Why is Wrestling so obsessed with judging what's best on

>Matthew Stafford is going to become the highest paid player on NFL history, yet he isn't even close to the best player in the league now.

That's a flaw in the markets, not a legitimate strategy.

>Avatar had the highest box office ever, and nearly everyone knows it was a forgettable move that was average at best.

It had a ton of hype surrounding it -- only after the fact did people realize it was ass.

In short: shut the fuck up, mark.

>No other form of entertainment thinks this way.

Boxing and UFC

File: 1495333985827.jpg (46KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 480x480px

>>2790814
>Matthew Stafford is going to become the highest paid player on NFL history, yet he isn't even close to the best player in the league now.
HE FUCKING COULD BE IF THEY WOULD BUILD THIS OFFENSIVE LINE WORTH HALF A SHIT AND THEY DIDN'T RUN OFF MEGATRON GOD DAMMIT I HATE THIS FUCKING TEAM

>>2790820

Mighty Mouse is recognized as the best pound for pound fighter in the sport, but he can't draw a dime.

>Why is Wrestling so obsessed with judging what's best on what makes the most money?
Because what makes money is objective, whereas "good" wrestling is subjective. There, end the thread.

>>2790814
Because in wrestling there is no other "objective" measurement, since it is a work.

>>2791772
this

putting butts in the seats is the only way to measure success based on facts

>>2790817
>It had a ton of hype surrounding it -- only after the fact did people realize it was ass.

Sounds like most of the shows from WWE desu

>Why is Wrestling so obsessed with judging what's best on what makes the most money?

Because they aren't actually making any money in the wrestling business.