Has Chloë been sexualized by Hollywood from her early age?

it is a bit eerie when you think about it, but what can you do?

>>655488446
Wait, hollywood knows that sex sells and abuses it in the young woman in the entertainment industry?
What a scooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooop!

support your arguments with pictures, dont forget this is image board

>>655488903

they seem to have overdone it will chloe though

Shes ahead of her years

>>655489009
Because the jews of hollywood knew that chloe is america's sweetheart and thus will bring in way more sheckles this way. Even though most people wont admit, someone innocent will will run the wildest in people's imaginations. Yes, I am claiming that everyone has some pedo urges and that hollywood uses this to make money.

>>655488446
how about a prostitute in The Equalizer

>>655489348

yeah he said that

File: shot04[1].jpg (37KB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 854x480px

>>655488903
So this unnecessary scene is okay at the age of 11?

And they've done way worse. Brooke Shields was completely naked and playing a child prostitute at the age of 11 or 12.

>>655489656
you, Americans are all pedophiles, thats the only reason I can think of that would explain why you tend to see sexual things where there is none

>>655489656
I am not saying it's okay at all. I'm just giving you info on why they do it. I personally don't see a problem with the specific scene you're showing there though. Just a kid in her underwear.

>>655488446
Is she even still around?

Who gives a fuck, even?

>>655488446
Are you fucking stupid or what?

You must be pretty young yourself to be saying this shit because the fact you've grown up in the SJW era is really showing.

Do you realize that there are plenty of movies from the 70s/80s and even the 90s to a degree that literally has scenes with girls who are between 12 and 16 completely nude/non sexually? I mean fuck, there was even some that was sexual (the movie implies, not shows acts of sex) of teenagers having sex, but they are actually fully nude in real life. No skin colored underwear bullshit.


Do you realize how brainwashed you have become by this SJW/PC shit?

Does everything in the world have to be censored "just in case"?

Have you ever viewed art?

>>655489800
lol, not even American. And how is a nip slip in a scene where she has sex at the age of 17 me seeing sexual things where there is none?
>>655489993
She's filming a movie Bad Neighbours 2 and she'll be dressed slutty, wearing a bikini, etc...

I don't see it.

I need webms, gifs and links to scenes.

>>655490358
Closet pedo detected

Absolutely disgusting degenerate. Do you realise that you're being SUBCONSCIOUSLY BRAINWASHED BY THE JEWISH SJWS YOU DISGUSTING RACE POLLUTANT

>>655489800
>American pedophiles
>Age of consent USA - 18
>Age of consent in Euro's - 14
>Age of consent in Asia - child donkey
>Age of consent in Africa - lol wut

K.

>>655490502

Illogical faggot who denies reality, facts and evidence detected.

Are you new to /b/? Because I've been here since 2006.

Newfaggots like yourself need to pack up your mainstream SJW mentality and leave.

>>655490555
trips are facts

>>655490555

Common info copypasta for you, you brain dead fuck.

"The legal consent age in the large majority of first world countries is 16. Notable countries that have between 14-16 are England, Germany, Russia, Iceland, Poland, Switzerland, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Norway, Sweden, Scotland, China, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Greenland. All well known countries.

Basically the only ones that are 18 is the US, Central African Republic, Egypt, Ethiopia ,Liberia, Nigeria, Republic of the Congo, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, India, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Pakistan, Turkey, Afghanistan, El Salvador, Haiti. Need I say more?

Places like Germany, Russia, Sweden, Iceland, Poland, Switzerland, Belgium, France, China, Japan, etc had 14-15 as the age.

The ages in this list are as they are stated. They do not have close in age or romeo and juliet clauses. When these countries say 16 for example is legal, it means they have the rights to consent to anyone of any age. Countries like America like to tell you a few of there states have 16 but it's not truly right because they always (In America) attach a close in age rule which states you have to be within 3 years or so of 16 for it to be considered legal, other countries do not have this. The first world countries that have lower age of consent laws have come to that conclusion by consulting medical professionals such as Doctors, psychiatrists, psychologists, sexologists, etc. Countries that have 18 - 21 come to that conclusion because of 'feelz' rather than any actual expert opinion."

