One of these threads? My results related. https://www.politi

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>715492038
Fucking Liberal fag.

fuck off you liberal cunt. I BELIEVE THE ARTIST IS IMPORTANT, eat my ass

File: Duh2.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>715492038
Mein neger

>>715492182
Edgelord. Drink some more Mountain Dew whilst beating it to My Little Pony.

>>715492307
I would, but I'm too busy beating it to anime characters while studying the blade.

File: chart (1)231016.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Like a year old but roast me anyway

File: 20161216_180832.jpg (930KB, 2560x1536px) Image search: [Google]

930KB, 2560x1536px

>>715492038
Op here, it gets worse I'm a libtard gun owner

File: 15171265_1358687587483628_6942449825170038545_n.jpg (18KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x400px

sup commies

File: Political Compass.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

When you see this do you think "He's a New Democrat" or "He's a Civic National Socialist"?

>>715492675
>>715492675
>>715492675
>guns
>show dicc

>>715492921
Probably National Socialist. Democrats are well to the right of this.

File: CyFyMRL.jpg (257KB, 800x1199px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 800x1199px

>>715492400
Understood.

>>715492675
I'm >>715492307 and I'm all for gun ownership.

>>715492921
Soc Dem

>>715493053
The fuck? Nat Soc would similar economic score, but dramatically more authoritarian. Top 3/4 at least

>>715493215
...You do know that American politics is well to the right of basically every other country on Earth?

Democrats in the US would be considered sort of middle-ground Tories in the UK.

File: 12162016.png (16KB, 486x475px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 486x475px

>>715492675
Liberal and pro gun as well

File: Bobby politial compass.jpg (27KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 480x400px

>>715492038
>>715492307
>>715492307
>>715492377
>>715492419
>being in the cuck corner

>>715493324
I understand and agree.

But Nat Soc is commonly accepted as being heavily authoritarian. Which is isn't what >>715492921 had as his result

File: image.jpg (52KB, 640x576px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x576px

>all these filthy statists

>>715493466
Well yeah, but we were only given two options.

File: fedora25.jpg (23KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 480x480px

>>715493444
>cuck

Nice trips

>>715493023
Colt 1911, m48 mauser, Marlin 60 with an $8 optic

>>715493565
I would say that he moreso used them as examples, and not necessarily the only two choices

File: 12.16.16 pol compas.jpg (38KB, 443x479px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 443x479px

>>715492251
>me now

File: polcompas.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

im ok with this

File: 1478740234178.png (795KB, 680x728px) Image search: [Google]

795KB, 680x728px

>>715493444
The FREEDOM corner, you mean.

Nice trips, though.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>715492038

>>715493444
I don't get this green hate meme. It's clearly the red part that contains the white guilt ridden, refugee welcoming SJW's.

>>715493762
>he thinks restricting economic freedoms means more freedom for the general populous

yeah ok buddy

>>715493762
>implying lib left isn't a bunch of tree fucking hippies

>>715493752
Wow. Do you have any opinions?

>>715493797
greens are liberals. almost all of the time they're liberals. and liberals are almost all of the time idiots. at the very least in this day and age.

>>715493356
pretty much exactly this

>>715493882
lol nope, my morals are completely neutral

>>715493842
And Worker control over the means of production is restricting economic freedom?


And allowing Monopolies is?

Anyone else think that these questions are loaded?

'No one chooses their country of birth, so its stupid as fuck to be proud of it.'

Yeah, being proud of your country just because you are born there, but its not stupid to be proud of your country for other completely valid reasons.

Feel like most of the questions are like this.

File: 10.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Just a friendly reminder that capitalism has created by far the most progress in the modern world, which is undeniable fact. Your hippy socialist utopias might seem nice, but when you're living in squalor, maybe then you'll want good facilities, and rich people to actually pay the obnoxiously high taxes you love so much.

Slackers.

>>715492419
You disgust me.

>>715493884
Really, Liberals would be along the Mid line for Economic and Social positions

The Hard left hate liberals for our own reasons

>>715494042
I agree. The wording in these questions are shit.

>>715492182
Mr. Friedman would be proud

File: compass.png (10KB, 505x382px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 505x382px

>>715492038
Took this one a couple weeks ago.
Pro choice
Pro guns
Hate SJWs
Non-binary gender is fantasy
Gays are fine
Trannies are usually fine
Not racist
Not sexist
Would be called racist and sexist
Voted Obama
Voted Trump

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>715492038

>>715493708
>>/pol/

>>715494198
I dunno, I think Friedman advocated in favour of having different minimum wages based on sex.

