[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

in 1945 a massive airplane smashed into the Empire State building.

The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Thread replies: 148
Thread images: 23

File: empire_state-1945.jpg (75KB, 862x540px) Image search: [Google]
empire_state-1945.jpg
75KB, 862x540px
in 1945 a massive airplane smashed into the Empire State building. it did not collapse

did the government think we would forget about this? airplanes do not knock down buildings
>>
>>714776892

It was a B-24 flying at low speed, please compare the physical size, flying speed, and fuel capacity of a 747 to a B-24. If you actually do that, you should feel stupid afterwards for saying something so silly.
>>
>>714777090
dude, 9/11 wasn't a 747 but a A280 you dumbfuck
>>
>>714777090
it was a b757
>>
>>714776892

empire state building didnt have bombs in it
>>
B-25, even smaller and slower.
>>
>>714777090
a b24 has never even touched the empire state building you colossal retard
>>
>>714777228
no, 9/11 was a 787
>>
>>714776892
You are one stupid son of a bitch
>>
>>714777171
>>714777197
So which was it fags?
>>
>>714777295
no one is sure what the plane was because it wasn't a plane. it was a missle painted like a plane
>>
>>714776892
but it wasn't loaded with jet fuel. the september 11th attacks caused jet fuel to spill all over the office furniture, and the resulting fire warped the steel beams just enough to cause a collapse. only a complete fucking retard would argue against this. thread.
>>
>>714777363
It was an Antonov AN-225. Fucking soviets
>>
>>714777171

triggered.
>>
>>714777090
Modern planes have better safety features. If anything it should have caused less damage.
>>
>>714777090
You all need to eat your red pills. It was a C130
>>
File: ZDMphSv.gif (14KB, 871x472px) Image search: [Google]
ZDMphSv.gif
14KB, 871x472px
>>714776892
First off the empire state building is built differently to the twin towers.
Second, the planes that hit the twin towers went through the building into the center support structure where the jet fuel proceeded to heat up the steal and weaken it.
This caused it to bend and collapse in on itself.

The plane you are referencing did nothing of the sort and just left a dent in the side of the building.

There's a lot of things pointing towards a possible inside job on 9/11 and I'm inclined to believe some of it, but believing the twin towers didn't fall because planes hit them is the most retarded part about it.
>>
>>714777449
it was completely full of gasoline (even more dangerous than jet fuel) incase the fog forced them to return to base
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-12-10-19-34-43-1.png (151KB, 1080x723px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-12-10-19-34-43-1.png
151KB, 1080x723px
Jews
>>
>>714777592
the plane did go all the way through. it even crashed into a building on the opposite side of the impact
>>
>>714777777
I hope Mike Pence finds out where you live.
Degenerate faggots all need to be given shock treatment.
>>
>>714777777
checked
>>
>>714777777
HEXES OF TRUTH
>>
>>714777777
CHECK THOSE FUCKING NUMBERS

THE TRUTH IS HEARD
>>
>>714777777
Bruh leave some 7's for someone else.
>>
>>714777777
Checked
>>
>>714777777
Checking those numbers
>>
>>714777777
Well if it did go all the way through, theres your reason the buliding didn't collapse.

A burning fuel source didn't stay inside the building continuing to heat the building up it left the building and just left a hole.

How stupid are you?
>>
>>714777911
>911
kek
>>
File: and here we go.png (98KB, 550x287px) Image search: [Google]
and here we go.png
98KB, 550x287px
>>714777777
inb4 a million checkeds
>>
File: 111589666.jpg (7KB, 267x200px) Image search: [Google]
111589666.jpg
7KB, 267x200px
>>714777777
WITNESSED
>>
>>714777592
they were designed to withstand multiple plane strikes
>>
>>714777777
Holy shit skin.
>>
>>714777228
this
>>
> 2016
> doesn't realise Saudi Arabia did 9/11
> kek
>>
>>714778001
They were designed to take plane hits, not have their structural supports heated to bending temperature.
>>
File: nejdette.jpg (150KB, 1600x800px) Image search: [Google]
nejdette.jpg
150KB, 1600x800px
>>714778049
no this
>>
>>714777777
omg
>>
>>714777777
I think you won the game of the hacker 4chan
>>
File: 57 - LGWWnJI.jpg (177KB, 1200x863px) Image search: [Google]
57 - LGWWnJI.jpg
177KB, 1200x863px
>>714777777
ALAH U AKBAR
>>
>>714778147
why does america need to make things so fucking big?
>>
>>714778100
Dubs speaks truth
>>
>>714778221
yea. Fuck you america. get your shit together
>>
File: 1478393452387.jpg (45KB, 651x525px) Image search: [Google]
1478393452387.jpg
45KB, 651x525px
>>714777777
>>
>>714778221
The Antonov An-225 (the plane pictured) was designed by the Soviet Union.
>>
>>714778221
It was designed for transporting your mom
>>
>>714777938
Your argument is invalid because you lack the repeating digits of truth. Go away until you've got something worth checking.
>>
>>714778100
They both hit near the top, and heat travels rises. The tops might have collapsed, but the lower parts of the buildings should not have been affected.
>>
>>714778221
Because they're compensating for something
>>
There's a well documented and scientifically plausible explanation for why the towers fell.