If you don't believe whats posted in this list you can look it all up for yourself one by one and begin to see how wrong you are.

>>655490555
lol, Europe is a continent and as such it has different countries and in every countries the laws are different.

Also, in US the age of consent is 16.

This is turning into a cringe thread.

>>655488446
Post the nipslip

>>655490736
Want to know the common factor between America and these middle eastern/african countries?

Religion.

No other first world country is as obsessed with religion as America. The only places that are as obsessed with religion are third world countries and places such as the middle east they just happen to worship a different religion.

File: 512833bf1f988140fdb3f7894e045603_full[1].jpg (132KB, 1280x459px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1280x459px

>>655490880
If you download a fullHD movie, you can see it more clearly.

>>655489656
even hollywood is waking up slowly.
it wont be that much longer until we have a global state of how things were in japan around the 80s within this area...

Literally the only problem will be those millions of JSW fighting it...

>>655490822
Sorry, but USA is stuck in the dark ages where reality is oppressed. The age of consent is 18 in USA. Read - >>655490736

>>655490995
*sjw.... jesus me

>>655489656
Oh. You PC too bro?

File: 1440542533045.jpg (96KB, 665x810px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 665x810px

>>655490994
thanks bro, have tits.

>>655490614
>hurr durr u r a newfag

Nigger, I've been posting on /pol/ since its inception. I thought people on /b/ would recognise Jewish corruption of our youth when they saw it, but apparently not.

You are a cancer on the white race. End yourself.

>>655488446
I never even took notice. I always watched her thinking "what a kick-ass daughter she'd be" regardless of her role. Remembering the nature of the Chloë threads of the past years, I don't think I'm alone in this.

I'm sort of sad she grew up.

>>655491133
Keep talking your bullshit you mainstream faggot. Please go back to facebook. Don't bring your cancer here.

Sjw feminist pussy.

>>655490822
>Euro's

Learn to read critically 12 year old

>>655490822
>Euro's
>Europe is a continent

He said Euro's, that kinda means European countries.

>>655490736
You literally supported my post with that reference. Are you fucking inbred?

>>655490736
this. so many fags ignoring the facts because to them knowledge is scary and has implications. what you posted isn't even an opinion its just literally fact. not sure how anyone can deny. +1

>>655491543
Well, he's still wrong. I'm from an European country and the age of consent is 16 and you can still get fucked up if the parents find out and decide to sue.

>>655489656
everything is always "ok"
youll learn that eventually, kid
nobody cares about shit like this as long as it's entertaining

>>655488446
I'm gonna need pics from those scenes before I decide op

>>655491661
You seemed to have posted it as if it was a negative thing. First world countries come to the conclusion by experts conclusion and studies in many fields, not just a few. USA and the rest of the third world base it off emotions and refuse to consult professionals because they know what the answer will be - as proven by every single other first world country.

America is the one that is backwards my friend. They are the ones aligning the laws with countries like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria and El Salvador to name a few.


>>655491744
Thanks.

File: Ages_of_Consent_-_United_States_svg.png (97KB, 959x593px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 959x593px

Fags.

>>655488446
Could you explain in what way a kid panties is sexual? I think problem is with your head and how it perceives certain images.

>>655488446
This is a list of scenes OP wants to add pictures of to his collection. OP wants you fags to do the heavy lifting by posting said scenes then debating it. OP is a faggot.

File: This.jpg (7KB, 192x192px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 192x192px

>>655492015

>>655492046
First of all you forgot the map key.

Second of all the states listed as below 18; 80% of those have a clause attached stating for example "The age of consent is 16 if you are within 3 years above 16 (meaning 18) if you are older than that then the consent age reverts to the national consent age of 18. Other first world countries do not have such clauses. None of them.

some people here watched waaay to much porn, so now everytime they see someone halfnaked its always related to sex haha,,,

>>655492097
Yes, I need you to give me the pics because stuff like search engines do not exist

>>655491264
>doesn't address single point I made
>"bak 2 fasebuk!!"
>feminist strawman

You really don't realise that you're supporting cultural degeneracy, do you? That the defilement of our children is how the ZOG starts?

