>Pure work-rate >The ability to invest and interact with

>>2592169
>The ability to invest and interact with a crowd during your matches

But that's what charisma is anon.

>>2592177
It's a branch of charisma, but I think overall ubiquitous charisma permeates through every aspect of one's work more-so than just good crowd-interaction and the subtleties it begets.
Example: Cass is decent at interacting with them, but is a black barren void of charisma.

2,1, 3, 4.

for women's wrestling its just 4.

>>2592169
1. The ability to invest and interact with a crowd during your matches
2. Mic-Work
3. Pure work-rate
4. The Look

Are these the only things you could think of btw OP?

>>2592225
I could've branched it out into different styles of wrestling (Flippy/Technical/Brawler), but that'd invite more shitposting about midgets because this is /asp/.

For me personally?

I considered work-rate to include your ability to invest (i.e. to work) the crowd, but I understand you're talking about stuff like stamina, agility, strength, MOVEZ with the former. So, given that:

1) Either work-rate or crowd investment, whichever one includes selling.
2) The one that doesn't include selling.
3) Mic work
4) The look

Work rate is dead last, objectively

>fat smarks putting the look last

go outside

>>2592516
Look is important, but being able to talk, wrestle and get the crowd invested are more important.

File: 1451570649365.jpg (26KB, 650x589px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 650x589px

>>2592516
>Straight men not giving a fuck about how another guy looks

Whats wrong with this?

1. Crowd control
2. Appearance
3. Mic ability
4. "Wrestling" skill

>>2592538
If I want to see a badass beat the shit out of someone I want him to look like a beast and/or intimidating, if a comedy character looks odd it adds to the humor part of his character. You just sound borderline homophobic.

>>2592169
>Mic-work
>Ability to invest crowd
>Work Rate
>Look