I'm doing a survey of Trump supporters for my research that

>>715633237

Your survey isn't going to give you fuckall with questions that simple.

Seek more complex answers.

No
Yes
Half

File: godemperor.jpg (87KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 800x600px

>>715633237
1) Yes
2) Yes
3) Yes

>>715633237
Trump supporter or just republican?

File: 1255890352269.jpg (404KB, 1708x2126px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1708x2126px

>>715633237
>Seek more complex answers.
Are you Jewish?

>>715633353
Nah. I only need the three questions answered. My thesis is based on something I suspect of all Trump supporters.

>>715633398
okay, thanks for your answer.

no, yes, yes

>>715633534
not op but republicans aren't really part of the movement. You're just as cucked as democrats.

>>715633526
Thanks for your answer.

>>715633534
Trump supporter.

>>715633654
No.

>>715633237
1. Yes but I think there could be a God
2. Yes
3. No, I have a lot of Native American and Hispanic in me. Id say 50/50 White (German, Spain), and 50/50 spic (Native/Puerto Rican

>>715633763
Thanks for your answer.

>>715633806
I agree. Both parties are cucked.

>>715633237
You call three short questions research?
1. yes
2. yes
3. mostly, I do have some sprinkles of other ethnicities in my family history, but yeah people would consider me white.

No
Yes
Im like your moms asshole, a bunch of colors

>>715633806
I identify as republican for people who give me a funny look when I say 'Fiscal Conservative'

>>715633237
No
No
No

>>715633237
I don't want to trigger you and send you running to your safe space with coloring books and puppies to pet.

>>715633237
Just gonna point this out and say your last question is a loaded one for your results.

The majority of america is white, so the majority of your responses are going to be....white.

They same will be if you asked democrats.

If you want to have the servay taken seriously, remove 3 because it would only be there to push the only white religious people. people vote trump....well yeah, white people vote democrat to, whats your point?

1) I can't prove or disprove a God.
2) Yes.
3) Yes

>>715633758
Maybe you should explain your research some more, our answers may or may not be helpful to you if you genuinely care about this for the research aspect and not because you want to prove yourself right

>>715633758
What is your thesis?
That Trump supporters are white atheists who consider feminism a religion?
Because if so, be careful. Criticizing feminism is a way to lose your future these days, unless you have money or power enough to avoid the repercussions.

>>715633237
1. no
2. yes
3. yes

>>715634135
This is very true.

You already have access to the racial voting data by the way. Its show that record number of hispanics voted Trump (still a low amount, 30ish I believe), and a high amount of blacks voted Trump (20ish percent).

Its already been proven whites on average vote more republican and minorities ( no matter how you break it down) will always majority vote democrat.

Lat question is useless.

>>715633237
1. No
2. Kinda
3. Yes

Taoist, not christian. I don't discount the possibility of a supreme being or other supernatural happenings but I do not believe in the god of Abraham.

I'm bisexual, and while I am opposed to gaybashing and applied racism, I am also against censorship. My disdain for the Klan comes as much from their cowardice and refusal to stand for their beliefs without a mask protecting their identity as it does from their general ignorance of the advances in genetics and anthropology of the last half-century.

Mostly german and irish, with one scottish great-great-grandmother and one cherokee great-great-grandmother. I tend to not think of the world as "black" and "white", but you would categorize me as "white"

>>715633237
Agnostic
Yes
White/American Indian mix

>>715633237
Yes
No
Yes

>>715633946
I will add this OP

It sounds to me like you are not a Trump supporter yourself, and already have a pre-formed opinion of Trump supporters but let me say this

To most Trump supporters I am liberal

Nothing against gays, Im bi myself
Nothing against transgender people (I have these issues)
I think drugs should be legal

Im very libertarian - I think the government shouldnt control people. It is no ones right to live another mans life for him.

I just think that equality cannot be forced (through quotas for example) and I think the law should never be based on peoples feelings. If we have laws based on hurt feelings then truly we are a privileged society to have no other greater problems to worry about that something so subjective

>>715633237
yes
no
no

>>715633237
Yes
Yes
No

>>715634671
That's something they won't tell you about Trump supporters. A good chunk of us are liberal as fuck. It's just that SJWs are fascists and most people want them to fuck off. Hillary, on top of being a criminal, was pandering to SJWs. Trump's the only one who was willing to tell the SJWs to fuck off.

>>715634194
>>715634277
My thesis has nothing to do with feminism. Has more to do with the number of immature adult white atheists anti-SJW's who voted for Trump and their impact on the election.

>>715634965
So it's based on the idea that anti-sjws are immature?
You do realize only 7% of women are feminists right?
SJWs are cancer.

