So Mick Foley is the feminist cuck who supports women's

>>1861258
This is a serious flaw with Raw, there's only three credible women in their women's division. Dana Brooke is a green jobber right now so Sasha having the title over Charlotte and Bayley feels a little empty.

>>1861258
If you had a daughter that hot you would be too

>>1861260
I think they need to like...stop trying to emulate the UFC and stop with the Rhonda Rousey path. Bring back the women who look like women and make them entertain the crowd with bra and panties matches.

Jesus christ, its no surprise why nu-males enjoy todays women in wrestling.

So sick of Raw blathering on and on about le womens revolution when they are only focusing on Sasha and Charlotte, with a dash of Bailey. Every time they push the 3 horsewomen, they are shitting on all the other women on Raw, as well as Smackdown and women who were there before Sasha arrived. Good for Nia Jax calling that shit out on twitter.

WWE tries to come across as feminist, but they clearly need some education on feminism. If some actual feminists came to wwe to review their practices, wwe would get btfo. It takes more than saying "women empowerment" to actually empower women.

File: image.gif (4MB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 200x150px

>>1861266
As much as we want the old days to come back, the social/political climate of this era would bring too much scrutiny on the E if it were to happen. So it probably never will.

>>1861258
Each show has 1(one) good woman. They're both shitty divisions

>>1861274
>the social/political climate of this era would bring too much scrutiny on the E
Why not do it anyway and embrace it? Business would sky-rocket as all the dudes of the world that are sick of this shit, support the product in full force. All while getting free publicity from whiny media outlets and butt-hurt pussies.

Zig while everyone else is zagging.

>>1863072
What few TV sponsors WWE has would bail on them.

>>1863072
>Business would sky-rocket

no