>Undertaker wants to main event Wrestlemania, so he enters

Takers retirement had to end the night it was the only way to sequence it

Randy vs Bray wasn't even second to last lmao. It was 4th

>>2543737
I don't disagree, I'm just saying, this kinda stuff denigrates the meaning of the Rumble.

>>2543737
the problem is that they didn't even say it was the last match of the Taker. It wasn't advertised as the retirement match or anything, they fucked up again.

>>2543468
not the first, second, or even third time the rumble winner hasnt main evented the mania

18+

>>2543749
>takers retirement match

Way to signal the result even further. They did it right.

>>2543746
The rumble is about a title shot. The idea of main eventing mania is a smark thing that vince sometimes pushes granted, but it's not the real prize.

>>2543757
Pretty sure they always announce before the RR that "the winner of this match will go on to main even wrestlemania"

>>2543737
This. Taker deserves nothing less than the main event of WrestleMania as his last match. It was more annoying when they kept saying Orton and Bray's were the main event.

>>2543757
Legitimately asking, when they did career vs streak, did everybody know HBK was gonna win?

Also, it's not like everybody didn't know Roman was going over anyway.

>>2543836
Fucking cringe

>>2543854
know HBK was gonna lose, durr.

>>2543854
>>2543858

Well personally I thought it was pretty obvious, and if I remember opinions on the sites I frequented so did almost everyone.

Closest I ever came to believing the streak would end was against HHH after Michaels was retired.

>>2543836
then why not just have taker win the fucking royal rumble?

>>2544359
or even better, have taker win the title and then drop it at mania

>Edge wins teh 2010 rumble to main event wrestlemania
>has a match mid card
>albert dorito wins 2011 rumble to main event wrestlemania
>is in the first match