Conspiracy faggots have yet to provide any rationale for why the government would have to both 1) hijack planes and crash them into buildings AND 2) subsequently destroy the buildings with explosives to achieve their objectives, when #2 would clearly expose themselves to great risk of being caught by all you brilliant basement-dwelling neckbeards.

Yet again, I'll wait for any logical rationale but will receive none.
>>
File: 1975fire.jpg (45KB, 280x250px) Image search: [Google]
1975fire.jpg
45KB, 280x250px
>>714778100
No steel columns were damaged/weakened/melted in the '75 fire that was hotter and burned longer
>so whats your excuse now?
>>
>>714778221
>soviet plane
where are you from then retard?
>>
>>714778364
The tops of the buildings are heavy and cause the bottoms to collapse under the weight of the tops falling on them
>>
>>714778318
Because we're a bigass place. Nigga, it takes four days to get coast to coast. We've got eight million people in NYC alone, and they have to work somewhere.
>>
>>714778411
so we could invade iraq and protect the petro-dollar retard. anyone with just an ounce of intelligance could figure that out
>>
The Empire State Building is one of the most over engineered structures in modern history, the amount of steel in it is ridiculous

>structural engineering class discussed this exact topic
>>
>>714778661
this
>>
>>714778443
>that was hotter than a fuel source burning in the center of the building for an hour compared to a common fire.

Source? Because im sure that fire burned the entire time in the center structure and only the center structure.

Stop grasping.
>>
>>714778485
the empire state building is made out of heavy ass stone. why didnt the fire collapse it? it was much heavier
>>
>>714778485
Correct, it's called impact load and the structure was never designed for that
>>
>>714777777
>7 .. 777777
> 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> seven sevens
> building seven

Illuminati confirmed
>>
>>714778769
not to mention it was a boeing 777 that hit the towers
>>
>>714778364
>a buliding is built to have tons of steel dropped on top of them and support it

Yeah you're definitely stupid.
>>
>>714778727
Did the top of the empire state building fall on the bottom?
>>
>>714778443
>fire that was hotter

Prove it was hotter, which will be rather difficult, since it was not hotter.
>>
THERMITE WAS FOUND AT GROUND ZERO
>>
File: edna.jpg (45KB, 390x365px) Image search: [Google]
edna.jpg
45KB, 390x365px
>>714778725
There was no 'fuel source' burning in the center of the building ( heat bending temps) Lol
There a woman standing in the epicenter of what you claim is blast furnace temps
>checkmate
>>
>>714778974
>epicenter
>the side of the building is the center of the building

Are you actively trying to make yourself look more and more stupid?
>>
>>714778411
Nice dubs, but please do explain why building seven colapsed without being hit by anything, you faggot
>>
>>714779226
>without being hit by anything
>was hit with debris
>thinks buildings won't fall when they are missing parts of themselves.
>it HAS to be bombs no other excuse.

This is why you're supposed to take and pay attention in physics class.
>>
>>714779226
It committed suicide because it was depressed
>>
>>714777777
>>714777833
>>714777850
>>714777862
>>714777869
>>714777907
>>714777911
>>714777938
>>714777981
>>714778019
>>714778199
>>714778330
I think what anon tries to tell all of you faggots with this hexes is that the wtc 7 fucking colapsed with no reason.
Now try to explain this
>>
>>714777777
witnessed
>>
>>714778617
You didn't answer my question, again proving how fucking retarded you people are.

