>I don't care how many titles Triple H wins, he could never lace my fucking boots up. Period. He was a very good, medium, mediocre wrestler.
Is he right?
>very good, medium, mediocre wrestler.
Did he have a stroke when saying/writing this?
All three of those words are mutually exclusive
>>2356391
He's saying he's good at being consistently mediocre
>>2356387
Triple H is entertaining.
Bret was not.
More dimes in telling a compelling story than doing a perfect suplex.
Jushin Thunder Liger was always better than Bret, but you don't see him being bitter about his popularity.
>>2356398
No, that's not what that phrase means.
He gave a list of adjectives that describe HHH. If he wanted to say HHH is good at being consistently mediocre, he wouldn't say a list of adjectives, he'd say he's good at being consistently mediocre.
Yes he was right
>>2356439
> bret wasnt a GOAT storyteller
Way to sound stupid as fuck m8
>>2356439
t. started watching in 2007
>>2356439
>More dimes in telling a compelling story than doing a perfect suplex.
Then it's a good thing Bret drew more dimes, told better stories AND did better suplexes than Triple H.
>>2356387
Someone stole a "Drake the type on nigga" joke and used it to shit on Bret? lmao
>>2356461
Did somebody say adjective(s)?
>>2356387
Bret is from era when wrestlers were paranoid over their characters, thinking they run out of food unless they have full control. Then they remember these times like saints (oh how i was treated bad but at least i was the best, silly business). Bret was and is and always will be an overrated asshole.
I've always thought Triple H sucked, and he was the major reason I quit watching for a couple years, so I'll agree to that.
>>2356682
Explain to me how he is overrated
>>2356439
>Jushin Thunder Liger was always better than Bret