's so much better known now

>>718260046
>terms of service cannot surperceed the freedom of speech laws

>>718274046
who?

>>718273807
>alt righters
>against freedom of speech
What?

>>718274454
no one said they are against freedom of speech
they just dont know what speech the 1st amendment protects and what it protects you from.

>>718273992
Doesnt really matter, he can do with it as he wants and will still make plenty of Jew gold.

>>718274454
A summary of the jumping-to-conclusions-type logic of this entire thread.

>>718273807
tits or get the fuck out

>>718274225
tits or get the fuck out.

>>718274225
The most amazing faggot to ever exist. Sad thing is you seem to outfaggot him in every way.

>>718275280
>not instantly recognizing a feminist attempting to marginalize him by pretending she doesn't know him

>>718276102
>not instantly recognizing the lack of fucks given about their intent