Why does #2 have to be done and expose so much risk to fucking geniuses like you "figuring it out" (LOL) when #1 would achieve the same goal. I get so depressed about the state of humanity when there are people as dumb as you that exist.
>>
File: bush puppet.jpg (173KB, 998x659px) Image search: [Google]
bush puppet.jpg
173KB, 998x659px
>>714778443
>Empire State bu
There was enormous kinetic energy transferred from the panes to the buildings which damaged/destroyed a lot of the support structures
>>
>>714779391
Lul, you suppose to read the 9/11 commision report, then use your physics knowledge to explain me the result
>>
>>714779109
Lame response kid .Don't worry about it , all the steel weakening arguments fall apart when you show 'em that picture
>>
>>714777777
INCLUDE ME IN SCREENCAP
>>
>>714779611
Once again , they were designed to withstand multiple plane strikes
>now you respond with blah blah blah...
>>
>>714779720
>I have no rebuttal so I'll just call him a kid and not respond properly.

>>714779701
>I bring forward and claim something
>lol don't look at me for the answer go find it yourself.

I already read it. Still waiting for you to say something logical.
>>
>>714779391
>sees video of plume of pulverized concrete and shattered steel bursting upward and outward over a 600 ft radius
>calls it a collapse
>pretends to have phd in physics
>>
>>714777592
A newer conspiracy theory is that the Saudi Arabian government gave funding to terrorist for 9/11. There was a document or something
>>
>>714779594
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Now shut the fuck up
>>
>>714778443
The columns weren't the structural element that failed, the beams are what became compromised due to the heat. The beams are carrying less load and are less resistant due to their decreased mass to the effects of a long burning fire.
>>
>>714779940
>I have never seen a building collapse the post
>>
All the jet fuel burned up instantly in the initial explosion you idiots. It didn't run down the through the center of the building and then decide to ignite dumb fucks do you ever think?
>>
>>714777777
woah
>>
>>714777777
this is correct. Building 7. also the outside of the WTC was straight up steel.
>>
>>714776892
WHY ARE THEY JUST STANDING AT THE EDGE LIKE THAT. I would be in literal tears if I was stood there. Call me a bitch, I don't care. That shit's nightmare fuel.
>>
>>714780114
worked demolition for twenty years sport. things don't automatically blow up when you knock them down, retard.
>>
>>714777777
>post talking about 9/11
>777777
>two boeing 777s hit the towers
>777 777
>>
>>714780129
>this is why people are stupid
>they think the jet fuel leaked through out the building and and caught on fire throughout the entire building.

No wonder you're so stupid, you jump to retarded conclusions. No one ever said that.

The plane hit the building and exploded and continued to burn in the center just like other fires.
The fire proceeded to weaken the steel beams where the plane hit, which caused this picture. >>714777592


It didn't need to go to the rest of the building.
>>
>>714778908
Ingredients of thermite are aluminium and iron oxide thermite was produced by the plane body burning mixing with the iron the thermite did the rest
>>
>>714777777
Jet fuel cant melt dank sextuple sevens
>>
>>714780260
Then you need to get your eyes check because world trade 7 falling looks like a normal building collapse unless you want to show me your super special video showing explosions after it collapses.
>>
>>714780399
>The plane hit the building and exploded and continued to burn in the center just like other fires.
>The fire proceeded to weaken the steel beams where the plane hit, which caused this picture. >>714777592

are you sure that's not a photoshop? I watched while it happened and towers looked a lot more substantial than that
>>
File: tmp_9507-images(14)-2065518959.jpg (31KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]
tmp_9507-images(14)-2065518959.jpg
31KB, 450x300px
Empire State Building: Construction begun in 1930 and finished in 1931

World Trade Center: Construction started in 1966, first buildings were ready by 1973. Continued construction throughout the 70's and 80's

Well there's the fuckin answer right there. Its not the illuminati... its not some government conspiracy or some terrorist plot.

Its hippies. The towers were built by fuckin hippies. Surprised they lasted as long as they did.
>>
File: 1397103069494.png (30KB, 712x649px) Image search: [Google]
1397103069494.png
30KB, 712x649px
>>714776892
>did the government think we would forget about this?
Apparently so.
>>
>>714780399
NIST concluded that the jet fuel bunt up on impact which caused this picture of a "fire" not hot enough to melt the woman standing in the center of it>>714778974
>>
>>714777749
>Citation needed
>>
>>714780556
building 7 fell at free fall speed according to NIST, and the fall started in the center beneath the penthouse, just identical to a classic demolition. way to strawman. the only way that building could have fallen at free fall is if all the supporting columns failed at the exact same time. get your eyes checked, sport.
>>
File: 1397237822784.png (27KB, 469x543px) Image search: [Google]
1397237822784.png
27KB, 469x543px
>>714780839
>>
File: 147994316324.jpg (19KB, 363x462px) Image search: [Google]
147994316324.jpg
19KB, 363x462px
>>714780868
>>
>>714777777
The sevens of truth
>>
File: northamerican-b25-mitchell_21.jpg (98KB, 800x536px) Image search: [Google]
northamerican-b25-mitchell_21.jpg
98KB, 800x536px
>>714778147
No it was a fucking b25

