Why are smarks these days okay with boring, non-gimmick manlets running the show in WWE? Like, what the fuck even is Sami Zayn's gimmick? Why should I care about Roman Reigns? Wrestlers from the 80s and 90s had a gimmick/catch you could sum up in a few words, like comic book characters. Wrestlers these days are fucking BORING in WWE. WWE needs memorable over the top gimmicks again
Sami Zayn is just happy to be there.
>Why are smarks these days okay with boring, non-gimmick manlets running the show in WWE?
Because almost the only people who become wrestlers now are marks for the WWE.
> Like, what the fuck even is Sami Zayn's gimmick?
Like everybody else, ''just happy to be there!''...but now they are slowly transitioning his character to an obnoxious blowhard faggot because he's an obnoxious blowhard faggot in real life and they are making fun of him to his face.
>Why should I care about Roman Reigns?
You shouldn't. No one else does.
>>2532401
>what is sami zayn's gimmick
he's that guy on his shirt, that's his gimmick
>>2532584
>BOILING
>>2532401
Sum up in a few words, you say?
If that's the case, are Ric Flair, Ted DiBiase, and JBL all the same character? (Rich guy)
Is Finn Balor the same as Kane? (lol)
I'd agree that gimmicks should be more over-the-top, but these performers are also portraying CHARACTERS. Sami Zayn for example is just who he is. You just get to know him as you see him. (or he's a lumberjack's hipster son, if you like)
>>2532401
Both Roman and Samuel are over 6'0.
>>2532417
> just happy to be there
So is Bayley. Are you saying Sami Zayn is just like the women's champion? Not exactly a compelling character
>>2532617
Sami still looks like a manlet. Maybe its the stupid ginger hair
>>2532598
Take the asshole in pic related for example. HE just looks like yet another Instagram fitness Chad. Why am I supposed to be compelled to watch him wrestle?