[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Am I a pedo for liking this? I don't get off on it, it's

The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Thread replies: 95
Thread images: 15

Am I a pedo for liking this? I don't get off on it, it's just a beautiful painting of a beautiful girl.
>>
>>716334944
no, only if you get off on it then yes
>>
>>716334944
if you have to ask someone else if you are a pedo you just might be, everyone can appreciate art.
>>
>>716335031
This. Plus being a pedo is underrated anyway.
>>
>>716334944
you're a pedo for posting it on 4chan

also you're a pedo

also it's not that great of a painting, unless you're a pedo
>>
File: 09.jpg (192KB, 600x768px) Image search: [Google]
09.jpg
192KB, 600x768px
>>716335208
>being a pedo is underrated
>>
File: darger3.jpg (280KB, 1456x672px) Image search: [Google]
darger3.jpg
280KB, 1456x672px
>>716334944
If you just appreciated it as art you wouldn't need to ask.
You want to lick those nips, man.
>>
>>716335198
I know I'm not a pedo, but I've been accused of being one because I think it's a beautiful work of art and people close to me decided that it's offensive. It's a lovely representation of a young girl seated holding some flowers.
>>
Yes. You're a pedo.
>>
>>716335442
I really don't. This is a picture of purity and I can't imagine doing anything to disturb that. I just wanted to stir up some conversation about it.
>>
>>716335465
stop telling people you appreciate that piece of art
being accused of being a pedo is almost as bad as actually being one
>>
>>716335465
it's not a great painting tho

and you're clearly a pedo
>>
>>716335642
>This is a picture of purity and I can't imagine doing anything to disturb that.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT PEDOS SAY ABOUT LITTLE GIRLS
>>
>>716335465
>I've been accused of being one because I think it's a beautiful work of art and people close to me decided that it's offensive.

yeah, that's complete bullshit, you have this hanging around your house? it's a conversation every time you have company?
>>
>>716334944
who's the artist?
>>
>>716334944
If art is supposed to make you think, this piece succeeded. Why would a child sit half naked on a chair, loosely holding two roses that are clearly not from the dead boquet behind her? Someone painted this child before murdering her.
>>
>>716335835
Its true
>>
>>716335915
all nudity or partial nudity is sexual in good old usa
>>
>>716335915
WEW LAD
>>
>>716335925
Alex Alemany. I can't find anything else like his work but I'd appreciate it if you could find some.
>>
>>716335915
i am a booty pervert, any butts that are not from males are sexy af
>>
>>716335915
it's sexual for me because I'm not a pedo. fuck I don't even find anyone below 30 attractive.

but the fact you have it and you're pretending like "it's just scientific interest" or whatever screams that you are a fucking pedo. even if you're not you deserve to die for throwing these up for pedos to jack off to.

fucking kys already edgelord
>>
>>716335943
Not even holding on to the roses she has
>>
>>716336160
*not

>fuck you freud you know what I meant
>>
>>716336022
Well that's sad. I don't believe there is anything inherently sexual about nudity in itself. The human body is a masterpiece and accurate and artful representation of it in pieces like this are not pornographic.
>>
>>716336291
save it for the judge
>>
>>716336291
but posting them on /b/ for pedo's to jack it to IS
>>
MODS
>>
>>716336160
Okay granted, there are people who would get off to stuff like this. I simply regard it as a tasteful representation of a young girl. That's all.
>>
>>716336084
>I'd appreciate it if you could find some.
yeah, no

i have a small collection of 'questionable' works by some of the great masters.

children have always been a favorite subject of those who patronize the arts. portraying them semi or fully nude was also more acceptable on a social level.

i look at the ones i have and wonder how i would feel about them if it weren't for the cloud that today's taboo about child nudity casts over them.