>>715634965
Not being an sjw is immature?
But SJW status is about putting yourself in a victim role and telling other people to change.
Mature people would deal with their own shit and only be victims if it was forced on them.
SJW's collect victim status like pokémon cards.

Yes yes yes

File: obama-joker-print-sized.jpg (70KB, 576x851px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 576x851px

>>715634671
I happen to be libertarian too. I already knew how bad Hillary was. But I saw Trump in the same light as Hillary. In the end, I voted for Gary Johnson.

>>715633237
1) yes
2) yes
3) no (Mexican)

>>715634136
Same

>>715635320
>Gary Johnson.
Gary Johnson is a moron. I hope you were voting for the party and not for the candidate. What a cancerous little faggot he was.

>>715635112
>>715635234
I don't agree with SJW's either, they think men who like porn are sexist. I see problems with both sides of the fence between SJW's and anti-SJW's.

1) no
2) yes
3) yes

>>715634965
You first have to prove theres a link between maturity and being anti-SJW before that can be used in your research

You also need to realize that the term SJW has become a popular term and it does conjure up a specific group of people, so when you ask someone if theyre against that group youre forcing them to answer that question even if they normally dont go around calling things "SJW'

SJW is heavily associated with feminism

Many of Trumps supporters are religious, check out nu-/pol/

>>715635635
Anti-SJWs only shared factor is a dislike of the SJWs

Beyond that they all have varying ideas and morals
You can liberal as fuck and still be against SJWs
Or conservative

>>715635635
So we have another potential bias in your research. Are anti-sjws who you perceive them to be or do you have research tools to figure them out?

>>715635518
Yeah I voted for the party. It is my hope that the Libertarian Party becomes a serious threat to the Democratic and Republican party someday.

>>715633237
No
No
No

File: 1480723385277.gif (490KB, 382x498px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 382x498px

>>715635716
Of course we're religious.
We watched an ancient frog God rise and bend reality.
You'd be religious too if you'd seen meme magic manifest into reality.

>>715633237
>no
>Yes, they're idiotic hypocrites
>yes

>>715633237
op you are probably going to fuck this up still because it looks like you are sampling on the dependent variable.

>>715635911
Well as a former Democrat I think the Democratic party will be fucked for a while especially if Trump is the God emperor we hope he is.
Next election will be Trump vs Libertarians vs Green Party with swindled money. Democrats will represent the corrupt old guard.

>>715633237
no
yes
yes

>>715633237
yes
yes
yes

>>715633237
1. fuck you
2. fuck you
3. fuck you

Yes
Yes
Half

Unless your theory is that all Trump supporters thought a Hillary Clinton presidency would have become an absolute disaster, you're not going to find anything that's true about all of them. That's the mistake the opinion polls made - the "experts" though they could fit everyone into neat rows and columns.
If you want something to think about, consider that one of the major parties nominated someone that the party leadership did not want, because the leadership was so disconnected from the general public. And the other major party, despite having the nomination process designed to give the party leadership considerable influence, had to pull out all the stops to prevent the same thing from happening.

Of course, you don't go to college to think. Just regurgitate whatever view the professor has expressed for maximum grade

kill all atheists.
Kill all the SJWs]
100%. Anything less, you're impure.

>>715633237
1)No
2)Yes
3)No

>>715633237
>1) Are you Atheist?
>2) Are you anti-SJW?
>3) Are you white?
Talk about a loaded question!
As a person who didn't vote for either side fuck off! You morons and your false dichotomy is bull shit!

fyi...
1: No
2: Yes
3: depends, Most dont care, to some I'm a Mexican. SJWs I'm white even thoe I'm native american.
You figure that one out asshole!

File: 1480618808859.jpg (140KB, 665x694px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 665x694px

"survey"

>>715635963
This shit is so gay.

File: 1452821709252.gif (2MB, 268x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 268x200px

>>715633237
Nice loaded questions to fit a confirmation bias you fuck.

Yes
Who isn't?
Half

>>715636187
>Of course, you don't go to college to think. Just regurgitate whatever view the professor has expressed for maximum grade
Truth, colleges are little more than indoctrination centers. Academia lives on in the form of autodidacts, in the colleges it's a naughty word.

File: 1476908595820.jpg (58KB, 960x568px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 960x568px

>>715633237

>>715635963
Ill admit Im starting to believe it more and more every day

>>715635716
>You first have to prove theres a link between maturity and being anti-SJW

There's already a link. I've based this on the numerous racial and homophobic slurs I've seen from anti-SJW's. They're just as immature as the SJW's.

>>715635830
I have yet to see anti-SJW's having any morals or being liberal.