God, you untermensch make me want to puke. Fucking nigger, you should be deported back to your spic Mexico.

>>655489656
She looks absolutely delicious in that pic. I gotta start watching all the movies OP listed.

>>655492385
>Implies never made a strawman themselves.
>Implies valid and logical points were made
>doesn't address a single point I made dispute factual evidence all throughout the thread.
>Proceeds to use ad hominems.
>Thinks they are actually intelligent.
>Probably autistic or has some sort of mental/learning disability.

Enjoy your brain cancer.

>>655491264 (You)
>>655492385 (You)

Is this samefag seriously arguing with himself? I don't know whether you're just an attention-seeker or schizophrenic.

>>655492638
>says "they"
>THEY

fucking gender-neutral pronoun tumblrette detected. Please go back to fucking your pony statuette of Bernie Sanders, you disgusting negroid ape

File: Laughing-Face-Meme-07[1].jpg (247KB, 2048x1544px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 2048x1544px

>>655492686
>manually adding (You)
>mfw

>>655489656
I'm okay with this.

File: lols.png (6KB, 762x123px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 762x123px

>>655492686
Are you sure you aren't the one with schizophrenia seeing as you are imagining things?

>>655490400
OP is overreacting.

>>655492781
How was I supposed to know if the person was a male or female (I mean what they literally are, not what they "identify as" or any of that bullshit).

Now that this place is mainstream since about 2008 give or take, plenty of females browse /b/.

/b/ and 4chan as a whole is a normal website for mainstream faggots nowadays. It is nothing of what it used to be. Not even a shadow of its former self.

>>655488446
i love chöle so much

>>655492925

Samefag confirm
Actually f12-ing to get rid of "you"
That's how much of a pathetic fuck you are, think about it for one second

Is this how you argue with your genderkin landplanetoids on Tumblr? This is not how debates on 4chan work, newfag, your bloggers have misinformed you.

lol OP, if you think this is sexualizing, you should watch some movies from the 70's. Eva Ionesco will seem like Sasha Grey compared to Chloe.

File: 2489299082522.jpg (51KB, 400x385px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 400x385px

>>655493205

>>655493086
>How was I supposed to know if the person was a male or female (I mean what they literally are, not what they "identify as" or any of that bullshit).
>How was I supposed to know if the person was a male or female

CUCK
U
C
K

"He" is the typical assumed pronoun, you motherfucking illiterate nigger. Back to Nigeria.

File: 1388163640588s.jpg (1KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 100x100px

>>655493205
Faggot.

>>655490555
>implying fucking 14 year olds makes you a pedophile
>not knowing what hebephiles or ephebophiles are
Casual.

File: Shh.png (185KB, 274x300px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 274x300px

>>655493302

File: 1387917887604.png (166KB, 560x400px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 560x400px

>>655493287
You're a real pathetic little cunt, aren't you? Does this argument trigger you? Are you actually upset enough to descend to nigger-speak?

God you're autistic.

>>655493480
self portrait, anon?

Seems like you're the one sexualizing innocent little girls here, OP.
Or do you think girls have clothing covering their entire bodies from they're born until they turn 18?

>>655493086
4chan is, in no sense, mainstream. A tiny amount of people use it or look at it ever. It's a niche site for a relatively few people. I have never seen it referenced anywhere on the net except on other niche sites. When mentioned on an actual mainstream site it's never as a "fellow mainstream site" but as a weird and objectionable abomination.

File: 124919891491.jpg (30KB, 640x454px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 640x454px

>>655493543

File: 5387.png (103KB, 226x256px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 226x256px

>>655493399
>implying phrases like hebephile, ephebophiles, hababaphiles, ehebananaphiles are anything more than an attempt at making it sound less disgusting

File: 1385895122049.png (9KB, 478x265px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 478x265px

>>655493603
>Actually imagines 4chan is what it used to be.
>Actually believes 4chan isn't mainstream now.
>Imagines this place is still what it was in it's glory day and doesn't realize the reason it isn't is because of cancer newfaggots like yourself.

