Why do people care about flippy shit being unrealistic and improbable

Honestly it's just people shitposting. Everyone likes flippy shit.

I don't really see people getting mad over floppy shit unless it's just shitposting. It's mostly no-selling that people get mad about. Like flippy spots where they'll just keep trading big moves and getting up over and over

>>2521336
They're mad their favourites can't do them.

File: neville combo.webm (2MB, 712x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 712x400px

Personally I don't like pointless flippyshit. Wrestling is about theatrics, but when people are having a "match" that's more like a choreographed dance routine it's just stupid. Like a guy will be there doing flips for literally no reason and it just looks daft. If you're really interested you can probably go look up Cornette since he's probably had a few rants about it.

That said it's not often I see pointless flips in WWE anyway, I like my flippyshit, it's just when they're being needlessly excessive with them. Plus I guess some people view it as cheap. Smarks love people who can "wrestle", being able to do flips isn't really wrestling, it's acrobatics

>>2521399
>being able to do flips isn't really wrestling, it's acrobatics

Throwing bad strikes isn't wrestling either.

2 words
Gorgeous George