Are people like Undertaker, Mick Foley, Kane and HHH only so

>>2370502
Undertaker was over before attitude era all memes aside

Mankind was over in ecw and idk about wcw but i assume so and in japan with cactus jack which is a much shittier gimmick than mankind

Kane idk kanes a good character.


Hhh who knows where hed be if he didnt kiss ass.

Triple H would have been successful and won the title regardless I think. Though he wouldn't have been overpushed as hard as he was, and RAW would have been completely different in 02-05.

>>2370508
>Undertaker was over before attitude era all memes aside

not that over cause that period before Austin saved the company was the lowest point in history

>>2370517
Non memeing, Taker was always a great side attraction, but it is evident he should never be the main attraction.

>>2370517
1991 to 1997?

Carder wasnt a hogan austin draw but he was a draw.

They'd have to contend with Vince's usual shit booking instead of the numerous factors that made The Attitude Era what it was.

Foley in particular never would've gotten the opportunities that he did.

>>2370517
>overness = drawing

Here's where you're wrong.

>>2370502
>Undertaker
Iconic. Well over before the Attitude Era or New Generation.
>Mick Foley
Spanned eras. Well over.
>Kane
Big one of a kind lug, pretty funny and intelligent.
>HHH
Not over. Only respected or whatever because of Attitude Era. Entirely relies on nostalgia for his storylines and pops.

>>2370600
Foley benefited greatly from the MNW causing WWF to do things that they ordinarily wouldn't.

>>2370605
Everybody benefited from the MNW but he didn't do anything in the WWF he couldn't have done in ECW or Japan or whatever else is going on in whatever era you place him. He's a pathetic shell of himself and should be considered a fourth character separate from his AE guise, the fact he gets chants, pops and a weekly job is a testament to how good he was and is.