Newfaggot confirmed. An hero please.

File: 1419331149881.jpg (54KB, 682x554px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 682x554px

>>655493815
"an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger. As a medical diagnosis, specific criteria for the disorder extends the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia (Wikipedia has citation, they got this information from 4 different websites made up of Gov Medical, psychological and dictionary websites. Here is one of them citations - http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/psychopathology-and-personality-traits-pedophiles

Also

"The words pedophile and pedophilia are sometimes used informally to describe an adult's sexual interest or attraction to pubescent or post-pubescent teenagers and to other situations that do not fit within the clinical definitions. Researchers state that the above uses for the term pedophilia are imprecise or suggest that they are best avoided. The Mayo Clinic states that pedophilia "is not a criminal or legal term" " - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#Misuse_of_medical_terminology (Mayo Clinic is a nonprofit medical practice and medical research group based in Rochester, Minnesota. It is the first and largest integrated nonprofit medical group practice in the world, employing more than 3,800 physicians and scientists and 50,900 allied health staff. The Mayo Clinic has been recognized by the American Government to be the best hospital in the nation 2014-2015 - http://www.mayoclinic.org)

>>655493815
Get wrecked faggot.

>>655488446
And now all men are fawning over her and will watch any action flick she is in for $8 per show plus popcorn and drinks. She is getting filthy rich off of it.

It's called a business model and investment into future gains.

>>655488446
Now those movies are my plan for the weekend, thanks anon

>>655493815
>not knowing that pedophiles want prepubescent CHILDREN
>not knowing that hebephiles want younglings age 11-14 when puberty is starting or has been underway
>not knowing that ephebophiles want postpubescent teens age 15-19

Stupid motherfucker. I'm not a pedophile. I'm a ephebophile. Most men are, but dumbshits like you are so pussy whipped by SJW scum that you believe liking anything under 18 makes you a pedophile. Fucking kill yourself, retard. We don't need your cancer in the gene pool.

>>655493815
And to add to>>655494034 post, all child molesters are pedophiles, but not every pedophile is a child molester.

>>655494436
gtfo, this thread is for Chloephiles.

>>655489656
Pretty Baby did exactly what it was supposed to do though. It showed the extreme disparity between morals, standards and practices from 1917 to barely 60 years later. Child prostitutes from that time were (possibly) alive to watch that movie.

It's also a good way for women to test if their husbands might be pedos. Get to the scene and grab crotch to check for boner. If boner then pedo so no kids for him.

>>655494628
kek

>>655494436
>makes fun of SJWs for made up bullshit
>uses made up bullshit to define themselves
never change

>>655494825
>made up bullshit
Yeah, because actual medical terms are made up, right? Check your sources before you call me a bullshitter, faggot. Stay cucked by the media and women everywhere, scum.

I love how you don't even have a proper retort for me, either. It's just "hurr durr bullshit retard hurrrr." Please, end your life.

>>655494825
>Implies real facts that are researchable by you are "made up".
>Doesn't take 10 seconds to google it.

I'm not the guy you were responding to but you truly have very low IQ, mentally challenged, etc.

>>655495036
>actual medical terms
LOL no they're actually not (source: my brother is a doctor), but i love how buttmad you're getting about me calling bullshit on your rationalizations

>>655495203
ooh some more butthurt. let the anger flow through you, pedo

>>655495036
Not who you replied to, but agreed with you in that well, it's completely normal for guys to be physically attracted to teens they cannot legally fuck. Age of consent is there not because morals (or at least not entirely), but because the majority of people below a certain age are still too mentally immature for a relationship. Plus, the government wants the population to complete basic education before having a family.

Still doesn't mean you should break the law though because legal consequences. Plus everyone insists their teen love is "that one kid who's really mature for her age so the relationship and consent are all genuine, I swear" but that is statistically unlikely to be true

>>655488446
Its super obvious shes a hooker in "The Equalized" which is actually The Equalizer.

>>655494825
>>655495458

You are a true representative of this generation. Social justice warrior faggot feminist bullshit political correctness.

Are you afraid of knowledge and research? Do you have facts and evidence? Why do you prefer to life in a fairy tale written by yourself?

