Don't care what this autistic board says. Raw has and always will be the better brand.
Literally better at everything than ShitDown.
inb4 hurr durr rawtist.
hurr durr rawtists
>>1748530
believe what ya want bud
>>1748530
Hi Carter
Raw is terrible, Smackdown is also terrible. It's just that Smackdown is not only shorter but a bit less shit and boring than Raw. Nobody wins this war.
They're both shit but at least smackdown is trying to be watchable. 2 hours, better segments, less pointless shit besides the milkman, better champions. If you want more you get the talking smack thing. Stephanie and a squash match every hour ruins raw. It's too long and bloated, if it's not unfunny enzo stuff it's a tired new day act or more jobber shit.
A tag match, some quick diva shit, aj segments, a couple other fueds is all you need
>>1748530
Being a RAW fan is true suffering.
Think of it like this, Raw and Smackdown are both cakes. Raw has been made with the finest ingredients but baked by bad quality chefs. SmackDown on the other hand uses cheap mediocre ingredients but the cake is quite good.
>>1748560
>Finest ingredients
>>1748548
I agree with you on everything but the length.
3 hours is a great time frame to advance alot of storylines, have great segments and build superstars especially with cruiserweight coming into the fray
However instead of all that we get
>commercials every 5 minutes
>fillers and promos
>half ass segments
>shitty kid comedy acts
Thats why it feels like its too long nobody wants to stare at shit for 3 hours.
How hard is it to turn 3 hours into a very entertaining show? What the hell is wrong with creative?
>>1748530
Agreed
>>1748560
Lose weight, fatso
>>1748530
>that denial
Lol.