>>715635847
Anti-SJW's are exactly how I see them, through their own actions.

Nope
Noperino
No.jpg

>>715633237
yes, yes, half-white, half-spic

>>715636350
You didn't see the gets when kek was among us.
I think he's sleeping. Haven't felt his presence as strongly since the election.
If kek's not real, explain this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAx0t3O55Zo
he predicted his own arrival.

>>715636225
You sound pretty angry. Your daddy sodomize you one too many times?

>>715633237
Soft atheist. I've seen some weird shit.
Anti SJW because they seek equality of outcome. I support equality of opportunity.
Quarter Native American, but still pretty white.

>>715635911
Until the Libertarians find a candidate with an IQ above that of a citrus fruit I don't think anyone has to worry.

>>715633237
1. Yes
2. Depends what they are doing.
3. And proud.

>>715636561
>I have yet to see anti-SJW's having any morals or being liberal.
Because you're biased and you live in a bubble.
You assume anti-sjw=conservative and never take the time to look too closely at those that challenge the sjw narrative.

>>715636697
Sounds like Clinton "Vote for me because I am a woman"

>>715633237
1) No
2) Yes
3) Mestizo

>>715633237
>no
>Partially
>Yes

>>715636561
Cool, when you are done doing your speech about how you are the arbiter of truth and have it verified by your teacher, come back and tell us about it.

>>715636370
underrated post

Yes
Yes
Yes

>>715636561
Do you realize that SJW's are authoritarian, not liberal?

They want to control how people speak and interact. They want government power enforcing those actions and punishing those that fail to abide by their notions of proper behavior and speech.

That's not liberal.

File: that really rattles me.gif (486KB, 475x347px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 475x347px

>>715636370
this

Yes
Yes
No

File: 1476913421451.jpg (84KB, 750x597px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 750x597px

>>715633237

>>715633237
No
Yes
No

>>715636561
But what about everyone against SJWs who hasnt said a racist or homophobic slur?

Does it matter if theyre just as bad? That does negate the fact SJWs are bad, it just means they are both bad and shouild be dealt with.

The fact you havent seen a liberal SJW, and the fact you seem to associate morals and liberalism, tells me you are the immature one. You have not had enough experiences to talk to people person to person and really know these groups of people. Your study is not about evidence or truth, but confirming your own biases.

I am liberal and anti-SJW. I believe people should be judged on merit, not race or sex. I believe on equal opportunity. I believe legal immigration is totally fine. I think Muslims are generally okay though mass immigration means they will not assimilate, and thats when they start bringing the Middle East with them. I am fine with gays, with trans, I am bi with my own issues.

I just also believe in free speech which is what SJWs dont. I am against them because they pretend to support people, but think minorities and LGBT must all think the same thing (what they think). They want to indoctrinate and control people, something liberals should not be about. They want to blame random, good people for their problems.

>>715636749
How dare you be proud to be white do you know how much evil white people have done? You racist.

>>715633237
>ITT
op is a faggot

>>715634194
I disagree, it might skew results

>>715636697
Our feelings come from/with rational arguments.

We can support our feelings logically.

>>715635911
Not while the libertarian party is full of "social libertarians" who don't understand that to be a libertarian, you also have to be in favor of economic liberty.

>>715636697
Trump did use rational arguments.
It was Hillary appealing to emotion and lying through her teeth.

>>715636680
There are other factions similar to libertarians, such as federalist, but they tend stay within one party or the other almost completely. I'm actually a supporter of a confederation in which almost all issues are decided on within the individual states, and only major macro issues are decided by a centralized government.

>>715637017
>stole furniture from the white house

always makes me kek

whats an SJW?!

>>715636187
I think all Trump supporters already had a legit reason not to vote for Hillary, which was based on the fact that she's corrupt. But I imagine that some of the liberal Trump supporters just didn't want a woman president.

>>715637119
Your results are already meaningless because you began your research with assumptions on how characteristics are related, rather than doing research to see how they actually are.

>>715637218
Social justice warrior.

File: 1481437512457.jpg (33KB, 540x420px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 540x420px

>>715633237
1) Yes, reluctantly.
2) Anti-commie.
3) Yes.

>>715636252
"Based on my findings, all Trump supporters are trap-loving, women-hating pedophiles who believe Bush did 9/11 and Hitler did nothing wrong. That's over 62 million people! This is an epidemic!"

>>715637017
I always find the furniture issue funny. It's like the police showing up to a murder scene, and making sure to put a parking ticket on the suspects car while taking him away.

