>And despite some resistance from diehard fans, it's

>>2253265
literally who

Yes. Goldberg's the best part of Raw lately.

Am I ready for him to drop the belt to Fatty McSteroids at Mania? Not so much.

>>2253265
Based Goldberg working the Indy losers into a shoot

>>2253275
He'd be better if he did TV squash matches as well instead of turning up for talking segments

>>2253265
I'm ok with that

>>2253275

>The guy who's booked as a dangerous tough guy on a show full of comedy jobbers is the best part of the show

You don't fucking say?

KO was the best part of the show when he was booked as a dangerous tough guy as well. It's somehow beyond the understanding of these retards that all you have to do to get a guy who is any of large, charismatic, or good over is to just have him break some shit. It's the easiest fucking thing in entertainment to get a wrestler with ANY upside over that it's fucking staggering how bad they are at doing it.

>Forbes

Why should I give a shit about what some gofer thinks?

>>2253265
>One of the most iconic wrestlers ever is more over and more profitable than a fat guy that wrestles in gym clothes
WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED?

MAYBE they should put the title on Goldberg and have him hold it until someone worth a shit comes along. Fuck Owens, Lesnar, Reigns, Rollins, and Balor. I like Zayn, but they'd never put him over Goldberg and he should beat a heel for it, anyway.

You can't deny that Goldburg is a draw and Owens isn't.

At the same time Goldburg v Lesnar doesn't need a title because they're both the biggest draws in the company to begin with. The match doesn't need to be elevated with a title. Especially considering Goldburg has already accepted Lesnar's challenge.

>>2253409
t. Oreowens

>>2253409
I don't know why but WWE books every heel as chicken shit or relying on dirty wins. Including Braun Strowman who walked away from Big Show

>>2254058
>"Goldburg"
>3 fucking times

the wrestling coverage in forbes is beyond embarrasing

like most of their economic coverage, they just make up stuff

fake news

File: wcwlogo.png (96KB, 737x257px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 737x257px

>Pushing old guys for short term gains at the expense of creating new stars

Where have I seen this before?

>>2254065

My bad lad, no need to get upset over spelling mistakes.

>>2254058
This

File: carter (2).jpg (73KB, 714x432px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 714x432px

>>2254065
>not knowing how to spot the Canadian tripfag

>>2254058
Yes you're correct, Goldberg vs Lesnar doesn't need the title.

But the title does need goldberg vs lesnar.

>>2254060
Cry more stone cold nigger amigo.

>>2254082

You know, you're not wrong. Looking at it like that, the universal title could gain some prestige from it. It's basically a joke title at this point and I like Owens.

>>2254082
I was really excited for Owens getting a title run, but man he sucks, so does Rollins and Reigns

In few year *gulp* we're getting Rodrick Strong

>>2254089
>you will never figure out the common denominator

>>2254070
Can't be that much of a draw if you don't even know his name.

>>2254087
>prestige
The title is going to Lesnar and we're going to be back on Lesnar not defending until 4 PPVs later. The title gets forgotten as fuck and we have to sit through repetitive #1 contender matches and Paul Heyman promos until they decide at what PPV Lesnar defends at. And the Universal title goes back into obscurity.

If Reigns is the biggest draw besides the legends obviously, then why didn't they put the title on him?

>>2254109

I UNIRONICALLY think that Goldburg is retaining at WM and putting someone over afterwards. Probably Balor unfortunately. Could be Joe or Nakameme though, not that nakameme needs that kind of rub.

>>2254101
>Triple H
>NXT
>Smarks

>>2254128
3 Strikes.

>>2254130
But Triple H wouldn't push Reigns

File: image.png (577KB, 893x895px) Image search: [Google]

577KB, 893x895px

>>2254066
>the article where they tried to say that Charlotte might be the greatest female wrestler ever

I'm pretty sure they're just a mouthpiece for Vince.

>>2254116
>anyone but Lesnar/Taker/Cena/Reigns over Goldberg

You seem to forget how protected this man's booking is. I think they're already losing faith in Joe after the crowd went mild for him this past Monday and the Monday before that.

>>2254133
That would mean he's not the common denominator...

>>2254137
>crowd went mild for him

Kinda hard to get over as a heel when your opposition is the most despised guy in the company.

File: Roman-Reigns-shirtless-body.jpg (119KB, 512x700px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 512x700px

>>2254133
He might. Just not as strong as Vince is. He's got the look, at least until you take off the vest.

>>2254137
That's because Joe wore jeans

>>2254136
There's more than one writer on the website. Someone being the best ever is subjective, but this article is posting facts to back up why Goldberg is a draw (which isn't even a debate desu)

>>2254144
>HHH giving a shit about "The Look"

His idol is Ric Flair.

>>2254144
He looks pretty good, should just keep wearing long trousers and stop skipping leg day

>>2254143
He was getting boos and mild reactions either way. Even when he debuted and attacked Rollins. WWE seems to overestimate how popular NXT actually is to the casual fanbase. Seeing as they rarely promote it (possibly after getting their PPVs shown up by multiple Takeover PPVs), I'm not surprised.