I have to assume you are one of these college students protesting headmasters about the need of a "safe space" and calling him a piece of shit for saying Halloween costumes are fine to wear. Snapping your fingers instead of clapping because clapping might be "triggering" to some people. You fucking faggot.

>>655495458
>how about a real citation?
>so once people are in the midst of their puberty or in fact nearing the end of it, and have developed many secondary sexual characteristics, it's still gross and "pedo" to be attracted to them?
>some of the teens I see on TV, if I saw any in real life, I would swear they look 20+

>>655490822
The U.S. is a country that has different states, and in every state the laws are different. Try to not make yourself look so stupid.

>>655495458
>source: my brother is a doctor
Kek, that's all I needed to hear, faggot. You continue to refuse to look up either term, but use your "brother" as a source. Even if your brother is a doctor, is he a psychologist? No, he's just a physician, right? Or are you gonna tell me he's a psychologist and a physician? Just admit that you're a stupid, lying faggot already.

>>655490358

but all that shit is swept under the rug and people pretend it never happened, it wasn't considered edgy back then, but now it's like they're pushing an agenda

>>655495682
see below because it touches on the "law" and what you claim to be "illegal".
>>655490736

also you cannot group everyone together and say just because someone is a certain age they are more mature or less mature. In my whole life I've met 14 year olds who are as mature as what you'd expect a 25 year old to be and I have met 25 year olds who have been lacking in maturity as much as you would expect a 14 year old to be.

The thing is, it's all on an individual basis if you want to think logically. People are different. Especially if the person is gifted/very smart or on the flip side of the person is "ditzy" or just plain stupid/immature.

It's more common than you think too. Would have been about half the younger crowd I met growing up who were extremely mature, meanwhile half the older crowd when I was growing up later on was extremely immature.

>>655495931
see
>>655494034
and
>>655490736

>>655490822
>being this autistic

>>655488446
america has a real love/hate relationship with white jailbait ass. They just salivate waiting for these girls to turn 18 and turn into total whores then they are all like "where did it all go wrong? must be drugs."

For a country that vilifies teenage sexuality we sure do watch a lot of it.

>>655496132
There are sources and evidence posted in this thread faggot.

Do you not know how to read? If you don't believe the links and quotes posted in the thread (which there is no reason to because it is medical and psychological websites usually government funded and do not have an agenda) then you cannot go further to do your own research?

You are basing all this off your illogical emotions and feelings about the situation and refusing to accept reality in the way of facts and evidence provided for you in this world.

>>655488763
Fap

>>655496324
But the law does group everyone together and follow general trends. There is no clear cut-off of course, for the age at which a suitable number of teenagers have reached emotional maturity, which explains the global differences in age of consent.

Sure it might be unfair to you if your love really is "mature enough", but refer to the fact that teens are behind the SJW movement and bad YA novels and all that, and indeed the law cares little for your personal experience of exceptions

>>655494628
That would really suck for the husband if he just got bored during the movie and started fantasizing about sex before he was crotch-groped.

>>655488446
duh? she's beautiful and that's what happens I don't think she's been overdone though as solely a sexual character and that's what makes her different, some girls are thrown in solely to be eye candy and no other reason. like megan fox in transformers, I don't like her look really but most people find her hot as hell. I think Chloes being slightly sexual but not all the way adds to the titillation though but I mean half of those things are actually part of the movie, like in Carrie she's in the shower room when she has her period... dressing like a hooker ? duh she's going to be dressed sexualized, wearing short shorts and such in private is normal it'd be unusual for someone to be dressed fully when they're home alone, wearing a towel when she comes out of the shower in Let Me In ? it's part of the plot when the child has to give her one of his mums dresses at least in the book and Let the right one in .
anyways why even care? It's not the 1930s anymore stop hiding from sex as a reality

>>655496646
I'm done arguing with you, faggot. I'll just post

http://web.archive.org/web/20110623130406/http://www.usccb.org/comm/kit6.shtml

Get based, faggot.

