Mick Foley winning the title won the night and turned the MNW

>>2905967
Eric Bischoff and Hulk Hogan killed WCW.

File: THIS.png (94KB, 770x424px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 770x424px

>>2905967
>>2905967
>Mick Foley winning the title won the night and turned the MNW in WWE's favour

Goldberg was WCW champion when Nitro started losing to RAW. The last rating battle Nitro won 10/21/1998. Bischoff rubber stamped Nash beating Goldberg because Nitro had lost to RAW 9 weeks in a row with Goldberg as WCW Champion.

Kevin Nash winning the title killed WCW
>Starrcade 98 drew a 1.15 PPV buyrate (450,000 buys). It was the 3rd best buyrate in WCW history.
>Starrcade 98 also drew a sellout of 16,066 paying $584,236 and another $114,120 in merchandise. It was the largest gate for a WCW PPV event in history and fourth largest ever for the company.
>Nitro in Baltimore on 12/28 drew a SELLOUT 13,358 (11,233 paying $263,315).
>Nash's first Nitro as WCW Champion drew a 4.6 rating up from 4.0 the prior week.
>WCW on 12/29 at Nassau Coliseum drew 12,323 paying $398,990 headlined by Nash vs. Goldberg vs. Giant. It was the largest gate for a WCW house show in history.
>WCW on 12/30 in Philadelphia at the Spectrum drew 17,196 paying $286,838 (about 800 shy of capacity) headlined by Nash vs. Goldberg. It was the 2nd largest attended house show in the history of the company.
>Nitro at Georgia Dome on 1/4 drew 38,809 (34,788 paid) paying $930,735. It was the 2nd biggest crowd & gate in WCW history.
>Nash's second Nitro as WCW Champion drew a 5.0 rating up from 4.6 the prior week.

After Nash lost the title to Hogan, although they were losing to WWF in ratings, their ratings and business still went up e.g. Hogan vs. Flair did basically the same amount of PPV buys at SuperBrawl as the supposed hottest feud in wrestling: Austin vs. McMahon.

Pic courtesy of ledge NWOWolfpacTV.

Hope you learned something today.

>>2906077
>Pic courtesy of ledge NWOWolfpacTV.

t. Wolfcuc

>>2906077
>fucking Wolfcuck
Does that dribbling mess of a cretin lurk here?

>>2906101
Yes. Anybody denying it, citing or praising him is wolfcuc.

>>2906095
>>2906101
>>2906108

Not only scared of my facts but intimidated by boy based Wolfpac's sophistication. TOPKEK!
Can't tell you how you how much I admire the man's ability to work asp into a shoot.

>>2906126
>sophistication

He's a Geordie developmentally-arrested and stuck in 1999

>>2906127
You know more about him than me! GET A LIFE PLEASE! for the love of GOD!

>>2905967

nWo being unbeatable killed WCW. nWo becoming stale killed WCW. The payouts to nWo members killed WCW.

AOL Time Warner killed ultimately WCW because they didn't want to admit professional wrestling was their number one rated show. USA didn't care that professional wrestling was or is their number one rated show because they were still the number one rated network, but AOL Time Warner execs wouldn't have it because they were embarrassed that they were paying millions more a year then USA for second place ratings.

>>2906138
I suppose that's technically true Wolfcuc since at least I can be honest about (You)

>>2906151
nWo had nothing to do with WCW's death.

>nWo being unbeatable killed WCW
nWo was not unbeatable. DDP beat Savage. Flair/Piper/Greene beat Nash/Hall/Syxx. Luger beat Hogan. DDP beat Hennig. Sting beat Hogan. Goldberg beat Hogan. Goldberg beat Giant. Flair beat Bischoff to become president. Mysterio beat Nash
>nWo becoming stale killed WCW
Numbers prove otherwise. Only after WCW stopped doing focusing on the nWo due to injuries did numbers go down in May 1999.
>The payouts to nWo members killed WCW.
Not true. The big stars were paid by Turner Home Entertainment not WCW. That's why when WWE bought WCW, Nash, Goldberg, Sting, etc. continued to get paid by Turner and WWE didn't want to buy them out of their huge contracts.

