Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: -X0t_VTF.jpg (18KB, 300x300px) Image search:
[Google]
18KB, 300x300px
He was never a draw.
>Vince vs Austin on RAW drew worse ratings than Nitro when WWF was already beating WCW
>Vince vs Hogan drew the lowest WM buyrate post-attitude era
>Vince vs Bret drew the 2nd lowest WM buyrate post-AE.
>>
>Vince vs Austin on RAW drew worse ratings than Nitro when WWF was already beating WCW
Didn't Vince, Taker and Austin have a 9.5 segment?
>>
>>1610573
No, Austin did.
McMetty and Undertetty were props.
>>
>>1610573
AE Taker was a legit draw.
>>
>>1610584
Then why didn't any other Austin segment draw this high ratings ya midget lover
>>
>>1610589
Because it was a high-point of a well-built angle around their main draw (Austin). And also ratings are a little whimsical.
>>
It's literally the greatest wrestling storyline of all time.
Of all time. So good it killed the business.
>>
>>1610588
I'll also say that Taker's return was the biggest draw of WM20. Nobody paid to see Benoit/HHH/HBK or Eddie/Angle. Some did for Lesnar/Goldberg but that's it. It was Taker who was the draw
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1