>According to Nash, the criticism that he did not draw as WWE's top guy is unwarranted because nobody drew at that time, even though WWE had the likes of Steve Austin, Bret Hart, Triple H, Shawn Michaels, The Undertaker, and many other top stars of the Attitude Era all under the WWE umbrella at the same time. Nash divulged that he probably did not even have 100 matches under his belt at the time he held WWE's top championship
literally trying to blame everyone for him being an absolute no draw
how embarassing
Austin wasn't even in WWE until January 1996, soo...
>>2933050
thats how you know Nash was making up stories
hes just a plain loser and a geek who always skipped leg day
Whoa Nash better be careful there, he might tear a quad making excuses for himself
Eh, he's not entirely wrong. The WWF had to take out loans in 1997 just to stay in business. Austin was over by 1997, but he wasn't red hot until the Tyson angle in early 1998. Coincidentally when the WWF finally started turning the tide against WCW.
>>2933081
>The WWF had to take out loans in 1997 just to stay in business.
Maybe they wouldn't have needed to if Diesel had drawn...
>>2933081
>Eh
cringe
>>2933026
He's right. In comparison to the Hogan era nobody drew. The steroid and sex scandals really did a number on the business. But Diesel drew more than most during those lean times. Credit nWoWolfpacTV for the stats.
>>2933099
A CLUE ..... GET ONE.
>>2933201
nwowolfcuck is a stupid mark that should be shot and killed on sight
>>2933050
96 and 97 drew less than 95
Shawn Bret Sid Taker and Austin were top stars in that period