You're right about AOL/Time Warner merger being the main reason WCW died. nWo success just delayed inevitable. When Ted Turner lost power, Turner suits who hated wrestling were getting rid of wrestling regardless of how successful it was doing.

I also think you're mixing up USA Network with TNT. Bonnie Hammer of USA Network was a huge supporter of WWE on USA Network.

>>2906077

Kevin Nash didn't draw
>Starrcade headlined by Nash does 450k buys
>17,000 for house show headlined by Nash
>38,000 for Nitro headlined by Nash
>13.8 million fans watching wrestling on a Monday night with 7.75 million fans watching Nash's match

CM Punk's best PPV buys was 369,000 for SummerSlam 2011. Daniel Bryan's best PPV buys was 332,000 buys for SummerSlam 2013. RAW today does 2.5 to 3.5 million viewers. RAW does max 10k fans. House Shows average 3,000-4000.

REALLY MAKES YOU THINK.

>>2906077
>be me
>let's fuck around with a random Mick Foley vs Nash thread and see if someone get triggered
>Wolfcuc gets triggered

WORKED

>>2906126
I'm losing my shit here 'mate

>>2906298
>Starrcade headlined by Nash does 450k buys
Um Goldberg was the proven draw, Nash was the secondary draw, sweetie.

>>2906303
This after you got WORKED by my Daniel Bryan thread.

>>2906298
>comparing buys from 1998 to buys from 2011

>>2906311
You mean a thread where you got BTFO?

>claims to not be Wolfcuc
>now says he is Wolfcuc

>>2906310
>Goldberg was a proven draw.
Only show he does over 450k buys with is Kevin Nash.

Non-WrestleMania PPV's over 400,000 buys: Goldberg vs. Hogan vs. Austin vs. Rock

>Goldberg
450,000 buys (Starrcade 1998)

>Hogan
650,000 buys (Starrcade 1997)
634,000 buys (SummerSlam 2005)
625,000 buys (SummerSlam 1989)
575,000 buys (No Way Out 2002)
525,000 buys (Bash at the Beach 1998)
507,000 buys (SummerSlam 1990)
500,000 buys (SummerSlam 1988)
450,000 buys (SuperBrawl 1999)
450,000 buys (No Way Out 2003)
440,000 buys (Royal Rumble 1991)
400,000 buys (Backlash 2002)
405,000 buys (SummerSlam 1991)
400,000 buys (Survivor Series 1990)

>Austin
655,000 buys (SummerSlam 1998)
600,000 buys (SummerSlam 1999)
605,000 buys (Unoforgiven 2000)
575,000 buys (No Way Out 2002)
550,000 buys (No Mercy 2000)
465,000 buys (Armageddon 2000)
450,000 buys (Valentine Day Massacre 1999)
450,000 buys (No Way Out 2003)
445,000 buys (King of The Ring 2001)
440,000 buys (King of The Ring 1999)
425,000 buys (Survivor Series 1999)
405,000 buys (Judgment Day 2001)
400,000 buys (Backlash 1999)
400,000 buys (Over The Edge 1999)
400,000 buys (Survivor Series 2000)

>Rock
625,000 buys (Backlash 2000)
605,000 buys (Unforgiven 2000)
590,000 buys (No Way Out 2001)
579,000 buys (Royal Rumble 2013)
570,000 buys (Summerslam 2000)
565,000 buys (Summerslam 2001)
550,000 buys (No Mercy 2000)
516,000 buys (SummerSlam 2002)
475,000 buys (King of the Ring 2000)
465,000 buys (Armageddon 2000)
450,000 buys (No Way Out 2003)
425,000 buys (Survivor Series 1999)
420,000 buys (Judgment Day 2000)
400,000 buys (Backlash 1999)

LEARN WHAT A PROVEN DRAW IS.

>>2906311
I haven't posted here in months 'mate.

I came back, saw a Foley thread, decided to make this and you got worked hard.

