>Reminder that WrestleMania 34 is going to be about 2 in 23-2

>>2759863
If Brock sticks around I'd like to see him get into some main-event level feuds, but not in his god-mode that he's been in since breaking the streak. It'd be interesting for him to have some /comfy/ feuds, but not just show up and steal big 4 main-events from the people who carry the show year round. If we're lucky the other world championship will have an interesting feud, and Wrestlemania will be decent. Lesnar vs Reigns is actually a pretty good match, but a lot of people are soured to it because it's taking up another mania main-event.

Why are they waiting so long to put the title on Reigns again?

Seriously just get this shit over with at Summerslam

>>2759863
>#2BECOMES1
that means sex

>>2759863
just realized that after lesnar it'll be roman retiring cena and unifying the titles in the process

>>2759874
because this time you're going to love him with ever fiber of your being, dammit

>>2759871
WM31 was only great because Lesnar pretty much destroyed Reigns (even though WWE have since tried to re-write that history by reiterating Reigns would have won if it wasn't for Seth).

Problem with WM34 is that they're going to make Reigns way more on Lesnar's power-level, and it's going to be about Lesnar making Reigns look super-strong and super-awesome (like everyone else on RAM has to), and that's going to suck.

File: 542.jpg (62KB, 542x361px)

62KB, 542x361px

>>2759877
WrestleMania 35 Roman Regins vs John Cena?

Which means we get FOUR WrestleManias in a row which have ended with Roman's "Crowning Moment".