https://youtu.be/CodLDGhTe0k
>>
>>714776892
The plane that hit the Empire State building was a B-25. The plane that hit the North Tower was a Boeing 767. For these calculations I'll use max load capacity. Max. capacity for 767: 395,000 lbs, max capacity for B-25, 20,300 lbs. pounds to kilogram 395,000 lbs = 178,935 kg, dividing by 9.8 Newtons = a mass of 18,258 kg, with this mass times velocity of 756 km/h = 13,803,557 kg. That's nearly 14 MILLION kilograms of force impacting a building. Now for the B-25. 20,300 lbs = 9195 kg divided by 9.8 Newtons = 938 kg, at a cruising speed of 370 km/h, that's a momentum of 347,192 kilograms of force. That is a massive gap between the B-25 and 767. Please, do us all a favor and kill yourself.
>>
>>714782168

>/thread
>>
File: 1442457012810.jpg (64KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]
1442457012810.jpg
64KB, 640x640px
>>714777777
SEXTS OF TRUTH
>>
File: 8.jpg (39KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]
8.jpg
39KB, 320x320px
>>714777777
>>
>>714782168
Towers were designed to withstand multiple planes strikes
So?
>>
File: 1419276320086.jpg (21KB, 678x258px) Image search: [Google]
1419276320086.jpg
21KB, 678x258px
>>714782472
It was also built with demolition explosives pre-installed. Those towers were targeted before they were even made.
>>
File: 1473556187934.jpg (60KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]
1473556187934.jpg
60KB, 960x960px
>>714782585
That makes more sense then 'Magical Jet fuel'.
>>
>>714782472
What kind of planes? There are a lot of planes. Cars are designed to keep deaths at a minimal, and while they do a good job, it's not always successful.
>>
You idiots on /b/ are too ignorant about the subject to capably argue about this.
>>
>millions of people watch as two 110 story towers literally explode in plumes of steel and powdered concrete and disappear in 11 seconds each
>dozens of reporters and witnesses talk about hearing many small and a few huge explosions
>mainstream newscasters report that buildings must have been demolished with bombs
>two weeks later govt says: that's not what happened
>people say "ok"
>>
>>714783060
Oh , now you're gonna throw engineers under the bus .
Funny how when science doesn't fit the narrative...
>>
>>714783060
they were designed to withstand multiple strikes of 737's
>>
>>714783060
Jet passenger planes and according to NIST the towers withstood them like they were designed to
>>714783534
707's
>>
>>714783534
No. The planes used in impact tests were 707's. Which if you do momentum calculations is a VERY large gap between that and a 767.
>>
>>714783390
How did I throw engineers under the bus?
>>
>>714777295
kek
>>
They weren't trying to hit the Empire State Building
>>
>>714783739
all that doesn't matter though. the towers were actually two buildings each, one inside another. they were made so that 30% of the columns could be cut at the towers would still stand. you can see from the videos that no where near 30% of the columns were cut. but even that doesn't matter, because millions of people saw those towers explode, throwing debris upwards and outwards for 600 ft which a gravity collapse cannot account for. the most damning evidence regarding the lack of truth about the 911 report is literally right in front of everyone's eyes.
>>
twin towers are glass frame steel core construction empire state is reinforced concrete,steel encased in masonary and masonary
>>
>>714783767
Your next evasive move would be "Oh what do engineers now , you can't design sumting in a computor and expect it to work in real life".
>>
>>714784247
With 100% honesty I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say.
>>
>>714784351
kek
>>
>>714784186
the twin towers had steel frames inside and out, and a six foot thick wall of concrete around the exterior of the inner core. they were the most robust steel structures built to that point. witness inside the towers said the towers only swayed slightly when they were struck.
>>
>>714777526
It was an a90-orlyonok u faggot
>>
>>714784419