Btw how does it feel to know that Nash failed in WWF and then killed WCW?

>>2906315
WORKED by Wolfpac because he thinks it's Wolfpac but doesn't know i'm not Wolfpac or am I Wolfpac?

>>2906316
>Wolfcuc getting so mad he posts his list of figures

File: HOF15_Photo_278-3451758083.jpg (113KB, 642x722px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 642x722px

>>2906320
FAKE NEWS. Research the numbers. Not hard. Numbers are historical facts not opinions.

2015 WWE HOF HEADLINER!

>>2906328
>Actually thinks I'm Wolfpac
That is all.

>>2906316
Holy KEK!
Goldberg BTFO!

>>2906336
Not being him would actually be more pathetic desu

>>2906343
Him living in your head rent free and talking about him regularly would be more pathetic. Do you go a day without discussing or thinking about him?

>>2905967
Found the faggot eDrone who believes WWE network "docudramas"

>>2906360
I wasn't even the first person to bring him up in here you moron.

>>2906151
You have no evidence to keep pulling this bullshit narrative. You're a dork, and the cool people who were interested in wrestling LOVED nWo. Literally 4 life, as proven by a bunch of Whos in Japan biting off them and the surge and immediate drop off when WWE brought them in and fucked them over. That was literally the death of the casual fan of wrestling. You can keep lying and crying because you didn't get your way as a kid and the wrestlers you liked were dorks just like you, but all you're doing is driving everyone away from the product with your bullshit lies and baby wants because you're a cancer that normal people dont want to associate with. Wrestling isn't for you. Your IQ may be low enough to watch wrestling but your T is too low. You should be reading comic books where the good guy always wins so you don't keep pissing your draws and crying yourself to sleep at night. Nope, on second thought, you fit right in with the mutants WWE caters to these days.

>>2906378
>arrested development manchild who isn't Y2K compliant shading anybody

>>2906378
HOLYSHIT!

One of the most on point like a decimal burials I've ever seen!

Kudos.

>>2906401
>poster count didn't go up

>>2906426
Use your brain dumbass. Maybe we've both already made more than 1 post in this thread.

>poster count
Also get a life

>>2906430
>t. wolfcuc

I love how Wolfpac makes asp neets seethe

>>2906316

I am actually impressed with the Rocks buys, considering he was never as protected as austin or Hogan or even Cena for that matter.

And we have morons today that think Punk and Bryan were as over as him.

>>2906503
Yeah, Rock lost a lot and looked weak a lot for a main eventer.

>>2906334
So what? Koko B Ware is in the Hall of fame.

>>2906503
Bryan was certainly as over as Rock.

>>2906517
Only amongst the indieriffic fans. As for the mainstream and casual fans that don't care for Rock was way over than Bryan. Get back to us when Bryan is the highest paying actor in Hollywood.

>>2906598
>being overpaid in Hollywood = being over in wrestling

>>2906455
Only NEET he makes "seethe" is himself

>>2906598
Too bad Hollyood hasn't produced a good movie in a decade, is going full cuck and Rock's Baywatch flopped.

>>2906614

This thread literally has list a PPV buys for the Rock .Does Bryan have a single 400k PPV buy excluding wrestlemania?

>>2906679

Go watch Dunkirk it's good.

>>2906862
>has list a PPV buys

calm down wolfcuc

>comparing PPV buys from over a decade between them

>>2906862
No.

Daniel Bryan's top PPV buys are as follows.
332,00 buys (SummerSlam 2013)
232,000 (Hell in a Cell 2013)
196,000 (Night of Champions 2013)
119,000 buys (Battleground 2013)

>>2906862
>>2906886
>replying to yourself

wolfcuc a faggot

>>2906871

Yeah that's why I asked for just one. He couldn't even draw with Cena in summer slam.

>>2906890

Then why am I getting only one (you) from you mate?

>>2906894
Royal Rumble 2012

>implying Cena is actually a draw

>>2906897
Because you're looking at it through one of the two devices (You) samefagged with

>>2906890

Also I don't care much about Nash but this 'wolfcuck' guy provides solid stats for BTFOing annoying Punk and Bryan fans who circlejerk about them being as over as Hogan or Rock or Austin. So I am glad he is around.

