>Sling blade > double stomp > Running dropkick And

god i want him to ravage me. becky is a lucky girl

Anti-smarks btfo

>It's another "t-those dumb smarks are being unfair against my roman! m-meme balor sucks but those stupid smarks only shit on poor roman!" thread
They're both shit. Case closed

A fucking leprechaun.

>>1520289

Based Finn!

got to see him squash a coconut nigger while building my lego set tonight. :D

>>1520424
>:D
Hi /wew/tist!

>>1520424
Enjoy it while it last, he just turned 35 and has 5 years or less at the top

>>1520289
That's totally fair, to be honest. There are a lot of moves he's capable of, but so often it's the same routine. Starts to feel like you're watching a rerun of one of his past matches sometimes.

I'm sick of the retarded "number of moves" bullshit. I disliked Roman Reigns because he was pushed beyond belief as this big unstoppable superman that could never ever be beaten clean by anyone. His number of moves is fine and a few botches aside, he performs them well enough, he's good at selling and has good looking offense. He's perfectly capable on the ring and can get carried by anyone with any slight talent to a great match.
Number of moves doesn't mean shit. It never has, it never will. That's not to say that wrestlers with a huge number of moves are bad, necessarily, but you have a million excellent wrestlers that had their move counter at like 5 different moves per match. A good match isn't dictated on move variety.

>>1520289
if you're tired of the same moves over and over again why do you watch the WWE?

>>1522491
So if you have two wrestlers who only do about 5 or 6 moves and they do this over and over for 20 min. Just because they can do these moves "solid",that would be entertaining to you?