Being an American he was probably pro-gun too.

File: BSIE.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Bat Shit Insane Edition.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Justin Trudeau is so hot

>>715494022
Having the government put that in place is restricting economic freedoms, exactly! Glad you know.

>>715493708
What the fuck?

I don't care as much about left vs. right as much as authoritarian vs. libertarian.

I'd much rather argue with someone I disagree with about how we should be left alone than someone who wants to control others.

Simple example, talking with a lefty today about conscription. The Jon Stewart, "Everyone should have to do required community service/military for citizenship."

When you ask them if they are willing to throw you in jail for saying no they usually don't have an answer. Weren't they all of the conscientious objectors in Nam?

>>715493752
Lawfully neutral

File: dRftK6n.png (271KB, 1088x653px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1088x653px

green fags die

>>715494298
underrated post.

>>715494583
True neutral, more like.

>>715494469
Except their would be no state. (Well, at the very bottom of the green at least)

So how could that state put those restrictions into place if it does not exist?

>>715494365
Yeah, but it was to promote equality of employment. A lower wage for the less desirable employee means they're more likely to gain employment. I'm not saying you didn't already know that of course :)

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>715492038

>>715494686
There wouldn't be. The thing is, though, is that you would have to have an unnaturally socialist population to even have your suggested model of no government and also worker control. Humans are greedy. There will eventually be business if you don't have a government clamping down on it.

File: me and my views.png (336KB, 1556x964px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 1556x964px

>>715494623
my dude

>>715494762
At least Friedman was a pragmatic guy. He was really into realistically weening people off of government programs. Too many people think libertarians are all about closing everything tomorrow, like that could ever realistically happen.

I'm down with his ideas on school wavers as a good example. I don't know enough about economics to know whether his negative income tax would work, but he's obviously super smart.

And he's was a Jew, so his practical ideas piss off people who'd otherwise agree with him were he a christcuck.

Hey fellas
This asshole fucked up one of my accounts and now he got my password and I am banned for life. I got his phone number herencia
+5491167224554
You know any way to fuck him Up?

>>715494922
There have been some samples of a system like that being put in place.

>>715495173
What would that be? How long did they last?

File: 2941460793.jpg (129KB, 800x895px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 800x895px

>>715494623
>>715494330
mine

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

marxist leninist but this is what I got so

>>715495358
>marxist leninist
could've saved time and put "lazy cunt". we would have known what you were talking about.

>>715495307
We had the Iroquois in the New World, functioned very much like a libertarian Socialist society.

Then we had Catalonia in Spain (Lasted ~3 years, before USSR essentially stabbed them in the back)

Also Free Territory in Ukraine. Again, 3 years then USSR invaded

Rojava (Not 100%) but is still on going

EZLN Been around for a good ~20 years

>>715495519
See this is the comrade we should be lynching.

>>715495358
Interesting for an ML to be that libertarian.

Would expect you to be atleast +2 on the Authoritarian scale

>>715495493
>dae marxists are lazy
good meme. which ideology thinks that parasite CEOs and incompetent management should be paid ludicrous sums of money?

>>715495681
well yea the quiz is kinda dumb, pretty sure it gave me libertarian points for being against parents hitting their kids and shit like that

File: commie there is food.jpg (50KB, 644x598px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 644x598px

>left-wing """""""""economics"""""""""

you morons must like starving to death

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Mine is pic related.
Not bad, right?

>>715495740
how about address the fucking claim instead of calling it a meme. socialism breeds a class of the lazy. there are no incentives to work hard.

>>715495740
which ideology has already been proven a failure? thanks for stopping by though.

>>715495818
True, I can see how some are loaded with a Lib Bias

I'm this one >>715492419 and I kinda doubt that my position is accurately represented.

>>715495818
>being against parents hitting their kids
commie faggot

>>715495740
Must be bait
It is easy to be a commie in a capitalist country, while still eating as you please and earning money.

>>715495583
All areas with a relatively low population. I agree that it could work in areas where everyone pretty much knows each other more or less, but in a society in which there is no consequence to your actions and no incentive not to do something you simply will end up having businesses, which is generally the most efficient model.

>>715492429
Too lazy to take the test again, but it was here but a two or three blocks left

>>715495891
come over more to the right and ill give you a handjob.

>>715496086
being against this doesn't turn you a commie, as this is social-related, not economic.