i find them thought provoking, not arousing.
>>
Listen. I didn't want to give sickos their jollies. I just wanted to talk about nudity. It's a painting of a young girl. She's not a victim, she's a drawing.
>>
>>716336022
nuke usa now
>>
File: e9d.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
e9d.jpg
16KB, 600x600px
>>716336160
>>
>>716336555
OP here and I agree. I don't intend to question you on that. It's just interesting to see people react to it, especially here.
>>
File: 532.gif (65KB, 400x296px) Image search: [Google]
532.gif
65KB, 400x296px
>>716335915
>Africa facing her straight on
>>
>>716335465
Tell those people that they're the ones sexualizing an image of a child. Accuse them of being pedos.
>>
File: 85.png (636KB, 948x803px) Image search: [Google]
85.png
636KB, 948x803px
>>716336540
>>
if you read "lolita" you're a huge faggot pedo
>>
I don't get this art why are there little girls naked? What's the point? It'd still be a good painting if the covered them up but nooooo.
>>
>>716335835
>I can't imagine doing anything to disturb that

is the same as

>I want to use my genitals to disturb that
>>
File: 31d.gif (106KB, 600x432px) Image search: [Google]
31d.gif
106KB, 600x432px
>>716336853
>if you read anne rice you believe in vampires
>>
There's still a few shards of sanity left in the USA. Nudity isn't automatically pornography, although nude photographs have to really be artistic.

The reason you probably get called out is because you're singling out this piece. If you don't appreciate and talk about paintings in general, and then the only one you've ever mentioned is this one, of course people are going to think it's weird.
>>
>>716335915
It's sexual when I start jacking off
>>
>>716337032
Art has always and will be subjective... R
>>
>>716337032
What's the point of a painting of anything? People paint War and hate and racism and nobody bats an eye, but a half naked little girl gets people in an uproar. It fascinates me.
>>
I'm looking for a painting I once saw at a boot fair. I would have purchased it if I had not been with my parents at the time. It is of a nude girl around 8-10 in front of a warm fireplace. All you see is her from behind but it is very sweet.
>>
File: fry.png (188KB, 603x452px) Image search: [Google]
fry.png
188KB, 603x452px
>>716337032
>It'd still be a good painting if the covered them up
>>
>>716335835
Fuck your labels I just want a wife who doesn't want to cuck me
>>
>>716334944
Bill Henson made a career out of pictures of nude young girls.
Also, nudism sites are 100% legal
>>
>>716337290
>boot fair

What?
>>
>>716337290
I'm sure it is, and there's nothing wrong with that. There is nothing inherently sexual about a painting of a naked child that isn't doing anything besides being naked.
>>
>>716337366
evwn retroacively
>>
>>716337211
nudity is far worse than war and hate and racism
do you even murrica?
>>
>>716337441
Like a public yard sale
>>
File: Untitled.png (13KB, 819x460px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
13KB, 819x460px
>>716337290
found it anon
>>
>>716337588
Dubs confirm it authentic
>>
>>716337441
Just googled it. It's where a bunch of people sell stuff out of their car trunks. Car trunks are referred to as 'boots' in the UK for some fucking reason
>>
i love this thread every time.

just a bunch of idiots that havn't seen a pussy irl claiming to be pedos

tragic cunts.
>>
>>716337578
Shut up, North Korea.
>>
>>716337427
>Nudism sites are 100$ legal

bullshit when it comes to the youngins

if you type in "nudist beach" or "nudist colony" on google images, it will always come up with a warning saying that some child abuse content was found, even if it's not really abuse at all
>>
>>716337671
So they're all putting their boots together? Sounds gay and vaguely racist.
>>
>>716334944

you are not a pedo if you recognize and admire the beauty of the girl
you are a pedo if you masturbate to her
>>
>>716337778
Not bullshit at all. Look up Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, Postmaster General, 355 U.S. 372
The SCOTUS ruled the nudist magazine legal because nudity is not sexual
>>
>>716337957
OP here and I appreciate your reply. I don't find anything sexual about the painting. I find it interesting that respecting a piece like it is so objectionable. When did everyone decide that nudity alone was so offensive? And why?
>>
MODSMODSMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS

WHERE THE FUCK ARE MODS

FUCK YOU MODS
>>
>>716337778
>"nudist colony" on google images, it will always come up with a warning saying

Nigga- da fuq is wrong with your computer?
Or are just making shit up?

