According to Meltzer it was Lesnar who pushed for Goldberg to

>Goldberg is 2-0
>big money match at Mania

>>1981369
>Meltzer
Stopped reading

>>1981371
Yes

>>1981369
2-1 doesn't make sense

>>1981375
He was the literal first guy who reported on the Goldberg signing w/2k17 and then for survivor series in a match

he obviously has a source in the jew's camp ya pinhead

>>1981383
>He was the literal first guy who reported on the Goldberg signing w/2k17 and then for survivor series in a match
No, he wasn't, actually

>>1981382
>can lesnar beat goldberg?
Yes it does

>>1981386
Yes, he was, actually.

>>1981389
Forbes reported it a day before Metlzer anon

>>1981393
No, they didn't, actually. It was JR (who is also Meltzer's source anyways)

>>1981398
Yes, they did.

File: the fuck.png (660KB, 1106x1012px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 1106x1012px

>Taker was the one to suggest losing his streak to Lesnar
>Lesnar is the one to suggest losing his streak to Goldberg in a squash match
History repeats itself. Up next: Goldberg and Brock Lesnar team up and get squashed by Hulk Hogan in a handycap match.

>>1981400
No, they didn't.

>>1981383
Deancuck a Meltzer mark too

>>1981402
Yes, they did

>>1981426
No, they didn't.

>>1981428
Yes, they did.

Le Meltz
>Idea was to get Goldberg over once he agreed to more dates

>It was better for Lesnar to lose short than to lose a long match, where Goldberg might get hurt

>Presumably they'll have a longer match at some point later on

>>1981439
No, they didn't. And you're not getting the last word on me in my thread.

>>1981444
Yes, they did times a hundred and this is my thread, I saw it first

>>1981449
No, they didn't.

>>1981449
No, it wasn't your thread.

>According to Meltzer

Here's the source:

http://thingspulledfrommyass.com/news/Lesnar_pushed_for_Goldberg_win_Wrestlemania_rematch

>>1981460
ya seethin

>>1981441
Alvarez
>It's mind blowing that they haven't fucked anything up from the moment he returned on RAW
>Especially when you consider how badly they fucked him up in 2003 w/ HHH

>>1981454
>>1981459

Yes, they did and this is my thread too.

>>1981468
No, they didn't. And you're still not getting the last word on me. I'll do this for another 10 hours.

>>1981454

>All these Janettys posting in my thread

YES THEY DID

>>1981472
No, they didn't.

Reflect on your lifes and realise how pathetic you are

A rematch is the worst possible thing they could do at this point. They literally just salvaged Brock's push by transferring it to Goldberg, and now instead of using it on a current or future star, they're going to make the exact same mistake they made before and let it fizzle out into nothing. Goldberg already won 2-0, I hope to God they don't do this.

>>1981478
Reading would be your friend

>>1981382
This is the 50-50 booking mentality.

"Can he actually win?" Is a better story than, "Who will break the tie?"

>>1981482
Are you retarded?

>>1981488
Reading would be your friend.

>>1981479
>i know how to build stars
>i know how to build and write stories in wrestling
The way faggots like you constantly post shit like this on the internet like you have a clue is hilarious

>>1981479
Another embarrassing pretentious post from a smark who thinks he knows the business.

>>1981474

ye

>>1981491
-
>>1981478
life*

>>1981495
>>1981496

RECORD

>>1981497
No, they didn't.

>>1981502
high revenue

>>1981495
>I know how to build a star
>a 50 years old has been
Clue

>>1981507
>the only way to build a star would be to beat lesnar!
>beating lesnar doesnt matter anymore because one of the most protected guys in wrestling history beat him
>hurrr durrrr i know everything

>>1981496
I don't pretend to know anything about business, but better business for WWE doesn't mean more enjoyable viewing for us. Goldberg vs Lesnar 3 at Wrestlemania might draw but it shits on the show we watch every week.

It's probably good business to have 2 PPVs every month, doesn't mean it makes for good viewing.

>>1981502
>wrestling is irrelevant in society
>watching live tv is a thing of the past
>thinking ratings matter in 2016
>this is somehow wwe's fault on top of that

>>1981514
Have a clue:

Nobody give a fuck about your individual case study, and you don't speak for the rest of "us".

>squash match main event

What the fuck were they thinking?

>>1981514
>shits on the show
No it doesn't
>2 ppvs a month is bad for viewing
How? 2 ppvs for 2 seperate shows, 2 seperate storylines, 2 seperate rosters.

>>1981523
It was pretty good tbqh, unexpected outcome for once

Yfw Lesnar beats Jewberg and tha big dawg finally beats Lesnar.

>>1981523
18+ kiddo

When Goldberg beat Hogan it was a squash match. When Goldberg beat nearly everyone and he was the top 3 biggest draws in the business, they were squash matches

File: image.jpg (101KB, 575x383px)

101KB, 575x383px

>>1981531
Yeah, squash matches are big money and highly entertaining because they're unexpected

>>1981543
I was highly entertained when New Day were eliminated by 1(one) superkick too

>>1981401
On the real if you think taker didn't want the streak to be over with 10 years ago you're a fool.