>>655497134
By the way, I'm not insinuating that breaking this particular law is in any way immoral if your love interest is precocious, but it is illegal. We cannot stop it from being illegal due to the points I will raise. I'm not saying either that this particular law is wholly fair and rational. It's just there for what is best for society as a whole, including that point a while back on family planning

>>655491815
jesus christ america's weird obsession with nipple slips .... I don't understand it it's so dumb a woman is clothed legaly if her nipples are covered and her pubis and ass crack wtf ? but could they wear a bikini that is skin tone and has the print of nipples and the bottom has the front with pubic hair ? it'd be considered technically obscene because of the pubic hair alone. but if it was just skin tone it wouldn't. any show of female pubic hair is considered obscene and pornographic

File: Screenshot_2015-12-04-10-12-27.png (828KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

828KB, 1440x2560px

>>655496646
>>655497355
It's a dot com website so I can't post the link, but literally type in "medical term for hebophilia and ephebophilia" and you'll get the these same links. Fucking pussy.

File: Screenshot_2015-12-04-10-12-47.png (853KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

853KB, 1440x2560px

>>655497856
>>655497355
>>655496646
Checkmate, faggot.

>>655497134
But look at the picture in this post >>655494034

The law does make exceptions, society does make exceptions. But only when it suits them (usually only when a female is the older one).

But as shown by that copypasta of legal ages around the world - Every single first world country except the USA have an age of consent 16 or lower with no clauses attached, no special rules except for the "not allowed to be in a position of authority" of that specific person rule which is applicable in nearly every country on earth. But no rules such as "You must be within x years for 16(or whatever it is) to be valid)". The only place that has that is the USA, why? To make it seem like the are up to speed with all the other first world countries by writing 16 but at the same time putting a whole bunch of fine print clauses, which again I will say, other first world countries DO NOT HAVE.

The national age for USA (which is what all the clauses revert to when you are more than 3 years older or whatever the clause in the US state specifies) is 18. Essentially 90% of America age of consent is 18 because saying "16 but you have to be within 3 years" is not a true age of consent. An age of consent means you can consent to anyone of any age as long as they are also over the age of consent. It's been said over and over again - The reason every single first world country comes up with similar numbers of 16 or lower is because they all bother to consult medical and psychological experts before creating/reviewing the law. USA and all the other third world countries base the law off feelings and nothing else. If they listened to experts in their own country, such as Mayoclinic as an example which was posted earlier, they would have a lower age.

>>655497543
Uptight puritan faggots.

>>655497856
>>655497914
Because fuck genuine medical expert opinions right?

>Better find a "free dicitionary.com" definition that confirms my bias.

You're laughable.

>>655490736
Lets not forget that Spain has an age of consent of 13, and incest is perfectly legal

>>655495458
wow your brother is a doctor and you're a retard, funny how that works, it's weird that you guys don't share knowledge.... besides is he a psych doctor ? hebephilia is normal it's the peak breeding time for a woman thus that's why we find those traits desirable. Look at the most famous actresses in hollywood through history and such, they tend to retain youthful features and that's their visual appeal

>>655498264
Let's somehow forget that Spain actually raised the age of consent to 16 around 2013.

Let's somehow forget that the age of consent in Canada used to be 14 till USA politicians pressured them to raise it in 2006 to 16. Meanwhile, the law used to be 16 in canada then was reviewed and lowered to 14 then America stuck their ass in saying they had to change it "because feels" and fuck expert consultation.

>>655498217
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary/com/hebephilia
Replace the / with .
>medical dictionary
>medical
>dictionary
>doesn't even read the first link I submitted
You are most definitely what's wrong with the world right now. Again, you've allowed yourself to get cucked by SJW scum and older women everywhere that know they pale in comparison to a younger, more fertile young woman. You have yet to give me any valid source as to why you think you're right besides "my brother is a doctor."
The only laughable one is you, child.