>>715637159
Too much freedom economically results in Company Stores like those run by the Coal Mines in the early 1900s, where people were paid in peanuts that they could exchange for a set ration of food, clothing, and miscellaneous effects instead of actual wages. Half a step up from slavery.

>>715636561
>wanting to be liberal

You have to be over 18 to use 4chan

>>715637291
Im not op

Im some agnostic arab who hates subhuman sjws and is totes cool with Trumpalumps.

>>715633237
I'm a part of what some people call the "alt-right" and it feels punk as fuck. It feels like an actual counter culture, or rebellion against the PC culture that dominates American colleges.

>>715633806
Bernie Sanders when

>>715633237
So basically OP, you just want to survey people to reconfirm an existing negative hypothesis and not actually take the time to understand those with a viewpoint different to yours. Typical. That's why people voted Trump, because they're sick of shit like this. Go fuck yourself. (For the record, Trump supporter not in US).

>>715637574
That was pretty well said honestly.

File: 1476910347964.jpg (149KB, 795x500px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 795x500px

>>715637568

>>715637450
No, those situations are what happens when gov't subsidizes parts of the market. If nothing was regulated, it would be easy for anyone to enter the market. And it's not just competition between businesses for business, it's also competition between them for the best employees, and it's competition between employees for the best spots and the most money.

>>715635911
If they do we're fucked

>>715636855
Kek

>>715637218
Social Justice Warrior is a term used to describe people who get very angry when you say something that could be construed as offensive based on race, gender, sex, religion, etc.
They're usually against free speech and have no sense of humor when it comes to these things. They're also ironically racist.
You see they think some races are inferior and require special protection while white people are so great that it's ok to treat them like subhumans.
They do the same thing to men.
It's not their fault, they teach this stuff at colleges. It's all a plan to divide the human race so the elite can keep what little power they have left.

>>715633237
no
yes
yes

File: 1477420799697.gif (544KB, 303x357px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 303x357px

>>715633237
>Mfw this is just a bait thread to get /b/tards to fight each other over religion and race
>mfw the jews did this

>>715637568
Sanders is a cuck who didn't mean a damn thing he said.
He got cheated by Hillary and supported her.

1) No, agnostic
2) Yes, but not actively
3) Yes

>>715637658
If the government doesn't mandate how companies are required to divvy wages and benefits, then what's to stop them from creating their own internal use currency?

And not anyone can just pick up a shovel and start a coal mine. There's a lot of very expensive, specialized equipment, and they would still have to compete with already established, experienced companies.

"Should we buy our coal from the guy with the shovel at a price that allows him to live? Or should we buy a metric fuckton of coal from this omega-conglomerate company that produces 10x that guy's weekly volume in an hour, and is thus 10000% cheaper? Hm. Tough call."

>>715633237

1) No, I's a god-fearing Christian.
2) Yes.
3) Damn straight.

>>715637030
I know one youtuber who is against SJW's, but his channel isn't very well known. He avoids racial and homophobic slurs. He's very supportive of the LGBT community. I think he's considered anti-SJW because of the things he said about Juggalos, but I can't confirm this.

>>715637816
Trump supporters dont' care about race/religion for the most part.

File: 1476913308677.jpg (86KB, 1080x809px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1080x809px

>>715633237

>>715637650
nice meme

>>715633237
Yes/Slightly becoming more spiritual
Very much yes
With blonde hair and blue eyes, Master race

>>715637635
Thanks fam. OP is a ideologue piece of shit.

File: Halal.jpg (81KB, 640x539px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 640x539px

>>715637537

>>715637928
Are you talking Sargon?

>>715633237
No
Yes
No

>>715637928
post his name, shit

>>715634537
Shaved, nice.

>>715638092
Sargon likes shitposting too much to avoid slurs, there is too much comedic value in them

>yes
>yes
>yes

I'm white, pissed off, and damn sure there isn't a God because all these non-whites would be struck down with haste if there was

>>715638099
holy shit a non-white trump supporter in our thread! welcome my friend. Not trying to be patronizing, I just don't see many of yall where I live.

>>715637537
Ooh, fuck why must you tease me.

It seems there are two "types" of arabs, darker skinned and light and with different facial features.

I find lighter skinned arabs to be so fucking god damned hot its unreal. Literally my type.
And youre agnostic...Sweet baby jesus kill me now.

>>715637537

>>715633237
Yes, but I like the religious Christmas music.

Absolutely. Even more so against SJWs that deny being SJWs.

No.

1. No
2. Yes
3. Yes

>>715633237
No
Yes
Yes

>>715633237
>1) Are you Atheist?
Yes
>2) Are you anti-SJW?
I'm against government mandated "equality"
>3) Are you white?
hispanic

>>715637939
Fuck you, I'm a Trump supporter and I care about both.