100% he wanted to lose it to randy. Cement Randy as the legend killer, but randy got cold feet.

>>1981502
yet you still watch

>>1981441
If they wanted him to lose why not let hm get at least SOME offence? It's completely unbelievable that Lesnar could get beaten so badly after everything, I don't care who the opponent is. He no sold Cena's finisher, ate 50 spears from Roman but was done after a single spear from Golberg

>>1981479

Fuck you and your future stars you fat son a botch. Ever think some fans actually want to see this match just for what it is?

>>1981514

You'd swear this guy was the one with the $1 billion wrestling business.

This match is a huge draw from a business standpoint & it is enjoyable viewing given the fan reaction in the arena.

Fat smelly niggas like you don't count. Nobody wants to see your midgets & charisma vacuums.

Some people have no problem watching hype match between two beasts. Some of us dont want to see DYEL and fatass ROH New Japan alumni going over Goldberg or Brock. Is that so wrong

>>1981944
>>1981919

Not the same anon, but WWE will die because of people like you.

It will die, and you will still all be joyful, because they will have made a Brock Lesnar VS Randy Savage's corpse by that point. I'm being half-serious now. People are excited to watch a rematch between an half-assing jock, and an old 50 year old man who might break in half if he gets suplexed once. That, that is the state of this business now. Could you imagine people wanting Bruno Sammartino VS Superstar Billy Graham in like the early 2000s instead of The Rock VS Stone cold? Yeah, that's kinda how this is.

Then again, I guess it doesn't matter that much anyway. Reigns' failed push has shown that they no longer know how to make new stars. I guess it's better to enjoy this while it lasts, and hope to fucking god that Lucha Underground finds a way to break into the mainstream, because once WWE dies, that'll possibly be the death of western wrestling.

>>1981369

>Le meltz

Woo please

>>1981479

>Muh future stars

Lol smarks are embarrassing man.

>>1982097
You're an absolute, brain-dead moron. Drink bleach.

>>1982097
KYS smark

>>1982097

I'd rather watch Brock vs. Goldberg 50 times than [Whichever smark darling you like that gets injured all the time] vs. Brock.

>>1982097
This is CM Punk tier mindset.

>>1982097
You are literally cancer

>>1982116
>>1982125
>>1982131
>>1982139
>>1982143

Enjoy your old men fighting forever you lemon party loving motherfuckers. I hope when they get to age 70 that they don't literally shit and piss themselves in the ring. Why don't you tell them to knock off the literal dust off themselves while you're at it?

>>1982157
KYS

>>1982157

Thanks I will.

>>1982157
Fucking Toronto went nuts when Lesnar got squashed. I bet you voted Clinton.

>>1982157
Imagine getting this worked up about a children's TV show. Literal autism.

>>1982097
Phil Brooks posting on 4chan, who woulda known

>>1982157
>WAHHH why is THE ROCK wrestling JOHN CENA when he should be making new stars and not taking spotlights wahhhh

>>1981454
Have sex pinhead

>>1981469
Have sex pinhead

>>1981495
An advice:
18+ kiddo

>>1981389
Meltzer you really have to make it harder to spot you, just saying YES HE DID LALALA isn't a valid argument you dementia case

>>1982157
You know how I know you are a virgin?

I think it would have been cooler to have just kept Taker undefeated at Mania and then have Goldberg vs Undertaker desu

PWInsider says Brock won't be at Raw tonight. What the fuck is wrong with the company?

>>1982221
Goldberg probably wont be either, haven't you realized they dont give a shit about ratings? Theyll probably have the faga ko and jericho open the show with cringe enzo for the millionth time

>>1982221
He shouldn't appear until his rematch with goldy. He needs to grow a beard as well. Would be bad ass

>>1982169
That isn't even comparable to this situation. At least The Rock put over Cena, like he should've. At least their feud had merit, and was entertaining when you look back on it.

This shit is garbage. A fucking squash match in order to hype a fucking rematch? Get out with that bullshit. You're all just fooling yourselves into thinking that this shit is a masterpiece. Anyone who liked that bullshit are marks of the highest order that jerked off to the thought of getting speared by Goldberg's cock when they were little boys watching Goldberg go over everyone in WCW.

>>1982164

Heh... Maybe you're right... This isn't worth getting too worked up. Not like the product is gonna get any better even if the match was as good as I expected.

>>1981478
Pathetic lives matter

>>1982296
>implying a mark is bad

I guess hating WWE and getting worked anyway is better

>>1982296
Rock didn't put cena over the first time around you stupid fucking mongoloid

>>1981469
Yes they did

File: tmp_14739756883741007353360.jpg (134KB, 822x525px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 822x525px

>>1982296

Kek this anon is working the /asp/ marks. Personally Im just here to watch WWE go down in flames.

>>1981369
People don't understand they're best buds outside of kayfabe