WWE's best logo is the WWE scratch logo prove me wrong pro

File: dde003dc94ca922bd87dcca9e502e4e1.jpg (29KB, 300x214px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 300x214px

>>2745502

>>2745524
>looks like two pieces of metal
>dumb gradient
>has a stupid flare on it
not even close

File: wwf_new_generation_arena_banner__1993_1996__by_hecrpd-d6l7ytp.png (134KB, 624x490px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 624x490px

>>2745502
I love that logo, but by the time they got ride of it, it was very dated and didn't suit the product well at all. Pic related is the best desu.

>>2745596
that logo reminds me of some channel that shows nothing but old sitcoms

File: WWF_Logo_Black_Version.jpg (85KB, 894x893px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 894x893px

At least post the real fucking logo

>>2745615
the F kills the aesthetic

>>2745617
18+

>>2745621
>he thinks people who didn't see the attitude era are under 18
people born in 1999 are 18 now dude, only a few more years before people born after that time period are 18

>>2745626
I'm sure all of those people born in 1999 saw the Attitude era as 1-3 year olds.

>>2745617
You're very very wrong there. It's the best logo they ever had

File: WWF_1994.png (20KB, 240x226px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 240x226px

Scratch logo is good for the edgy 90's aesthetic it was going for but around the time they lost the F it was dated as hell and stuck out like a sore thumb.

>>2745524

It's good but the gradient really gives it a "babbies first photoshop/wordart" aesthetic these days.

I'd argue pic related is the best. It's simple but not overly simplistic like the modern one (I fucking despise boring as fuck minimalist branding) and keeps the general aesthetic of the 80's logo.

File: WrestleManiaXIX.png (204KB, 631x293px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 631x293px

Which WM had the best logo and why is it pic related

>>2745930
I like WrestleMania 1's and 23's the most

File: wrestlemania-xx.gif (56KB, 323x307px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 323x307px

>>2745930

>>2745502

imagine thinking this