>>715633237
no
yes
yes

fuck off kike

>>715633758
Between that statement, the questions asked and where you're asking them, this sounds like a good old-fashioned case of biased research, otherwise known as confirmation bias.

>>715633237
1. Jew
2. Yes
3. Yes

File: Baby Trump.png (501KB, 611x483px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 611x483px

>>715637574
You sound angry. It seems very easy for anti-Trump people to get under your skin.

Yes
Yes
Hispanic

>>715637910
Haha, the people stop them from using their own currency. If the currency only works in one store, nobody uses it! Why are you so sure that people are that stupid? Would you work in WalMart if they paid you in WalMart Bucks? The whole point of it is that people drive the economy, not the government. Just because you have no faith in yourself to choose a job that benefits you and pays you what you feel you deserve (if they didn't pay you that amount, you should leave... however if there are no other jobs or you don't possess the required skills for another job, you should feel lucky that anyone is employing you in the first place), doesn't mean that no one else has faith in themselves.

>And not anyone can just pick up a shovel and start a coal mine.

This is why business owners make the big bucks. They have the know-how and take the huge, multi-million-dollar risk. And even if you aren't wealthy, if you are intelligent, have a detailed plan, and are willing to give banks or entrepreneurs a higher percentage return on their investments, you're more likely to get a loan.

>Should we buy..

You should buy from wherever the best deal/service/whatever-it-is-you're-looking-for is.

Mandating who should buy from whom makes you anti-liberty.

>>715636225
shut the fuck up prairie nigger

File: 7ada6362a96860469c735213eb7281ab.jpg (50KB, 450x328px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 450x328px

1.yes
2.yes
3.yes
Voted for Gary because couldn't vot for Bernie

>>715637955

Which is still several orders of magnitude more intelligent and educated than 100% of Trump voters.

>>715638386
>for the most part
retard.

Yes, yes, yes

File: batman to the rescue.jpg (69KB, 427x640px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 427x640px

>>715633237
nope
yes
no

File: Screenshot_2016-12-15-12-09-31.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

>>715638256
Cant tell is sarcastic...
This is me tho

People always can't pin my race.

Btw, did op ever reveal purpose of this shit?

>>715633237
bad subject, bad place to ask, bad bait

>>715638531
>Trump supporters only

>>715633237
no
yes
yes

>>715638467
it's the discontent majority that got trump elected. but sure, sit on /b/ and antagonize random people who can pretend to be whatever they want.

>>715633849
Poor lardo just trying to fit in. Just be yourself don't give into fads like this liberal media bullshit.

>>715638092
>>715638116
Ninja-X3 is what he goes by on youtube.

>>715633758
Your thesis and your major are both useless.

>>715638531
that worked out real well for you, eh? Would you like them to do a recount ala Jill Stein? She gained a lot

>>715633237
1.) Yes, No? IDK I' consider myself agnostic atheist.
2.) Yes
3.) No, I'm Asian.

>>715638642
get that racist look off your face, cis-scum.

>>715638445
They call stuff like this peer reviewed research these days. I just listened to TL:DR and Bunny Blackwell reading out loud from a study in black anal porn earlier today. One of the key words were black Anality.

File: 1464869126334.gif (364KB, 540x300px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 540x300px

>>715633237
1) yes
2) yes
3) yes

thats not how proper surveying works. maybe some click bait buzzfeed type shit, but not real credible surveys. many non trump supporters answer yes to those three questions. therefor, any conclusion you would draw would be fallible.

>>715633237
No
Yes
No
Now fuck off to /pol/

>>715638642
Nah, Im not sarcastic. Its sort of my secret type, like friggin aphrodisiac.

Youre incredibly attractive, I likely wouldnt immediately pin you as arabic right away because you have a unique mix of features I suppose, but its obvious if you look for more than 30 seconds.

They did not

>>715638492

>And not anyone can just pick up a shovel and start a coal mine.

This is why business owners make the big bucks. They have the know-how and take the huge, multi-million-dollar risk. And even if you aren't wealthy, if you are intelligent, have a detailed plan, and are willing to give banks or entrepreneurs a higher percentage return on their investments, you're more likely to get a loan.

while this is ideologically true people like trump profit by taking risks with other peoples money thus the bankruptcies to avoid liabilities, also this is why corporations exist where people can borrow money with no personal liability.
but what do I know I am just a lowly accountant/business analyst.

the reality is that the current economic system is severly distorted.

while your comments on currency are valid the reality is that currency's value is based in time; while today what a dollar will buy you will not buy you the same amount tomorrow or down the road due to inflation. the classical economics answer is that it is due to scarcity but the reality in todays markets is that the reason is the increasing supply of money not the dwindling of resources. its all a controlled game to benefit a very select few as is the situation with businesses and those at the top earning excessive amounts and claiming they took on risks when they in reality did not, they just had good enough credit or connections to get a loan.

