Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: deezle_vs_racer.jpg (28KB, 818x459px) Image search:
[Google]
28KB, 818x459px
How do you judge a wrestler's ability in the ring? Do you place more weight on the number of moves they can perform, or their ability to perform their moves consistently?
If you look at someone like Styles, he's got both down pat - a decent variety, and he executes them with a high degree of accuracy. There are plenty of other wrestlers who don't botch, but are boring because their movesets are something like >abdominal stretch >side slam >clothesline over the top rope >shitty submission maneuver
How would you change a boring wrestler's moveset to make it more interesting?
>>
if teh crowd pops
>>
>>2965464
>that pic
Sir... you can take your gay porn and GEEEETROUT!
>>
>>2965464
>their ability to perform their moves consistently
This, plus connecting with the audience.
Stone Cold's offense was primarily punches and kicks but the crowd loved his character so much that they went nuts for everything he did.
It doesn't matter how many moves, flips or stunts you do if the audience isn't emotionally invested.
>>
The less moves the better. All the moves must not involve any lifting whatsoever apart from the finisher. The finisher needs to have a silly name and some theatrics.
>>
By how good their performance is
>>2965492
kek
>>
>>2965464
Number of moves is meaningless. It's more important for a wrestler to connect with the audience through a strong personality, tell a good story and perform the moves they do have with minimal botches.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1