Time to get a concensus on /asp/, are you for PRO WRASSLIN or

I am for attitude era level segments (even if thats still trash TV) and ruthless aggresion era in-ring work

>>2724372
>all the wrestlers end up Benoited, Guerreroed, or Austined from the excess workload of having both skits and ring work to be excessively violent

>>2724365
Sports Entertainment is objectively better.

Sports Entertainment is dead. What's old will always become new again and pro wrestling is coming back.

Angles & Characters > "Great wrestling"

>>2725340
Why not both?

>>2725354
Because that wasn't the discussion pinhead

Sports entertainment. A match like Hogan vs Rock is better than any tokyko dome flippy fest by a mile. If you want to see wrestling go watch the olympics.

>>2724365
Pro Wrestling will always be more based and not cringe like "le sports entertainment". If you disagree then you are a certified babby E drone.

>>2724365
Russo and Cornette are both faggots

Sports entertainment will always be a draw and not be a bingo hall like *le pro wrestling". If you disagree then you are a certified babby obese smark.

>>2725361
>still forcing stupid terms like a retard
Cringe

>>2725358
Hey sometimes it's not flippy, sometimes its dudes stiffing each other and dropping each other on their heads.

>>2724365
I'm pro wrestling. Pageantry and in-ring product is most important to me.

File: image.jpg (15KB, 190x266px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 190x266px

>>2724365
I want pro wrestling. I want jobbers, belts that matter, and a champion that is nearly invincible. Brock should hold the title until he dies.

I'm starting to think I'm not for both and maybe leaning towards puroresu.

>>2724365

Sports entertainment killed wrestling

Attitude era the boys were still calling it pro wrestling. Ruthless Aggression is when the main event guys were conditioned to call it sports entertainment and it all went downhill from there