>>715633353
That and he shouldn't be doing it on 4chan, anyway. Since people will deliberately fuck up his results to muddy the waters. Not that it matters since nobody is really that stupid and OP is just trying to get reactions and answers for the hell of it.

File: donald-trump-thumbs-up.jpg (106KB, 1180x842px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1180x842px

>1) Are you Atheist?

Protestant

>2) Are you anti-SJW?

YES

>3) Are you white?

Yes

>>715633237
Yes
Yes
Yes

>>715633237
1. no
2. yes
3. yes

>>715638815
...that's my neutral face!

I once had a lady stop me in the mall and tell me life is amazing and "why are you so unhappy"?

... This is my face
Its just how it sits.
Who are you?!

>>715638754
Fuck it. Today you're telling him your survey answers; tomorrow you'll be telling him what toppings you want on your sub.

>>715638792
Being "Agnostic Atheist" is impossible. They're a contradiction of each other. You're either an atheist that doesn't believe in God, or an agnostic who doesn't know if there is a God or not.

What's your major? Liberal Arts? KYS, libcuck and do something that actually matters.

>>715633237
1-no but believe in other means
2-no but hate to see them so involv
3-no south american
I voted for trump because i was sick of seeing black so empowered about a black on politics. Trump should put an end to then. Or just the belief is good enough

>>715639161
To bad man, you have resting angry face.

>>715633237
No
Yes
No

>>715633237
please discuss your hypothesis.
oh wait you are prolly a humanities major... good luck finding a job.....

no
yes
yes

>>715633237

1. No

2. Yes. SJW are a disease.

3. No. African America. Yeah, I was one of the so-called 8% that voted for Trump.

>>715639551
>3. No. African America. Yeah, I was one of the so-called 8% that voted for Trump.
smart man

>>715639551
Y did u voted for trump

>>715639253
No. You can combine.

"I believe the existence of god is unknowable, but if I had to bet on it I would say nonexistence."

>>715639017
>what do i know
appeal to authority?

>currency value

And what makes the value of the dollar raise or lower? Is it greedy businessmen or the government? And to what end?

One thing you should consider is the 2008 housing market crash. The politicians love that people protest evil politicians, but what actually led to the failure? It was the gov't telling banks that they A) had to give loans to everyone because it was racist for them not to and B) not to worry, because the US gov't (tax payers) would pay them back on any loan that couldn't be paid. Banks loan money to make money, so instead of taking their usual cautious approach (they were backed by the gov't), they start investing everywhere. When the housing loans were not paid back (surprise), the banks were left with collateral that could not be converted into cash because the market had already collapsed. That, coupled with the fact that they made shit investment decisions led to a collapse of the market.

Who's fault is this? The greedy businessman who will almost always follow the path of least resistance (is it cheaper to pay off a politician than it is to compete? if yes, pay corrupt politician) or the politician who makes promises with your dollars?

The solution is to take away the gov't's power to make these promises, so there is nothing to bribe them with. The gov't should not should the economy at all. People should drive the market.

>>715639161
>didn't deny that you are cis-scum.

I bet you man-spread, too.

>>715639811
what does this have to do with anything?

File: Everyone-I-Don-t-Like-is-Hitler.jpg (83KB, 600x726px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 600x726px

Oh look...it's this thread again.

>>715639948
He didn't deny it because it's a meritless ad hominem argument designed to discredit him on the base of what he is, not who he is or what he says.

>>715633237

1) No, not really. I believe in a God or Gods, but I don't follow a religion.

2) Yes. I think its a waste of time unless you are pushing for very specific policy changes. Cultural and societal changes will happen naturally, just be good to each other and teach your children to respect others.

3) Yes.

>>715640010
Saw the picture of Trump, so I posted that screen shot.

>>715639880
You clearly don't actually know what caused the housing crisis.

The housing crisis wasn't caused because banks were forced by the government to give bad credit. The housing crisis was caused because banks deliberately targeted people with bad credit, hid their files in big bunches that other companies were paid to rate as overall good credit (and forced to, since if they weren't loose with positive ratings then a competitor rater would come out of the woodwork and take all their business: capitalism at its finest), then sold those bunches to other (typically smaller) banks that discovered their worthlessness only after the deals were finalized.

>>715640132
whoa, take your micro-aggressions to your own safe space.