>>2905967

Kind of true, but in reality it was a lot of bad decisions over a longer period that eventually killed off WCW.

I can see your point, but you have to look at the bigger picture. People were getting more and more tired of seeing the same old faces in WCW's main event. Nash title reign and Hogan's Fingerpoke of Doom shortly after eroded their fan base over time.

Mick Foley was NOT THE game changer. Steve Austin's first title run turned the tide. It did help cement WWF's win, because it gave their heavy weight title scene another new fresh face.

>>2906901

Royal Rumble is the draw. Not Bryan.

>>2906904
This must be a ticket for a show headlined by WWF Champion Dielse: because nobody's buying it.

>>2906911
>goalposts

You asked. I answered.

>>2906151

WCW had a 65 million dollar loss in their dying days. That's enough to kill any tv-show and their numbers could not compensate for that.

>>2906298

Different times. Also it had to do with the other competitor in the ring, Bill Goldberg. Nash was also the booker who made himself look great and that was amongst the top reasons WCW took a big nosedive during 1999.

>>2906914

Well I was under the impression we were still operating under wolfpacks rules( no mania, no rumble , no megastars like cena, rock, Hogan).

You do realize that list would be longer with those included right.

>>2906908

>Kind of true
Not true

>People were getting more and more tired of old faces in WCW's main event
SuperBrawl IX headlined by Hogan vs. Flair drew both drew a 1.15 PPV buyrate (joint 3rd highest PPV buyrates in WCW history) & only 0.06 less than WWF St. Valentines Day Massacre headlined by the Austin vs. McMahon in a cage that same month which drew a 1.21 PPV buyrate.

>Nash's 2 week title reign eroded audience
See:
>>2906077

>Finger Poke of Doom eroded audience of time
Can you provide proof which directly links Finger Poke to WCW's fanbase eroding over time? Contrary to revisionist commentary, WCW's business and ratings actually went up after Finger Poke.

It's 2017 mate. The numbers are easily accessible. It's not hard to take one look at them and find the nonsense your parroting you've heard/seen others say is bullshit.

File: WWF-E Champ Domestic & International House Show Attendance Average.jpg (64KB, 280x445px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 280x445px

>>2906914
From nWoWolfpacTV twitter

Sorry but your neet opinion can't hold a candle to the facts.

>>2906934

Ok, genius, so why wasn't WCW not around anymore in 2001 if Hogan and Nash were the best draws ever? You can shout numbers after numbers for an eternity but WCW was still gone after two years.

>>2906944
>wolfpac
Fake news.

>>2906316
Um how often did Nash draw over 400 sweetie

>>2906922
>Different times
Yep, many fans had to decide if they were going to buy a WCW or WWF PPV each month. Guys like Punk and Bryan had luxury of fans only having WWE PPV's to choose from.

>Also it had to do with the other competitor in the ring, Bill Goldberg.
Prove it. All talk but no evidence. Wolfpac has already debunked this anyway. See picture.

>Nash was also the booker who made himself look great and that was amongst the top reasons WCW took a big nosedive during 1999.
Nash made himself look great buy laying down for Hogan, putting over Rey Mysterio and doing job for Goldberg in their rematch at Spring Stampede. WCW took a nosedive in 1999 for tonnes of reasons. Also if you're going to say Nash was responsible bring some reasons to table.

File: nvg.png (44KB, 840x308px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 840x308px

>>2906922
Said picture.

"It was all Goldberg" - you the dumbass

>>2905973
Bischoff and Hogan are WWE plants than Vince hires to kill other companies

>>2906962
How often did Goldberg? once with Nash.
How often did Nash? once with Goldberg.

Nash detractors retarded logic? Goldberg was 100% responsible.

Fact I have to keep pointing this out again and again speaks to the low IQ of Nash detractors. I mean maybe they have point if they could bring some supporting evidence to help their claim but they don't.

