>Crowd chanting his name in excitement
>Doesn't immediately tell them to shut up
Jesus christ what a shit '''''heel'''''
Smarks ruin everything and would cheer him if he wiped his ass with the flag. The cena kids at least boo him.
>>1710739
>what is an egotistical heel
This your first week in wrestling, kiddo?
>>1715171
Glad to see another redditor on here
>>1715171
fucking idiot
>>1710745
>Smarks ruin everything
You still mad FedoRamen?
>>1715175
I knew from the start you are faqing redditar ... you are do not belonging here.
>>1715198
U god damn guy
F to u and ur ancessters
Krishna feels shame every time you make the post
>>1715191
Forgot to use your punjabi gimmick there sperg
>>1715225
Sir you are not making contribution to Roman Empire if you thinking I am sarcastic ... ewen if I was trying make fun , it vould not make sense since all my argument are logiqal. That is big big baqfire.
>>1715208
Faq you sir , I already exposed you in another thread ; he is not a King he is Emperor ;
And #1 uniwersities are all in Panjab I am hate to break it too you,,,
>>1715225
You're confusing me with another person much smarter than you, cuckboi
WWE is currently running a tweener program. They want all of their wrestlers to have about 50% audience support - hated by some, adored by others. They want their crowds to be like split crowds at sports events with "home" and "away" fans.
They see this as the best way to boost merchandising sales for every superstar.
>>1715681
Your forced meme is not going to get over, dumbass.
>>1715681
sauce
>>1715702
Look at the evidence in the programming lad.
>>1715708
>evidence
CHEER ROMAN REIGNS DAMMIT! YOU'LL LIKE WHAT I TELL YOU TO LIKE
>>1715707
Sauce? You mean as in if I link you to Dave Meltzer saying "Thuh Vince told me...." then you would believe that more than your own eyes? See what this thread is about. There is the sauce.
If a wrestler has organic support (AJ, KO, Y2J, Rollins) then they are being deliberately booked as heels. So IWC likes them, and casuals follow the booking and boo them.
The "talent" with no organic fanbase - Sasha, Reigns, New Day - gets pushed to the moon and utterly devoured by the casuals.
It's a tweener program. Step back and see what it is you are looking at.
>>1715716
>The "talent" with no organic fanbase - Sasha, Reigns, New Day
holy shit even your delusions are wrong, that's impressive
>>1715711
that is literally the opposite of what is being said there. You are a binary person - you might have borderline personality disorder.
Throw a third way into your way of thinking, and you just go crazy and can't handle it.
>>1715718
>the point
- your head
>>1715717
"Organic" being support that does not come in any way from the booking, but from their natural in-ring ability, or from years of 'paying their dues' - the stuff that smarks look out for.
Which of those do you think has that kind of IWC support? Because you're wrong.
>>1715716
>one program
>They want all of their wrestlers to have about 50% audience support
that is why everybody hates dipshit smarks like you now
>>1715719
Don't pretend you had a point to make, other than posting in angry caps about Roman Reigns.
>>1715722
WWE runs a stricter brand identity strategy than any other promotion in history. You cannot even use certain words in commentary now. Of course they run a company-wide program.
You...thought the brand split was a shoot or something?
>>1715725
>doesn't recognise Vinceposting
How new can somebody be?
>>1715726
he makes posts that read like Meltzer implying he has inside info
he is the worst kind of dipshit smark because he is talking out of his ass
>>1715732
He's like a pseudo-smark
And he's a cuck for WWE so that makes him an anti-smark
>>1715729
where did I imply anything about the brand split dipshit?
>>1715733
>anti-smarks are cucks for WWE
god damn is everybody a dipshit on this board?
>>1715733
>anti-smarks are cucks for WWE
>>1715726
>New Day got over AS heels
>Sasha has had a cult following for literally years
>Thinks New Day getting over was not booked
>Thinks Sasha wasn't pushed to the moon
>Calls other people "marks"
>admits New Day got over "while getting booked as heels"
>still tries to argue it is not a tweener program
Are you literally drunk
>>1715733
>The absolute state of this guy
>>1715733
>And he's a cuck for WWE so that makes him an anti-smark
>>1715732
Actually, that is the polar opposite of what I am saying.
I am saying, ignore the IWC commentary and go home and watch for yourself. See how they are creating a situation where EVERY superstar shifts merch - not just the 5-6 top babyfaces.
You either sell to the casuals, or you sell to the smarks.
So - now we have discovered you have been raging your anger at a point that was 360° away from the actual point I was making, can we agree that you actually see things my way after all?
>>1715747
You are still talking out of your ass which was the only point I was making you illiterate faggot
>>1715733
>>1715747
>360° away
Brilliant.
>>1715739
No because smarks and marks liked new day for ages. They made the positivy gimmick themselves and pitched it. They were getting xpac heat then silence. They were turned heel because there was nothing else for them. They were getting over as heels by getting heat then eventually were turned face because they slowly got to the point where they were too popular.
Sasha jobbed for ages and earned a cult following further cemented by her push. She was ratchet for months before getting over as a face.
Sasha paid her dues and was a top star on a program aimed at smarks. She wasn't marketed to casuals. You saying new day or sasha didn't get over organicaly is bullshit. New day got over with charisma, comedy and mic time. Sasha got over by wrestling great matches in NXT.
>>1715739
Sasha might have literally been pushed to the Moon considering she was off the show for what seemed like months at a time.
Vince unironically believed New Day would get over as clapping preachermen minstrels.
>tweener
You don't understand this phrase.
>>1715983
>memeshitting
B T F O
T
F
O
>>1716003
>echoing
Astounding.
>>1716014
>memeshitting
BTFO
T
F
O
>>1716024
Oh no, did I break you?
>>1716026
>still memeshitting
BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
>>1710739
youre literally a wwe mark
>>1716031
>all he can do is repeat phrases that rekt him
The ultimate cuck
>STILL MEMESHTTING
Oh no, did I break you?0
>>1716050
>botching a reply
So raging.
>LOL U MAD
MEMESHITTERS BTFO
Oh no! How dare WWE have a cool bad guy!
Austin and Edge made a career off the same thing. Acting like heels and still getting cheered.