>>2254143
>literally every other heel gets cheered like mad when facing roman
>Sloppy joe can't draw a peep from the audience even against BBD
>he's 38 going on 39 and obese
There's no hope for sloppy joe, just release him and cut our losses

>>2254149
I'd say work on upper body overall. Samoans seem to have this fatty structure that keeps them from toning. Roman probably doesn't even juice really, he should hop on a roid cycle and get big. Look at how big Neville fucking got in a year. All juice.

>>2254059
Shut the fuck up retard.

>>2254150
>le NXT rant

Yawn-o-rama.

>>2254151
>wanting a heel to get cheered

Just proved my point dumbshit.

File: 57927.jpg (60KB, 500x495px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x495px

>goldberg
>a draw
he may have drawn on the outlaws in the 90s but come on guys

it's goldberg

>>2254151
Senior Joe is Cena's best friend before the WWE he's not going to get canned especially if Cena wants to go against Joe

>>2254156
Neville was ripped before he was even on the WWE radar.

>>2254159
>being this young
wwe babbies are literally babbies

>>2254158
>the state of this seething neckbeard
>Waaaahhhh, my fat fuck with Shane McMahon-tier punches can't get over

>>2254163
>an outlaWCW mark
>2017

>>2254149
That picture is so old it's enrolling in Kindergarten. He doesn't even look like that anymore.

File: neville_wwe_2017_png__by_dylanking21-daui830.png (87KB, 400x283px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 400x283px

>>2254162
He bulked up a lot afterwards.

File: 16808418128_4c21c2bd2b_b.jpg (170KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1024x683px

>>2254166

>>2254164
>Cuckterposting

AAAAANND (you) lose.

>>2254157
t. Kevin Obesity

File: 20130225_642xvariable_NXT-SSpg-template-adrienne.jpg (34KB, 642x361px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 642x361px

>>2254169
Not really tho.

>>2254172
Is that supposed to be impressive? He's not even on par with Tony Nese.

>>2254173
>worked to this degree
Get over it faggot. He was over in NXT and WWE didn't promote it enough for it to translate to the main roster.

>best for business
>will retire after mania

>no long term plans

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
Holy fuck who writes this crap?

File: 1bbc69ac84f167647a212d27b93a58f4.jpg (108KB, 736x1141px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 736x1141px

>>2254177
I was responding to the anon who said the flabman nogains photo posted above was years old, posted a recent one to show he's still flabby and needs to hit the bench and work on abs.

>>2254179
>g-get o-o-over it fa-fa-faggot

The purpose of a work is to draw money.

>literal surprise debut
>"didn't promote it enough"

Uh, no shit? Next you'll be saying his NXT gimmick is somehow at fault too.

>>2254070
Once is a spelling mistake. Evwry time you write it means you're retarded.

>>2254146
Goldberg is a draw right now but what does WWE always pushing oldfuck part timers at the top of the card say about their ability to create new stars? He's good for business right now but eventually fans will figure out that the guy is really old and only has two moves if you expose him too much.

WWE is going to squeeze every bit of 'hey, remember this guy from 17 years ago when wrestling was at its peak?' nostalgia that they can, but once that's over because those guys are all too old, then what's the plan? Maybe there is one but I have my doubts.

>>2254182
>>2254172
No wonder Vince makes him wear a vest, looks like a slob

>>2254182
holy fuck
roman's tummy needs my cummies
yuuuuuuummy

File: 1479816631786.jpg (13KB, 366x329px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 366x329px

>>2254187

Nice, fucking nice. The irony.

>>2254084
Wut

>>2254184
>surprise debut
>literally little-to-no reaction

Why did NXT guys like Zayn, Dillinger and Neville get far better reactions on their debuts than dad-jeans Joe who was given the final segment of that night?

>>2254172
>Everyone in the front repulsed by it, woman in pink wet

>>2254188
>WWE always pushing oldfuck part timers at the top of the card say about their ability to create new stars?

Finn Balor, Roman Reigns, Kevin Owens, Tyler Bates, Seth Rollins, Ambrose, Rich Swan are huge stars

File: Vince.0.0.jpg (162KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1600x900px

>>2254210
>Owens
>Bate
>Swann
>Balor
>huge stars
>2017

>>>>>>>>/r/SquaredCircle my friend

File: aqua laff.png (180KB, 544x584px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 544x584px

>>2254210
>Finn Balor, Roman Reigns, Kevin Owens, Tyler Bates, Seth Rollins, Ambrose, Rich Swan are huge stars

>>2254210

That's a good joke.

File: 1402415814635.jpg (24KB, 506x513px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 506x513px

>>2254210

Owens made the Universal championship a joke. Its worse than the IC belt currently.

Well yeah, of course it gives short term gains. That was always likely. The problem is that it does so at the expense of current wrestlers.

WWE is in for a huge shock once all these part time and older wrestlers step away and retire in the next few years, because they have consistently failed to create a genuine draw in the past 10 or so years. Could you imagine any current full time wrestler in WWE headlining a record setting Mania?

That's not even the wrestlers fault either. They're made to look like total jobbers against these returning geriatrics time and time again.

>>2254297
Seth Rollins vs Dean Ambrose vs Roman Reigns probably could have headlined with the right build up, but thats about it.

>>2253265
>at the expense of Owens.
You say that like it's a bad thing, and Lesnar was losing steam after le suplex city got stale, it's refreshing to see him get wrecked after years of dominance.