>>2907008
How often did Nash draw over 350?

>>2907008
Wouldn't even know where to begin looking for historical buy rates 2bh.

>>2905967
It was his winning it that killed WCW, it was his booking practices. And the fact that Hogan, Nash and other top guys would be given matching pay to the highest paid guys - and guess who was negotiating the contracts with new talent

>>2907043
PPV's over 350,00 buys

>Kevin Nash
450,000 buys (Starrcade 1998)
415,000 buys (SummerSlam 2003)
385,000 buys (Bad Blood 2003)

>Goldberg
450,000 buys (Starrcade 1998)
415,000 buys (SummerSlam 2003)
398,000 buys (Survivor Series 2003)

Nash like Goldberg has three PPV's over 350,000 buys.

However No Way Out 2002 drew 575,000 buys and the major reason why was due to the debut of the nWo (Hogan, Nash, Hall). Of course Nash detractors will probably say that it was ALL because of Hogan plus Rock and Austin being on the card.

HOWEVER Nash didn't appear on No Way Out 2003 with Hogan, Rock and Austin in the top 2 matches and the PPV drew 450,000 buys and thus 125,000 PPV buys than year prior.

>>2907071
Don't just say it. Prove it.

>>2907092
Main event, you idiot, not just when they appeared on the card.

Anyways, if you want to prove once and for if Nash was a draw (I don't particularly care, but I find your obsession with the man intriguing), why don't you work out the average attendence for EVERY house show main evented, and then EVERY ppv main evented, and see, on average, where he stacks up against other draws. That's as inarguable a method as you can use, and it will, once and for all, completely put down Diesal/Nash detractors.

Food for thought.

>>2907100
When he took the title off Goldberg, after the show where peoole tuned in to see the fallout from Starcade, the ratings tanked.

LOWEST

>>2907138
DRAWING

>>2907140
LEGLETT

>>2907140
CHAMPION

tore 8 thousand quads

never drew a dime

>>2907150
nWo was the draw, Nash was a cronnie.

Also reminder that he never worked morw than a 3.25 star match in ANY singles run and his average star rating is a pitiful 1.75

File: WWF Champ PPV Buyrates & Revneue Average.jpg (158KB, 684x434px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 684x434px

>>2907127
>>2907127
450,000 buys (Starrcade 1998) Main Event = Nash vs. Goldberg
415,000 buys (SummerSlam 2003) Main event = Nash vs. Goldberg vs. HHH vs. HBK vs. Orton vs. Jericho
385,000 buys (Bad Blood 2003) Main Event = Nash vs. HHH

>Goldberg
450,000 buys (Starrcade 1998) Main Event = Nash vs. Goldberg
415,000 buys (SummerSlam 2003) Main event = Nash vs. Goldberg vs. HHH vs. HBK vs. Orton vs. Jericho
398,000 buys (Survivor Series 2003) Main Event = Goldberg vs. HHH

You're the idiot, not me.

nWoWolfpacTV already did this

see
>>2906944
and
>>2906988
also see pic I got from his twitter

>>2907131
LMAO!!!!!

2 Nov 98 (4.1)
9 Nov 98 (4.1)
16 Nov 98 (4.3)
23 Nov 98 (4.5)
30 Nov 98 (4.2)
7 Dec 98 (4.2)
14 Dec 98 (4.2)
21 Dec 98 (4.0)
> 27 Dec 98 - Starrcade
28 Dec 98 (4.6)
4 Jan 99 (5.0)
11 Jan 99 (5.0)
18 Jan 99 (4.4)
25 Jan 99 (5.0)
1 Feb 99 (4.7)
8 Feb 99 (5.7)
15 Feb 99 (3.9)
22 Feb 99 (4.8)
29 Feb 99 (4.3)

> Nitro average rating
Nov 98 (4.24)
Dec 98 (4.25)
Jan 99 (4.85)
Feb 99 (4.68)

ITT Wolfpac burying the competition who are trying to step to him

>>2905973
There wouldn't even have been a MNW without them.