You can't argue with these people. They don't listen to facts. That's why they voted for Hillary.
>>
>>714776892
The plane that crashed into the ESB was a twin engined b25, not a quad engined b24. BIG difference in weight
>>
>>714783661
"Based on its comprehensive investigation, NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large number of jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires (which reached temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius, or 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) significantly weakened the floors and columns with dislodged fireproofing to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns. This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers. Both photographic and video evidence—as well as accounts from the New York City Police Department aviation unit during a half-hour period prior to collapse—support this sequence for each tower."
>Source:https://www.nist.gov/el/faqs-nist-wtc-towers-investigation
>>
>>714779809
kill yourself newfag
>>
>>714784678
Which resulted in near free fall collapse .
WTC 1 hit at 91 st floor , an estimated 4 % of the building then 'pile-drived' through the 96% rest of the building?!!?
>do you also believe in Santa Claus
>>
>>714776892

And a year later another military plane crashed into 40 Wall Street (The Trump Building)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpKB9Juy0DM
>>
>>714784678
And they made those conclusions without conducting any sort of investigation on the destroyed buildings, because the debris was hauled away many months before the commission even began to work on the report. Many of the commission members have stated that the report was a fraud and a coverup, and the commission would never even have been formed had not the families of the victims pressured the Bush administration to conduct an investigation. We don't know who funded the attacks and were told that was irrelevant, while the attacks were used to initiate a 5 trillion dollar war on terror that has created more terror. You must be really drinking the koolaid if you don't find anything suspicious in all this.
>>
>>714785346
That's not hard to understand. Structural A36 steel used in the Twin Towers has an overall strength of 16,425 KSI (Kilograms per Square Inch), and like I said in the above posts, the full force of the 767 was 13,803,557 kg. That is more than enough to sever many columns of steel; and the columns that didn't sever were warped by immense heat and bent, causing floors to warp and eventually caving in, bringing the entire building with it. Keep in mind that the 4% you are talking about is the area of impact of the plane on the building itself, not the amount of building left on top of the impact.
>>
File: kik.jpg (134KB, 1434x1655px) Image search: [Google]
kik.jpg
134KB, 1434x1655px
>>714785370
OH SHIT
>>
>>714785623
I'm not saying that I don't smell anything fishy. Just saying that the situation is perfectly explainable through measurable circumstances, and not some transcendental feeling.
>>
https://discord.gg/jhFmw

Join our discord

When you enter ask for that faggot Mark.

Mark was born in 1945
>>
>>714786340
No...these towers were built with a 5 X their load capacity .That means you could stack five towers on top of them .
WTC 1 , the top of the building(above the 91st floor) was only 4% of the total structure .
>>
>>714786340
do you get paid to promote this tripe? how many times have you seen gravity eject things upward and outward? the plume was consistent all the way down the towers as they disintegrated. people reported explosions, some huge and some smaller strings. these can plainly be heard on some of the videos. whatever the truth is about the destruction of those towers is, we haven't been told it. the biggest crime in american history and the evidence was destroyed. if a burger king owner burns down his restaurant every single aspect of the fire is studied, but two 110 story towers are destroyed and the investigation is started 400 days later, after all the evidence has been hauled off? if it is true that many columns were severed, why were the buildings standing up straight until the moment the they began to disintegrated into plumes of debris?
>>
>>714776892
>comparing a B25 to a Boeing 767
>being this stupid

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_B-25_Mitchell

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_767

The 767 is 3x the plane the B25 is...
>>
File: dubs-amazeballs.jpg (23KB, 300x245px) Image search: [Google]
dubs-amazeballs.jpg
23KB, 300x245px
>>714777777
>>
>>714786340
Project manager Frank DeMartini stated: "It would be like poking a screen door with a pencil"
Designed to withstand multiple plane strikes .
I'd believe a pre-9/11 statement from the guy who them to Bush investigation any day .
>>
>>714786607
that may be so, if you had any evidence to base your measurements on, but you don't. all you have is conjecture while the whole damn world saw the buildings exploding. you have no idea how many columns were cut, or how many were bent, or how many actually had the insulation dislodged from them. explain what ejected 30 ton sections laterally for 600 feet. was that burning office chairs too? did burning office chairs turn all the concrete into a four inch blanket of dust that covered the whole of manhattan?
>>
>>714786857
I'm still not sure that is 4% of the total structure, but if it is, thats 18,000,000 kg
>>
>>714777090
it was a b-25.
Thread posts: 148
Thread images: 23


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.