>>655498207
exactly it's fucked up that america is still stuck in this weird dark age fantasy that we should revert back to "traditional values" like using the bible for well gimme a break it's just a reason to not like gays. but most people are so afraid of sex. the first time I left the country and was in germany I was settling into my hotel and shit and had the tv on for a few and a topless ad was on and was like wow... that's odd lol and people don't treat sex like it's a forbidden subject or whatever. I'm originally form Poland don't remember much from their but here in the states now and sex is such a forbidden topic but it's weird that men talk about it around men and women talk about it around women but society just wants to think that men talk and think about it. most of my friends are girls and I'm bi so they talk about shit around me but I'll walk in on much more lurid subjects of conversation then if I was there. I've fucked like half of them and they'll even talk about that, I tend to date friends and people I shouldn't but we're very liberal so it's awkward for a couple weeks then it's back to normal

>>655498710
Because "Medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com" is certainly a better source of information than Mayoclinic or any other genuine medical source!

Do you have a learning disability?

My point was based of exactly what you wrote.
For some reason you actually believe that posting a photo from "Thefreedictionary" is a better source then a world renown medical research facility and hospital.

What world do you live in where this is the correct way to think?

>>655497543
What the fuck are you even saying? All I read is incoherent babble.

>>655499311
sorry english isn't my first language, and I speak 4 so it's hard sometimes, basically I find it fucked up that as long as nipples and the pubis and slit of the vagina are covered up a woman is not nude in american media.

>>655491815
fake

>>655496324
>mature 14 yr olds
>had small talk with 14 yr old and he/she said some smart things
>now thinks there are mature 14 yr olds

toppest keks

>>655499155
Did you even read the first link I posted? Or are you going to continue dodging my question? You are reprehensible.

>>655498264
No they don't you inbred fucktard

File: 1449023406706.jpg (113KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 960x640px

>>655497914
>shooped
link or it didnt happen

File: WTF.png (223KB, 650x340px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 650x340px

>>655499550
American media's additude towards media is truly weird, I agree. I remember a scene in Hannibal where a woman is sewn into a horse, which was fine. Yet her nipple was covered because it would've offended sensibilities or some backwards reason.

>>655500106
I already posted the link here>>655498710

>>655500106
I fell for this guy. I completely understand his pain.

File: Screen Shot 2015-12-04 at 10.43.03 AM.png (304KB, 1280x651px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1280x651px

>>655497914
>>655497856
see?

>>655488446
How does one sexualize an effeminate looking boy in a dress?

>>655501004
I know, that literally what I posted, but I'm on mobile, in class.

>>655499722
"The term hebephilia has been proposed to denote the erotic preference for pubescent children (roughly, ages 11 or 12-14)"
Source - search google; pubmed 18686026 and you will find the government medical website.

"Ephebophilia is the primary or exclusive adult sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19" - Search wikipedia - Ephebophilia. If you don't know how to read wikipedia sources at the bottom of the page you are a pleb.

What are you trying to prove?

>>655501140
>faggot didnt read

kek

>>655501014

gee, i wonder

>>655489656
There is nothing sexual in this picture so I don't understand the problem. Care to elaborate?

>>655488446

I'm going to need to see Chronological Screen shots of all of the above to make a determination.

>>655501014
First we had Chloe threads, then came the trap threads...

>>655501233
>what are you trying to prove
What you just fucking wrote. I've been saying that from the very beginning, but you were denying that they're medical terms because your "brother is a doctor," or are you too stupid to remember?

File: 1407012240917.jpg (54KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 400x400px

>>655492871
>>655492686
TOPPEST KEKS

>>655501746
Have you seen the recent AMA pics of her? I was half expecting to see a 'bulge' under her dress..

>>655501297
Kek, noticed it now

File: A7Cmh.jpg (45KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 500x500px

your chloe thing is just embarassing, op.

why do you care this much? I'm starting to think you are a gigantic faggot.

>>655501766
I'm not that person who said anything about a brother being a doctor.

But what does these terms prove in your mind? How is Ephebophilia a negative term?

Were you not the one saying "It's all the same" when these definitions prove there is distinct lines between the definitions? There is pubmed study saying hebe is very common too, something like near half of people?

>>655488446
>early age

a human female can go thru puberty as early as the age of 8 (if she has been eating a genetically modified and hormone rich diet) so that means that girls can have sexual thots as early as that age.

if the girl is thinking about it and the guy is thinking about it its not too early. its just the right time.