>>2907151
Star ratings? Only star ratings that matter are buyrates, merchandise sales, ticket sales & TV ratings. That's how you rate a "star".

Stars are not real...Money is...Its a business.

Like it or not, Nash got paid and more so than most.

Go back to sucking off Meltzer and get off of /asp.

>>2907092
I agree with you for the most part but no way out 2003 didn't have the novelty of 2002s first ever appearance of the Nwo and overall a less hyped PPV.

>>2907151
>Also reminder that he never worked morw than a 3.25 star match in ANY singles run

Nash vs Shawn IYH Good friends Better Enemies
Nash vs Bret Survivor Series 95

So, what I get from this thread:
-Mick Foley was a huge draw for some reason
-Kevin Nash not so much. When he started writing, he killed WCW
-there's a twitter dude with a boner for Nash that posts his tweets here

SAD

>>2907237
Foley a huge draw based on what exactly?

>>2907244
WWF started winning in the ratings with Foley as champ

Lol at Nash booking his dick to pin Goldberg. 1 move, company dead. Instead of creating talent he buried them. Fucking egomaniac.

File: WWF & WCW Monday Night Wars Ratings.jpg (332KB, 1149x854px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1149x854px

>>2907250
WRONG. WCW Nitro last won ratings on Oct 21, 1998. The Rock was WWF Champion in November 1998 after winning at Survivor series. Mick Foley won title on Jan 4, 1999.

This has already been pointed out ITT. You're a fucking idiot.

Why is /asp so dumb?

>>2907263
Hate to break it to you, but Nash wasn't booking. He wasn't the booker until late January 1999. Starrcade occurred on Dec 27, 1998.

>>2907271
I meant Oct 26, 1998.

>>2907250
So again how was Foley a huge draw exactly?

>arguing over how good your favorite children's TV show actor is by citing walls of text of pay per view buys and ratings
this is so fucking autistic

>>2907271
>Raw in 1999 had a peak rating of 8
>the average was six
>even WCW at its worst did 2.5
>Raw now struggles to get a rating of 2.

Roman Reigns.

>>2907299
That's great but can you tell me how Foley was a huge draw? this guy keeps telling me he was based on some dumb and flat out false logic.

>>2907286
top ratings, good merch sales and great crowd reactions


that's how they used to do business

>>2907276
Bullshit, everyone backstage confirmed Nash booked himself to win WW3 and end Goldberg's streak and WCW.

He's a fucking cancer.

File: Roman Reigns tops list of most 1 million view videos on WWE's YouTube channel.jpg (49KB, 514x487px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 514x487px

>>2907312
Roman Reigns is main reason ppl are still watching dipshit. It's the indie midgets and fatass Kevin Owens driving casual fans away.

The only person who ever posts about wolfcuk is wolfcuk

The only person who ever posts about carter is carter

the only person who ever posts about that bixen guy is that bixen guy.

The only person who ever posts about blampied is blampied.

Proof of this: nobody else on planet earth considers these people noteworthy in any way. Even their own mothers forget their birthdays some years.

>>2907322
Do you know how easy it is to fake YouTube views

>>2907322
I would say it is no one person, but the generally embarrassing, childlike tone of the whole show. It's like watching a Simon Cowell talent show but the cast is made up of Jim Henson muppets, gurning and winking towards the camera.

>>2907235
>2 of the best workers in the business couldn't even carry Nash to a decent match

File: streak.png (71KB, 761x541px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 761x541px

>>2907321
Bullshit my ass.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_HaD8bS46s

in video @
0:34 - Eric Bischoff accepts full responsibility for Goldberg's streak ending
2:00 - Nash on how he didn't book himself to beat Goldberg
3:34 - Nash on Bischoff deciding Goldberg should get beat
4:15 - head booker at the time Kevin Sullivan on Bischoff deciding the streak should end

You stupid brain dead E-drone.

File: 1474632475943.jpg (305KB, 691x859px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 691x859px

>>2907389
Bret v Diesel at 95 Survivor was easily a minimum of 4.5 stars.