>>715639253
>Being "Agnostic Atheist" is impossible.
Not necessarily. Atheism can be seen as a matter of belief, or in this case, a lack thereof; while Agnosticism can be seen in much the same way but regarding knowledge, instead.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/agnostic
>a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as God, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Gnostic
>pertaining to knowledge
>possessing knowledge
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/atheism?s=t
>disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/theist?s=t
>belief in the existence of a god or gods (opposed to atheism)
So yes, you can be both simultaneously, because they're similar answers to different questions.

>>715639253

So you are an atheist then. You don't believe in a God.

Yes
God yes, they have no clue and hate when you prove facts.
What kind of white? Kinda racist to stick us all in one group. I'm Germanic Viking.

>>715640221
Okay, now I know you're faking it. No real SJW would ever tolerate the notion of giving those horrible rasist bigoted mysogonistic right-wingers their own space to have their own thoughts.

1) YES
2) YES
3) NO

>>715633237
1 no
2 yes
3 no

>>715640212
Where did it spawn from? It was fueled by the argument that not giving loans to people who couldn't afford it was racist (in that the majority of them were non-white).

What you are talking about was a symptom, which was obviously illegal and that's why we have courts.

>>715640446
;)

>>715633237
No
Yes
Yes

>>715638467
Eat shit libcuck

>>715633237
No
Yes
No

>>715633237
Yes
Yes
Slav

File: good-good-let-the-butthurt-flow-through-you.jpg (25KB, 494x371px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 494x371px

>>715640832

>>715640212
>As of 2002, government-sponsored mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had extended more than $3 trillion worth of mortgage credit.
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/09/subprime-market-2008.asp#ixzz4TANELDdg

That's my point. That fact is the source of the problem. Take gov't out of the equation, and shit like this wouldn't happen because there would be a constant fear of failure.

>>715633237
1) Not
2) Yes
3) No

>>715633237
>Do you have a brain?
>Do you have a brain?
>Are you white?

ftfy

Yes
Yes
Paki

>>715633946
>Yes but I think there could be a God
That's not atheism, that's agnosticism.

> Agnostic
> SJWs are cucks
> Hispanic

>>715641284
You could also say that it was caused because of the banks lobbying to repeal Glass-Steagall provisions of the Banking Act of 1933.

Since 1933, Government denied banks the ability to use their customers' money for investments that were too risky. When it was repealed in... what, 2003? 2004? Banks started playing fast and loose with customer money (which is why so many 401ks and investment portfolios of Bank of America customers disappeared overnight).

And since the money was insured by the federal reserve, if they lost the money on failed ventures, they could just write an IOU from the fed. The repeal of Glass-Steagall singlehandedly added nearly 6 trillion to the national debt.

It takes a certain level of normie to use a 4chan poll as reliable information for a college paper.

>>715633237
No
Yes
No

>>715633237
yes
yes
yes

>>715633237
yes
yes
yes
But I was a Bernie supporter

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes to all three. I was a Bernie vollenteer than helped get my supporters switch to Trump, cause fuck Hillary.

>>715641764
Again, gov't intervention in the first place.
Let banks or whomever makes a bad decision fail.

I gotta go, bro. Nice chat.

no
not really
yes

>>715642011
>Bernie vollenteer
filthy kike detected

>>715642242
Except when banks fail, the executives walk away with a ton of money and the people who put their money into those banks are impoverished. The insurance through the fed is not negotiable.

I'm Muslim

I used to be one but I believe they have lost their way


I was born into a black Muslim family

I was more of a Hillary opposer than a Trump supporter. The crying of liberals was just a fringe benefit.

>>715633237
1) no
2) definitely
3) yes

1. Not sure
2. Yes
3. No

>>715638467
I don't even know where to start with this guy? Do you honestly think Trump supporters are in any way butthurt? Do you think a football player spikes a football after scoring a touchdown because he's angry?

>>715633237
1.)yes
2.) yes, reason i voted for him
.)yes

File: 1481691623647.jpg (31KB, 399x399px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 399x399px

>>715633237
No
Yes
Yes

>>715633237
do you really think /b/ is representative of the population at large?

no
yes
no

>>715639551

Wow, so there really ARE blacks who are that fucking stupid.

>>715633237
no
yes
yes

>>715633237
Since they're Trump supporters, shouldn't you be asking their guardian or helper?

No(not Christian either)
Yes
No

Yes
Yes
Yes

>>715634671
Oh, so you're just a fucking retard. Got it.

