>you've never stayed in touch with anyone after breaking

>>18633538
If you cared about staying in touch with them you wouldn't break up with them. Simple.

You can't be friends or pals with someone you break up with unless the split is on mutual terms, otherwise one person is just constantly being hurt.

>>18633543
Awful advice.
Wanting to be there for someone and loving them is not the same thing.

>>18633562
It is accurate advice.

Staying in touch with someone after breaking up generally stops them from being able to move on to someone who will actually love them, assuming the break up wasn't mutual.

If you care about someone and they cannot tolerate simply being a friend, then your options are either to be with them or let them go. Anything else at that point shows a lack of care for their well being and shows you aren't a good friend. You cannot hold someone's feelings on ice and have them hurting on the sidelines just in case you need someone if your current plans fall through.

Like I said, if they expressed they needed more and you actual want them around. Then you pick them, if not you let them go.

>>18633543
>>18633562
I love them, they don't love me I guess. It's considered not serious mostly by their choice and me not wanting to admit exactly how much deeper I'm into it. If we're to break up within the foreseeable future, I'd be the one breaking up. I know it'll end sometime either way, though.

Don't know what I should do cause I don't know many other people...

>>18633562
I believe it to be on point advise.