All Bret's work desu, but still. Nash was there too.

>>2907399
Nah, ir was 3.5

>>2907401
watch it for yourself, don't rely on small dick chumps to tell you what it rates as.

>>2907399
Nash vs Goldberg was better than Nash vs. Bret.

I don't need someone else i.e. Meltzer to tell me what to think and like either unlike you.

Why does Wolfcuck always browse this board?

>>2907416
>Nash vs Goldberg was better than Nash vs. Bret
Lol no

>>2907423
Why you always mentioning him?

>>2907423
I dunno but isn't it funny a notorious channel about Kevin Nash can't draw more than 10k subscribers?

>>2907423
He has no life, no job, no friends, and no hobbies. He spends his time dissecting quarter-hour ratings from 20 years ago and putting together clips of wrestlers on talk shows from 1999.

>>2907426
It was better. It was brilliant big man match with a big match atmosphere with a way more memorable finish. Nash carries green Goldberg also. Try watching it instead of repeating the opinions you've heard other say online.

>>2907416
still laughing at your opinion.

But no, I have no idea what the Melt rates either match. Diesel Bret was the high point of Nash's career in terms of work rate, though.

>>2907431
I sense jealously.
Hard weeks graft doing your dead end 9-5 job?

Nash was not a bad wrestler. This is one of the biggest misconceptions in wrestling.

>>2907429
You must be looking at his 2nd channel. His main got 32k subs.

>>2907322
Except that youtube vids and social media are distorted by the number of Pajeets, who of course love Roman

Nice try Wolfcuc

>>2907454
Everyone knows he was the most overrated piece of trash of all times.

Egomaniac, buried talents, never drew a dime.

>>2906316

How many times did Haitch draw over 400k?

>>2907873
here comes the guy who's obssessed with Reddit and calls ''reddit'' everyone who disagrees with him

we also know who you are (((neet)))

>>2907865
when he's not wrestling Hogan, Austin, Rock + not including WrestleMania

480,000 buys (No Way Out 2000) vs. Foley
429,000 buys (Vengeance 2005) vs. Batista

when you include 3 megastars Hogan, Austin, Rock

600,000 buys (SummerSlam 1999) vs. Austin & Foley
625,000 buys (Backlash 2000) vs. Rock
570,000 buys (Summerslam 2000) vs. Rock & Angle
475,000 buys (King of the Ring 2000) w/ McMahons vs. Rock/Kane/Taker
465,000 buys (Armageddon 2000) 6 man HIAC
425,000 buys (Survivor Series 1999) vs. Austin (Big Show) & Rock
420,000 buys (Judgment Day 2000) vs. Rock
400,000 buys (Survivor Series 2000) vs. Austin
400,000 buys (Backlash 2002) vs. Hogan

>>2908177
I forgot to add SummerSlam 2003

>>2907446
>sense jealously

The state of wolfcuc

>>2907336
The Muppets unironically has better writing than WWE

>>2907429
kek BTFO

>>2906951
It wasn't fucking booking decision you dunce, it was financial ones. The product was always watchable and even better than WWE at the time.

>>2907321
Only bullshit is coming from your mouth straight from the ass of McMahon who fed it you edrone.

>>2906298
>REALLY MAKES YOU THINK.

About what? You're comparing buyrates from a time when wrestling was super popular to a time when no one gave a shit.

>>2905967
Is this on WWE Network?

>>2910330
Wrestling was super popular? erm yes and why? because of nWo specifcally Kevin Nash, Scott Hall and Hollywood Hogan.

Nash was major contrubuter to making wrestling cool and popular again on and off screen. CM Punk and Daniel Bryan not so much, so stop making exucses for them. If they were game changers like Nash they'd have made the business more popular during their time on top so their buyrates could be better but they didn't.

You fucking idiot. You stupidity fo you ppl never ceases to amaze me. You're a prime example why sponsorhships give wrestling shitty ad rates. Low income and dumb.

>>2910594
>You stupidity fo you ppl
>sponsorhships
>and dumb.

kek

>>2910594
Calm down Wolfpack