By the way, this site automatically backtraces your IP address
>>
>>716338421
What's the difference between this and any other loli?
>>
Paintings of clouds and trees and fields are beautiful. What's the difference?
>>
>>716338291
Not him.

They find it sexual because they are under the impression that any child that is showing skin is cp. The general population (other than russia) all believe this is how it is. If i a child is partially naked it is cp, due to a lack of knowledge. Russia has no problems with topless girls and acknowleges the fact that there is jo difference between the torsos of the body between a male and female at a young age.

Furthermore, not sure on the laws of the u.s but in australia a picture of a girl (underage) topless is production of cp. Which can result in criminal charges.
>>
>>716338458
Doesn't mean it's illegal. It just means that some of the sites that contained nudity were flagged for illegal content.

>By the way, this site automatically backtraces your IP address

So, the government already monitors everyone anyways.
>>
>>716335791
Okay then you're a terrorist.
>>
>>716334944
I'm a pedo and liking this painting does not make you a pedo.
>>
>>716338809
See
>>716338170
For the law in the US
>>
>>716338809

Isn't Australia the place that tried to pass a law banning flat chested women in porn?
>>
File: IMG_1970.png (675KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1970.png
675KB, 640x1136px
>>716338938
>captcha
>pizza
>>
>>716334944
>Am I a pedo for liking this?
Yes
>>
>>716338291

Yeah, it's purely about aesthetics.
It's like when a straight guy says something like "Brad Pitt is a very handsome and attractive man". You don't have to be necessarily gay to admit it.
>>
>>716339016
Australia is the place where saving a picture of lisa simpson drawn naked will LITERALLY GET YOU FUCKING JAIL TIME FOR YEARS

I am not joking.
>>
>>716338938
So you're saying that objectively, it is a beautiful piece of art and that appreciation of it does not necessitate sexual feelings.
>>
File: 010.jpg (61KB, 705x477px) Image search: [Google]
010.jpg
61KB, 705x477px
Some of Bill Henson
>>
>>716339074
everyone cares.
>>
>>716338829
WHY TEH FUCK WOULD THEY WARN YOU ABOUT PICTURES THEY'RE NOT EVEN SHOWING?
SHUT
THE
FUCK
UP
YOU
DILDO
>>
>>716339016

Yes and they did. You cant buy mags with small breasted chicks in it, (i dont know how they deal with the internet side of it though)

It was bought in because it is believed that it encourages pedophilia.
>>
File: 012.jpg (404KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
012.jpg
404KB, 1024x1024px
>>716339240
you showed them.
>>
>>716339155
That's how it is in Canada. Only if you get caught with loli porn that is. So far they're not operating any stings to track down that shit like they do with CP, but if they catch you with it an airport then they charge you.

Same thing with child sex dolls.
>>
>>716339211
Shitty image.
Who's the other famous child photographer that does really nice images (many featuring attractive teenage girls?
>>
>>716335208
>be pedo
>Go to jail
No.
>>
>>716339211
lol, you're gonna get banned. 4chan doesn't give two fucks if it's artistic or legal, if it's under 18 and nude it's b&. Fuck they'll even ban for clothed child models.
>>
>>716339585
This. Being a pedo is not illegal. Exploiting and abusing children is.
>>
>>716334944
if your first question is if you are a pedo for liking something then yes you are
>>
>>716339240
It's the same shit that sometimes happens if you look up a game, or a movie. Sites might have been flagged for pirated versions of that movie, and so google warns you. Even if you weren't' actively looking up a torrent.
>>
>>716335208
I dont understand. How is being a pedo underrated? How would it even be rated? Who rates shit like that?
>>
>>716339678
The question was imposed for conversational purposes. I know I'm not a pedo.
>>
>>716339664
1. Get b&
2. Reset IP
3. ?????
4. Profit
Thread posts: 95
Thread images: 15


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.