Did he ever really realize his potential? >Supposed to be

>Closest was 2008-09
18+
Jericho's peak was 2000/01.

>>2037177
Yeah he was a midcard talent who didn't make a difference

>>2037182
>Winning the WWE/F title
>Midcard
you just proved yourself to be underage
18+

>>2037185
Jericuck was given the title, failed and then shat in the midcard until 2005

>never had a ***** match in his life
>has put on an underwhelming borefest at all but one WrestleMania he's ever done, when he was carried by Michaels
>smark-pandering cancer who just spouts meme catchphrases and doesn't even attempt to get booed
>whiny, politicking little bitch
>got BTFO by Lesnar
>got BTFO by Rob Van Dam
>the worst kind of narcissist--a mark for himself
>cares more about being a wannabe-rock star with his cringey band than being a wrestler
>wanted to change his based theme song to one of his awful band's songs and Vince told him no
>is an actual fucking shill
>Iiterally Reddit: the wrestler
Can't wait until Jerichoetty fucks off my TV for good.

>>2037192
Precisely, his peak was in 2000/01. I'm not a mark for Jericho, btw. Was just saying his peak was in 2000/01.

>>2037205
Maybe only in in-ring ability, because his promos/character peaked in 2009.

>>2037210
His character was great in 2000/01, check out his promos on Stephanie. In terms of overall ability, he peaked in 2001.

He could have easily been a top guy had HHH not buried him out of jealousy that Jericho was more beloved than he was.

>>2037307
Triple H is literally the most over superstar since Hulk Hogan.

>>2037174
> Supposed to be the Shawn Michaels of his era
> but he ended up never drawing, never being a consistent A+ player (closest was 2008-09)
So exactly the same as shawn michaels

>never seen as a tippy top guy
So exactly the same as shawn michaels

>>2037331
No not exactly the same as shawn Michaels, Jericho was over with straight males

>>2037335
Yes
Jericho was also not a confirmed anti-draw

>>2037324
HHH wasn't even the top guy in his era letalone a hulk hogan. He's decently over but lets not go too far.

>>2037331
EIGHTEEN FUCKING PLUS HOLY SHIT

>>2037344
Bruv im 29
Unlike you i was sentient in the 90s, yawn michaels was always seen as a placeholder for bret or the next big guy.
Never was an A+ player, never was bona-fide top guy and was never truly over with the majority of the audience aka white straight males

>>2037344
18+

>>2037201
This.

>suppose to be Shawn Micheals
>not drawing
Sounds about right

So if he's supposed to put the new guys over, like Kane, shouldn't he sometimes win? Why's that 50/50 booking meme doesn't affect him? He'd be great with the USA belt, Roman doesn't do anything with it.

>>2037185
And you prove you are retard
Most people who watched wwe 2008-2009 are 20-22 right now, its been 8 years since, and counting you are watching this at least 10 years old you must be 18+ right now.

>>2037344
Are you talking to yourself? Micheals was never the top guy. The period where he was marked to be the top guy Austin came along and blew everyone out of the water, and then The Rock came around and Shawn was pushed down even further.

This idea that Shawn was some huge draw and booked as the top guy in an extremely recent bit of revisionist history.

>>2039239
if it's 8 years ago, that makes them 16. Seeing as WWE is a children's show, and nobody over 9 years of age is meant to be watching it.

>>2039420
This. It was Hogan, then Bret, then Austin, then Rocky, then HHH, then Cena.

Shawn was LITERALLY never the guy.

>>2039429
There was Warrior between Hogan and Bret.