I''m centre-right

>>715495934
>implying I would want to address this stupid fucking bourgie propaganda
ok I'll bite, if the worker is not alienated from his product and workplaces are democratically run, there is more incentive to work than under capitalism, which only provides incentive to work through threat of starvation

File: Baited.gif (2MB, 400x392px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x392px

>>715496297
>was a joke

File: Untitled.jpg (59KB, 520x494px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 520x494px

>>715492038

I was pretty close to the ''ghandi point'', still get called a nazi. Oh well

I'm not all that sure how I ended up on the left

>>715496430
>"I-I was just pretending to be retard!"
This doesn't make you any more right.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

What am I?

>>715496403
alienated by his product in what way? and i think you're definitely misrepresenting capitalism. sure, i'll agree there is some incentive to work via the threat of starvation, but the main motivating factor would be that if you work hard, you have potential to get a raise. that brings in more cash, and thus pushes you to work harder. also, you commies really are laughable, honestly. you're literally calling a common sense analytic propaganda.

File: Duh.gif (236KB, 300x161px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 300x161px

>>715496687

>>715496719
A well-balanced person.

>>715496719
A faggot who entered politics yesterday or don't have a firm point.

>>715494298
This is me too

>>715496719
a non-participant

>>715496929
"well balanced"
"person"

>>715496781
Why do you think you can debate about marxism with such little knowledge on the topic? Alienated in the sense that a foxconn worker never sees the iphone he slaved away at improving someone's life. And lol @ the idea that you can consistently/realistically move up in a significant way as a min wage worker with no connections.

File: idk.jpg (40KB, 569x485px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 569x485px

Is it good?

File: idk.jpg (56KB, 456x488px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 456x488px

Any thoughts?

>>715497141
>>715497209
Sorry for the double post. Something is wrong with my connection.

File: compass.png (17KB, 443x473px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 443x473px

waddup liberals

>>715496021
>Because corporations cannot be trusted to voluntarily protect the environment, they require regulation.

Like this one. They don't require regulation, they require seizing

>>715497339
you are a liberal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

>Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality, and international cooperation.

>>715497045
Firstly, my points are valid enough regardless of how much I know on the topic. I'm analyzing your arguments. Second, how much support is there to actual show that seeing the final product will push workers to work harder? Also, you're implying all jobs are centered around making something. Waiters get to serve people and see the benefit of their labor. That's simply one example. Finally, what evidence is there to show that workers don't consistently get wage increases?

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

how fucked am I?

>>715497560

stop trying to keep everyone happy

>>715497830
pretty accurate. fuck.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>715495891
Here
I remade the test today.
What am I?

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

I am Gandhi

File: kekkkk.png (10KB, 602x437px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 602x437px

Did Nazi that coming...

>>715497996
get the fuck out you alt-right racist cuck

>>715497551
>I don't know anything about economics but let me explain how they work. I don't know anything about sports but let me tell you why your nfl team sucks. I've never studied anthropology, but let me tell you why blacks are violent. I'm not an electrician, but let me rewire your cable box
>dunning-kruger.jpeg

Stop asking me for basic shit. I'm not explaining alienation, or why social mobility is inherently unequal under capitalism to someone clearly uninterested in learning anything about socialism on 4chan.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Fucking lefties

>>715498574
I'm not racist.

File: left collective.jpg (65KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 640x480px

>>715495519
There are a couple of near-center reds but it looks like you and I are the only true members of the master race represented here.

>>715498674
Are you American? Because if so, congratulations, this result qualifies YOU as a lefty around here.

File: pinochet.jpg (169KB, 800x1047px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 800x1047px

>>715493708
good job anon

>>715498928
Brilliant response

>>715498644
Yeah, no, I'm asking you how you think your system is supposed to work. Why is it so hard to respond to my "basic" questions? If it's so easy to answer, just answer me. The questions I ask are pretty critical to your ideology. Going without answering is simply a failure of your argument.

>>715498574
>Libertarian
>Racist
Kill yourself faggot

>>715498966
>implying communism isn't THE most shit tier ideology.

>>715497345
Yep. I interpreted as Regulation through seizing the means.

File: filename.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

stupid liberal cunts

>>715499467
Different fag here. I don't know you so this may well not apply to you, but easily 3/4 of the libertarians I know would prefer not to be anywhere near people who aren't white.

File: Political.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Here is mine

>>715497619
Mutualist?

>>715492429
>>715494796
>>715495519

>cucks

>>715499666

>>715497996 Here, and I have an easy time with blacks and any other skin color/culture.
>>715499268
Are you being sarcastic?

>>715499372
And this is why communists are idiots. No response. Still.