File: cancerthread.jpg (56KB, 720x390px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 720x390px

>>715633237

No - catholic (and gay)
Yes - should go without saying
Yes - Irish English

File: 1476256856619.jpg (52KB, 498x600px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 498x600px

>>715633758

>>715635112
bullshit statitistic

>>715642926
The problem with what you said is this...
1) That Trump supporter said "fuck off". Which is an angry response.
2) An angry response like that isn't the same or comparable to a guy scoring a touchdown.
3) Your analogy made you sound like an idiot.

>>715644009
>No(not Christian either)
Christianity isn't the only religion out there.

No, Yes, No.

>>715644250
That dude is full of shit.

>>715636444
The idea that colleges are indoctrination centers is fucking retarded bullshit. I went to school for chemical engineering and we all challenged everything because that's our job. To question, research and discover. No one forced anything down our throat. What college/uni did you go to where they forced opinions on you?

>>715633237
Catholic
Yes
Asian American (Korean)

no
yes
yes

>>715633237
Buddhist
Yes
No, Vietnamese

Lutheran
Yes
Yes

>>715633237
No. 2: what in the fuck do you think.

>>715638492
Getting a loan for a startup without ownership/mgmt experience in that field is near impossible. You're speaking out of your ass.

>>715633237
1) I prefer the term "ecumincally unaffiliated"
2) Yes
3) Yes

I'm also from the rural south, if that helps.

>>715633237
No
yes
yes

File: 1467258763157.png (237KB, 462x264px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 462x264px

>>715633237
you dont have to be a trump supporter for question 2. Anyone with common sense and enough neurons would dislike sjw.

>>715638092
sargon is bearable. he has a beat. You can dance to him.

File: jew dont say.jpg (71KB, 714x535px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 714x535px

>>715641103

>>715633237
No
Yes
Yes

>>715633237
>1) Are you Atheist?
No, I'm Panpsychist.
>2) Are you anti-SJW?
Yes, SJWs are a form of cancer.
>3) Are you white?
Yes, I'm a Euro-mutt.

However, let me point out something, because your thesis is retarded, and you should, instead, have asked WHY we DID vote for Trump.
I voted for Trump because I want lower taxes, do NOT want war with Russia, and do NOT support Free Rides for non-productive shits who don't even want to try.

>>715634671
This guy over here has a good point.
I have no problems with LGBTQ+
I don't have any particular issue with drugs, at least not things like Marijuana. It shouldn't prosecuted on its own, only as an accessory should someone wind up hurting someone under the influence (e.g. same we do with alcohol: You can drink it, just not in a car or operating machinery).


These questions are just to get a more negative stereotype of Trump supporters. To be fair, I would've preferred Gary, but you first gotta get the complete fucking psychopaths and criminals away from the race (e.g. Hillary).

>>715643373
This

>>715646116
this.

>>715646116
>panpsychism
retarded.

>>715633237
no
yes
no

>>715646523
Y-you too

But, for real, do you even know what Panpsychism is?

>1) Are you Atheist?
Yep.
>2) Are you anti-SJW?
Yep.
>3) Are you white?
Yep.

Didn't vote but would have voted for Trump; lower taxes, better international appearance with world leaders, and the fact that he's a business man (who will help the economy) helped sway my opinion in his favor.

>>715646784
Yes and it doesn't fucking make sense unless you're fucking Goku trying to make a Spirit Bomb

File: tmp_31193-hollwood-celebrities-shilled-for-her-the-entire-mainstream-media-shilled-7548733281746672.png (124KB, 500x374px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 500x374px

Seems you silly willy libbycuckolds have a bad memory so here's a reminder. Pic related. Cry moar shillnigs.

>>715633237
No
Yes
Yes

>>715633237
1) No
2) Yes
3) Yes

>>715647080
Underrated

>>715647080
Well memed, friend.

>>715647080
>Muslim Nations gave her millions
>People were murdered on her behalf
>They rigged the debates for her
Do you have any evidence to support any of these claims?

>>715647080
/thread

yes - i'm not retarded

yes - fuck yes

yes - thankfully

>>715645550
>correlation
lrn2statistics

>>715647080
So true.

>>715647049
This response innately means you have no idea what it is.

Panpsychism is a GROUP of beliefs that primarily center around the existence of spirits throughout the Universe.

There are only a few things each type of it have in common, one of the main ones being that Consciousness is not purely biological in nature, e.g. it doesn't die with the death of a body.

Pretty much everything else is up for grabs, but generally includes nature spirits, some type of god/gods/god-like beings, and sometimes includes psychic abilities.

You do NOT know what it is, because if you did, you would have said it was probably one of the most reasonable forms of spiritual belief around, since the only unifying thing between Panpsychists is that they believe in spirits of a non-biological nature...